Back to Search Start Over

Comparison of clinical diagnosis and standard laboratory and molecular methods for the diagnosis of genital ulcer disease in Lesotho: association with human immunodeficiency virus infection

Authors :
Scott Schmid
Karina Anna Orle
Judith B. Weiss
Y Dangor
Ye Htun
Ronald C. Ballard
Consuelo M. Beck-Sague
Glenda Fehler
F Radebe
David L. Trees
Stephen A. Morse
Source :
The Journal of infectious diseases. 175(3)
Publication Year :
1997

Abstract

A multiplex polymerase chain reaction (M-PCR) assay for Haemophilus ducreyi, Treponema pallidum, and herpes simplex virus (HSV) was compared with clinical and standard laboratory methods for the diagnosis of genital ulcer disease (GUD) in 105 patients; 36% were human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-seropositive. Chancroid (80%), syphilis (8%), and genital herpes (8%) were the most frequent diagnoses. H. ducreyi and HSV were isolated from ulcers of 43% and 18% of patients, respectively; in 35%, all cultures were negative and the laboratory diagnosis indeterminate. M-PCR detected H. ducreyi, T. pallidum, and HSV in 56%, 23%, and 26% of patients, respectively; (no definitive diagnosis, 6%). The proportion of patients with more than one agent was 4% by culture and 17% by M-PCR (P = .002). Resolved sensitivities of M-PCR for H. ducreyi and HSV cultures were 95% and 93%, respectively. The sensitivities of H. ducreyi and HSV cultures were 75% and 60%, respectively. HSV, detected in 47% of specimens from HIV-infected versus 16% from HIV-uninfected patients (P < .001), may be emerging as a more frequent cause of GUD.

Details

ISSN :
00221899
Volume :
175
Issue :
3
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
The Journal of infectious diseases
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....5712fae8a776d1e43fe3edd164a7f31e