1. Sexual health interventions delivered to participants by mobile technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
- Author
-
Melissa J Palmer, Emma Wilson, Anasztazia Gubijev, Caroline Free, Sima Berendes, and Ona McCarthy
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,Safe Sex ,medicine.medical_specialty ,Telemedicine ,Sexual transmission ,Adolescent ,Psychological intervention ,Sexually Transmitted Diseases ,Subgroup analysis ,Dermatology ,law.invention ,Condoms ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,Condom ,law ,medicine ,Humans ,030212 general & internal medicine ,Reproductive health ,Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic ,Text Messaging ,030505 public health ,business.industry ,Infectious Diseases ,Family medicine ,Relative risk ,Meta-analysis ,Female ,Sexual Health ,0305 other medical science ,business - Abstract
BackgroundThe use of mobile technologies to prevent STIs is recognised as a promising approach worldwide; however, evidence has been inconclusive, and the field has developed rapidly. With about 1 million new STIs a day globally, up-to-date evidence is urgently needed.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of mobile health interventions delivered to participants for preventing STIs and promoting preventive behaviour.MethodsWe searched seven databases and reference lists of 49 related reviews (January 1990–February 2020) and contacted experts in the field. We included randomised controlled trials of mobile interventions delivered to adolescents and adults to prevent sexual transmission of STIs. We conducted meta-analyses and assessed risk of bias and certainty of evidence following Cochrane guidance.ResultsAfter double screening 6683 records, we included 22 trials into the systematic review and 20 into meta-analyses; 18 trials used text messages, 3 used smartphone applications and 1 used Facebook messages as delivery modes. The certainty of evidence regarding intervention effects on STI/HIV occurrence and adverse events was low or very low. There was moderate certainty of evidence that in the short/medium-term text messaging interventions had little or no effect on condom use (standardised mean differences (SMD) 0.02, 95% CI −0.09 to 0.14, nine trials), but increased STI/HIV testing (OR 1.83, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.36, seven trials), although not if the standard-of-care control already contained an active text messaging component (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.68 to 1.47, two trials). Smartphone application messages also increased STI/HIV testing (risk ratio 1.40, 95% CI 1.22 to 1.60, subgroup analysis, two trials). The effects on other outcomes or of social media or blended interventions is uncertain due to low or very low certainty evidence.ConclusionsText messaging interventions probably increase STI/HIV testing but not condom use in the short/medium term. Ongoing trials will report the effects on biological and other outcomes.
- Published
- 2021