1. Comprehensive Laboratory Evaluation of a Specific Lateral Flow Assay for the Presumptive Identification of Francisella tularensis in Suspicious White Powders and Aerosol Samples
- Author
-
Segaran P Pillai, Brook Yockey, Gowri Manickam, Jeannine Petersen, Nagarajan Thirunavkkarasu, David R Hodge, Julie R Avila, Nishanth Parameswaran, Lindsay DePalma, Shashi K. Sharma, Jason G Ramage, Jawad Sarwar, Christine A Pillai, Kevin Anderson, Kodumudi Venkat Venkateswaran, Ajay Singh, Kristin W Prentice, Stephen A Morse, Carol Chapman, and John Young
- Subjects
Health (social science) ,White powder ,Rapid detection ,Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis ,030231 tropical medicine ,Virulence ,Lateral flow assay ,Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law ,Sensitivity and Specificity ,Microbiology ,Tularemia ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Francisella tularensis ,Aerosols ,Detection limit ,biology ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Environmental detection ,Reproducibility of Results ,Original Articles ,biology.organism_classification ,medicine.disease ,Bioterrorism ,White (mutation) ,Emergency Medicine ,Francisella ,Biological Assay ,Powders ,Safety Research - Abstract
We conducted a comprehensive, multi-phase laboratory evaluation of the Tularemia BioThreat Alert® (BTA) test, a lateral flow assay (LFA) for the rapid detection of Francisella tularensis. The study, conducted at 2 sites, evaluated the limit of detection (LOD) of this assay using the virulent SchuS4 strain and the avirulent LVS strain of F. tularensis. In 6-phase evaluation (linear dynamic range and reproducibility, inclusivity, near-neighbor, environmental background, white powder, and environmental filter extract), 13 diverse strains of F. tularensis, 8 Francisella near neighbors, 61 environmental background organisms, 26 white powders, and a pooled aerosol extract were tested. In the 937 tests performed, the Tularemia BTA demonstrated an LOD of 107 to 108 cfu/mL, with a sensitivity of 100.00%, specificity of 98.08%, and accuracy of 98.84%. These performance data are important for accurate interpretation of qualitative results arising from screening suspicious white powders in the field.
- Published
- 2020
- Full Text
- View/download PDF