Search

Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by real-time PCR is not yet standardized across laboratories. We have implemented a standardization protocol to compare the performance of thirteen commercial and in-house approaches. Despite differences on threshold values of samples, all assays were able to detect at least 20M. pneumoniae genomes per reaction., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The number of pathogens involved in community-acquired pneumonia, with varying susceptibilities to antimicrobials, is numerous constituting an enormous challenge for diagnostic microbiology. Differentiation of infections due to Streptococcus pneumoniae and those due to Mycoplasma pneumoniae, Chlamydophila pneumoniae, or L. pneumophila as well as those due to viruses is essential to allow correct decisions concerning the antibiotics to be administered. The sensitivity and specificity of real-time simplex and multiplex nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA), and simplex PCR were compared for the detection of M. pneumoniae, C. pneumoniae and Legionella spp. in respiratory specimens from hospitalized and outpatients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Two hundred fifty one respiratory specimens were collected from 147 patients with CAP. NASBA was done using the NucliSens Basic Kit (bioMérieux). PCR for M. pneumoniae and C. pneumoniae was done as described earlier [Ieven, M., Ursi, D., Van Bever, H., Quint, W., Niesters, H. G. M., and Goossens, H. 1996. Detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae by two polymerase chain reactions and role of M. pneumoniae in acute respiratory tract infections in pediatric patients. J. Infect. Dis. 173, 1445-14452.; Ursi, D., Ieven, M., Van Bever, H. P., and Goossens, H. 1998. Construction of an internal control for the detection of Chlamydia pneumoniae by PCR. Mol. Cellul. Probes. 12, 235-238.]. A real-time PCR was developed to detect L. pneumophila whereas a real-time NASBA was designed to detect Legionella spp. All samples with discordant results were re-analysed. Compared to an expanded gold standard the sensitivities of the different techniques, were 77.8%, 100%, and 100% for detection of M. pneumoniae; and 50%, 100%, and 50% for detection of L. pneumophila by PCR, real-time simplex NASBA, and real-time multiplex NASBA, respectively. C. pneumoniae was detected in two samples only. Simplex real-time NASBA proved to be more sensitive than simplex PCR and was also more sensitive than real-time multiplex NASBA, as previously found with spiked clinical specimens. It's practical attractiveness pleads for further optimalisation of the multiplex approach.

Nucleic acids were extracted from 215 throat swabs from patients with community-acquired pneumonia by the manual Boom extraction, the NucliSens miniMAG and the Qiagen DNA blood kit and amplified respectively by in-house real-time NASBA, NucliSens EasyQ reagents, and real-time PCR for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae and Chlamydophila pneumoniae. Five out of 215 throat swabs were found to be C. pneumoniae positive by all techniques used. A total of 11 out of 215 throat swabs were positive for M. pneumoniae; 10/215 by Qiagen extraction and PCR amplification and 9/215 by NucliSens miniMAG and NucliSens EasyQ amplification. The NucliSens miniMAG and NucliSens EasyQ applications were successfully coupled to detect both organisms in throat swabs.

Isothermal nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) was applied to detect Legionella 16S rRNA. The assay was originally developed as a Legionella pneumophila conventional NASBA assay with electrochemiluminescence (ECL) detection and was subsequently adapted to a L. pneumophila real-time NASBA format and a Legionella spp. real-time NASBA using molecular beacons. L. pneumophila RNA prepared from a plasmid construct was used to assess the analytical sensitivity of the assay. The sensitivity of the NASBA assay was 10 molecules of in vitro wild type L. pneumophila RNA and 0.1-1 colony-forming units (CFU) of L. pneumophila. In spiked respiratory specimens, the sensitivity of the NASBA assays was 1-10000 CFU of L. pneumophila serotype 1 depending on the background. After dilution of the nucleic acid extract prior to amplification, 1-10 CFU of L. pneumophila serotype 1 could be detected with both detection methods. Finally, 27 respiratory specimens, well characterized by culture and PCR, collected during a L. pneumophila outbreak, were tested by conventional and real-time NASBAs. All 11 PCR positive samples were positive by conventional NASBA, 9/11 and 10/11 were positive by L. pneumophila real-time NASBA and Legionella spp. real-time NASBA, respectively.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with real-time detection using two adjacent fluorescent probes in a Lightcycler instrument was applied for detection of the Mycoplasma pneumoniae P1 protein gene. To monitor inhibition in each sample an internal control was constructed that can be amplified by the same primers but detected by different probes and dual color detection. The real-time PCR was applied on 115 respiratory samples from 82 patients and compared to a conventional PCR. There was 100% agreement between the assays, but the real-time PCR proved to be highly superior in speed with a much lower risk of false positives by laboratory contamination.

A commercially available nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) NucliSens Basic Kit (NBK) assay for the detection of Mycoplasma pneumoniae 16S rRNA in respiratory specimens was developed and compared to standard NASBA and PCR assays previously developed in our laboratory. The specificity and sensitivity of the NBK assay was comparable to the specificity and sensitivity of the corresponding standard NASBA assay. The NBK offers standardized reagents for the development of a NASBA assay for the detection of M. pneumoniae in respiratory specimens and is easily adaptable to other amplification targets.

A panel of 78 respiratory samples collected from 43 patients was analyzed in three different Centers for the presence of Mycoplasma pneumoniae DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). One Center collected the samples and extracted the DNA by two different methods. DNA extracted according to the first method was amplified using primers targetting the 16 S rRNA gene. DNA extracted according to the second method was amplified using the same primers in a semi-nested format and was sent to the two other Centers. The latter Centers both used the same primers targetting the P1 gene but with a different detection format. Thirty-nine samples (50%) from 19 patients were positive by at least two PCR assays. None of the laboratories were free of false positive or false negative PCR results. Calculated specificities of the individual PCR assays ranged from 97.4% to 87.2% and sensitivities ranged from 97.4% to 89.2%. Complement fixation was done on sera of 33 patients. The calculated specificity and sensitivity of serology was 100% and 58.8%, respectively. Several aspects concerning false positive and false negative results with PCR are discussed.