201. Cross-Mode Comparability of Computer-Based Testing (CBT) Versus Paper-Pencil Based Testing (PPT): An Investigation of Testing Administration Mode among Iranian Intermediate EFL Learners
- Author
-
Monirosadat Hosseini, Seyyed Morteza Hashemi Toroujeni, and Hooshang Khoshsima
- Subjects
Linguistics and Language ,Vocabulary ,media_common.quotation_subject ,05 social sciences ,Comparability ,Applied psychology ,Computer based ,050301 education ,050109 social psychology ,Language and Linguistics ,Education ,Language assessment ,0501 psychology and cognitive sciences ,Pearson Correlation Test ,Analysis of variance ,Psychology ,0503 education ,Social psychology ,Pencil (mathematics) ,Statistical hypothesis testing ,media_common - Abstract
Advent of technology has caused growing interest in using computers to convert conventional paper and pencil-based testing (Henceforth PPT) into Computer-based testing (Henceforth CBT) in the field of education during last decades. This constant promulgation of computers to reshape the conventional tests into computerized format permeated the language assessment field in recent years. But, enjoying advantages of computers in language assessment raise the concerns of the effects that computerized mode of testing may have on CBT performance. Thus, this study investigated the score comparability of Vocabulary in Use test taken by 30 Iranian undergraduate students studying at a state university located in Chabahar region of Iran (CMU) to see whether scores from two administrations of testing mode were different. Therefore, two similar tests were administered to the male and female participants on two testing mode occasions with four weeks interval. Employing One-Way ANOVA statistical test to compare the mean scores and Pearson Correlation test to find the relationship between mode preference and performance revealed that two sets of scores were not different and gender difference was not also considered a variable that might affect performance on CBT. Based on the results, computerized version of the test can be considered a favorable alternative for the state undergraduate students in Iran.
- Published
- 2017