Search

The aim of this study was to determine the wound healing outcomes of patients with a plantar diabetic foot ulcer (DFU) treated with an interdisciplinary team approach, and to identify associated variables. A retrospective observational cohort study of 140 adult patients, with a plantar DFU, treated between 2012 and 2018 at a wound care clinic of a University affiliated hospital was conducted. Predictive and explicative analyses were conducted with logistic multivariate methods and with a Receiver Operating Characteristics curve. The best predictor of wound healing at 3 months was a 41.8% wound size reduction at 4 weeks (AUC: 0.86; sensitivity: 83.1%; specificity: 67.2%, positive predictive value: 72.8%; negative predictive value: 78.9%; positive and negative likelihood ratios: 2.53 and 0.25, respectively). Main baseline variables independently associated with this predictor were: a monophasic Doppler waveform (OR 7.52, 95% CI [2.64–21.39]), cigarette smoking (OR 4.7, 95% CI [1.44–15.29]), and male gender (OR 3.58, 95% CI [1.30–9.87]). The health care provider should be cautious and intensify its management of DFUs particularly with patients of male gender; smoking, having a monophasic waveform with a hand‐held Doppler, and not achieving a minimal 41.8% wound area reduction at 4 weeks of treatment.

Background: Peripheral arterial disease is defined as a clinical disorder in which there is a stenosis or occlusion of the arteries of the limbs. The most common etiology is ischemia due to occlusive disease. The objective of this study is to assess the severity of lower-limb peripheral arterial diseases based on various Doppler parameters. Methods: This descriptive cross-sectional study comprised 55 patients with clinical signs and symptoms of lower-limb peripheral arterial disease. Both inpatients and outpatients attending the authors' institute were taken up for the study. In this study, Doppler sonography was performed using 3–12 MHz linear array and 1–7 MHz curvilinear array transducers (SAMSUNG RS80A Ultrasound System). Results: Out of 55 patients, Doppler sonography demonstrated echogenic plaques in 32 patients and corkscrew collaterals in 15 patients. Monophasic waveform with peak systolic velocity ratio of >2:1 was found in 42 patients, which is consistent with significant stenoses. Conclusion: Our study shows that Duplex Doppler sonography aided by color Doppler sonography can accurately locate the site and severity of stenosis/occlusion. It is safe, cost-effective, repeatable, and noninvasive.

The pulse waveform and current direction of transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) influence its interactions with the neural substrate; however, their role in the efficacy and reliability of single- and paired-pulse TMS measures is not fully understood. We investigated how pulse waveform and current direction affect the efficacy and test-retest reliability of navigated, single- and paired-pulse TMS measures. 23 healthy adults (aged 18–35 years) completed two identical TMS sessions, assessing resting motor threshold (RMT), motor evoked potentials (MEPs), cortical silent period (cSP), short- and long-interval intra-cortical inhibition (SICI and LICI), and intracortical facilitation (ICF) using either monophasic posterior-anterior (mono(PA); n=9), monophasic anterior-posterior (mono(AP); n=7), or biphasic (bi(AP-PA); n=7) pulses. Averages of each TMS measure were compared across the three groups and intraclass correlation coefficients were calculated to assess test-retest reliability. RMT was the lowest and cSP was the longest with bi(AP-PA) pulses, whereas MEP latency was the shortest with mono(PA) pulses. SICI and LICI had the largest effect with mono(PA) pulses, whereas only mono(AP) and bi(AP-PA) pulses resulted in significant ICF. MEP amplitude was more reliable with either mono(PA) or mono(AP) than with bi(AP-PA) pulses. LICI was the most reliable with mono(AP) pulses, whereas ICF was the most reliable with bi(AP-PA) pulses. Waveform/current direction influenced RMT, MEP latency, cSP, SICI, LICI, and ICF, as well as the reliability of MEP amplitude, LICI, and ICF. These results show the importance of considering TMS pulse parameters for optimizing the efficacy and reliability of TMS neurophysiologic measures.

Biphasic defibrillation waveforms are now accepted as being more effective at terminating ventricular fibrillation (VF) than monophasic waveforms. If two phases are better than one, this naturally leads to the hypothesis that additional phases improve efficacy. This study tests the hypothesis by adding one additional phase. We examined the efficacy of 18 different triphasic waveforms simultaneously. We tested the rate of recovery, i.e., successful defibrillation, of 21 guinea pigs (820-1,050 g) using triphasic, monophasic and biphasic defibrillation waveforms. The biphasic and monophasic were control waveforms. VF was electrically induced twenty times per animal and a single defibrillation attempt was made using a test waveform VF episode. Every waveform was adjusted to the energy required to defibrillate that animal 50% of the time, using a biphasic waveform as a control. The success rate of each triphasic waveform was pair-wise compared to the biphasic and monophasic control using the adjusted McNemar statistical test. Of the 18 triphasic waveforms tested, two were significantly poorer than the monophasic control (p

The efficacy of electrical therapy at terminating ventricular fibrillation is highly dependent on the waveform used. We present experimental results which test one theory for defibrillation waveform dependence. Forty-four defibrillation waveforms (22 monophasic, 22 biphasic) were designed according to the theoretical construct of Fishier (2000). The waveforms were then tested on 67 male guinea pigs (46 for monophasic, 21 for biphasic waveforms) using a custom designed defibrillator and 12-mm subcutaneous disc electrodes. There was considerable agreement between the theoretical and experimental results. For example, as predicted, the ascending exponential waveform of 1 ms proved to be the most effective (86.4%) monophasic waveform, where efficacy is the number of successful shocks divided by the total number delivered. In addition, the efficacy decrease with duration increase was accurately predicted by the model for monophasic waveforms. For biphasic waveforms, as predicted by the model, when the first phase was optimized, an increase in second phase duration caused an increase in defibrillation efficacy (10 of 11 tested duration pairs). We conclude that the theoretical framework adequately explains the mechanism by which the defibrillation waveform affects efficacy for monophasic waveforms and, in at least one aspect, biphasic waveforms.

Background— The passive implantable atrial defibrillator (PIAD) (with no battery or discharging capacitor and powered transcutaneously by radio-frequency energy) delivering a novel monophasic low-tilt waveform is more efficacious than the standard monophasic waveform at atrial defibrillation. Standard biphasic (STB) waveforms, however, are more efficacious and safer than monophasic waveforms. This study compared the efficacy and safety of the PIAD waveform with biphasic waveforms. Methods and Results— Sustained atrial fibrillation (AF) was induced by rapid atrial pacing. Cardioversion was attempted via 2 atrial defibrillation leads. The efficacy of the PIAD was compared with 3 biphasic waveforms (standard, single rounded, and double rounded) at varying voltage settings in 10 pigs. After a synchronized shock, hemodynamic changes between the PIAD, standard biphasic, and monophasic waveforms were compared at 1.5 and 3.0 J in 12 pigs. Myocardial injury (biochemical and histological) after ten 5-J PIAD shocks was compared with a no-shock group in 14 pigs. The PIAD 100-V setting was significantly more efficacious than the STB (100/−50 V: 100% [1.88±0.02 J] versus 90% [0.89±0.0 J]; P =0.025). No arrhythmic, hemodynamic, or myocardial injury was observed with the PIAD waveform. Conclusions— Defibrillation with the PIAD is more efficacious than with the STB waveform and appears safe. This device could provide a more effective option for cardioversion.

Background —Clinical studies have shown that biphasic shocks are more effective than monophasic shocks for ventricular defibrillation. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy of a rectilinear biphasic waveform with a standard damped sine wave monophasic waveform for the transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation. Methods and Results —In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, patients undergoing transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation were randomized to receive either damped sine wave monophasic or rectilinear biphasic shocks. Patients randomized to the monophasic protocol (n=77) received sequential shocks of 100, 200, 300, and 360 J. Patients randomized to the biphasic protocol (n=88) received sequential shocks of 70, 120, 150, and 170 J. First-shock efficacy with the 70-J biphasic waveform (60 of 88 patients, 68%) was significantly greater than that with the 100-J monophasic waveform (16 of 77 patients, 21%, P P P =0.005). The following 3 variables were independently associated with successful cardioversion: use of a biphasic waveform (relative risk, 4.2; 95% confidence intervals, 1.3 to 13.9; P =0.02), transthoracic impedance (relative risk, 0.64 per 10-Ω increase in impedance; 95% confidence intervals, 0.46 to 0.90; P =0.005), and duration of atrial fibrillation (relative risk, 0.97 per 30 days of atrial fibrillation; 95% confidence intervals, 0.96 to 0.99; P =0.02). Conclusions —For transthoracic cardioversion of atrial fibrillation, rectilinear biphasic shocks have greater efficacy (and require less energy) than damped sine wave monophasic shocks.

OBJECTIVES We compared the efficacy of a novel rectilinear biphasic waveform, consisting of a constant current first phase, with a damped sine wave monophasic waveform during transthoracic defibrillation. BACKGROUND Multiple studies have shown that for endocardial defibrillation, biphasic waveforms have a greater efficacy than monophasic waveforms. More recently, a 130-J truncated exponential biphasic waveform was shown to have equivalent efficacy to a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic waveform for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation. However, the optimal type of biphasic waveform is unknown. METHODS In this prospective, randomized, multicenter trial, 184 patients who underwent ventricular defibrillation were randomized to receive a 200-J damped sine wave monophasic or 120-J rectilinear biphasic shock. RESULTS First-shock efficacy of the biphasic waveform was significantly greater than that of the monophasic waveform (99% vs. 93%, p = 0.05) and was achieved with nearly 60% less delivered current (14 ± 1 vs. 33 ± 7 A, p CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates a superior efficacy of rectilinear biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation, particularly in patients with a high transthoracic impedance. More important, biphasic shocks defibrillated with nearly 60% less current. The combination of increased efficacy and decreased current requirements suggests that biphasic shocks as compared with monophasic shocks are advantageous for transthoracic ventricular defibrillation.

Background The most important factor for improving out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation survival rates is early defibrillation. This can be achieved if small, lightweight, inexpensive automatic external defibrillators are widely disseminated. Because automatic external defibrillator size and cost are directly affected by defibrillation waveform shape and because of the favorable experience with truncated biphasic waveforms in implantable cardioverter-defibrillators, we compared the efficacy of a truncated biphasic waveform with that of a standard damped sine monophasic waveform for transthoracic defibrillation. Methods and Results The principal goal of this multicenter, prospective, randomized, blinded study was to compare the first-shock transthoracic defibrillation efficacy of a 130-J truncated biphasic waveform with that of a standard 200-J monophasic damped sine wave pulse using anterior thoracic pads in the course of implantable cardioverter-defibrillator testing. Pad-pad ECGs were also examined after transthoracic defibrillation. After the elimination of data for 24 patients who did not meet all protocol criteria, the results from 294 patients were analyzed. The 130-J truncated biphasic pulse and the 200-J damped sine wave monophasic pulse resulted in first-shock efficacy rates of 86% and 86%, respectively ( P =.97). ST-segment levels measured 10 seconds after the shock in 151 patients in sinus rhythm were −0.26±1.58 and −1.86±1.93 mm for the 130- and 200-J shocks, respectively ( P Conclusions We found that 130-J biphasic truncated transthoracic shocks defibrillate as well as the 200-J monophasic damped sine wave shocks that are traditionally used in standard transthoracic defibrillators and result in fewer ECG abnormalities after the shock.

Orientador: Orlando Petrucci Junior Tese (doutorado) - Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas Resumo: Introdução: O aumento do limiar de estimulação ventricular (LEV) tem sido observado após a administração de choque elétrico de cardioversão/desfibrilação transtorácico (CDT) para desfibrilação ventricular, contudo, poucos estudos têm avaliado este fenômeno no que diz respeito à energia e a forma de onda empregada para a CDT. Este estudo analisou o LEV após CDT de 360J, comparando-se os resultados após aplicação de onda de energia Mono e Bi. Método: Em suínos Landrace femininos foram implantados sistema de estimulação permanente de marcapasso, divididos em três grupos: sem indução de fibrilação ventricular (FV) e CDT com formato de onda monofásica (Mono) e bifásica (Bi) (Grupo I); indução FV, um minuto de observação sem intervenção, dois minutos de massagem cardíaca externa, e CDT Mono e Bi (Grupo II) e indução de FV, dois minutos de observação sem intervenção, quatro minutos de massagem cardíaca externa e CDT Mono e Bi (Grupo III). Após CDT, o LEV foi avaliado a cada minuto durante dez minutos. Resultados: Um total de 143 experimentos foram concluídos. No final do período de observação, os grupos I e II mostraram valores constantes LEV. O Grupo III mostrou aumento no LEV Mono e Bi com energia externa, sem diferença entre os formatos de ondas externas. O formato Mono foi associada a valores mais elevados de LEV quando o tempo de parada cardiorrespiratória (PCR) foi maior, o que não foi verificado na Bi. Conclusão: A CDT não tem impacto significativo sobre o LEV. Com onda Mono, observou-se aumento do LEV quando o período de PCR foi mais longo Abstract: Introduction. Although an increase in the ventricular pacing threshold (VPT) has been observed after administration of transthoracic shock for ventricular defibrillation, few studies have evaluated the phenomenon in respect to the defibrillation waveform energy. Therefore, this study examined the VPT behavior after transthoracic shock with a monophasic or biphasic energy waveform. Method. Domestic Landrace female piglets implanted with a permanent pacemaker stimulation system were divided into 3 groups: no ventricular fibrillation (VF) induction and transthoracic shock with monophasic or biphasic energy (group I); VF induction, 1 minute of observation without intervention, 2 minutes of external cardiac massage, and transthoracic shock with monophasic or biphasic energy (group II); and VF induction, 2 minutes of observation without intervention, 4 minutes of external cardiac massage, and transthoracic shock with monophasic or biphasic energy (group III). After external shock, the VPT was evaluated every minute for 10 minutes. Results. A total of 143 experiments were performed. At the end of the observation period, groups I and II showed steady VPT values. Group III showed an increase in VPT with monophasic or biphasic external energy, with no difference between the external energy sources. The monophasic but not the biphasic waveform was associated with higher VPT values when the VF was longer. Conclusion. Defibrillation does not have a significant impact on pacing threshold, but a longer VF period is related to a higher VPT after defibrillation with monophasic waveform Doutorado Fisiopatologia Cirúrgica Doutor em Ciências

Biphasic waveforms reduce defibrillation threshold compared with corresponding monophasic waveforms. However, effects of fibrillation duration on relative efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveforms are unknown. This study used a newly developed defibrillation model, the isolated right- and left-sided working rabbit heart, with epicardial defibrillation electrodes, to compare threshold for a monophasic waveform (5 msec rectangular) and an asymmetrical biphasic waveform (5 msec each pulse, V2 = 50% V1). Mean voltage defibrillation threshold (V50) was determined from sigmoidal probability of successful defibrillation versus shock intensity curves after 5, 15, and 30 seconds of fibrillation in a paired study with 10 hearts. Results showed that biphasic waveforms had significantly lower voltage and energy thresholds at all fibrillation durations and that their relative efficacy improved with increasing fibrillation duration. Biphasic voltage threshold was 38.2 +/- 2.2, 44.7 +/- 4.8, and 46.6 +/- 3.2 V after 5, 15, and 30 seconds of fibrillation compared with monophasic thresholds of 51.7 +/- 4.4 (p less than 0.002), 63.0 +/- 7.6 (p less than 0.05), and 72.1 +/- 3.9 V (p less than 0.005). Biphasic waveform energy threshold was 0.67 that for the monophasic waveform after 5 seconds of fibrillation (0.12 +/- 0.01 versus 0.18 +/- 0.03 J, p less than 0.05). The ratio between biphasic waveform threshold and monophasic waveform threshold (B/M) decreased to 0.62 at 15 seconds. At 30 seconds, B/M was 0.52 (0.17 +/- 0.02 versus 0.33 +/- 0.04 J, p less than 0.02). This study also showed that biphasic waveform threshold was a nonlinear function of monophasic waveform threshold so that improved biphasic defibrillator waveform efficacy was greatest for hearts having higher monophasic thresholds.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

ObjectivesThe purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that superiority of biphasic waveform (BW) over monophasic waveform (MW) defibrillation shocks is attributable to less intracellular calcium (Cai) transient heterogeneity.BackgroundThe mechanism by which BW shocks have a higher defibrillation efficacy than MW shocks remains unclear.MethodsWe simultaneously mapped epicardial membrane potential (Vm) and Cai during 6-ms MW and 3-ms/3-ms BW shocks in 19 Langendorff-perfused rabbit ventricles. After shock, the percentage of depolarized area was plotted over time. The maximum (peak) post-shock values (VmP and CaiP, respectively) were used to measure heterogeneity. Higher VmP and CaiP imply less heterogeneity.ResultsThe defibrillation thresholds for BW and MW shocks were 288 ± 99 V and 399 ± 155 V, respectively (p = 0.0005). Successful BW shocks had higher VmP (88 ± 9%) and CaiP (70 ± 13%) than unsuccessful MW shocks (VmP 76 ± 10%, p < 0.001; CaiP 57 ± 8%, p < 0.001) of the same shock strength. In contrast, for unsuccessful BW and MW shocks of the same shock strengths, the VmP and CaiP were not significantly different. The MW shocks more frequently created regions of low Cai surrounded by regions of high Cai (post-shock Cai sinkholes). The defibrillation threshold for MW and BW shocks became similar after disabling the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) with thapsigargin and ryanodine.ConclusionsThe greater efficacy of BW shocks is directly related to their less heterogeneous effects on shock-induced SR Ca release and Cai transients. Less heterogeneous Cai transients reduces the probability of Cai sinkhole formation, thereby preventing the post-shock reinitiation of ventricular fibrillation.

Objective: To compare the efficacy of cardioversion in patients with atrial fibrillation between monophasic damped sine waveform and rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks at a high initial energy level and with a conventional paddle position. Design: Prospective randomised study. Patients and setting: 227 patients admitted for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation to a tertiary referral centre. Results: 70% of 109 patients treated with an initial 200 J monophasic shock were cardioverted to sinus rhythm, compared with 80% of 118 patients treated with an initial 120 J biphasic shock (NS). After the second shock (360 J monophasic or 200 J biphasic), 90% of the patients were in sinus rhythm in both groups. The mean cumulative energy used for successful cardioversion was 306 J for monophasic shocks and 159 J for biphasic shocks (p < 0.001). Conclusions: A protocol using monophasic waveform shocks in a 200–360 J sequence has the same efficacy (90%) as a protocol using rectilinear biphasic waveform shocks in a 120–200 J sequence. This equal efficacy is achieved with a significantly lower mean delivered energy level using the rectilinear biphasic shock waveform. The potential advantage of lower energy delivery for cardioversion of atrial fibrillation needs further study.

Newly developed biphasic waveforms improve defibrillation efficacy both by reduction of defibrillation threshold and by amelioration of shock-induced dysfunction depending on the relative shape of the first and second pulses. Each of these independent effects improves the waveform's safety factor, the ratio between the shock intensity that produces a specific degree of postshock dysfunction and the shock intensity that produces defibrillation (or cellular excitation). Symmetrical waveforms reduce defibrillation threshold to about 60% that of the corresponding monophasic waveform, probably by reduction of excitation threshold for ischemic cells, but increase postshock arrhythmias. Biphasic waveforms with 10% "tails" reduce postshock arrhythmias. This study tests the hypothesis that these independent mechanisms for improvement of defibrillation efficacy can be combined into a single triphasic waveform that will have a higher safety factor than either of the two biphasic waveforms of which it is composed. Cultured myocardial cells were subjected to high-intensity electric-field stimulation with a control monophasic rectangular waveform, a symmetrical biphasic waveform, and a triphasic waveform consisting of the biphasic waveform with an added 10% "tail." Each waveform portion was 5 msec in duration. Photocell mechanograms monitored contractile activity. We found that the duration of postshock arrest of spontaneous contractile activity increased with stimulus intensity for all waveforms. The voltage gradient producing a 4-second arrest after the biphasic waveform shock was 80.6 +/- 1.3% that of the control waveform (100%), while the voltage gradient for the triphasic waveforms was 87.1 +/- 0.73% of control. The difference between biphasic and triphasic waveforms was significant (p less than 0.001).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biphasic waveforms have been suggested as a superior waveform for ventricular defibrillation. To test this premise, a prospective randomized intraoperative evaluation of defibrillation efficacy of monophasic and biphasic waveform pulses was performed in 22 survivors of out of hospital ventricular fibrillation who were undergoing cardiac surgery for implantation of an automatic defibrillator.The initial waveform used in a patient for defibrillation testing, either monophasic or biphasic, was randomly selected. Subsequently, each patient served as his or her own control for defibrillation testing of the other waveform. The defibrillation threshold was defined as the lowest pulse amplitude that would effectively terminate ventricular fibrillation with a single discharge delivered 10 s after initiation of an episode of ventricular fibrillation induced with alternating current. Each defibrillation pulse was recorded oscilloscopically, and defibrillation pulse voltage, current, resistance and stored energy were measured.Fifteen (68%) of the 22 patients had a lower defibrillation threshold with the biphasic pulse, 3 (14%) had a lower threshold with the monophasic pulse and 4 (18%) had equal defibrillation thresholds (within 1.0 J) regardless of waveform. The mean leading edge defibrillation threshold voltage was 317 ± 105 V when the monophasic pulse was used and 267 ± 102 V (16% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.008). Mean leading edge defibrillation threshold current was 7.9 ± 3.7 A when the monophasic pulse was used and 6.8 ± 3.8 A (14% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.051). There were no differences in system resistance with the two waveforms: the leading edge resistance for the monophasic pulse was 45.3 ± 17.5 and 44.1 ± 14.4 ω for the biphasic pulse (p = 0.183). The stored energy defibrillation threshold was 8.5 ± 6.1 J when the monophasic pulse was used and 6.3 ± 5.2 J (26% less) when the biphasic pulse was used (p = 0.028). These findings show that in the majority of patients, biphasic pulse defibrillation is more efficient than monophasic pulse defibrillation.

Implantable cardiac defibrillators are now an accepted form of therapy for patients with life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias that cannot be controlled by antiarrhythmic drugs. These devices could be made even more acceptable if they were smaller, had increased longevity and the surgical procedure for implantation was less invasive. Reducing the energy requirements for internal defibrillation with use of a nonthoracotomy lead system would make all of these goals achievable. Monophasic and double and single capacitor biphasic waveforms were compared in 14 anesthetized dogs (25.5 ± 2.2 kg) with use of a nonthoracotomy lead system that has previously been shown to distribute the delivered voltage throughout the heart more equally. Cathodal catheter electrodes were placed in the right ventricular apex and outflow tract. The anodal electrode was a large cutaneous R2 patch placed over the left side of the chest. The mean energy requirement for defibrillation when a single capacitor biphasic waveform was used was significantly less (6.4 ± 2.6 J) than that for either the double capacitor biphasic or the monophasic waveform (18.0 ± 8.0 and 17.4 ± 8.0 J, respectively) of the same duration. Unexpectedly, the leading edge voltage for the phase I of the single capacitor biphasic waveform was significantly less (266 ± 51 V) than that for either the double capacitor biphasic or the monophasic waveform (336 ± 76 and 427 ± 117 V, respectively). In conclusion, in large dogs, defibrillation is possible at low energy levels with a single capacitor biphasic waveform.