Search

The goal of the study was to assess the impact of deep inspiration breath hold technique (DIBH), surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT), and daily kilovoltage cone-beam computed tomography (kV-CBCT) on the dose to organs at risk (OAR) in left-sided breast cancer radiotherapy. Twenty-six consecutive left-sided breast cancer patients treated using Volumetric Intensity Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT), DIBH, SGRT, and a hypofractionated regimen were retrospectively evaluated in this study. Dose parameters were extracted from dose-volume histograms (DVH). The Wilcoxon Matched Pairs test was used to test dose parameters obtained in free breathing (FB) and DIBH for statistical significance. Multivariable analysis of variance (ANOVA) and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis were used to identify parameters and cut-off points associated with the reduction of the mean heart dose (MHD) by DIBH. Based on published models, the risk of cardiac and lung toxicity (pneumonitis) using SGRT or daily kV-CBCT was estimated and compared. DIBH substantially reduced the MHD (median, 43.6%; range, 4.2% to 75.1%; P < 0.00001). The risk of cardiac toxicity using SGRT increased by 1%, compared to 3.6% to 20.5% using daily kV-CBCT. No significant difference in the risk of radiation-induced pneumonitis using SGRT versus daily kV-CBCT was detected. The ANOVA revealed the relative increase of the left lung volume by DIBH as the only significant impact factor for the MHD. The ROC analysis of this parameter showed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.89 (95%CI, 0.71 to 0.98; P < 0.0001). DIBH can substantially reduce the MHD in left-sided breast cancer patients treated with modern radiotherapy techniques and hypofractionation. Patient setup using SGRT compared to daily kV-CBCT may be the preferred option for many patients. In our patient cohort, the relative reduction of the left lung volume by DIBH can be used as a predictor to select patients who benefit from DIBH., Competing Interests: Declarations Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the inter-fraction reproducibility and intra-fraction stability of breast radiotherapy using voluntary deep-inspiration breath hold (DIBH) and free breathing (FB) based on an optical surface imaging system (OSIS)., Methods: Seventeen patients (510 breath-hold sessions) treated using a field-in-field (FiF) technique and twenty patients (600 breath-free sessions) treated with a volume-modulated arc therapy (VMAT) technique were included in this retrospective study. All the patients were positioned with the guidance of CBCT and OSIS, and also monitored with OSIS throughout the whole treatment session. Eight setup variations in three directions were extracted from the treatment reports of OSIS for all sessions and were subsequently manually introduced to treatment plans, resulting in a total of 296 perturbed plans. All perturbed plans were recalculated, and the dose volume histograms (DVH) for the target and organs at risk (OAR) were analyzed., Results: The OSIS and CBCT for both DIBH and FB treatments showed a good agreement of less than 0.30 cm in each direction. The intra-fraction respiratory motion data during DIBH were -0.06 ± 0.07 cm, 0.12 ± 0.15 cm, and 0.12 ± 0.12 cm in the lateral, longitudinal, and vertical directions, respectively; for FB, the respiratory motion data were -0.02 ± 0.12 cm, 0.08 ± 0.18 cm, and 0.14 ± 0.20 cm, respectively. For the target, DIBH plans were more sensitive to setup errors; the mean deviations in D 95 for CTV were 39.78 Gy-40.17 Gy for DIBH and 38.46 Gy-40.52 Gy for FB, respectively. For the OARs, the mean deviations of V 10 , V 20 , and D mean to the heart; V 5 , V 20 , and D mean to the ipsilateral lung; and D mean to the breast were lower for the FB plan compared with the DIBH plan., Conclusion: Based on OSIS, our results indicate that both DIBH and FB can provide good reproducibility in the inter-fractions and stability in the intra-fractions. When the patient respiratory motion is large, the FB technology has greater possibility for the undercoverage of the target volume, while DIBH technology is more likely to result in increases in dose to OARs (the lung, heart, and contralateral breast)., Competing Interests: Declarations Ethics approval and consent to participate This retrospective study was approved by the Ethics Committee of our hospital (Approval Number No. SCCHEC-02-2021-026). Consent for publication Not applicable. Competing interests The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: In the adjuvant right breast radiation therapy, after breast-conserving surgery, we wanted to look for a parameter that would help in the choice between the 3D-CRT or VMAT techniques, considering the risk of pneumonia to the ipsilateral lung (IL) linked to high doses. We also investigated the risk of second tumors in the IL related to the VMAT low doses., Methods: We examined twenty-five 3D-CRT and thirty-five VMAT technique plans, between September 2022 and September 2023. We collected the MAximum Thickness of Ipsilateal Lung (MATIL) included between lateral and medial target borders for evaluating the risk of pneumonia due to the high dose (V 20Gy ), finally we calculated the Excess of Absolute Risk related to the second tumor risk due to the low dose., Results: VMAT technique showed a better dose conformity than 3D-CRT. We detected a linear relationship between the V 20Gy and MATIL of the IL only for the 3D-CRT technique; over a threshold value of MATIL the 3D-CRT is disadvantaged compared to the VMAT in terms of the risk of toxicity to the IL. We calculated that for every Gy more in average dose, a 12 % increase in the risk of induced cancer is expected., Conclusions: In the adjuvant right breast RT, the MATIL is a good surrogate parameter to predict the need to use a VMAT technique to limit high doses to IL. VMAT technique, according to the IL second tumor estimated risk, seems justified., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of the current study is to compare the dosimetry of 3 radiation therapy (RT) techniques used in the EORTC 22922/10925 trial for irradiating the internal mammary (IM) and medial supraclavicular nodes (MS) using a treatment planning system available nowadays for dose calculation., Methods: We performed a retrospective dosimetry analysis of anonymised data; thus, ethics approval was not required. Ten cases of left-sided breast were randomly selected for RT planning to a total dose of 50 Gy in 25 fractions. The treatment planning was done according to the trial's protocol and under the supervision of the EORTC trial's coordinators. Doses to planning target volumes (PTV) and to organs at risk (OARs) are reported. Data is presented in descriptive statistics., Results: A total of 10 cases and 40 treatment plans (4 plans per case: standard-plan A, modified standard-plan B, individualised-plan C and breast-only-plan D). For all planning techniques, the mean dose to the PTV of the left breast (plan A-D) and the PTV-MS (plan A-C) exceeded 95% of the prescribed dose (>47.5 Gy). The individualised technique (plan C) had a lower coverage for PTV-IM, with a mean of 87% of the prescribed dose compared to ∼102% for plans A and B. The dose to OARs varied between techniques, with the mean heart dose being higher in the standard and modified standard techniques (18.3 and 16.6 Gy, respectively) compared to the individualised technique (9.5 Gy)., Conclusions: The 3 RT techniques used in the trial varied in target coverage and OARs dose. Our results may help to understand the observed larger absolute benefit of individualised IM-MS treatment planning in terms of breast cancer outcomes., (Copyright © 2024 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Treatment planning parameters in radiotherapy are key elements that dictate the success of treatment outcome. While some parameters are commonly evaluated irrespective of cancer type, others are site-dependent and strongly patient specific. Given the critical influence of planning parameters on personalized therapy, the aim of this study was to evaluate the correlations between the dosimetric indices (conformity, homogeneity and mismatch indices) related to tumor coverage and the patient-specific parameters which encompass parameters pertaining to organs at risk (widths and lengths of heart and ipsilateral lung included in treatment fields, mean/maximum doses to heart, ipsilateral lung, left anterior descending aorta and contralateral breast) and tumor volume. Forty breast cancer patients were divided into two groups according to tumor location: twenty with left-sided (group A) and twenty with right-sided breast cancer (group B). Conformal (3DCRT), intensity modulated (IMRT) and volumetric arc modulated (VMAT) radiotherapy techniques were used for plan creation. Moderate to strong correlations were found for ipsilateral lung parameters for both groups of patients regardless of the treatment technique. Moderate to strong correlations were found for heart parameters in group A patients, while no correlations were observed in group B. The mismatch index presented moderate to strong correlations with tumor volume for all treatment techniques (r = -0.861 3DCRT, r = -0.556 IMRT, r = -0.533 VMAT) particularly in group A. The evaluated correlations indicate the role of dosimetric indices in personalized treatment planning., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This study aimed to investigate the influence of gantry angle increment (Inc) parameters on the Monaco treatment planning system for volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) in right breast cancer, and to determine the optimal Inc parameters. Twenty-three patients with right breast cancer at the Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital from August 2022 to August 2023 were retrospectively selected. Four VMAT plans were generated for each patient incorporating Inc of 10°, 20° (control group), 30°, and 40°, while the other optimization parameters and constraint functions remained constant. The D98 and conformity index were lower in the Inc30 and Inc40 groups than in the Inc20 group. As Inc increased from 10° to 30°, the irradiated dose to the ipsilateral lung, including the V20, V5, and Dmax, mean dose, gradually increased. There were no statistically significant differences in the irradiated dose to the contralateral breast, contralateral lung, heart, esophagus, and brachial plexus. The number of monitor units and control points decreased with increasing Inc. Smaller Inc values can achieve higher target coverage and lower irradiated dose to the ipsilateral lung, but will reduce delivery efficiency. Considering the plan quality and delivery efficiency, an Inc of 10° or 20° is recommended for right breast cancer VMAT plans., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background and Purpose: Regional nodal irradiation (RNI) for breast cancer delivers radiation in proximity to the shoulder and torso, and radiation exposure may contribute to long-term upper extremity and postural morbidity. To date, no studies have assessed the differential dosimetric impact of proton versus photon radiation on shoulder and torso anatomy. This study examined clinically relevant musculoskeletal (MSK) structures and assessed the dose delivered with each modality., Patients/material and Methods: Ten MSK structures were contoured on IMPT (intensity-modulated proton therapy) and VMAT (volumetric modulated arc therapy) plans for 30 patients receiving RNI. Relevant dose metrics were compared for each of the structures. Intensity-modulated proton therapy dose was calculated using the relative biological effective value of 1.1. Hypo-fractionated plans were scaled to the equivalent dose in 2 Gy fractions (EQD2) using an alpha/beta ratio of four. Wilcoxon signed rank sum tests compared doses. Select three-dimensional and optimised VMAT plans were also informally compared., Results and Interpretation: Each of the 10 structures received a statistically significantly lower dose with the use of IMPT compared with VMAT. Differences were greatest for posterior structures, including the trapezius, latissimus dorsi and glenohumeral joint. Mean absolute differences were as great as 23 Gy (supraspinatus D5cc) and up to 30-fold dose reductions were observed (deltoid D50cc). An average 3.7-fold relative dose reduction existed across all structures. Measures of low/intermediate dose (V15Gy and D50cc) showed the largest differences. Intensity-modulated proton therapy results in statistically lower radiation exposure to relevant shoulder and torso anatomy compared to photon radiation for patients requiring RNI. Prospective study is needed to correlate functional outcomes with radiation dose.

Purpose: This study investigated the use of surface guided radiotherapy (SGRT) in combination with a tomotherapy treatment mode using discrete delivery angles for deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) treatments of breast cancer (bc). We aimed to assess the feasibility and dosimetric advantages of this approach., Materials and Methods: We evaluated camera occlusion in the Radixact treatment system bore and the stability of DIBH signals during couch movement. The SGRT system's ability to maintain signal and surface image accuracy was analyzed at different depths within the bore. Dosimetric parameters were compared and measured for 20 left-sided bc patients receiving TomoDirect (TD) tangential radiotherapy in both DIBH and free breathing (FB)., Results: The SGRT system maintained surface coverage and precise DIBH-signal at depths up to 40 cm beyond the treatment center. Camera occlusion occurred in the clavicular and neck regions due to the patient's morphology and gantry geometry. Nonetheless, the system accurately detected respiratory motion for all measurements. The DIBH plans significantly (p < 0.001) reduced mean heart and left anterior descending artery (LAD) radiation doses by up to 40%, with a 50% reduction in near-maximum heart and LAD doses, respectively. No significant dosimetric differences between DIBH and FB were observed in other investigated parameters and volumes., Conclusions: Camera occlusion and couch movement minimally impacted the real-time surface image accuracy needed for DIBH treatments of bc. DIBH reduced heart and LAD radiation doses significantly compared to FB, indicating the feasibility and dosimetric benefits of combining these modalities., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

The accuracy of artificial intelligence (AI) generated contours for intact-breast and post-mastectomy radiotherapy plans was evaluated. Geometric and dosimetric comparisons were performed between auto-contours (ACs) and manual-contours (MCs) produced by physicians for target structures. Breast and regional nodal structures were manually delineated on 66 breast cancer patients. ACs were retrospectively generated. The characteristics of the breast/post-mastectomy chestwall (CW) and regional nodal structures (axillary [AxN], supraclavicular [SC], internal mammary [IM]) were geometrically evaluated by Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), mean surface distance, and Hausdorff Distance. The structures were also evaluated dosimetrically by superimposing the MC clinically delivered plans onto the ACs to assess the impact of utilizing ACs with target dose (Vx%) evaluation. Positive geometric correlations between volume and DSC for intact-breast, AxN, and CW were observed. Little or anti correlations between volume and DSC for IM and SC were shown. For intact-breast plans, insignificant dosimetric differences between ACs and MCs were observed for AxN V95% (p = 0.17) and SC V95% (p = 0.16), while IMN V90% ACs and MCs were significantly different. The average V95% for intact-breast MCs (98.4%) and ACs (97.1%) were comparable but statistically different (p = 0.02). For post-mastectomy plans, AxN V95% (p = 0.35) and SC V95% (p = 0.08) were consistent between ACs and MCs, while IMN V90% was significantly different. Additionally, 94.1% of AC-breasts met ΔV95% variation <5% when DSC > 0.7. However, only 62.5% AC-CWs achieved the same metrics, despite AC-CW V95% (p = 0.43) being statistically insignificant. The AC intact-breast structure was dosimetrically similar to MCs. The AC AxN and SC may require manual adjustments. Careful review should be performed for AC post-mastectomy CW and IMN before treatment planning. The findings of this study may guide the clinical decision-making process for the utilization of AI-driven ACs for intact-breast and post-mastectomy plans. Before clinical implementation of this auto-segmentation software, an in-depth assessment of agreement with each local facilities MCs is needed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) is an accepted treatment option for early breast cancer. Treatment delivered on the Magnetic Resonance integrated Linear Accelerator (MRL) provides the added assurance of improved soft tissue visibility, important in the delivery of APBI. This technique can be delivered in both the supine and prone positions, however current literature suggests that prone treatment on the MRL is infeasible due to physical limitations with bore size. This study aims to investigate the feasibility of positioning patients on a custom designed prone breast board compared with supine positioning on a personalised vacuum bag. Geometric distortion, the relative position of Organs at Risk (OAR) to the tumour bed and breathing motion (intrafraction motion) will be compared between the supine and prone positions. The study will also investigate the positional impact on dosimetry, patient experience, and position preference., Methods: Up to 30 patients will be recruited over a 12-month period for participation in this Human Research Ethics Committee approved exploratory cohort study. Patients will be scanned on the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Simulator in both the supine and prone positions as per current standard of care for APBI simulation. Supine and prone positioning comparisons will all be assessed on de-identified MRI image pairs, acquired using appropriate software. Patient experience will be explored through completion of a short, anonymous electronic survey. Descriptive statistics will be used for reporting of results with categorical, parametric/non-parametric tests applied (data format dependent). Survey results will be interpreted by comparison of percentage frequencies across the Likert scales. Thematic content analysis will be used to interpret qualitative data from the open-ended survey questions., Discussion: The results of this study will be used to assess the feasibility of treating patients with APBI in the prone position on a custom designed board on the MRL. It may also be used to assist with identification of patients who would benefit from this position over supine without the need to perform both scans. Patient experience and technical considerations will be utilised to develop a tool to assist in this process. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR): ACTRN1262400067583. Registered 28th of May 2024. https://www.anzctr.org.au/ACTRN12624000679583.aspx., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Breast cancer radiotherapy can increase the risks of heart disease, lung cancer and oesophageal cancer. At present, the best dosimetric predictors of these risks are mean doses to the whole heart, lungs and oesophagus, respectively. We aimed to estimate typical doses to these organs and resulting risks from UK breast cancer radiotherapy., Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted of planned or delivered mean doses to the whole heart, lungs or oesophagus from UK breast cancer radiotherapy in studies published during 2015-2023. Average mean doses were summarised for combinations of laterality and clinical targets. Heart disease and lung cancer mortality risks were then estimated using established models., Results: For whole heart, thirteen studies reported 2893 doses. Average mean doses were higher in left than in right-sided radiotherapy and increased with extent of clinical targets. For left-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 2.0 Gy (range 1.2-8.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 2.7 Gy (range 0.6-5.6 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 2.9 Gy (range 1.3-4.7 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For right-sided radiotherapy, average mean heart doses were: 1.0 Gy (range 0.3-1.0 Gy) breast/chest wall and 1.2 Gy (range 1.0-1.4 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes. There were no whole heart dose estimates from right internal mammary radiotherapy. For whole lung, six studies reported 2230 doses. Average mean lung doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 2.6 Gy (range 1.4-3.0 Gy) breast/chest wall, 3.0 Gy (range 0.9-5.1 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 7.1 Gy (range 6.7-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary. For whole oesophagus, two studies reported 76 doses. Average mean oesophagus doses increased with extent of targets irradiated: 1.4 Gy (range 1.0-2.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with either axilla or supraclavicular nodes and 5.8 Gy (range 1.9-10.0 Gy) breast/chest wall with nodes including internal mammary., Conclusions: The typical doses to these organs may be combined with dose-response relationships to estimate radiation risks. Estimated 30-year absolute lung cancer mortality risks from modern UK breast cancer radiotherapy for patients irradiated when aged 50 years were 2-6% for long-term continuing smokers, and <1% for non-smokers. Estimated 30-year mortality risks for heart disease were <1%., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Secondary breast cancer is a frequent late adverse event of mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma radiotherapy. Secondary breast cancers overwhelmingly correspond to ductal carcinoma and develop from the glandular mammary tissue. In addition, during childhood, radiation overexposure of the glandular tissue may lead to a late breast hypotrophy at adult age. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiation exposure to the glandular tissue in patients treated for mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma with intensity-modulated proton therapy, in order to evaluate the potential dosimetric usefulness of its delineation for breast sparing., Materials and Methods: Sixteen consecutive intermediate-risk mediastinal female patients with Hodgkin lymphoma treated with consolidation radiation with deep inspiration breath hold intensity-modulated proton therapy to the total dose of 30Gy were included. Breasts were delineated according to the European Society for Radiotherapy and Oncology guidelines for treatment optimization ("clinical organ at risk"). The glandular tissue ("glandular organ at risk") was retrospectively contoured on the initial simulation CT scans based on Hounsfield unit (HU) values, using a range between -80HU and 500HU., Results: The mean and maximum doses delivered to the glandular organ at risk were significantly lower than the mean and maximum doses delivered to the clinical organ at risk, but were statistically correlated. Glandular organ at risk volumes were significantly smaller., Conclusion: Optimizing the treatment plans on the clinical breast contours will systematically lead to overestimation of the dose received to the glandular tissue and, consequently, to an indistinct and involuntary improved glandular tissue sparing. As such, our findings do not support the consideration of the glandular tissue as an additional organ at risk when planning intensity-modulated proton therapy for mediastinal Hodgkin lymphoma in female patients., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: This study evaluated the impact and clinical utility of an auto-contouring system for radiation therapy treatments., Methods and Materials: The auto-contouring system was implemented in 2019. We evaluated data from 2428 patients who underwent adjuvant breast radiation therapy before and after the system's introduction. We collected the treatment's finalized contours, which were reviewed and revised by a multidisciplinary team. After implementation, the treatment contours underwent a finalization process that involved manual review and adjustment of the initial auto-contours. For the preimplementation group (n = 369), auto-contours were generated retrospectively. We compared the auto-contours and final contours using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and the 95% Hausdorff distance (HD95)., Results: We analyzed 22,215 structures from final and corresponding auto-contours. The final contours were generally larger, encompassing more slices in the superior or inferior directions. Among organs at risk (OAR), the heart, esophagus, spinal cord, and contralateral breast demonstrated significantly increased DSC and decreased HD95 postimplementation (all P < .05), except for the lungs, which presented inaccurate segmentation. Among target volumes, CTVn&#95;L2, L3, L4, and the internal mammary node showed increased DSC and decreased HD95 postimplementation (all P < .05), although the increase was less pronounced than the OAR outcomes. The analysis also covered factors contributing to significant differences, pattern identification, and outlier detection., Conclusions: In our study, the adoption of an auto-contouring system was associated with an increased reliance on automated settings, underscoring its utility and the potential risk of automation bias. Given these findings, we underscore the importance of considering the integration of stringent risk assessments and quality management strategies as a precautionary measure for the optimal use of such systems., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Lymphopenia is known for its significance on poor survivals in breast cancer patients. Considering full dosimetric data, this study aimed to develop and validate predictive models for lymphopenia after radiotherapy (RT) in breast cancer., Material and Methods: Patients with breast cancer treated with adjuvant RT were eligible in this multicenter study. The study endpoint was lympopenia, defined as the reduction in absolute lymphocytes and graded lymphopenia after RT. The dose-volume histogram (DVH) data of related critical structures and clinical factors were taken into account for the development of dense neural network (DNN) predictive models. The developed DNN models were validated using external patient cohorts., Results: A total of 918 consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer enrolled. The training, testing, and external validating datasets consisted of 589, 203, and 126 patients, respectively. Treatment volumes at nearly all dose levels of the DVH were significant predictors for lymphopenia following RT, including volumes at very low-dose 1 Gy (V1) of organs at risk (OARs) including lung, heart and body, especially ipsilateral-lung V1. A final DNN model, combining full DVH dosimetric parameters of OARs and three key clinical factors, achieved a predictive accuracy of 75 % or higher., Conclusion: This study demonstrated and externally validated the significance of full dosimetric data, particularly the volume of low dose at as low as 1 Gy of critical structures on lymphopenia after radiation in patients with breast cancer. The significance of V1 deserves special attention, as modern VMAT RT technology often has a relatively high value of this parameter. Further study is warranted for RT plan optimization., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Background and Purpose: This study recommends clinical epidermal dose calculation methods based on in-vivo film measurements and registered skin dose distributions with the Eclipse (Varian Medical Systems) treatment planning system's Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA) and Acuros XB (AXB) dose calculation algorithms., Materials and Methods: Eighteen AAA V13.6 breast plans were recalculated using AXB (dose to medium) V13.5 with the same beam parameters and monitor units as in the original plans. These are compared against in-vivo Gafchromic film measurements from the lateral and inferior breast regions. Three skin structures in the treatment planning system are evaluated: a surface layer of voxels of the body contour, a 0.2 cm internal skin rind, and a 0.5 cm internal skin rind., Results: Systematic shifts are demonstrated between the film measurements of skin dose and the Eclipse dose calculations. On average, the dose to the surface layer of pixels is underestimated by AAA by 8% and overestimated by AXB by 3%. A 5 mm skin rind extended into the body can increase epidermal dose calculations on average by 8% for AAA and 4% for AXB., Conclusion: This is the first study to register in-vivo skin dose distributions in the breast to the treatment planning system for comparison. Based on the results from this study it is recommended that epidermal dose is calculated with a 0.5 cm skin rind for the AAA algorithm and with rind thickness up to 0.2 cm for the AXB algorithm., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Objective: To develop new two-dimensional geometric parameters for pulmonary and cardiac dose estimation in left-sided breast cancer radiation therapy without dose-volume histogram (DVH)., Methods: On the CT image of 90 patients with left breast cancer, treatment planning was performed using two opposed tangent fields with/without supraclavicular. The field-in-field technique and 6MV photons were used. From DVH dosimetric parameters of mean dose, Vx (x (Gy) =5, 10, 15, 20, 30, 40, 50) were calculated, and from heart and lung outlines on the beam's eye view, new geometric parameters of percent of lung area in tangent and supraclavicular fields (%area of the lung in the tangent (ALT), %ALS) and percent of heart in tangent field (%area of the heart in the tangent (AHT)) were measured. Correlation, regression, and diagnostic performance by receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) were investigated for statistical analysis., Results: The Pearson coefficient between %ALT and Vx (x = 10, 15, 20, 30, 40) show strong correlation in patient treatment with only opposed tangents (>0.85) and weaker in treatment by opposed tangents with supraclavicular (0.56-0.88), the %ALS indicate weak correlation (<0.5) and %AHT show strong correlation (0.93-0.98). The regression analysis shows a positive relation between %ALT and mean dose (R2 = 0.8), V20Gy (R2 = 0.9) in the lung (tangent treatment), and between %AHT and mean dose (R2 = 0.9), V20Gy (R2 = 1.0) in the heart. The ROC analysis shows by %ALT <20.3 for treatment by just opposed fields, %ALT <22.1% for treatment tangents with supra, and %AHT <11.6%, practical lung and heart dose constraints are addressed., Conclusion: The proposed geometric parameters could replace previous one-dimensional maximum and central distances for predicting doses to lung and heart., Advances in Knowledge: This study presents simple geometric parameters that could estimate pulmonary and cardiac dose in left breast cancer treatment from a 2D radiograph., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Journal of Cancer Research and Therapeutics.)

Purpose: To present the results of the first multi-centre real-world validation of autoplanning for whole breast irradiation after breast-sparing surgery, encompassing high complexity cases (e.g. with a boost or regional lymph nodes) and a wide range of clinical practices., Methods: The 24 participating centers each included 10 IMRT/VMAT/Tomotherapy patients, previously treated with a manually generated plan ('manplan'). There were no restrictions regarding case complexity, planning aims, plan evaluation parameters and criteria, fractionation, treatment planning system or treatment machine/technique. In addition to dosimetric comparisons of autoplans with manplans, blinded plan scoring/ranking was conducted by a clinician from the treating center. Autoplanning was performed using a single configuration for all patients in all centres. Deliverability was verified through measurements at delivery units., Results: Target dosimetry showed comparability, while reductions in OAR dose parameters were 21.4 % for heart D mean , 16.7 % for ipsilateral lung D mean , and 101.9 %, 45.5 %, and 35.7 % for contralateral breast D 0.03cc , D 5% and D mean , respectively (all p < 0.001). Among the 240 patients included, the clinicians preferred the autoplan for 119 patients, with manplans preferred for 96 cases (p = 0.01). Per centre there were on average 5.0 ± 2.9 (1SD) patients with a preferred autoplan (range [0-10]), compared to 4.0 ± 2.7 with a preferred manplan ([0,9]). No differences were observed regarding deliverability., Conclusion: The automation significantly reduced the hands-on planning workload compared to manual planning, while also achieving an overall superiority. However, fine-tuning of the autoplanning configuration prior to clinical implementation may be necessary in some centres to enhance clinicians' satisfaction with the generated autoplans., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: (1) All authors have participated in (a) conception and design, or analysis and interpretation of the data; (b) drafting the article or revising it critically for important intellectual content; and (c) approval of the final version. (2) This manuscript has not been submitted to, nor is under review at, another journal or other publishing venue. (3) Stefania Zara is employees of the company “Tecnologie Avanzate TA Srl” that distributes the software RayStation in Italy; this company supports the group in terms of collecting data. Data were analyzed objectively and independently from the vendor; (4) Remaining authors have no affiliation with any organization with a direct or indirect financial interest in the subject matter discussed in the manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Study: The objective of this research is to present our firsthand experience and provide up-to-date data for the further study of cases involving simultaneous breast irradiation using helical Tomotherapy, ©Accuray Inc., Methods: The radical treatment options for bilateral breast cancer are surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Being that radiotherapy for bilateral breast cancer is challenging due to limitations in the geometry of modern radiotherapy equipment, helical Tomotherapy was chosen as an appropriate technique of irradiation. The retrospective review focused on the records of patients who underwent bilateral irradiation of the breast or chest wall and regional lymph nodes using helical Tomotherapy., Results: Only four patients with bilateral breast cancer completed a radiation therapy course in our center from 2018 to 2023. Two patients underwent radical mastectomy with lymph node dissection on both sides before irradiation. For the other two patients, radical mastectomy was done after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Acute radiation toxicity scoring was based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. Only mild adverse effects, such as general weakness and slight skin irritation below Grade 3, were observed, with no instances of skin swelling, dryness, or pigmentation noted. Evaluation of late complications revealed tissue fibrosis in the area of the internal mammary nodes and respiratory failure with various severity. Complications and deterioration in the cardiovascular system were not observed during the follow-up period, which varied from 3 to 48 months., Conclusion: Our results show the efficacy of using helical Tomotherapy considering positive outcomes, being that three out of four patients are in remission with low acute toxicity and late complications. There are a small number of articles describing bilateral breast cancer treatment with helical Tomotherapy. On this occasion, our data could contribute to the studies of tolerant doses for organs at risk and improve the parameters of treatment plans for bilateral breast cancer. Since the small sample of patients with bilateral breast cancer limits the study, a larger cohort of patients is essential to obtain statistically reliable results., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Introduction: Intraoperative electron radiotherapy (IOERT) is a technique aiming to deliver radiotherapy during oncological surgery. In breast IOERT, the applicator and shielding disc placement are correlated with organs at risk (OAR) irradiation, in vivo verification of these parameters is scarcely reported. The aim of our study is to report and analyze possible causes of the misalignment using radiochromic films and compare our results to others reported in the bibliography., Methods: From November 2019 to April 2023, in vivo verifications were performed for 33 patients. IOERT was performed using a LIAC 10 MeV (Sordina, Italy) electron accelerator. We attached a radiochromic film to the upper side of the polytetrafluoroethylene cover of the shielding disc. The percentage of the irradiation area outside the disc was recorded and various parameters (applicator angulations, prescription depth, tumor location and breast size) were analyzed to find possible correlations., Results: For 29 patients, 20 Gy were prescribed while 10 Gy were prescribed to 4 patients. The average irradiated area outside the disc was 19% (0-56%) corresponding to a surface of 4.5 cm 2 (0-17.4 cm 2 ). The applicator of 5 cm was used for most of the patients. The mean prescription depth was 1.4 cm (0.5-2.5 cm). We found no correlation between the analyzed parameters and misalignment., Conclusion: This study confirms the presence and magnitude of the misalignments. We strongly recommend in vivo verifications as a quality check during IOERT procedures. The misalignment has no correlation with tumor localization parameters, so the solution could be based on technical improvements of the applicator., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Purpose: One of the advantages of integrating automated processes in treatment planning is the reduction of manual planning variability. This study aims to assess whether a deep-learning-based auto-planning solution can also reduce the contouring variation-related impact on the planned dose for early-breast cancer treatment., Methods: Auto- and manual plans were optimized for 20 patients using both auto- and manual OARs, including both lungs, right breast, heart, and left-anterior-descending (LAD) artery. Differences in terms of recalculated dose (ΔD rc M ,ΔD rc A ) and reoptimized dose (ΔD ro M ,ΔD ro A ) for manual (M) and auto (A)-plans, were evaluated on manual structures. The correlation between several geometric similarities and dose differences was also explored (Spearman's test)., Results: Auto-contours were found slightly smaller in size than manual contours for right breast and heart and more than twice larger for LAD. Recalculated dose differences were found negligible for both planning approaches except for heart (ΔD rc M =-0.4 Gy, ΔD rc A =-0.3 Gy) and right breast (ΔD rc M =-1.2 Gy, ΔD rc A =-1.3 Gy) maximum dose. Re-optimized dose differences were considered equivalent to recalculated ones for both lungs and LAD, while they were significantly smaller for heart (ΔD ro M =-0.2 Gy, ΔD ro A =-0.2 Gy) and right breast (ΔD ro M  =-0.3 Gy, ΔD ro A =-0.9 Gy) maximum dose. Twenty-one correlations were found for ΔD rc M,A (M=8,A=13) that reduced to four for ΔD ro M,A (M=3,A=1)., Conclusions: The sensitivity of auto-planning to contouring variation was found not relevant when compared to manual planning, regardless of the method used to calculate the dose differences. Nonetheless, the method employed to define the dose differences strongly affected the correlation analysis resulting highly reduced when dose was reoptimized, regardless of the planning approach., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background and Purpose: By employing three surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT)-assisted positioning methods, we conducted a prospective study of patients undergoing SGRT-based deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy using a Sentine/Catalys system. The aim of this study was to optimize the initial positioning workflow of SGRT-DIBH radiotherapy for breast cancer., Materials and Methods: A total of 124 patients were divided into three groups to conduct a prospective comparative study of the setup accuracy and efficiency for the daily initial setup of SGRT-DIBH breast radiotherapy. Group A was subjected to skin marker plus SGRT verification, Group B underwent SGRT optical feedback plus auto-positioning, and Group C was subjected to skin marker plus SGRT auto-positioning. We evaluated setup accuracy and efficiency using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) verification data and the total setup time., Results: In groups A, B, and C, the mean and standard deviation of the translational setup-error vectors were small, with the highest values of the three directions observed in group A (2.4 ± 1.6, 2.9 ± 1.8, and 2.8 ± 2.1 mm). The rotational vectors in group B (1.8 ± 0.7°, 2.1 ± 0.8°, and 1.8 ± 0.7°) were significantly larger than those in groups A and C, and the Group C setup required the shortest amount of time, at 1.5 ± 0.3 min, while that of Group B took the longest time, at 2.6 ± 0.9 min., Conclusion: SGRT one-key calibration was found to be more suitable when followed by skin marker/tattoo and in-room laser positioning, establishing it as an optimal daily initial set-up protocol for breast DIBH radiotherapy. This modality also proved to be suitable for free-breathing breast cancer radiotherapy, and its widespread clinical use is recommended., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

In breast cancer radiation therapy, minimizing radiation-related risks and toxicity is vital for improving life expectancy. Tailoring radiotherapy techniques and treatment positions can reduce radiation doses to normal organs and mitigate treatment-related toxicity. This study entailed a dosimetric comparison of six different external beam whole-breast irradiation techniques in both supine and prone positions. We selected fourteen breast cancer patients, generating six treatment plans in both positions per patient. We assessed target coverage and organs at risk (OAR) doses to evaluate the impact of treatment techniques and positions. Excess absolute risk was calculated to estimate potential secondary cancer risk in the contralateral breast, ipsilateral lung, and contralateral lung. Additionally, we analyzed the distance between the target volume and OARs (heart and ipsilateral lung) while considering the treatment position. The results indicate that prone positioning lowers lung exposure in X-ray radiotherapy. However, particle beam therapies (PBTs) significantly reduce the dose to the heart and ipsilateral lung regardless of the patient's position. Notably, negligible differences were observed between arc-delivery and static-delivery PBTs in terms of target conformity and OAR sparing. This study provides critical dosimetric evidence to facilitate informed decision-making regarding treatment techniques and positions., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Deep learning (DL) models for auto-segmentation in radiotherapy have been extensively studied in retrospective and pilot settings. However, these studies might not reflect the clinical setting. This study compares the use of a clinically implemented in-house trained DL segmentation model for breast cancer to a previously performed pilot study to assess possible differences in performance or acceptability., Material and Methods: Sixty patients with whole breast radiotherapy, with or without an indication for locoregional radiotherapy were included. Structures were qualitatively scored by radiotherapy technologists and radiation oncologists. Quantitative evaluation was performed using dice-similarity coefficient (DSC), 95th percentile of Hausdorff Distance (95%HD) and surface DSC (sDSC), and time needed for generating, checking, and correcting structures was measured., Results: Ninety-three percent of all contours in clinic were scored as clinically acceptable or usable as a starting point, comparable to 92% achieved in the pilot study. Compared to the pilot study, no significant changes in time reduction were achieved for organs at risks (OARs). For target volumes, significantly more time was needed compared to the pilot study for patients including lymph node levels 1-4, although time reduction was still 33% compared to manual segmentation. Almost all contours have better DSC and 95%HD than inter-observer variations. Only CTVn4 scored worse for both metrics, and the thyroid had a higher 95%HD value., Interpretation: The use of the DL model in clinical practice is comparable to the pilot study, showing high acceptability rates and time reduction.

Partial breast irradiation for the treatment of early-stage breast cancer patients can be performed by means of Intra Operative electron Radiation Therapy (IOeRT). One of the main limitations of this technique is the absence of a treatment planning system (TPS) that could greatly help in ensuring a proper coverage of the target volume during irradiation. An IOeRT TPS has been developed using a fast Monte Carlo (MC) and an ultrasound imaging system to provide the best irradiation strategy (electron beam energy, applicator position and bevel angle) and to facilitate the optimisation of dose prescription and delivery to the target volume while maximising the organs at risk sparing. The study has been performed in silico, exploiting MC simulations of a breast cancer treatment. Ultrasound-based input has been used to compute the absorbed dose maps in different irradiation strategies and a quantitative comparison between the different options was carried out using Dose Volume Histograms. The system was capable of exploring different beam energies and applicator positions in few minutes, identifying the best strategy with an overall computation time that was found to be completely compatible with clinical implementation. The systematic uncertainty related to tissue deformation during treatment delivery with respect to imaging acquisition was taken into account. The potential and feasibility of a GPU based full MC TPS implementation of IOeRT breast cancer treatments has been demonstrated in-silico. This long awaited tool will greatly improve the treatment safety and efficacy, overcoming the limits identified within the clinical trials carried out so far., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Alessio Sarti reports financial support was provided by S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A. Vincenzo Patera reports financial support was provided by S.I.T. Sordina IORT Technologies S.p.A. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purposes: This study aimed to develop and validate algorithms for automating intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning in breast cancer patients, with a focus on patient anatomical characteristics., Material and Methods: We retrospectively selected 400 breast cancer patients without lymph node involvement for automated treatment planning. Automation was achieved using the Eclipse Scripting Application Programming Interface (ESAPI) integrated into the Eclipse Treatment Planning System. We employed three beam insertion geometries and three optimization strategies, resulting in 3600 plans, each delivering a 40.05 Gy dose in 15 fractions. Gantry angles in the tangent fields were selected based on a criterion involving the minimum intersection area between the Planning Target Volume (PTV) and the ipsilateral lung in the Beam's Eye View projection. ESAPI was also used to gather patient anatomical data, serving as input for Random Forest models to select the optimal plan. The Random Forest classification considered both beam insertion geometry and optimization strategy. Dosimetric data were evaluated in accordance with the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 1005 protocol., Results: Overall, all approaches generated high-quality plans, with approximately 94% meeting the acceptable dose criteria for organs at risk and/or target coverage as defined by RTOG guidelines. Average automated plan generation time ranged from 6 min and 37 s to 9 min and 22 s, with the mean time increasing with additional fields. The Random Forest approach did not successfully enable automatic planning strategy selection. Instead, our automated planning system allows users to choose from the tested geometry and strategy options., Conclusions: Although our attempt to correlate patient anatomical features with planning strategy using machine learning tools was unsuccessful, the resulting dosimetric outcomes proved satisfactory. Our algorithm consistently produced high-quality plans, offering significant time and efficiency advantages., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics is published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background: Toxicity after whole breast Radiotherapy is a relevant issue, impacting the quality-of-life of a not negligible number of patients. We aimed to develop a Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) model predicting late toxicities by combining dosimetric parameters of the breast dermis and clinical factors., Methods: The skin structure was defined as the outer CT body contour's 5 mm inner isotropic expansion. It was retrospectively segmented on a large mono-institutional cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients enrolled between 2009 and 2017 (n = 1066). Patients were treated with tangential-field RT, delivering 40 Gy in 15 fractions to the whole breast. Toxicity was reported during Follow-Up (FU) using SOMA/LENT scoring. The study endpoint was moderate-severe late side effects consisting of Fibrosis-Atrophy-Telangiectasia-Pain (FATP G ≥ 2) developed within 42 months after RT completion. A machine learning pipeline was designed with a logistic model combining clinical factors and absolute skin DVH (cc) parameters as output., Results: The FATP G2 + rate was 3.8 %, with 40/1066 patients experiencing side effects. After the preprocessing of variables, a cross-validation was applied to define the best-performing model. We selected a 4-variable model with Post-Surgery Cosmetic alterations (Odds Ratio, OR = 7.3), Aromatase Inhibitors (as a protective factor with OR = 0.45), V20 Gy (50 % of the prescribed dose, OR = 1.02), and V42 Gy (105 %, OR = 1.09). Factors were also converted into an adjusted V20Gy., Conclusions: The association between late reactions and skin DVH when delivering 40 Gy/15 fr was quantified, suggesting an independent role of V20 and V42. Few clinical factors heavily modulate the risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Flattening filter-free (FFF)-based volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) has been shown to be feasible and significantly improves treatment efficiency and lung protection for synchronous bilateral breast irradiation (SBBI). This research compared the commonly used VMAT field arrangements using FFF beams., Methods: Twenty-eight patients underwent SBBI were retrospectively enrolled to design irradiation plans using tangential arc VMAT (taVMAT), half arc VMAT (haVMAT), and large arc VMAT (laVMAT). Dosimetric and delivery parameters of all designed plans were recorded and compared., Results: Comparable target volume coverage was observed for all field arrangements. taVMAT significantly reduced the dose to spinal cord and the volume covered by 5 Gy (V 5Gy ) and V 7Gy of the lungs while decreasing the conformity index of the target volume. It also increased the volume covered by 105% of the prescription dose (V 105% ) and V 107% of the target volume. haVMAT considerably decreased V 20 Gy and V 30 Gy of the lungs, mean dose (D mean ) and V 30 Gy of the heart and the liver. It also notably reduced D mean and V 40 Gy of the left anterior descending coronary artery while increasing the beam-on time. laVMAT significantly reduced the mean treatment time (range, 113-117 seconds) compared with the other field arrangements., Conclusions: There were distinct differences in various dosimetric and delivery parameters for different field arrangements, highlighting the importance of selecting the appropriate field arrangement based on specific treatment goals and considerations. This study contributes valuable insights into the use of FFF-based VMAT techniques in SBBI., Competing Interests: Disclosures None., (Copyright © 2023 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose/objective: Field size limitations on Halcyon and Ethos treatment machines largely preclude use of the conventional monoisocentric three-field technique for breast/chest wall and regional lymph nodes. We present an alternative, IMRT-based planning approach that facilitates treatment on Halcyon and Ethos while preserving plan quality., Materials/methods: Eight breast and regional node cases (four left-sided, four right-sided) were planned for an Ethos machine using a 15-17 field IMRT technique. Institutional plan quality metrics for CTV and PTV coverage and OAR sparing were assessed. Five plans (four right-sided, one left-sided) were also planned using a hybrid 3D multisocenter technique. CTV coverage and OAR sparing were compared to the IMRT plans. Eclipse scripting tools were developed to aid in beam placement and plan evaluation through a set of dosimetric scorecards, and both are shared publicly., Results: On average, the IMRT plans achieved breast CTV and PTV coverage at 50 Gy of 97.9% and 95.7%, respectively. Supraclavicular CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 95.5%. Axillary lymph node CTV and PTV coverages at 45 Gy were 100% and 97.1%, and IMN CTV coverage at 45 Gy was 99.2%. Mean ipsilateral lung V20 Gy was 19.3%, and average mean heart dose was 1.6 Gy for right-sided cases and 3.0 Gy for left-sided. In comparison to the hybrid 3D plans, IMRT plans achieved higher breast and supraclavicular CTV coverage (99.9% vs. 98.6% and 99.9% vs. 93.4%), higher IMN coverage (99.6% vs. 78.2%), and lower ipsilateral lung V20 Gy (19.6% vs. 28.2%)., Conclusion: Institutional plan quality benchmarks were achieved for all eight cases using the IMRT-based planning approach. The IMRT-based planning approach offered superior conformity and OAR sparing than a competing hybrid 3D approach., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Background and Purpose: Doses to the coronary arteries in breast cancer (BC) radiotherapy (RT) have been suggested to be a risk predictor of long-term cardiac toxicity after BC treatment. We investigated the dose-risk relationships between near maximum doses (Dmax) to the right coronary artery (RCA) and left anterior descending coronary artery (LAD) and ischemic heart disease (IHD) mortality after BC RT., Patients and Methods: In a cohort of 2,813 women diagnosed with BC between 1958 and 1992 with a follow-up of at least 10 years, we identified 134 cases of death due to IHD 10-19 years after BC diagnosis. For each case, one control was selected within the cohort matched for age at diagnosis. 3D-volume and 3D-dose reconstructions were obtained from individual RT charts. We estimated the Dmax to the RCA and the LAD and the mean heart dose (MHD). We performed conditional logistic regression analysis comparing piecewise spline transformation and simple linear modeling for best fit., Results: There was a linear dose-risk relationship for both the Dmax to the RCA (odds ratio [OR]/Gray [Gy] 1.03 [1.01-1.05]) and the LAD (OR/Gy 1.04 [1.02-1.06]) in a multivariable model. For MHD there was a linear dose-risk relationship (1,14 OR/Gy [1.08-1.19]. For all relationships, simple linear modelling was superior to spline transformations., Interpretation: Doses to both the RCA and LAD are independent risk predictors of long-term cardiotoxicity after RT for BC In addition to the LAD, the RCA should be regarded as an organ at risk in RT planning.

Purpose: Within a multi-institutional project, we aimed to assess the transferability of knowledge-based (KB) plan prediction models in the case of whole breast irradiation (WBI) for left-side breast irradiation with tangential fields (TF)., Methods: Eight institutions set KB models, following previously shared common criteria. Plan prediction performance was tested on 16 new patients (2 pts per centre) extracting dose-volume-histogram (DVH) prediction bands of heart, ipsilateral lung, contralateral lung and breast. The inter-institutional variability was quantified by the standard deviations (SDint) of predicted DVHs and mean-dose (Dmean). The transferability of models, for the heart and the ipsilateral lung, was evaluated by the range of geometric Principal Component (PC1) applicability of a model to test patients of the other 7 institutions., Results: SDint of the DVH was 1.8 % and 1.6 % for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (20 %-80 % dose range); concerning Dmean, SDint was 0.9 Gy and 0.6 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and the heart, respectively (<0.2 Gy for contralateral organs). Mean predicted doses ranged between 4.3 and 5.9 Gy for the ipsilateral lung and 1.1-2.3 Gy for the heart. PC1 analysis suggested no relevant differences among models, except for one centre showing a systematic larger sparing of the heart, concomitant to a worse PTV coverage, due to high priority in sparing the left anterior descending coronary artery., Conclusions: Results showed high transferability among models and low inter-institutional variability of 2% for plan prediction. These findings encourage the building of benchmark models in the case of TF-WBI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Associazione Italiana di Fisica Medica e Sanitaria. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Compared to the free-breathing technique, adjuvant left breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery or mastectomy using the breath-hold method significantly reduces the heart mean dose, Left anterior descending artery, and ipsilateral lung doses. Movement with deep inspiration may also reduce heart volume in the field and regional node doses., Materials and Methods: Pre-radiotherapy planning CT was performed in the free-breathing, and breath-hold techniques using RPM, demographic information, clinicopathological data, heart volume in the field, heart mean dose, LAD mean dose, and regional nodal doses were calculated in both free breathing and DIBH. Fifty patients with left breast cancer receiving left breast adjuvant radiation were enrolled., Results: There was no significant difference in axillary LN coverage between the two techniques, except for SCL maximum dose, Axilla I node maximum dose, and Axilla II minimum dose in favor of the breath hold technique. The mean age was 47.54 years, 78% had GII IDC, 66% had positive LVSI results, and 74% of patients had T2. The breath hold strategy resulted in considerably decreased mean heart dose (p = 0.000), LAD dose (p = 0.000), ipsilateral lung mean dose (p = 0.012), and heart volume if the field (p = 0.013). The mean cardiac dosage and the dose of the LAD were significantly correlated (p = 0.000, R = 0.673). Heart volume in the field and heart mean dosage was not significantly correlated (p = 0.285, r = - 0.108)., Conclusion: When compared to free breathing scans, DIBH procedures result in considerably reduced dosage to the OAR and no appreciable changes in dose exposure to regional lymph node stations in patients with left-sided breast cancer., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Federación de Sociedades Españolas de Oncología (FESEO).)

Objective: To investigate the dosimetric effects of using individualized silicone rubber (SR) bolus on the target area and organs at risk (OARs) during postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT), as well as evaluate skin acute radiation dermatitis (ARD). Methods: A retrospective study was performed on 30 patients with breast cancer. Each patient was prepared with an individualized SR bolus of 3 mm thickness. Fan-beam computed tomography (FBCT) was performed at the first and second fractions, and then once a week for a total of 5 times. Dosimetric metrics such as homogeneity index (HI), conformity index (CI), skin dose (SD), and OARs including the heart, lungs, and spinal cord were compared between the original plan and the FBCTs. The acute side effects were recorded. Results: In targets' dosimetric metrics, there were no significant differences in D mean and V 105% between planning computed tomography (CT) and actual treatments ( P  > .05), while the differences in D 95% , V 95% , HI, and CI were statistically significant ( P  < .05). In OARs, there were no significant differences between the D mean , V 5 , and V 20 of the affected lung, V 5 of the heart and D max of the spinal cord ( P  > .05) except the V 30 of affected lung, which was slightly lower than the planning CT ( P  < .05). In SD, both D max and D mean in actual treatments were increased than plan A, and the difference was statistically significant ( P  < .05), while the skin-V 20 and skin-V 30 has no difference. Among the 30 patients, only one patient had no skin ARD, and 5 patients developed ARD of grade 2, while the remaining 24 patients were grade 1. Conclusion: The OR bolus showed good anastomoses and high interfraction reproducibility with the chest wall, and did not cause deformation during irradiation. It ensured accurate dose delivery of the target and OARs during the treatment, which may increase SD by over 101%. In this study, no cases of grade 3 skin ARD were observed. However, the potential of using OR bolus to reduce grade 1 and 2 skin ARD warrants further investigation with a larger sample size., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Proton radiotherapy may be a compelling technical option for the treatment of breast cancer due to its unique physical property known as the "Bragg peak." This feature offers distinct advantages, promising superior dose conformity within the tumor area and reduced radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues, enhancing the potential for better treatment outcomes. However, proton therapy is accompanied by inherent challenges, primarily higher costs and limited accessibility when compared to well-developed photon irradiation. Thus, in clinical practice, it is important for radiation oncologists to carefully select patients before recommendation of proton therapy to ensure the transformation of dosimetric benefits into tangible clinical benefits. Yet, the optimal indications for proton therapy in breast cancer patients remain uncertain. While there is no widely recognized methodology for patient selection, numerous attempts have been made in this direction. In this review, we intended to present an inspiring summarization and discussion about the current practices and exploration on the approaches of this treatment decision-making process in terms of treatment-related side-effects, tumor control, and cost-efficiency, including the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) model, the tumor control probability (TCP) model, genomic biomarkers, cost-effectiveness analyses (CEAs), and so on. Additionally, we conducted an evaluation of the eligibility criteria in ongoing randomized controlled trials and analyzed their reference value in patient selection. We evaluated the pros and cons of various potential patient selection approaches and proposed possible directions for further optimization and exploration. In summary, while proton therapy holds significant promise in breast cancer treatment, its integration into clinical practice calls for a thoughtful, evidence-driven strategy. By continuously refining the patient selection criteria, we can harness the full potential of proton radiotherapy while ensuring maximum benefit for breast cancer patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Background: Breast cancer is the most widespread cancer in women and young women worldwide. Moving towards customised radiotherapy, balancing the use of the available technology with the best treatment modality may not be an easy task in the daily routine. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing IQ-feasibility into clinical practice to support the decision of free-breathing (FB) versus breath-hold (BH) left-sided breast irradiations, in order to optimise the technology available and the effectiveness of the treatment., Methods: Thirty-five patients who received 3D radiotherapy treatment of the left breast in deep-inspiration BH were included in this retrospective study. Computed tomography scans in FB and BH were acquired for each patient; targets contoured in both imaging datasets by an experienced radiation oncologist, and organs at risk delineated using automatic segmentation software were exported to PlanIQ™ (Sun Nuclear Corp.) to generate feasibility dose volume histogram (FDVHs). The dosimetric parameter of BH versus FB FDVH, and BH clinical dataset versus BH FDVH were compared., Results: A total of 30 patients out of 35 patients analysed, presented for the BH treatments a significant reduction (p < 0.05) in the heart mean dose ([Formula: see text]), volume receiving 5 Gy ([Formula: see text]) and 20 Gy ([Formula: see text]), of 35.7%, 54.5%, and 2.1%, respectively; for the left lung, a lower reduction was registered and significant only for [Formula: see text] (21.4%, p = 0.046). For the remaining five patients, the FDVH cut-off points of heart and lung were superimposable with differences of less than 1%. Heart and left lung dosimetric parameters of the BH clinical plans are located in the difficult zone of the FDVH and differ significantly (p < 0.05) from the corresponding parameters of the FDVH curves delimiting this buffer area between the impossible and feasible zones, respectively., Conclusion: The use of PlanIQTM as a decision-support tool for the FB versus BH treatment delivery modality allows customisation of the treatment technique using the most appropriate technology for each patient enabling accurate management of available technologies., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background/purpose: Gastric dose parameters comparison for deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) or free breathing (FB) mode during radiotherapy (RT) for left-sided breast cancer patients (LSBCPs) has not been investigated before. This study aimed to analyze the impact of Active Breath Coordinator (ABC)-DIBH technique on the dose received by the stomach during RT for LSBCPs and to provide organ-specific dosimetric parameters., Materials and Methods: The study included 73 LSBCPs. The dosimetric parameters of the stomach were compared between FB and DIBH mode. The correlation between the stomach volume and dosimetric parameters was analyzed., Results: Compared to FB mode, statistically significant reductions were observed in gastric dose parameters in ABC-DIBH mode, including Dmax (46.60 vs 17.25, p  < 0.001), D1cc (38.42 vs 9.60, p  < 0.001), Dmean (4.10 vs 0.80, p  < 0.001), V40Gy (0.50 vs 0.00, p  < 0.001), V30Gy (6.30 vs 0.00, p  < 0.001), V20Gy (20.80 vs 0.00, p  < 0.001), V10Gy (51.10 vs 0.77, p  < 0.001), and V5Gy (93.20 vs 9.60, p  < 0.001). ABC-DIBH increased the distance between the stomach and the breast PTV when compared to FB, from 1.3 cm to 2.8 cm ( p  < 0.001). Physiologic decrease in stomach volume was not found from FB to ABC-DIBH (415.54 cm 3 vs 411.61 cm 3 , p  = 0.260). The stomach volume showed a positive correlation with V40Gy (r 2 = 0.289; p  < 0.05), V30Gy (r 2 = 0.287; p  < 0.05), V20Gy (r 2 = 0.343; p  < 0.05), V10Gy (r 2 = 0.039; p  < 0.001), V5Gy (r 2 = 0.439; p  < 0.001), Dmax (r 2 = 0.269; p  < 0.05) and D1cc (r 2 = 0.278; p  < 0.05) in FB mode. While in ABC-DIBH mode, most stomach dosimetric parameters were not correlated with gastric volume., Conclusions: The implementation of ABC-DIBH in LSBCPs radiotherapy resulted in lower irradiation of the stomach. Larger stomach volume was associated with statistically significantly higher dose irradiation in FB mode. To reduce radiotherapy related side effects in FB mode, patients should be fast for at least 2 hours before the CT simulation and treatment.

Purpose: To report the planning benchmark case results of the POTENTIAL trial-a multicenter, randomized, phase 3 trial-to evaluate the value of internal mammary nodal (IMN) irradiation for patients with high-risk breast cancer., Methods: All participating institutions were provided the outlines of one benchmark case, and they generated radiation therapy plans per protocol. The plans were evaluated by a quality assurance team, after which the institutions resubmitted their revised plans. The information on beams arrangement, skin flash, inhomogeneity corrections, and protocol compliance was assessed in the first and final submission., Results: The plans from 26 institutions were analyzed. Some major deviations were found in the first submission. The protocol compliance rates of dose coverage for the planning target volume of chest wall, supraclavicular fossa plus axilla, and IMN region (PTVim) were all significantly improved in the final submission, which were 96.2% vs. 69.2%, 100% vs. 76.9%, and 88.4% vs. 53.8%, respectively. For OARs, the compliance rates of heart D mean , left anterior descending coronary artery V 40Gy , ipsilateral lung V 5Gy , and stomach V 5Gy were significantly improved. In the first and final submission, the mean values of PTVim V 100% were 79.9% vs. 92.7%; the mean values of heart D mean were 11.5 Gy vs. 9.7 Gy for hypofractionated radiation therapy and 11.5 Gy vs. 11.0 Gy for conventional fractionated radiation therapy, respectively., Conclusion: The major deviations were corrected and protocol compliance was significantly improved after revision, which highlighted the importance of planning benchmark case to guarantee the planning quality for multicenter trials., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The intraoperative radiotherapy in newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (INTRAGO) clinical trial assesses survival in patients with glioblastoma treated with intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) using the INTRABEAM. Treatment planning for INTRABEAM relies on vendor-provided in-water depth dose curves obtained according to the TARGeted Intraoperative radioTherapy (TARGIT) dosimetry protocol. However, recent studies have shown discrepancies between the estimated TARGIT and delivered doses. This work evaluates the effect of the choice of dosimetry formalism on organs at risk (OAR) doses., Methods and Materials: A treatment planning framework for INTRABEAM was developed to retrospectively calculate the IORT dose in 8 INTRAGO patients. These patients received an IORT prescription dose of 20 to 30 Gy in addition to external beam radiation therapy. The IORT dose was obtained using (1) the TARGIT method; (2) the manufacturer's V4.0 method; (3) the C Q method, which uses an ionization chamber Monte Carlo (MC) calculated factor; (4) MC dose-to-water; and (5) MC dose-to-tissue. The IORT dose was converted to 2 Gy fractions equivalent dose., Results: According to the TARGIT method, the OAR dose constraints were respected in all cases. However, the other formalisms estimated a higher mean dose to OARs and revealed 1 case where the constraint for the brain stem was exceeded. The addition of the external beam radiation therapy and TARGIT IORT doses resulted in 10 cases of OARs exceeding the dose constraints. The more accurate MC calculation of dose-to-tissue led to the highest dosimetric differences, with 3, 3, 2, and 2 cases (out of 8) exceeding the dose constraint to the brain stem, optic chiasm, optic nerves, and lenses, respectively. Moreover, the mean cumulative dose to brain stem exceeded its constraint of 66 Gy with the MC dose-to-tissue method, which was not evident with the current INTRAGO clinical practice., Conclusions: The current clinical approach of calculating the IORT dose with the TARGIT method may considerably underestimate doses to nearby OARs. In practice, OAR dose constraints may have been exceeded, as revealed by more accurate methods., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is used to decrease the dose of radiotherapy delivered to the heart. There is a need to define criteria to select patients with the potential to derive a real clinical benefit from DIBH treatment. Our study's main goal was to investigate whether two CT-scan cardiac anatomical parameters, cardiac contact distance in the parasagittal plane (CCDps) and lateral heart-to-chest distance (HCD), were predictive of unmet dosimetric cardiac constraints for left breast and regional nodal irradiation (RNI)., Materials and Methods: This retrospective single-institution dosimetric study included 62 planning CT scans of women with left-sided breast cancer (BC) from 2016 to 2021. Two independent radiation oncologists measured HCD and CCDps twice to assess inter- and intra-observer reproducibility. Dosimetric constraints to be respected were defined, and dosimetric parameters of interest were collected for each patient., Results: Mean heart dose was 7.9Gy. Inter-rater reproducibility between the two readers was considered excellent. The mean heart dose constraint<8Gy was not achieved in 25 patients (40%) and was achieved in 37 patients (60%). There was a significant correlation between mean heart dose and HCD (r s =-0.25, P=0.050) and between mean heart dose and CCDps (r s =0.25, P=0.047). The correlation between HCD and CCDps and unmet cardiac dosimetric constraints was not statistically significant., Conclusion: Our dosimetric analysis did not find that the cardiac anatomical parameters HCD and CCDps were predictive of unmet dosimetric cardiac constraints, nor that they were good predictors for cardiac exposure in left-sided BC radiotherapy comprising RNI., (Copyright © 2023 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Background: This study aims to compare the incidence of cardiac events and to identify its predictors in left breast cancer patients receiving adjuvant radiotherapy using breath-hold technique (DIBH) versus free breathing technique (FB)., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multi-center study of two arms; the free breathing arm included 208 patients who were treated with traditional radiotherapy treatment technique, while DIBH arm included 224 patients who were treated with breath-hold technique using The Varian Real-time Position Management (RPM). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of the patients from January 2010 to December 2017., Results: The mean dose to the heart and left anterior descending artery were significantly lower in the DIBH arm (2.10 ± 0.39 and 6.16 ± 0.18 Gy) compared with (4.29 ± 0.60 Gy and 12.69 ± 0.93 Gy, respectively) in the FB arm. The incidence of cardiac events was higher in the FB arm than in the DIBH arm, but it was not statically significant. Our analysis revealed that age, diabetes, hypertension, smoking, mean LAD dose, and heart mean dose were significant prognostic factors for the occurrence of cardiac events in the breath-hold arm. Hypertension, smoking, as well as heart mean dose were independent risk factors for the occurrence of cardiac events., Conclusion: Use of the DIBH technique resulted in a significant reduction in doses to the heart, LAD and lesser cardiac events incidence compared to free breathing., (© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.)

Background: We retrospectively studied the dosimetry and setup accuracy of deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) radiotherapy in right-sided breast cancer patients with regional nodal irradiation (RNI) who had completed treatment based on surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) technology by Sentinel/Catalyst system, aiming to clarify the clinical application value and related issues., Methods: Dosimetric indicators of four organs at risk (OARs), namely the heart, right coronary artery (RCA), right lung, and liver, were compared on the premise that the planning target volume met dose-volume prescription requirements. Meanwhile, the patients were divided into the edge of the xiphoid process (EXP), sternum middle (SM), and left breast wall (LBW) groups according to different positions of respiratory gating primary points. The CBCT setup error data of the three groups were contrasted for the treatment accuracy study, and the effects of different gating window heights on the right lung volume increases were compared among the three groups., Results: Compared with free breath (FB), DIBH reduced the maximum dose of heart and RCA by 739.3 ± 571.2 cGy and 509.8 ± 403.8 cGy, respectively (p < 0.05). The liver changed the most in terms of the mean dose (916.9 ± 318.9 cGy to 281.2 ± 150.3 cGy, p < 0.05). The setup error of the EXP group in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction was 3.6 ± 4.5 mm, which is the highest among the three groups. The right lung volume increases in the EXP, SM, and LBW groups were 72.3%, 69.9%, and 67.2%, respectively (p = 0.08), and the corresponding breath-holding heights were 13.5 ± 3.7 mm, 10.3 ± 2.4 mm, and 9.6 ± 2.8 mm, respectively (p < 0.05)., Conclusions: SGRT-based DIBH radiotherapy can better protect the four OARs of right-sided breast cancer patients with RNI. Different respiratory gating primary points have different setup accuracy and breath-hold height., (© 2023 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate three techniques of irradiation of left-sided breast cancer patients, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT), hybrid Intensity-Modulated Radiotherapy (h-IMRT), and hybrid Volumetric-Modulated Arc Therapy (h-VMAT, h-ARC), in terms of dose distribution in the planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OARs). The second aim was to estimate the projected relative risk of radiation-induced secondary cancers for hybrid techniques., Materials and Methods: Three treatment plans were prepared in 3D-CRT, h-IMRT, and h-VMAT techniques for each of the 40 patients, who underwent CT simulation in deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH). For hybrid techniques, plans were created by combining 3D-CRT and dynamic fields with an 80%/20% dose ratio for 3D-CRT and IMRT or VMAT. Cumulative dose-volume histograms were used to compare dose distributions within the PTV and OARs (heart, left anterior descending coronary artery [LAD], left and right lung [LL, RL], right breast [RB]). Projected risk ratios for secondary cancers were estimated relative to 3D-CRT using the organ equivalent dose (OED) concept for the Schneider's linear exponential, plateau, and full mechanistic dose-response model., Results: All plans fulfilled the PTV criterium: V95%≥95%. Compared to 3D-CRT, both hybrid techniques showed significantly better target coverage (PTV: V95%>98%, p  < 0.001), and the best conformality was achieved by h-ARC plans (CI: 1.18 ± 0.09, p  < 0.001). Compared to 3D-CRT and h-ARC, h-IMRT increased the average sum of monitor units (MU) over 129.9% ( p  < 0.001). H-ARC increased the mean dose of contralateral organs and the LL V5Gy parameter ( p  < 0.001). Both hybrid techniques significantly reduced the D max of the heart by 5 Gy. Compared to h-IMRT, h-ARC increased secondary cancer projected relative risk ratios for LL, RL, and RB by 18, 152, and 81%, respectively., Conclusions: The results confirmed that both hybrid techniques provide better target quality and OARs sparing than 3D-CRT. Hybrid VMAT delivers less MU compared to hybrid IMRT but may increase the risk of radiation-induced secondary malignancies.

Background and Purpose: Deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) protects critical organs-at-risk (OARs) for adjuvant breast radiotherapy. Guidance systems e.g. surface guided radiation therapy (SGRT) improve the positional breast reproducibility and stability during DIBH. In parallel, OARs sparing with DIBH is enhanced through different techniques e.g. prone position, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). By inducing repeated DIBH with the same level of positive pressure, mechanically-assisted and non-invasive ventilation (MANIV) could potentially combine these DIBH optimizations., Materials and Methods: We conducted a randomized, open-label, multicenter and single-institution non-inferiority trial. Sixty-six patients eligible for adjuvant left whole-breast radiotherapy in supine position were equally assigned between mechanically-induced DIBH (MANIV-DIBH) and voluntary DIBH guided by SGRT (sDIBH). The co-primary endpoints were positional breast stability and reproducibility with a non-inferiority margin of 1 mm. Secondary endpoints were tolerance assessed daily via validated scales, treatment time, dose to OARs and their inter-fraction positional reproducibility., Results: Differences between both arms for positional breast reproducibility and stability occurred at a sub-millimetric level (p < 0.001 for non-inferiority). The left anterior descending artery near-max dose (14,6 ± 12,0 Gy vs. 7,7 ± 7,1 Gy, p = 0,018) and mean dose (5,0 ± 3,5 Gy vs. 3,0 ± 2,0 Gy, p = 0,009) were improved with MANIV-DIBH. The same applied for the V 5Gy of the left ventricle (2,4 ± 4,1 % vs. 0,8 ± 1,6 %, p = 0,001) as well as for the left lung V 20Gy (11,4 ± 2,8 % vs. 9,7 ± 2,7 %, p = 0,019) and V 30Gy (8,0 ± 2,6 % vs. 6,5 ± 2,3 %, p = 0,0018). Better heart's inter-fraction positional reproducibility was observed with MANIV-DIBH. Tolerance and treatment time were similar., Conclusion: Mechanical ventilation provides the same target irradiation accuracy as with SGRT while better protecting and repositioning OARs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: The aim of this study was to analyze the heart dose for left-sided breast cancer that can be achieved during daily practice in patients treated with multicatheter brachytherapy (MCBT) accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI) and deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) using a simultaneous integrated tumor bed boost (SIB)-two different concepts which nonetheless share some patient overlap., Materials and Methods: We analyzed the nominal average dose (Dmean) to the heart as well as the biologically effective dose (BED) and the equivalent dose in 2‑Gy fractions (EQD2) for an α/β of 3 in 30 MCBT-APBI patients and 22 patients treated with DIBH plus SIB. For further dosimetric comparison, we contoured the breast planning target volume (PTV) in each of the brachytherapy planning CTs according to the ESTRO guidelines and computed tangential field plans. Mean dose (Dmean), EQD2 Dmean, and BED Dmean for three dosing schemes were calculated: 50 Gy/25 fractions and two hypofractionated regimens, i.e., 40.05 Gy/15 fractions and 26 Gy/5 fractions. Furthermore, we calculated tangential field plans without a boost for the 22 cases treated with SIB with the standard dosing scheme of 40.05 Gy/15 fractions., Results: MCBT and DIBH radiation therapy both show low-dose exposure of the heart. As expected, hypofractionation leads to sparing of the heart dose. Although MCBT plans were not optimized regarding dose to the heart, Dmean differed significantly between MCBT and DIBH (1.28 Gy vs. 1.91 Gy, p < 0.001) in favor of MCBT, even if the Dmean in each group was very low. In MCBT radiation, the PTV-heart distance is significantly associated with the dose to the heart (p < 0.001), but it is not in DIBH radiotherapy using SIB., Conclusion: In daily practice, both DIBH radiation therapy as well as MCBT show a very low heart exposure and may thus reduce long term cardiac morbidity as compared to currently available long-term clinical data of patients treated with conventional tangential field plans in free breathing. Our analysis confirms particularly good cardiac sparing with MCBT-APBI, so that this technique should be offered to patients with left-sided breast cancer if the tumor-associated eligibility criteria are fulfilled., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Radiotherapy can induce cardiac injury in left-sided breast cancer cases. Cardiac-sparing irradiation using the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique can achieve substantial dose reduction to vulnerable cardiac substructures compared with free breathing (FB). This study evaluated the dosimetric differences between both techniques at a single institution., Methods: From 2017 to 2019, 130 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent breast-conserving surgery (BCS; n = 121, 93.1%) or mastectomy (ME; n = 9, 6.9%) along with axillary lymph node staging (n = 105, 80.8%), followed by adjuvant irradiation in DIBH technique; adjuvant systemic therapy was included if applicable. 106 (81.5%) patients received conventional and 24 (18.5%) hypofractionated irradiation. Additionally, 12 patients received regional nodal irradiation. Computed tomography (CT) scans in FB and DIBH position were performed for all patients. Intrafractional 3D position monitoring of the patient surface in deep inspiration and breath gating was performed using Sentinel and Catalyst HD 3D surface scanning systems (C-RAD, Catalyst, C‑RAD AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Individual coaching and determination of breathing amplitude during the radiation planning CT was performed. Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed using standard tangential treatment portals (6 or 18 MV). The delineation of cardiac structures and both lungs was done in both the FB and the DIBH scan., Results: All dosimetric parameters for cardiac structures were significantly reduced (p < 0.01 for all). The mean heart dose (Dmean) in the DIBH group was 1.3 Gy (range 0.5-3.6) vs. 2.2 Gy (range 0.9-8.8) in the FB group (p < 0.001). The Dmean for the left ventricle (LV) in DIBH was 1.5 Gy (range 0.6-4.5), as compared to 2.8 Gy (1.1-9.5) with FB (p < 0.001). The parameters for LV (V10 Gy, V15 Gy, V20 Gy, V23 Gy, V25 Gy, V30 Gy) were reduced by about 100% (p < 0.001). The LAD Dmean in the DIBH group was 4.1 Gy (range 1.2-33.3) and 14.3 Gy (range 2.4-37.5) in the FB group (p < 0.001). The median values for LAD such as V15 Gy, V20 Gy, V25 Gy, V30 Gy, and V40 Gy decreased by roughly 100% (p < 0.001). An increasing volume of left lung in the DIBH position resulted in dose sparing of cardiac structures., Conclusion: For all ascertained dosimetric parameters, a significant dose reduction could be achieved in DIBH technique., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Introduction: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women. Treatment with drugs and radiotherapy increases the incidence of late cardiovascular disease. It is therefore particularly important to protect the heart from radiation exposure., Method: We prepared an irradiation plan for 45 patients with left breast cancer using deep breathing and normal breathing techniques. The plans were compared and analyzed. The irradiation plans were created in the Philips Pinnacle v. 16 planning system., Results: At the same target volume coverage, the use of the deep breathing technique leads to a reduction of the dose burden to the heart and to the left descending coronary branch, thus reducing the incidence of late cardiovascular complications., Discussion: The results obtained show that the use of the deep breathing technique during adjuvant radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer patients has a beneficial effect on the radiation exposure of the heart. Our results are in good agreement with similar data from national centres. We were not only able to maintain planning target volume coverage, but also to achieve an improvement of 1%. There is a significant difference in dose to the heart and coronary artery. By using the deep breathing technique, we were able to reduce the average cardiac dose by almost half (deep breathing: 2.87 Gy, normal breathing: 5.4 Gy). The coronary exposure was reduced from 19.5 Gy to 10.98 Gy., Conclusion: The accuracy of treatment can be further improved by using a respiratory gating system with a surface-guided radiotherapy system. The successful use of deep breathing technique requires professionalism of the treatment staff and good patient cooperation. It is less equipment intensive than a respiration-guided system. The deep breathing technique is no longer considered state-of-the-art in the era of breath-holding, but the experience gained in our department is worth describing because of its relevance to oncocardiology. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(11): 420-425.

Background: Active breathing coordinator (ABC)-assisted deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is an important organ sparing radiation therapy (RT) technique for left-sided breast cancer patients. Patients with advanced breast cancer undergoing chest wall and regional nodal irradiation often require a field matching technique. While field matching has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in free breathing patients, its safety and accuracy in DIBH/ABC use has not been previously reported., Purpose: To report the accuracy, feasibility, and safety of field matching with ABC/DIBH for patients receiving breast/chest wall irradiation with nodal irradiation using a three-field technique., Methods: From December 2012 to May 2018, breast cancer patients undergoing ABC/DIBH-based RT at a single institution were reviewed. For each fraction, the amount of overlap/gap between the supraclavicular and the tangential field were measured and recorded. Patient characteristics, including acute and delayed skin toxicities, were analyzed., Results: A total of 202 patients utilized ABC/DIBH and 4973 fractions had gap/overlap measurements available for analysis. The average gap/overlap measured at junction was 0.28 mm ± 0.99 mm. A total of 72% of fractions had no measurable gap/overlap (0 mm), while 5.6% had an overlap and 22.7% a gap. There was no significant trend for worsening or improvement of gap/overlap measurements with increasing fraction number per patient. OSLD measurements were compared to the planned dose. The median dose 1 cm above the junction was 106% ± 7% of planned dose (range 94%-116%). One centimeter below the junction, the median dose was 114% ± 11% of planned dose (range 95%-131%). At the junction, the median dose was 106% ± 16.3% of planned dose (range 86%-131%). Acute skin toxicity was similar to historically reported values (grade 3, 5.4%, grade 4, 0%)., Conclusion: ABC-assisted DIBH is a safe and technically feasible method of delivering RT in the setting of complex matching field technique for breast and regional nodal treatments., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics published by Wiley Periodicals, LLC on behalf of The American Association of Physicists in Medicine.)

Purpose: This study compared the dosimetric parameters of field-in-field forward intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FIF-IMRT) and fixed-field inversely optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy (FFIO-IMRT) for the whole-breast irradiation of patients undergoing right-breast lumpectomy., Material and Methods: A total of 30 patients with pT1-2N0M0 right-breast invasive ductal carcinoma were enrolled in this study. Two different treatment plans, i.e., FIF-IMRT and FFIO-IMRT, were designed for each patient. The dosimetric parameters of the two treatment plans were compared including ipsilateral lung and heart, conformity index (CI), and the homogeneity index (HI) of the planning target volume (PTV)., Results: Fixed-field inversely optimized intensity-modulated radiotherapy was found to significantly improve CI (83.302% vs. 60.146%) and HI (11.837% vs. 19.280%), and significantly reduced V 25 (18.038% vs. 19.653%) and V 30 (15.790% vs. 18.492%) of the ipsilateral lung. It also significantly increased V 5 (69.791% vs. 32.615%) of the ipsilateral lung and V 5 (61.579% vs. 3.829%), V 10 (14.130% vs. 0.381%), V 20 (1.843% vs. 0.051%), and D mean (5.211Gy vs. 1.870Gy) of the heart., Conclusion: Regardless of improving the conformity and homogeneity of PTV and reducing the ipsilateral lung irradiation volume at high doses, FFIO-IMRT significantly raised the ipsilateral lung irradiated volume at low doses, as well as the irradiation volume and mean radiation doses to the heart. This limits its use in patients with early-stage right breast cancer., (Copyright © 2022 Société française de radiothérapie oncologique (SFRO). Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Right-lateralized cardiac substructures can be substantially exposed during right breast cancer (R-BC) radiotherapy. The cardiac benefit of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) is established in combination with volumetric modulated arctherapy (VMAT) for left breast cancer with regional node irradiation but is unknown for R-BC. This study evaluated the dosimetric benefit of DIBH for locoregional irradiation of R-BC with VMAT., Material and Methods: All patients treated for R-BC with adjuvant locoregional DIBH-VMAT in the Department of Radiation Oncology of the Institut Curie (Paris, France) until December 2022 were included, corresponding to 15 patients. FB- and DIBH-VMAT plans were compared both for a normofractionated regimen (50 Gy/25fx) used for treatment and a replanned hypofractionated regimen (40 Gy/15fx). Dose to the heart, cardiac substructures (sinoatrial node (SAN), atrio-ventricular node (AVN), right coronary artery, left anterior descending coronary artery, left ventricle), ipsilateral lung and liver were retrieved and compared., Results: Mean heart dose (MHD) was 3.33 Gy with FB vs. 3.10 Gy with DIBH on normofractionated plans ( p  = 0.489), and 2.58 Gy with FB vs. 2.41 Gy with DIBH on hypofractionated plan ( p  = 0.489). The benefit of DIBH was not significant for any cardiac substructure. The most exposed cardiac substructure were the SAN (mean dose of 6.62 Gy for FB- and 5.64 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans) and the RCA (mean dose of 4.21 Gy for FB- and 4.06 Gy for DIBH-VMAT on normofractionated plans). The maximum benefit was observed for the RCA with a median individual dose reduction of 0.84 Gy on normofractionated plans ( p  = 0.599). No significant dosimetric difference were observed for right lung. Liver mean dose was significantly lower with DIBH with median values decreasing from 2.54 Gy to 0.87 Gy ( p  = 0.01)., Conclusion: Adding DIBH to efficient cardiac-sparing radiotherapy techniques, such as VMAT, is not justified in the general case for locoregional R-BC irradiation. Specific R-BC patient subpopulations who could benefit from additional DIBH combination with locoregional VMAT are yet to be identified.

We conducted a prospective study to quantitatively evaluate the movement of the chest wall to establish the simple and reproducible deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) method. The left nipple position was monitored to confirm the inspiratory state. Planning computed tomography (CT) was performed under DIBH and free-breath. We conducted radiation plans with DIBH and free-breath CT and evaluated organ at risk (OAR) and target doses according to two different plans. The relationship between positioning errors of the chest wall and patient factors was evaluated using univariate analysis and fixed-effects models. Twenty-three patients aged ≤ 60 years were enrolled during January-August 2021; 358 daily radiation treatments were evaluated. The median time of treatment room occupancy was 16 minutes (interquartile range, 14-20). The area of the planning target volume (PTV) surrounded by the 95% isodose line was more extensive in DIBH than in free breathing (71.6% vs 69.5%, P < 0.01), whereas the cardiac and left anterior descending (LAD) artery doses were lower (both P < 0.01). In the fixed-effects model analysis, the occupation time of the treatment room was correlated with positioning error. The difference between the planned and irradiated dose was the largest in the LAD branch of the coronary artery (-2.5 Gy), although the OAR dose decreased owing to positional error. The current DIBH method, wherein a single point on the chest wall is monitored to confirm that the patient is in an inspiratory state, allows radiation to be performed in a short time with a small dose error., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japanese Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Radiation Oncology.)

The purpose of this study was to investigate the impact of deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) on the positioning of thoracic structures and provide treatment planning recommendations for internal mammary chain (IMC) irradiation in breast cancer patients. Thirty-two breast cancer patients from our database underwent both DIBH and free breathing (FB) treatment planning. Contouring of the axillary lymph node clinical target volumes (CTVs: level I, II, III, IV, and IMC according to ESTRO), the internal mammary artery (IMA), the heart, and the left anterior descending artery (LAD) was performed. The following were then analyzed: the distance between the IMA and the heart, the craniocaudal distance in which IMC-CTV and heart coexist, the craniocaudal distance between the lower end of the of level III and IV and the upper end of the heart. Several significant geometric differences were observed between DIBH and FB that explain the efficacy of the DIBH for regional nodal irradiation. In >80% of patients the cranial origin of the LAD lies below the lower edge of the IMC-CTV in DIBH. In addition the slices in which the heart/LAD and IMC-CTV coexist decrease during DIBH. The IMA-heart distance is significantly larger in DIBH. Also the craniocaudal distance between the lower border of the CTV level III and IV and the upper border of the heart is larger in DIBH. The observed mechanisms during DIBH contribute significantly to the dose reduction in regional nodal irradiation. To further enhance the benefits of DIBH for the irradiation of the IMC-CTV, it is recommended to implement steep dose gradients in the caudal plane., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest CSE Advisory Boards/Advisor: BMS, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Novo- cure, Daiichi Sankyo, Icotec. Speakers Honoraria: BMS, Astra Zeneca, Roche, Novocure, Daiichi Sankyo, Icotec, Brainlab, varian, Accuray, Zeiss Meditec, Dr. Sennewald, Elekta, Merck Darmstadt, Medac. MND Speakers Honoraria: Astra Zeneca All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2023 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)