Landscape researchers have described different options for landscape classifications and have suggested the approximate size of landscape units for various scale levels of study and the most suitable data layers (representing biophysical characteristics) for differentiating them. The literature already contains examples of evaluating data layers with regard to their information value, their correlation with one another, and so on, but less research has been done on the suitability of data layers from the perspective of the scale of landscape research. The objective of this paper is to propose a quantitative method to assess different data layers by landscape classification scale. The proposed method is based on systematic sequential multilevel division of the study area, calculating the average moderate coefficient of variation for each scale level, and comparing calculations between scale levels. It can be used to objectively determine which raster data layers are more suitable for defining large landscape units and which are more suitable for defining small ones. We tested the method for Slovenia, a small country at the junction of the Alps, Pannonian Basin, Mediterranean, and Dinaric Alps with a high landscape diversity. To test the method, we systematically divided the country into smaller units using ten differently structured grids (for the case of Slovenia, we used squares with a baseline of 1, 10, 20 km, and so on up to 100 km). For each data layer, we calculated the average moderate coefficient of variation for each division and compared it with the average coefficient of variation for the highest level, which represented the country as one whole unit. The ratios allowed us to classify the data layers into categories and assess which data layers are more important in landscape classification at a small scale, which ones are more important at a large scale, and which ones function as noise. As expected, variation diminishes with a smaller baseline in all cases, but the gradient of decreasing variation is different. We also studied the categorization of data layers using a hierarchical classification method. Following to the proposed method, it is possible to create various categories of data layers by the landscape classification scale for a certain area. The method can be used for any area and is an option for reducing subjectivity in selecting data layers for landscape analysis classification for the most general purposes (e.g., production of landscape classifications for education). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]