Back to Search Start Over

Preoperative assessment of breast cancer: Multireader comparison of contrast-enhanced MRI versus the combination of unenhanced MRI and digital breast tomosynthesis

Authors :
Chiara Zuiani
Rossano Girometti
Luisa Di Mico
Francesco Sardanelli
Anna Linda
Federica Bondini
Valentina Marconi
Source :
Breast, Vol 49, Iss, Pp 174-182 (2020), The Breast : official journal of the European Society of Mastology
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
Elsevier, 2020.

Abstract

Purpose To compare the sensitivity for breast cancer (BC) and BC size estimation of preoperative contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CEMRI) versus combined unenhanced magnetic resonance imaging (UMRI) and digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT). Patients and methods We retrospectively included 56 women who underwent DBT and preoperative 1.5 T CEMRI between January 2016–February 2017. Three readers with 2–10 years of experience in CEMRI and DBT, blinded to pathology, independently reviewed CEMRI (diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], T2-weighted imaging, pre- and post-contrast T1-weighted imaging) and a combination of UMRI (DWI and pre-contrast T1-weighted imaging) and DBT. We calculated per-lesion sensitivity of CEMRI and UMRI + DBT, and the agreement between CEMRI, UMRI and DBT versus pathology in assessing cancer size (Bland-Altman analysis). Logistic regression was performed to assess features predictive of cancer missing. Results We included 70 lesions (64% invasive BC, 36% ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive BC with in situ component). UMRI + DBT showed lower sensitivity (86–89%) than CEMRI (94–100%), with a significant difference for the most experienced reader only (p = 0.008). False-positives were fewer with UMRI + DBT (4–5) than with CEMRI (18–25), regardless of the reader (p = 0.001–0.005). For lesion size, UMRI showed closer limits of agreement with pathology than CEMRI or DBT. Cancer size ≤1 cm was the only independent predictor for cancer missing for both imaging strategies (Odds ratio 8.62 for CEMRI and 19.16 for UMRI + DBT). Conclusions UMRI + DBT showed comparable sensitivity and less false-positives than CEMRI in the preoperative assessment of BC. UMRI was the most accurate tool to assess cancer size.<br />Highlights • Combined UMRI + DBT shows high sensitivity in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer. • UMRI + DBT avoids most false-positives induced by CEMRI. • In combined imaging, UMRI is the better predictor of cancer size at pathology. • UMRI + DBT is a potential alternative to CEMRI in the preoperative assessment of breast cancer.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
15323080
Volume :
49
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Breast
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....da3612ea6ad84370fab024a97fb03091