Search

GABAergic hypothesis of anxiety was introduced many years ago, however, a limited number of supporting data were accumulated so far and the role of GABA(B) receptors in behavioral processes related to the anxiety disorders has not been resolved. In the present study, we examined anxiolytic activity of CGP 36742, a potent and selective GABA(B) receptor antagonist, in rodent tests/models. We have demonstrated that CGP 36742 (30 mg/kg) is active in several animal tests detecting anxiolytic activity (the elevated plus-maze, conflict drinking test and four-plate test). Moreover, we examined the effects of another antagonist--CGP51176 and agonist--CGP 44532 of GABA(B) receptor in the four-plate test in mice. CGP 51176 (5 or 8 mg/kg) was inactive, while CGP 44532 (0.125 mg/kg) exhibited anxiogenic-like effect. These preclinical data further implicate GABA(B) receptor function in anxiety, and support the GABAergic hypothesis of this disorder.

The present study was designed to evaluate the effects of BIBO 3304 in the Vogel's conflict drinking test and in the water intake test in non-deprived rats after injection of the drug into the basolateral nucleus of the amygdaloid complex. BIBO 3304 was given at the doses of 25, 100 and 200 pmol/0.5 microl/site. We investigated also the effect of 5-hydroxytryptophan (5-HTP), given intraperitoneally at a dose of 20 mg/kg, which was used as a positive control in the water intake test. Water consumption was measured 1, 2, 4, 6 and 24 h after drug administration. We found that water intake was increased both after 5-HTP and BIBO 3304 administration.

Two series of novel 4-ethyl- or 4-propyl-1-arylpiperazines (5-12) with the 4,4'-disubstituted diphenylmethylamino (series a) or the diphenylmethoxy (series b) terminal fragment were synthesized and evaluated for their binding affinity at 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors. The influence of the introduction of 4-methyl, 4-chloro or 4-fluoro substituents at both phenyl rings of that terminal moiety on in vitro and in vivo 5-HT1A receptor activity of those modified compounds was discussed. Compounds 5a, 6a, 9a-12a, 5b, 6b, 9b, 11b and 12b displayed high to fairly high affinity for 5-HT1A receptors (Ki = 2.4-72 nM). Compounds of both series showed low or very low 5-HT2A receptor affinity (Ki = 155-5400 nM). Amines 5a, 6a, 11a, and their ether analogs 5b, 6b and 11b, also possessed high or moderate alpha(1)-adrenoceptor affinity (K(i) = 6-104 nM). The functional activity of compounds 5a, 6a, 9a-12a, 5b, 8b, 9b, 11b and 12b was tested in vivo in the commonly used animal models. The majority of those ligands behaved like 5-HT1A receptor antagonists, their influence on the pre- and/or postsynaptic sites being diverse, though. They exhibited characteristics of partial agonists of postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptors (11a), of weak antagonists of pre- and postsynaptic sites (12a, 9b), of antagonists of presynaptic (5a) or of antagonists of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors (9a, 10a, 5b, 8b, 11b and 12b) while, 6a was devoid of functional activity at those receptors. The above findings indicate that introduction of 4-methyl, 4-chloro or 4-fluoro substituents to the diphenylmethyl part of the 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazines tested in vivo may modify their 5-HT1A receptor functional activity.

Several lines of evidence indicate that inhibition of the metabotropic glutamate (mGlu) receptor 5 produces anxiolytic-like effects in rodents. Peptide neurotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY) produces an anxiolytic effect in rats after intraventricular or intra-amygdalar administration. Many classes of anxiolytic drugs exert their effect through the GABA-benzodiazepine (BZD) receptor complex. Therefore, in the present study we have investigated whether the anxiolytic action of MPEP (2-methyl-6-(phenylethynyl)pyridyne), an mGlu5 receptor antagonist, is mediated by a mechanism involving either the GABA-BZD receptor complex or NPY receptor. In the behavioral studies, the anxiolytic activity of MPEP (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was examined using plus-maze test. The BZD antagonist flumazenil (10 mg/kg, i.p.) was given to one group of rats and Y1 receptor antagonist BIBO 3304 (((R)-N-[[4-(aminocarbonylaminomethyl) phenyl] methyl]-N2-(diphenylacetyl)-argininamide trifluoroacetate)3304) (200 pmol/site, intra-amygdala) to the other. It was found that anxiolytic effects of MPEP were not changed by flumazenil, but were abolished by BIBO 3304. Immunohistochemical studies showed a high density of mGlu5 receptor immunoreactivity (IR) in the amygdala. The effect of MPEP on NPY expression in the amygdala was studied using immunohistochemistry (IH) and radioimmunoassay (RIA). Both methods showed a diminution of NPY IR expression, to about 43% (IH) or 81% (RIA) of the control level after multiple administrations, but we observed an increase up to 148% of the control after single MPEP administration. These effects may suggest a release of NPY from nerve terminals after MPEP administration. Our results indicate that the anxiolytic action of MPEP is conveyed through NPY neurons with the involvement of Y1 receptors in the amygdala and that BZD receptors do not significantly contribute to these effects.

A series of 15 new 2-H- and 2-substituted 5-[omega-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-piperazinyl]-alkyl]-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-gamma-carboline derivatives were prepared, and their affinity for 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A serotonin receptors was determined. Most of those hybrid compounds were found to bind with high affinity to 5-HT1A sites (Ki < 50 nM; 2d, 3a, 3b, 3d, 3e, 4b, 4d, 4e) and moreover two of them (4d, 4e) were mixed 5-HT1A/5-HT2A ligands. The results of a lower lip retraction test in rats indicated that the 2-acetyl derivative with a dimethylene spacer (2d) had features of a postsynaptic 5-HT1A receptor agonist, whereas its analogues with longer chains (3d and 4d) behaved like antagonists. Both 5-HT2A receptor ligands (4d, 4e) at high doses inhibited the (+/-)-DOI-induced head twitches in mice and were classified as weak antagonists of those receptors.

The aim of the present study was to examine a potential anxiolytic-like action of (+)-7-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (7-OH-DPAT), a preferential dopamine D(3) receptor agonist, and (N-[4-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]butyl]-2-naphthylcarboxamide (BP 897), partial dopamine D(3) receptor agonist. Diazepam was used as a reference compound. The anxiolytic-like effect of those drugs was tested in the conflict drinking test (Vogel test) in male Wistar rats. The obtained results showed that 7-OH-DPAT and BP 897 (like diazepam) induced anxiolytic-like effects in the conflict drinking test. 7-OH-DPAT (0.05 and 0.1 mg/kg), BP 897 (0.5 mg/kg) and diazepam (5 and 10 mg/kg), tested at the effective doses in an animal model, did not affect motor coordination but produced significant reduction in exploratory activity in the open field test. These data suggest that preferential dopamine D(3) agonists may play a role in the therapy of anxiety, however, further studies are necessary to elucidate the mechanism of these actions.

Clinical data suggest that coadministration of pindolol, a 5-HT1A/5-HT1B/beta-adrenoceptor antagonist, and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) may shorten the time of onset of a clinical action and may increase beneficial effects of the therapy of drug-resistant depression. Effects of combined administration of SSRIs and 5-HT receptor ligands are currently evaluated in animal models for the detection of an antidepressant-like activity; however, the obtained results turned out to be inconsistent. The aim of the present study was to investigate effects of a 5-HT1A antagonist (WAY 100635), 5-HT1B antagonists (SB 216641 and GR 127935) or pindolol, given in combination with paroxetine or fluoxetine (SSRIs), in the forced swimming test in rats (Porsolt test). When given alone, paroxetine (10 and 20 mg/kg), fluoxetine (10 and 20 mg/kg), WAY 100635 (0.1 and 1 mg/kg), SB 216641 (2 mg/kg), GR 127935 (10 and 20 mg/kg) and pindolol (4 and 8 mg/kg) did not shorten the immobility time of rats in that test. Interestingly, SB 216641 administered alone at a dose of 4 mg/kg produced a significant reduction of the immobility time in that test. A combination of paroxetine (20 mg/kg) and WAY 100635 or pindolol failed to reveal a significant interaction; on the other hand, when paroxetine was given jointly with SB 216641 (2 mg/kg) or GR 127935 (10 and 20 mg/kg), that combination showed a significant antiimmobility action in the forced swimming test in rats. The active behaviors in that test did not reflect increased general activity because combined administration of both the 5-HT1B antagonists and paroxetine failed to alter the locomotor activity of rats, measured in the open field test. Coadministration of fluoxetine and all the antagonists used did not affect the behavior of rats in the forced swimming test. The obtained results seem to indicate that blockade of 5-HT1B receptors, but not 5-HT1A ones, can facilitate the antidepressant-like effect of paroxetine in the forced swimming test in rats. No interaction was observed between fluoxetine and 5-HT1A/5-HT1B receptor antagonists.