Search

Objectives: The aim of this study was to examine prognostic differences between liver resection (LR) and percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (PRFA) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) based on preoperative predicted microvascular invasion (MVI) risk. Methods: Data on consecutive patients who underwent LR (n = 1344) or PRFA (n = 853) for hepatitis B virus-related HCC within the Milan criteria (MC) were analyzed. A preoperative nomogram was used to estimate MVI risk. Overall survival (OS), time to recurrence, and patterns of recurrence were compared using propensity score matching. Results: The concordance indices of the nomogram to predict MVI were 0.813 and 0.781 among LR patients with HCC within the MC or ≤ 3 cm, respectively. LR and PRFA resulted in similar 5-year recurrence and OS for patients with nomogram-predicted low-risk of MVI. LR provided better 5-year recurrence and OS versus PRFA for patients with high-risk of MVI (71.6% vs. 80.7%, p = 0.013; 47.9% vs. 34.0%, p = 0.002, for HCC within the MC; 62.3% vs. 78.8%, p = 0.020; 63.6% vs. 38.3%, p = 0.015, for HCC ≤ 3 cm). Among high-risk patients, LR was associated with lower recurrence and improved OS compared with PRFA, on multivariate analysis [hazard ratio (HR) 0.78, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.63–0.97, and HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.52–0.88, for HCC within the MC; HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.32–0.81, and HR 0.47, 95% CI 0.26–0.84, for HCC ≤ 3 cm], and resulted in less early and local recurrence than PRFA (42.4% vs. 54.8%, p = 0.007, and 31.2% vs. 46.1%, p = 0.007, for HCC within the MC; 27.9% vs. 50.8%, p = 0.016, and 15.6% vs. 39.5%, p = 0.046, for HCC ≤ 3 cm). Conclusions: LR was oncologically superior over PRFA for early HCC patients with predicted high-risk of MVI. LR was associated with better local disease control than PRFA in these patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: To compare combined percutaneous radiofrequency ablation and ethanol injection (RFA-PEI) with hepatic resection (HR) in the treatment of resectable solitary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with 2.1-5.0 cm diameter.Methods: From June 2009 to December 2015, 271 patients whom underwent RFA-PEI (n = 141) or HR (n = 130) in three centres were enrolled. The overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) between groups were compared with Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank tests. Complications, hospital stay and cost were assessed.Results: The OS rates at 1, 3 and 5 years were 93.5%, 72.7%, 58.6% in RFA-PEI group and 82.3%, 57.5%, 51.8% in HR group (p = 0.021). The corresponding 1-, 3- and 5-year RFS rates were 65.8%, 41.3%, 34.3% in RFA-PEI group and 50.5%, 33.8%, 28.4% in HR group (p = 0.038). For patients with 2.1-3.0 cm tumours, the 1-, 3- and 5-year OS after RFA-PEI and HR were 98.0%, 82.3%, 74.2% and 89.4%, 65.1%, 61.9%, respectively (p = 0.024). The corresponding RFS were 79.6%, 54.7%, 45.1% in RFA-PEI group, and 57.6%, 43.9%, 31.7% in HR group, respectively (p = 0.020). RFA-PEI was superior to HR in major complication rates, length of hospital stay and cost (all p < 0.001).Conclusion: RFA-PEI had a survival benefit over HR in the treatment of solitary HCCs, especially for those with 2.1-3.0 cm in diameter.Key Points: • RFA-PEI provided superior survival to HR in solitary HCC with 2.1-5.0 cm in diameter. • RFA-PEI is superior to HR in complications, length of hospital stay and cost. • RFA-PEI might be an alternative treatment for solitary HCC within 5.0 cm in diameter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility, local efficacy and long-term outcomes of microwave (MW) ablation for the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) that met up-to-seven criteria.Methods: Between January 2007 and January 2012, 142 HCC patients with 294 nodules, which conformed to up-to-seven criteria, were enrolled into this retrospective study. All patients were followed up for more than 3 years after receiving MW ablation. Technical success, complications, local tumour progression (LTP) and distant recurrence (DR) were monitored. Recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors were analysed.Results: Primary technical efficacy was achieved in 95.2% (280/294) of the carcinomatous nodules, and major complications occurred in four (2.8%) patients. Among the 294 tumours, LTP was observed in 44 (15.0%) tumours. Among the 142 patients, DR was observed in 97 (68.3%) patients. The estimated OS rates after MW ablation at 1, 3 and 5 years were 97.2%, 75.4% and 50.6%, respectively; and the corresponding RFS rates were 76.1%, 33.1% and 19.5%, respectively.Conclusions: MW ablation is a safe and effective treatment with a high rate of primary technical efficacy for patients with HCC that met up-to-seven criteria.Key Points: • The first study expanding MW ablation to HCC category beyond Milan criteria. • The first report that used up-to-seven criteria as indications for MW ablation. • HCC of up-to-seven criteria viewed as a subgroup of BCLC stage B. • MW ablation is safe and effective for treating HCC within up-to-seven criteria. • MW ablation is preferable in treating unresectable HCC within up-to-seven criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To evaluate the clinical efficacy of the combined treatment with transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) and percutaneous ethanol injection (PEI) on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). 312 patients with moderate or advanced HCCs were divided into two groups: 170 cases underwent TACE treatment alone, 142 cases were treated with TACE and PEI under B-ultrasound guidance. The rates of reduction in tumor diameter and the decline in serum AFP level were 41.2% and 40.4% in the TACE group and 75.4% and 74.1% in the TACE + PEI group respectively. The 6,12 and 24 months survival rates in the TACE group were 77.1%, 34,1% and 18.8%, respectively and in the TACE + PEI group 87.3%, 62.0% and 38.0%, respectively. Overall, there was a significant difference between the two treatment groups ( P<0.05). Treatment on HCCs with TACE + PEI is convenient, safe and results in better survival rates than TACE alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]