30 results on '"Claggett, B"'
Search Results
2. Aficamten for Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy.
- Author
-
Maron, M. S., Masri, A., Nassif, M. E., Barriales-Villa, R., Arad, M., Cardim, N., Choudhury, L., Claggett, B., Coats, CJ, DOngen, H.-D., Garcia-Pavia, P., Hagtge, A. A., Januzzi, J. L., Lee, M. M. Y., Lewis, G. D., Ma, C.-S., Michels, M., Olivotto, Oreziak, A., and Owens, A. T.
- Subjects
- *
HYPERTROPHIC cardiomyopathy , *VENTRICULAR outflow obstruction , *EXERCISE tests , *VALSALVA'S maneuver , *VENTRICULAR ejection fraction - Abstract
BACKGROUND One of the major determinants of exercise intolerance and limiting symptoms among patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) is an elevated intracardiac pressure resulting from left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Aficamten is an oral selective cardiac myosin inhibitor that reduces left ventricular outflow tract gradients by mitigating cardiac hypercontractility. METHODS In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned adults with symptomatic obstructive HCM to receive aficamten (starting dose, 5 mg; maximum dose, 20 mg) or placebo for 24 weeks, with dose adjustment based on echocardiography results. The primary end point was the change from baseline to week 24 in the peak oxygen uptake as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The 10 prespecified secondary end points (tested hierarchically) were change in the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire clinical summary score (KCCQ-CSS), improvement in the New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional class, change in the pressure gradient after the Valsalva maneuver, occurrence of a gradient of less than 30 mm Hg after the Valsalva maneuver, and duration of eligibility for septal reduction therapy (all assessed at week 24); change in the KCCQ-CSS, improvement in the NYHA functional class, change in the pressure gradient after the Valsalva maneuver, and occurrence of a gradient of less than 30 mm Hg after the Valsalva maneuver (all assessed at week 12); and change in the total workload as assessed by cardiopulmonary exercise testing at week 24. RESULTS A total of 282 patients underwent randomization: 142 to the aficamten group and 140 to the placebo group. The mean age was 59.1 years, 59.2% were men, the baseline mean resting left ventricular outflow tract gradient was 55.1 mm Hg, and the baseline mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 74.8%. At 24 weeks, the mean change in the peak oxygen uptake was 1.8 ml per kilogram per minute (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2 to 2.3) in the aficamten group and 0.0 ml per kilogram per minute (95% CI, -0.5 to 0.5) in the placebo group (least-squares mean between-group difference, 1.7 ml per kilogram per minute; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.4; P<0.001). The results for all 10 secondary end points were significantly improved with aficamten as compared with placebo. The incidence of adverse events appeared to be similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with symptomatic obstructive HCM, treatment with aficamten resulted in a significantly greater improvement in peak oxygen uptake than placebo. (Funded by Cytokinetics; SEQUOIA-HCM ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT05186818.) [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Recurrent venous thromboembolism and vaginal estradiol in women with prior venous thromboembolism: A nested case-control study.
- Author
-
Eckert-Lind C, Meaidi A, Claggett B, Johansen ND, Lassen MCH, Skaarup KG, Fralick M, Pareek M, Jensen JUS, Torp-Pedersen C, Gislason G, Biering-Sørensen T, and Modin D
- Abstract
Objectives: Whether vaginal estradiol use is associated with an increased risk of recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE) in women with prior VTE is unknown. We sought to evaluate the association between vaginal estradiol use and recurrent VTE in women with prior VTE., Methods: We performed a nationwide nested case-control study among 44 024 women aged ≥45 years who developed a first VTE without a history of vaginal estrogen use prior to VTE diagnosis. Cases with recurrent VTE were matched 1:2 on birth year with controls using incidence density sampling. Exposure to vaginal estradiol tablets was categorized into current use (0-2 months before index), prior use (2-24 months before index) and past use (more than 24 months prior to index)., Results: We identified 5066 cases and 10 127 age-matched controls. In fully adjusted analysis vaginal estrogen was not associated with recurrent VTE with a hazard ratio of 0.75, p = .07 for current use, 0.83, p = .13 for prior use, and 1.24, p = .06 for past use., Conclusion: Use of vaginal estradiol tablets in women with prior VTE was not associated with an increased rate of recurrent VTE. Our study indicates that vaginal estradiol therapy is unlikely to increase risk of recurrent VTE in women with prior VTE., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
4. Response by Chatur et al to Letter Regarding Article, "Outpatient Worsening Among Patients With Mildly Reduced and Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure in the DELIVER Trial".
- Author
-
Chatur S, Vaduganathan M, Claggett B, and Solomon SD
- Subjects
- Humans, Disease Progression, Outpatients, Heart Failure physiopathology, Heart Failure therapy, Stroke Volume
- Abstract
Competing Interests: S.C. is supported by the Canadian Arthur J.E. Child’s Cardiology Fellowship. M.V. has received research grant support, served on advisory boards, or had speaker engagements with American Regent, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Baxter Healthcare, Boehringer Ingelheim, Chiesi, Cytokinetics, Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Pharmacosmos, Relypsa, Roche Diagnostics, Sanofi, and Tricog Health; and has participated on clinical trial committees for studies sponsored by AstraZeneca, Galmed, Novartis, Bayer Aktiengesellschaft, Occlutech, and Impulse Dynamics. B.L.C. has consulted for Amgen, AO Biome, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia, Gilead, Myokardia, Cardurion, and Novartis. S.D.S. has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Heatlh/National Heart Lung and Blood Institute, Neurotronik, Novartis, NovoNordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boeringer-Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Puretech Health.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Dosing and Safety Profile of Aficamten in Symptomatic Obstructive Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: Results From SEQUOIA-HCM.
- Author
-
Coats CJ, Masri A, Nassif ME, Barriales-Villa R, Arad M, Cardim N, Choudhury L, Claggett B, Düngen HD, Garcia-Pavia P, Hagège AA, Januzzi JL, Lee MMY, Lewis GD, Ma CS, Maron MS, Miao ZM, Michels M, Olivotto I, Oreziak A, Owens AT, Spertus JA, Solomon SD, Tfelt-Hansen J, van Sinttruije M, Veselka J, Watkins H, Jacoby DL, German P, Heitner SB, Kupfer S, Lutz JD, Malik FI, Meng L, Wohltman A, and Abraham TP
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Double-Blind Method, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Adult, Atrial Fibrillation drug therapy, Atrial Fibrillation diagnosis, Atrial Fibrillation physiopathology, Benzylamines, Uracil analogs & derivatives, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic physiopathology, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic drug therapy, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic diagnosis, Ventricular Function, Left drug effects, Stroke Volume drug effects
- Abstract
Background: Aficamten, a novel cardiac myosin inhibitor, reversibly reduces cardiac hypercontractility in obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. We present a prespecified analysis of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and safety of aficamten in SEQUOIA-HCM (Safety, Efficacy, and Quantitative Understanding of Obstruction Impact of Aficamten in HCM)., Methods and Results: A total of 282 patients with obstructive hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were randomized 1:1 to daily aficamten (5-20 mg) or placebo between February 1, 2022, and May 15, 2023. Aficamten dosing targeted the lowest effective dose for achieving site-interpreted Valsalva left ventricular outflow tract gradient <30 mm Hg with left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥50%. End points were evaluated during titration (day 1 to week 8), maintenance (weeks 8-24), and washout (weeks 24-28), and included major adverse cardiac events, new-onset atrial fibrillation, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator discharges, LVEF <50%, and treatment-emergent adverse events. At week 8, 3.6%, 12.9%, 35%, and 48.6% of patients achieved 5-, 10-, 15-, and 20-mg doses, respectively. Baseline characteristics were similar across groups. Aficamten concentration increased by dose and remained stable during maintenance. During the treatment period, LVEF decreased by -0.9% (95% CI, -1.3 to -0.6) per 100 ng/mL aficamten exposure. Seven (4.9%) patients taking aficamten underwent per-protocol dose reduction for site-interpreted LVEF <50%. There were no treatment interruptions or heart failure worsening for LVEF <50%. No major adverse cardiovascular events were associated with aficamten, and treatment-emergent adverse events were similar between treatment groups, including atrial fibrillation., Conclusions: A site-based dosing algorithm targeting the lowest effective aficamten dose reduced left ventricular outflow tract gradient with a favorable safety profile throughout SEQUOIA-HCM., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique Identifier: NCT05186818.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Quality of Life and Exercise Capacity in Early Stage and Subclinical Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy: A Secondary Analysis of the VANISH Trial.
- Author
-
Ireland CG, Burstein DS, Day SM, Axelsson Raja A, Russell MW, Zahka KG, Pereira A, Canter CE, Bach RG, Wheeler MT, Rossano JW, Owens AT, Bundgaard H, Mestroni L, Taylor MRG, Patel AR, Wilmot I, Soslow JH, Becker JR, Giverts I, Orav EJ, Claggett B, Lin KY, and Ho CY
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Adolescent, Young Adult, Adult, Child, Angiotensin II Type 1 Receptor Blockers therapeutic use, Treatment Outcome, Quality of Life, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic physiopathology, Cardiomyopathy, Hypertrophic drug therapy, Exercise Tolerance drug effects, Exercise Test, Valsartan therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: The health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) performance of individuals with subclinical and early stage hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) have not been systematically studied. Improved understanding will inform the natural history of HCM and factors influencing well-being., Methods: VANISH trial (Valsartan for Attenuating Disease Evolution in Early Sarcomeric HCM) participants with early stage sarcomeric HCM (primary analysis cohort) and subclinical HCM (sarcomere variant without left ventricular hypertrophy comprising the exploratory cohort) who completed baseline and year 2 HRQOL assessment via the pediatric quality of life inventory and CPET were studied. Metrics correlating with baseline HRQOL and CPET performance were identified. The impact of valsartan treatment on these measures was analyzed in the early stage cohort., Results: Two hundred participants were included: 166 with early stage HCM (mean age, 23±10 years; 40% female; 97% White; and 92% New York Heart Association class I) and 34 subclinical sarcomere variant carriers (mean age, 16±5 years; 50% female; and 100% White). Baseline HRQOL was good in both cohorts, although slightly better in subclinical HCM (composite pediatric quality of life score 84.6±10.6 versus 90.2±9.8; P =0.005). Both cohorts demonstrated mildly reduced functional status (mean percent predicted peak oxygen uptake 73±16 versus 78±12 mL/kg per minute; P =0.18). Percent predicted peak oxygen uptake and peak oxygen pulse correlated with HRQOL. Valsartan improved physical HRQOL in early stage HCM (adjusted mean change in pediatric quality of life score +4.1 versus placebo; P =0.01) but did not significantly impact CPET performance., Conclusions: Functional capacity can be impaired in young, healthy people with early stage HCM, despite New York Heart Association class I status and good HRQOL. Peak oxygen uptake was similarly decreased in subclinical HCM despite normal left ventricular wall thickness and excellent HRQOL. Valsartan improved physical pediatric quality of life scores but did not significantly impact CPET performance. Further studies are needed for validation and to understand how to improve patient experience., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01912534., Competing Interests: Dr Day is involved in consulting for Lexicon Pharmaceuticals; is on the Data Monitoring Committee of Cytokinetics; and receives funding from Lexicon Pharmaceuticals and Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Canter is a consultant for Bristol Myers Squibb and receives research support from Tenaya, Merck, and Novartis (none relevant). Dr Bach receives research support (institutional only) from MyoKardia, Bristol Myers Squibb, and Cytokinetics, outside of the submitted work. Dr Wheeler receives research support and in-kind support from MyoKardia Inc, a wholly owned subsidiary of Bristol Myers Squibb, and research support from Cytokinetics Inc and Novartis Inc, all outside of the submitted work. Dr Rossano is a consultant for AskBio, American Regent, Bayer, BioMarin, Bristol Myers Squibb, Enzyvant, and Merck. Dr Owens has been consulting for Bristol Myers Squibb, Cytokinetics, Pfizer, Tenaya, BioMarin, Lexicon, Lexeo, Edgewise, and Stealth Therapeutics and receives research support from Bristol Myers Squibb. Dr Mestroni receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Tenaya Therapeutics, Pfizer, BioMarin, Greenstone Bioscience, and Spark Therapeutics. Dr Taylor receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squibb, Tenaya Therapeutics, Rocket Pharmaceuticals, BioMarin, and Spark Therapeutics. Dr Patel receives a research grant from GE Healthcare. Dr Soslow is involved in unrelated consulting for Sarepta, Pfizer, Immunoforge, and WCG Imaging. Dr Claggett is involved in statistical consulting for Alnylam, Cardurion, Corvia, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Intellia, and Rocket. Dr Ho is a consultant for and receives research funding from Bristol Myers Squib, Pfizer, Cytokinetics, Tenaya, BioMarin, viz.AI, and Lexicon (none relevant). The other authors report no conflicts.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
7. Training the Next Generation of Data Monitoring Committee Members: An Initiative of the Heart Failure Collaboratory.
- Author
-
Fleming TR, Wittes J, Fiuzat M, Bristow MR, Rockhold FW, Connor JT, Saville BR, Claggett B, Cavagna I, Abraham WT, Cook TD, Lindenfeld J, O'Connor C, and DeMets DL
- Subjects
- Humans, Clinical Trials as Topic, Heart Failure therapy, Clinical Trials Data Monitoring Committees
- Abstract
Clinical trials are vital for assessing therapeutic interventions. The associated data monitoring committees (DMCs) safeguard patient interests and enhance trial integrity, thus promoting timely, reliable evaluations of those interventions. We face an urgent need to recruit and train new DMC members. The HFC (Heart Failure Collaboratory), a multidisciplinary public-private consortium of academics, trialists, patients, industry representatives, and government agencies, is working to improve the clinical trial ecosystem. The HFC aims to improve clinical trial efficiency and quality by standardizing concepts, and to help meet the demand for experienced individuals on DMCs by creating a standardized approach to training new members. This paper discusses the HFC's training workshop, and an apprenticeship model for new DMC members. It describes opportunities and challenges DMCs face, along with common myths and best practices learned through previous experiences, with an emphasis on data confidentiality and need for quality independent statistical reporting groups., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures Dr Fleming has received consulting fees from the National Institutes of Health, the World Health Organization, the Food and Drug Administration, and the pharmaceutical and biotech industry in the design, monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials; and he has received fees for serving on several industry-sponsored Data Monitoring Committees (DMCs). Dr Wittes has received compensation for her membership on several DMCs sponsored by industry, government, and not-for-profit organizations; and has received consulting fees from a variety of pharmaceutical and medical device companies. Dr Bristow is the President/CEO/Director at ARCA biopharma. Dr Rockhold has received consulting fees from Intercept, Clover, and Inventprise; has received compensation for serving on several industry-sponsored DMCs; and holds stock in Clover, GSK, Athira, Spence, Adaptic, and Doctor Evidence. Dr Claggett has received consulting fees from Alnylam, Axon, Cardior, Cardurion, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Intellia, and Rocket. Dr Abraham has received consulting fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardionomic, Zoll Respicardia, scPharmaceuticals, Sensible Medical, and Vectorious; has received salary support from V-Wave Medical; and has served as a speaker for Edwards Lifesciences. Dr Lindenfeld has received consulting fees from Abbott, ADI, Alleviant, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Axon, Boston Scientific, Cordio, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Edwards Lifesciences, Medtronic, Merck, VWave, Vascular Dynamics, Vectorious, and Whiteswell; and has received grants from Analog Devices Inc, AstraZeneca, and Volumetrix. Dr DeMets has received consulting fees from the National Institutes of Health, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, and the pharmaceutical and medical device industry on the design, monitoring, and analysis of clinical trials; and he has received compensation for serving on several recent industry-sponsored data and safety monitoring committees or steering committees including AstraZeneca, Bristol Meyers Squib, GSK, Merck, Boston Scientific, Medtronic, USONA, LivaNova, AnthosTherapy, ARCA biopharma, Duke Clinical Research Institute, and the Population Health Research Institute of Hamilton Ontario. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. Effect of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Cognitive Function in Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: A Prespecified Analysis of PARAGON-HF.
- Author
-
Dewan P, Shen L, Pedro Ferreira J, Jhund PS, Anand IS, Chandra A, Chiang LM, Claggett B, Desai AS, Gong J, Lam CSP, Lefkowitz MP, Maggioni AP, Martinez F, Packer M, Redfield MM, Rouleau JL, van Veldhuisen DJ, Zannad F, Zile MR, Solomon SD, and McMurray JJV
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Female, Aged, Middle Aged, Prospective Studies, Neprilysin antagonists & inhibitors, Treatment Outcome, Cognitive Dysfunction drug therapy, Aged, 80 and over, Biphenyl Compounds therapeutic use, Valsartan therapeutic use, Valsartan adverse effects, Aminobutyrates therapeutic use, Aminobutyrates adverse effects, Heart Failure drug therapy, Heart Failure physiopathology, Drug Combinations, Cognition drug effects, Stroke Volume drug effects, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Tetrazoles therapeutic use, Tetrazoles adverse effects
- Abstract
Background: A hypothetical concern has been raised that sacubitril/valsartan might cause cognitive impairment because neprilysin is one of several enzymes degrading amyloid-β peptides in the brain, some of which are neurotoxic and linked to Alzheimer-type dementia. To address this, we examined the effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan on cognitive function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a prespecified substudy of PARAGON-HF (Prospective Comparison of Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibitor With Angiotensin Receptor Blocker Global Outcomes in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction)., Methods: In PARAGON-HF, serial assessment of cognitive function was conducted in a subset of patients with the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; score range, 0-30, with lower scores reflecting worse cognitive function). The prespecified primary analysis of this substudy was the change from baseline in MMSE score at 96 weeks. Other post hoc analyses included cognitive decline (fall in MMSE score of ≥3 points), cognitive impairment (MMSE score <24), or the occurrence of dementia-related adverse events., Results: Among 2895 patients included in the MMSE substudy with baseline MMSE score measured, 1453 patients were assigned to sacubitril/valsartan and 1442 to valsartan. Their mean age was 73 years, and the median follow-up was 32 months. The mean±SD MMSE score at randomization was 27.4±3.0 in the sacubitril/valsartan group, with 10% having an MMSE score <24; the corresponding numbers were nearly identical in the valsartan group. The mean change from baseline to 96 weeks in the sacubitril/valsartan group was -0.05 (SE, 0.07); the corresponding change in the valsartan group was -0.04 (0.07). The mean between-treatment difference at week 96 was -0.01 (95% CI, -0.20 to 0.19; P =0.95). Analyses of a ≥3-point decline in MMSE, decrease to a score <24, dementia-related adverse events, and combinations of these showed no difference between sacubitril/valsartan and valsartan. No difference was found in the subgroup of patients tested for apolipoprotein E ε4 allele genotype., Conclusions: Patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in PARAGON-HF had relatively low baseline MMSE scores. Cognitive change, measured by MMSE, did not differ between treatment with sacubitril/valsartan and treatment with valsartan in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction., Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01920711., Competing Interests: Dr Jhund reports receiving grant support from Boehringer Ingelheim and fees for serving on an advisory board from Cytokinetics. Dr Anand reports receiving fees for serving on a steering committee from AstraZeneca, ARCA biopharma, Amgen, and LivaNova; fees for serving as chair of a data and safety monitoring board from Boston Scientific; fees for serving on an end-point committee from Boehringer Ingelheim; and fees for serving on an advisory board from Zensun. Dr Claggett received consulting fees from AOBiome, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia Medical, Gilead Sciences, and MyoKardia. Dr Desai received consulting fees from Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, and Regeneron; grant support, paid to Brigham and Women’s Hospital, consulting fees, and fees for serving on an advisory board from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals and AstraZeneca; consulting fees and fees for serving on a steering committee from Biofourmis; consulting fees and fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring committee from Boston Scientific; fees for serving on an advisory board from Corvidia; and fees for serving on an advisory board and consulting fees from Relypsa. Drs Chiang, Gong, and Lefkowitz are employed by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Dr Lam received grant support and fees for serving on an advisory board from Boston Scientific and Roche Diagnostics; grant support, fees for serving on an advisory board, and fees for serving on steering committees from Bayer; grant support from Medtronics; grant support and fees for serving on a steering committee from Vifor Pharma; fees for serving on an advisory board and fees for serving on steering committees from AstraZeneca and Novartis; fees for serving on an advisory board from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Abbott Diagnostics; consulting fees from Merck and Stealth BioTherapeutics; fees for serving on a steering committee from Janssen Research and Development; lecture fees and consulting fees from Menarini; and fees for serving on a scientific committee from Corvia Medical and holding a pending patent (PCT/SG2016/050217) on a method regarding diagnosis and prognosis of chronic heart failure. Dr Maggioni received fees for serving on a study committee from Bayer and Fresenius. Dr Packer received consulting fees from AbbVie, Akcea Therapeutics, Actavis, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardiorentis, Daiichi Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Johnson & Johnson, Novo Nordisk, Pfizer, Relypsa, Sanofi, Synthetic Biologics, and Theravance Biopharma. Dr Rouleau received consulting fees from AstraZeneca. Dr van Veldhuisen received fees for serving on a steering committee and travel support from ARCA Biopharma and Corvia Medical. Dr Zannad received fees for serving on a steering committee from Janssen, Bayer, Boston Scientific, CVRx, and Boehringer Ingelheim; consulting fees from Amgen, Vifor Pharma–Fresenius, Cardior, Cereno Pharmaceutical, Applied Therapeutics, and Merck; and consulting fees and fees for serving on a steering committee from AstraZeneca and serving as founder of cardiorenal and CVCT. Dr Zile received fees for serving on a steering committee from Abbott and Ironwood Pharma; consulting fees from Boston Scientific and MyoKardia; grant support and fees for serving on a steering committee from CVRx and Medtronic; fees for serving on an eligibility committee from EBR Systems and V-Wave; fees for serving on a clinical-events committee from Endotronics; and fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Merck. Dr Solomon received grant support, paid to Brigham and Women’s Hospital, and consulting fees from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, MyoKardia, Novartis, Theracos, Bayer, and Cytokinetics; grant support, paid to Brigham and Women’s Hospital, from Bellerophon Therapeutics, Celladon, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Lonestar Heart, Mesoblast, Sanofi Pasteur, and Eidos Therapeutics; consulting fees from Akros Pharma, Corvia Medical, Ironwood Pharma, Merck, Roche, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Quantum Genomics, AOBiome, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya Therapeutics, and Daiichi Sankyo; and fees for serving on a data and safety monitoring board from Janssen. Dr McMurray reports that his employer, Glasgow University, has been paid by Novartis for serving as an executive committee member and coprincipal investigator of ATMOSPHERE, PARADIGM-HF, and PARAGON-HF trials and executive/steering committee member of the PARADISE-MI and PERSPECTIVE trials (with sacubitril/valsartan) and for meetings/presentations related to these trials, aliskiren, and sacubitril-valsartan. Novartis has also paid for his travel and accommodation for some of these meetings. Glasgow University has also been paid by Novartis for advisory board; by Bayer for serving as a steering committee member of the PANACHE trial using neladenoson bialanate (BAY 1067197); by Cardiorentis for serving as a steering committee member and end-point committee chair for the TRUE-AHF trial and attending meetings related to this trial; by Cardiorentis for travel and accommodation to attend some of these meetings; by Amgen for serving as steering committee member for the ATOMIC-HF and COSMIC-HF trials and attending meetings related to this trial; by Amgen for travel and accommodation for some of these meetings; by Oxford University (which received a grant from Bayer, which manufactures acarbose) for serving as a steering committee member for the ACE trial (using acarbose) and attending meetings related to this trial; by Theracos for serving as principal investigator for the BEST trial and attending meetings related to this trial; by Theracos for travel and accommodation to attend some of these meetings; by Abbvie (which manufactures atrasentan) for serving as steering committee member for the SONAR trial (using atrasentan) and to attend meetings related to this trial; by Abbvie for his travel and accommodation to attend some of these meetings; by DalCor Pharmaceuticals for serving as steering committee member for the Dal-GenE trial and to attend meetings related to this trial; by Pfizer for serving on the data safety monitoring committee for the SPIRE trial and to attend meetings related to this trial; by Merck for serving on the data safety monitoring committee for the MK-3102 program, for the VICTORIA trial, and to attend meetings related to these trials; by AstraZeneca (which markets dapagliflozin) for serving as principal investigator of DAPA-HF and coprincipal investigator of DELIVER (trials using dapagliflozin on heart failure) and to attend meetings related trial; by AstraZeneca for his travel and accommodation to attend meetings; by GSK for serving as coprincipal investigator and steering committee member for the Harmony-Outcomes trial (albiglutide) and the trials ASCEND-D and ASCEND-ND, using daprodustat, respectively, and to attend meetings related to these trials; by GSK for his travel and accommodation to attend some of the meetings; by BMS for serving as a steering committee member for the STAND-UP clinical trial (using an HNO donor) on heart failure and to attend meetings related to this trial; and by Kings College Hospital (which has received a grant from KRUK and Vifor-Fresenius, which manufactures intravenous iron) for serving as steering committee member for the PIVOTAL trial (using intravenous iron) and for running the end-point adjudication committee for this trial, to attend meetings related to PIVOTAL, and for his travel and accommodation for to attend some of the meetings. All payments were made through consultancies with Glasgow University, and Dr McMurray has not received any personal payments in relation to the trials or drugs. The other authors report no conflicts. The study supporters had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
9. Diagnostic Utility of SGLT2 Inhibitors to Facilitate Myocardial Glucose Suppression During Evaluation of Myocardial Inflammation.
- Author
-
Selvaraj S, Vidula MK, Claggett B, Rojulpote C, Bhattaru A, Clancy CB, Rossman M, Pryma DA, Goldberg LR, and Bravo PE
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Biomarkers blood, Blood Glucose metabolism, Blood Glucose drug effects, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 blood, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 diagnosis, Myocarditis diagnostic imaging, Myocarditis drug therapy, Predictive Value of Tests, Treatment Outcome, Myocardium pathology, Myocardium metabolism, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors therapeutic use, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors adverse effects
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
10. Safety and Tolerability of Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibitor Initiation in High-Risk Acute Myocardial Infarction Relative to Care Setting: A Subgroup Analysis of the PARADISE-MI Trial.
- Author
-
De Pasquale CG, Claggett B, Jering K, McMurray JJV, Mann D, Miao ZM, Granger CB, Køber L, Maggioni AP, Rouleau JL, Solomon SD, Steg PG, van der Meer P, Braunwald E, and Pfeffer MA
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Biphenyl Compounds, Female, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Tetrazoles therapeutic use, Tetrazoles adverse effects, Middle Aged, Drug Combinations, Risk Factors, Myocardial Infarction drug therapy, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Neprilysin antagonists & inhibitors, Aminobutyrates therapeutic use, Aminobutyrates adverse effects, Valsartan
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Dr De Pasquale reports research funding from AstraZeneca and Novartis; consulting fees or speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Vifor, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Eli Lilly, and Roche. Dr Claggett reports statistical consulting at Alnylam, Cardurion, Corvia, CVRx, Cytokinetics, Intellia, and Rocket. Dr McMurray received support from British Heart Foundation Centre of Research Excellence grant RE/18/6/34217 and the Vera Melrose Heart Failure Research Fund; has received payments through the Glasgow University from work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; has received personal consulting fees from Alnylam Pharma, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), George Clinical Pty Ltd, Ionis Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharma, and River 2 Renal Corporation; has received personal lecture fees from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, AstraZeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharma Ltd, Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of CME, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica Health, Intas Pharma, J.B. Chemicals and Pharma Ltd, Lupin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharma, The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy; and is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. Dr Granger reports consulting fees from Abbvie, Abiomed, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Anthos, Bayer Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific Corporation, BMS, Cardionomics, CeleCor Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Merck, Novo Nordisk, Novartis Pharmaceutical Company, Pfizer, Philips, Reata, and NephroSynergy; salary funded by Duke; grants sponsored by Alnylam, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Daiichi Sankyo, Food and Drug Administration, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, National Institutes of Health (NIH), Novartis Pharmaceutical Company, Pfizer, and Philips; and equity in Tenac.io. Dr Køber reports speaker honoraria from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Maggioni reports personal fees for participation in studies from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Novartis, and Sanofi, outside the present work. Dr Rouleau reports DMC membership with Novartis, BMS, Bayer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Solomon reports research grants from Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gossamer, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, MyoKardia, NIH/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Valo. Dr Steg reports research grants from Amarin and Sanofi; clinical trials (Steering Committee, CEC, DSMB) at Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Idorsia, Janssen, Novartis, and Sanofi; consulting or speaking at Amarin, Amgen, BMS, Novartis, and Novo Nordisk; and senior associate editor at Circulation. Dr van der Meer is supported by a grant from the European Research Council (ERC CoG 101045236, DISSECT-HF). The UMCG, which employs Dr van der Meer, received consultancy fees and grants from Novartis, Pharmacosmos, Vifor Pharma, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Pharma Nord, BridgeBio, Novo Nordisk, Daiichi Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Ionis. Dr Braunwald has received research grants through his institution from AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, and Novartis; and has consultancies with Amgen, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Cardurion, and Verve. Dr Pfeffer reports research grant support (via institution) from Lexicon and Novartis; consultant at Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly Alliance, Lexicon, NHLBI CONNECTs (Master Protocol Committee), Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi; and has equity in DalCor. The other authors report no conflicts.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
11. The relative vaccine effectiveness of high-dose vs standard-dose influenza vaccines in preventing hospitalization and mortality: A meta-analysis of evidence from randomized trials.
- Author
-
Skaarup KG, Lassen MCH, Modin D, Johansen ND, Loiacono MM, Harris RC, Lee JKH, Dufournet M, Vardeny O, Peikert A, Claggett B, Solomon SD, Jensen JUS, and Biering-Sørensen T
- Subjects
- Humans, Aged, Vaccine Efficacy, Pneumonia prevention & control, Pneumonia mortality, Male, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Influenza Vaccines administration & dosage, Influenza Vaccines immunology, Influenza, Human prevention & control, Influenza, Human mortality, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
- Abstract
Objectives: To summarize current evidence of high-dose influenza vaccine (HD-IV) vs standard-dose (SD-IV) regarding severe clinical outcomes., Methods: A prespecified meta-analysis was conducted to assess relative vaccine effectiveness (rVE) of HD-IV vs SD-IV in reducing the rates of (1) pneumonia and influenza (P&I) hospitalization, (2) all hospitalizations, and (3) all-cause death in adults ≥ 65 years in randomized controlled trials. Pooled effect sizes were estimated using fixed-effects models with the inverse variance method., Results: Five randomized trials were included encompassing 105,685 individuals. HD-IV vs SD-IV reduced P&I hospitalizations (rVE: 23.5 %, [95 %CI: 12.3 to 33.2]). HD-IV vs SD-IV also reduced rate of all-cause hospitalizations (rVE: 7.3 %, [95 %CI: 4.5 to 10.0]). No significant differences were observed in death rates (rVE = 1.6 % ([95 %CI: -2.0 to 5.0]) in HD-IV vs SD-IV. Sensitivity analyses omitting trials with participants sharing the same comorbidity, trials with ≥ 100 events, and random-effects models provided comparable estimates for all outcomes., Conclusions: HD-IV reduced the incidence of P&I and all-cause hospitalization vs SD-IV in adults ≥ 65 years in randomized trials, through no significant difference was observed in all-cause death rates. These findings, supported by evidence from several randomized studies, can benefit from replication in a fully powered, individually randomized trial., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest KGS has served on advisory boards for Sanofi. MML, RH, and MD are full-time employees of Sanofi and may hold stocks and/or shares in the company. SDS has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH/NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi, Theracos, US2. AI and consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Puretech Health. TBS is chief investigator of the Boston Scientific financed ”DANLOGIC-HF” trial, the Sanofi financed “NUDGE-FLU” trial, the Sanofi financed “DANFLU-1″ trial, the Sanofi financed “DANFLU-2″ trial and steering committee member of the Boston Scientific sponsored “LUX-Dx TRENDS Evaluates Diagnostics Sensors in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Boston Scientific's Investigational ICM System” trial, the Amgen sponsored GALACTIC-HF trial, the Boehringer Ingelheim financed EASi-KIDNEY trial and served on advisory boards for Sanofi, Amgen, CSL Seqirus and GSK and received speaker honorariums from Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi, GE Healthcare and GSK and received research grants from Boston Scientific, GE Healthcare, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, and Sanofi and consulted for Novo Nordisk, IQVIA and Parexel. The remaining authors have nothing to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
12. Cardioprotective effects of early versus late initiated antiretroviral treatment in adolescents with perinatal HIV-1 infection.
- Author
-
Magodoro IM, Guerrero-Chalela CE, Claggett B, Jermy S, Samuels P, Myer L, Zar HJ, Jao J, Ntsekhe M, Siedner MJ, and Ntusi NAB
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Adolescent, Male, HIV-1 drug effects, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Child, Anti-HIV Agents therapeutic use, Anti-HIV Agents administration & dosage, Anti-Retroviral Agents administration & dosage, Anti-Retroviral Agents therapeutic use, Infectious Disease Transmission, Vertical prevention & control, Child, Preschool, HIV Infections drug therapy
- Abstract
Whether, and how, cardioprotective effects of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in adolescents with perinatal HIV infection (APHIV) vary with age at treatment initiation is unknown. We used magnetic resonance imaging to compare cardiac status between APHIV initiated on ART at < 5 years of age (early ART, n = 37) and ≥ 5 years of age (delayed ART, n = 34) versus HIV-uninfected peers (n = 21), reporting z-score mean differences adjusted for confounders. Relative to HIV-uninfected adolescents, APHIV with early ART had higher left ventricular (LV) global circumferential strain (GCS) [adjusted mean (95%CI) z-score: 0.53 (0.13, 0.92)] and maximum indexed left atrium volume (LAVi) [adjusted z-score: 0.55 (0.08, 1.02)]. In contrast, APHIV with delayed ART had greater indexed LV end-diastolic volume (LVEDVi) [adjusted z-score: 0.47 (0.09, 0.86)] and extracellular volume fraction [adjusted z-score: 0.79 (0.20, 1.37)], but lower GCS [adjusted z-score: -0.51 (-0.91, -0.10)] than HIV-uninfected peers. APHIV had distinct albeit subclinical cardiac phenotypes depending on ART initiation age. Changes in early ART suggested comparatively worse diastology with preserved systolic function while delayed ART was associated with comparatively increased diffuse fibrosis and LV dilatation with reduced systolic function. The long-term clinical significance of these changes remains to be determined., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
13. Cardiovascular Burden of the V142I Transthyretin Variant.
- Author
-
Selvaraj S, Claggett B, Shah SH, Mentz RJ, Khouri MG, Manichaikul AW, Khan SS, Rich SS, Mosley TH, Levitan EB, Arora P, Goyal P, Haring B, Eaton CB, Cheng RK, Wells GL, Manson JE, Fontana M, and Solomon SD
- Subjects
- Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Disease Progression, Heterozygote, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data, Prealbumin genetics, Stroke Volume, United States epidemiology, Cost of Illness, Amyloidosis ethnology, Amyloidosis genetics, Black or African American genetics, Cardiomyopathies ethnology, Cardiomyopathies genetics, Heart Failure ethnology, Heart Failure genetics, Heart Failure mortality
- Abstract
Importance: Individual cohort studies concur that the amyloidogenic V142I variant of the transthyretin (TTR) gene, present in 3% to 4% of US Black individuals, increases heart failure (HF) and mortality risk. Precisely defining carrier risk across relevant clinical outcomes and estimating population burden of disease are important given established and emerging targeted treatments., Objectives: To better define the natural history of disease in carriers across mid to late life, assess variant modifiers, and estimate cardiovascular burden to the US population., Design, Setting, and Participants: A total of 23 338 self-reported Black participants initially free from HF were included in 4 large observational studies across the US (mean [SD], 15.5 [8.2] years of follow-up). Data analysis was performed between May 2023 and February 2024., Exposure: V142I carrier status (n = 754, 3.2%)., Main Outcomes and Measures: Hospitalizations for HF (including subtypes of reduced and preserved ejection fraction) and all-cause mortality. Outcomes were analyzed by generating 10-year hazard ratios for each age between 50 and 90 years. Using actuarial methods, mean survival by carrier status was estimated and applied to the 2022 US population using US Census data., Results: Among the 23 338 participants, the mean (SD) age at baseline was 62 (9) years and 76.7% were women. Ten-year carrier risk increased for HF hospitalization by age 63 years, predominantly driven by HF with reduced ejection fraction, and 10-year all-cause mortality risk increased by age 72 years. Only age (but not sex or other select variables) modified risk with the variant, with estimated reductions in longevity ranging from 1.9 years (95% CI, 0.6-3.1) at age 50 to 2.8 years (95% CI, 2.0-3.6) at age 81. Based on these data, 435 851 estimated US Black carriers between ages 50 and 95 years are projected to cumulatively lose 957 505 years of life (95% CI, 534 475-1 380 535) due to the variant., Conclusions and Relevance: Among self-reported Black individuals, male and female V142I carriers faced similar and substantial risk for HF hospitalization, predominantly with reduced ejection fraction, and death, with steep age-dependent penetrance. Delineating the individual contributions of, and complex interplay among, the V142I variant, ancestry, the social construct of race, and biological or social determinants of health to cardiovascular disease merits further investigation.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
14. Baseline characteristics of patients with heart failure with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction: The FINEARTS-HF trial.
- Author
-
Solomon SD, Ostrominski JW, Vaduganathan M, Claggett B, Jhund PS, Desai AS, Lam CSP, Pitt B, Senni M, Shah SJ, Voors AA, Zannad F, Abidin IZ, Alcocer-Gamba MA, Atherton JJ, Bauersachs J, Ma CS, Chiang CE, Chioncel O, Chopra V, Comin-Colet J, Filippatos G, Fonseca C, Gajos G, Goland S, Goncalvesová E, Kang SM, Katova T, Kosiborod MN, Latkovskis G, Lee AP, Linssen GCM, Llamas-Esperón G, Mareev V, Martinez FA, Melenovský V, Merkely B, Nodari S, Petrie MC, Saldarriaga CI, Saraiva JFK, Sato N, Schou M, Sharma K, Troughton R, Udell JA, Ukkonen H, Vardeny O, Verma S, von Lewinski D, Voronkov LG, Yilmaz MB, Zieroth S, Lay-Flurrie J, van Gameren I, Amarante F, Viswanathan P, and McMurray JJV
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Double-Blind Method, Ventricular Function, Left physiology, Ventricular Function, Left drug effects, Middle Aged, Treatment Outcome, Glomerular Filtration Rate physiology, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain blood, Heart Failure physiopathology, Heart Failure drug therapy, Stroke Volume physiology, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Naphthyridines therapeutic use
- Abstract
Aims: To describe the baseline characteristics of participants in the FINEARTS-HF trial, contextualized with prior trials including patients with heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced and preserved ejection fraction (HFmrEF/HFpEF). The FINEARTS-HF trial is comparing the effects of the non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist finerenone with placebo in reducing cardiovascular death and total worsening HF events in patients with HFmrEF/HFpEF., Methods and Results: Patients with symptomatic HF, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) ≥40%, estimated glomerular filtration rate ≥ 25 ml/min/1.73 m
2 , elevated natriuretic peptide levels and evidence of structural heart disease were enrolled and randomized to finerenone titrated to a maximum of 40 mg once daily or matching placebo. We validly randomized 6001 patients to finerenone or placebo (mean age 72 ± 10 years, 46% women). The majority were New York Heart Association functional class II (69%). The baseline mean LVEF was 53 ± 8% (range 34-84%); 36% of participants had a LVEF <50% and 64% had a LVEF ≥50%. The median N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) was 1041 (interquartile range 449-1946) pg/ml. A total of 1219 (20%) patients were enrolled during or within 7 days of a worsening HF event, and 3247 (54%) patients were enrolled within 3 months of a worsening HF event. Compared with prior large-scale HFmrEF/HFpEF trials, FINEARTS-HF participants were more likely to have recent (within 6 months) HF hospitalization and greater symptoms and functional limitations. Further, concomitant medications included a larger percentage of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitors than previous trials., Conclusions: FINEARTS-HF has enrolled a broad range of high-risk patients with HFmrEF and HFpEF. The trial will determine the safety and efficacy of finerenone in this population., (© 2024 The Authors. European Journal of Heart Failure published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of European Society of Cardiology.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
15. Cardiac Troponin and Treatment Effects of Omecamtiv Mecarbil: Results From the GALACTIC-HF Study.
- Author
-
Felker GM, Solomon SD, Metra M, Mcmurray JJV, Diaz R, Claggett B, Lanfear DE, Vandekerckhove H, Biering-Sørensen T, Lopes RD, Arias-Mendoza A, Momomura SI, Corbalan R, Ramires FJA, Zannad F, Heitner SB, Divanji PH, Kupfer S, Malik FI, and Teerlink JR
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Double-Blind Method, Female, Middle Aged, Aged, Treatment Outcome, Urea analogs & derivatives, Urea therapeutic use, Urea pharmacology, Carbamates therapeutic use, Heart Failure drug therapy, Heart Failure blood, Troponin I blood, Stroke Volume drug effects, Biomarkers blood
- Abstract
Background: Omecamtiv mecarbil improves outcomes in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). We examined the relationship between baseline troponin levels, change in troponin levels over time and the treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil in patients enrolled in the Global Approach to Lowering Adverse Cardiac Outcomes through Improving Contractility in Heart Failure (GALACTIC-HF) trial (NCT02929329)., Methods: GALACTIC-HF was a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that randomized 8256 patients with symptomatic HFrEF to omecamtiv mecarbil or placebo. High-sensitivity troponin I (cTnI) was measured serially at a core laboratory. We analyzed the relationship between both baseline cTnI and change in cTnI concentrations with clinical outcomes and the treatment effect of omecamtiv mecarbil., Results: Higher baseline cTnI concentrations were associated with a risk of adverse outcomes (hazard ratio for the primary endpoint of time to first HF event or CV death = 1.30; 95% CI 1.28, 1.33; P < 0.001 per doubling of baseline cTnI). Although the incidence of safety outcomes was higher in patients with higher baseline cTnI, there was no difference between treatment groups. Treatment with omecamtiv mecarbil led to a modest increase in cTnI that was related to plasma concentrations of omecamtiv mecarbil, and it peaked at 6 weeks. An increase in troponin from baseline to week 6 was associated with an increased risk of the primary endpoint (P < 0.001), which was similar, regardless of treatment assignment (P value for interaction = 0.2)., Conclusions: In a cohort of patients with HFrEF, baseline cTnI concentrations were strongly associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Although cTnI concentrations were higher in patients treated with omecamtiv mecarbil, we did not find a differential effect of omecamtiv mecarbil on either safety or efficacy based on baseline cTnI status or change in cTnI., Competing Interests: DISCLOSURES GMF has received research grants from NHLBI, American Heart Association, Amgen, Bayer, BMS, Merck, Cytokinetics, and CSL-Behring; he has acted as a consultant to Novartis, Amgen, BMS, Cytokinetics, Medtronic, Cardionomic, Boehringer-Ingelheim, American Regent, Abbott, Astra-Zeneca, Reprieve, Myovant, Sequana, Windtree Therapuetics, and Whiteswell and has served on clinical endpoint committees/data safety monitoring boards for Amgen, Merck, Medtronic, EBR Systems, V-Wave, LivaNova, Siemens, and Rocket Pharma. SDS reports receiving grants (via Brigham and Women's Hospital) from Amgen and Cytokinetics during the conduct of the study; grants (via Brigham and Women's Hospital) from Actelion, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon Therapeutics, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos Therapeutics, Eli Lilly, Gilead Sciences,GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Mesoblast,Myocardium, the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, NeuroTronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, and Theracos; and consulting fees from Abbott Laboratories, Action Pharma, Akros Pharma, Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, American Regent, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardiac Dimensions, Cardior Pharmaceuticals, Cardurion Pharmaceuticals, CellProthera, Corvia Medical, Cytokinetics, Daiichi Sankyo, Dinaqor, Eli Lilly and Company, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Merck & Co, Moderna, Myokardia, Novartis, Quantum Genomics, Roche, Sanofi Pasteur, Sarepta Therapeutics, Tenaya Therapeutics, Theracos, and Tremeau Pharmaceuticals. MM reports receiving personal fees from Amgen and Servier Laboratories during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, Actelion, AstraZeneca, Edwards Lifesciences, LivaNova, Vifor Pharma, and Windtree Therapeutics. JJVM reports receiving travel fees and nonfinancial support (via the University of Glasgow) from Amgen during the conduct of the study; travel fees and nonfinancial support (via the University of Glasgow) from Alnylam Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cyclerion Therapeutics, Cytokinetics, DalCor Pharmaceuticals, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, Pfizer, Servier Laboratories, and Theracos; and personal fees from Abbott Laboratories, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Servier Laboratories, and Sun Pharmaceutical Industries. RD reports receiving grants from Amgen during the conduct of the study. BC reports receiving grants (via Brigham and Women's Hospital) from Amgen and Cytokinetics during the conduct of the study and consulting fees from Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Corvia Medical, Myokardia, and Novartis. DEL is supported in part by grants from the National Institutes of Health (P50MD017351, R01HL132154), has received research funding or support from Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Janssen, Eli Lilly, and Somalogic, and has acted as consultant to ACI Clinical (Abbott Laboratories), AstraZeneca, Cytokinetics, Duke Clinical Research Institute (CONNECT-HF), Illumina, Janssen, Martin Pharmaceuticals, Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, and Otsuka. HV reports being a national leader of GALACTIC-HF and has received lecture fees and consultation fees from Amgen. RDL reports research grants or contracts from Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GlaxoSmithKline, Medtronic, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis and funding for educational activities or lectures from Pfizer and Daiichi Sankyo and funding for consulting or other services from Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, and Novo Nordisk. S-IM reports being a national leader of GALACTIC-HF and has received lecture and consultation fees from Amgen. TB-S reports being a steering committee member of the Amgen-financed GALACTIC-HF trial, chief investigator and steering committee chair of the Sanofi Pasteur-financed NUDGE-FLU trial; chief investigator and steering committee chair of the Sanofi Pasteur-financed DANFLU-1 trial; steering committee member of LUX-Dx TRENDS Evaluates Diagnostics Sensors in Heart Failure Patients Receiving Boston Scientific's Investigational ICM System trial; is on the advisory boards of Sanofi Pasteur, Amgen and GSK; receives speaker honoraria from Bayer, Novartis, Sanofi Pasteur, and GSK and research grants from GE Healthcare and Sanofi Pasteur. SBH, PHD, SK, and FIM are employees of Cytokinetics. JRT reports receiving grants from Amgen and Cytokinetics, personal fees from Amgen, Cytokinetics and Servier Laboratories, and nonfinancial support from Amgen and Cytokinetics during the conduct of the study; grants from Abbott Laboratories, Bayer, Boerhinger Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, EBR Systems, LivaNova, Medtronic, Novartis, and Windtree Therapeutics; and personal fees from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Cytokinetics, Merck & Co, and Servier Laboratories. All other authors report no relevant disclosures., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
16. Multi-Organ System Metabolic Stress and Sex-Divergent Vascular Associations.
- Author
-
Kwan AC, Wang M, Ji H, Claggett B, Ouyang D, Trivedi H, Sharma S, Shyy J, Velazquez A, Ebinger JE, and Cheng S
- Abstract
Introduction: Women experience excess cardiovascular risk compared to men in the setting of similar metabolic disease burden. This consistent finding could be related to sex differences in the vascular response to various forms of metabolic stress. In this study we examine the association of both systemic and organ-specific metabolic stress with vascular health in women and men., Methods: We conducted an observational study of 4,299 adult participants (52% women, aged 59±13 years) of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2017-2018 cohort and 110,225 adult outpatients (55% women, aged 64±16 years) of the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) 2019 cohort. We used natural splines to examine the association of systemic and organ-specific measures of metabolic stress including body mass index (BMI), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), hepatic FIB-4 score, and CKD-EPI estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Piecewise linear models were generated using normal value thresholds (BMI <25 kg/m
2 , HbA1c <5.7%, FIB-4 <1.3, and eGFR ≥90 ml/min), which approximated observed spline breakpoints. The primary outcome was increase in SBP (relative to a sex-specific physiologic baseline SBP) in association with increase in level of each metabolic measure., Results: Women compared to men demonstrated larger magnitudes and an earlier onset of increase in SBP per increment increase across all metabolic stress measures. The slope of SBP increase per increment of each metabolic measure was greater for women than men particularly for metabolic measures within the normal range, with slope differences of 1.71 mmHg per kg/m2 of BMI, 9.61 mmHg per %HbA1c, 6.45 mmHg per FIB-4 unit, and 0.37 mmHg per ml/min decrement of eGFR in the NHANES cohort (P difference <0.05 for all). Overall results were consistent in the CSMC cohort., Conclusions: Women exhibited greater vascular sensitivity in the setting of multiple types of metabolic stress, particularly in periods representing the transition from metabolic health to disease. These findings underscore the importance of involving early metabolic health interventions as part of efforts to mitigate vascular risks in both women and men.- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
17. Prognostic Models for Mortality and Morbidity in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction.
- Author
-
McDowell K, Kondo T, Talebi A, Teh K, Bachus E, de Boer RA, Campbell RT, Claggett B, Desai AS, Docherty KF, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez F, Simpson J, Vaduganathan M, Jhund PS, Solomon SD, and McMurray JJV
- Subjects
- Humans, Male, Proportional Hazards Models, Prognosis, Cause of Death, Heart Failure, Diastolic diagnosis, Heart Failure, Diastolic mortality, Models, Cardiovascular
- Abstract
Importance: Accurate risk prediction of morbidity and mortality in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) may help clinicians risk stratify and inform care decisions., Objective: To develop and validate a novel prediction model for clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF using routinely collected variables and to compare it with a biomarker-driven approach., Design, Setting, and Participants: Data were used from the Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure (DELIVER) trial to derive the prediction model, and data from the Angiotensin Receptor Neprilysin Inhibition in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction (PARAGON-HF) and the Irbesartan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-PRESERVE) trials were used to validate it. The outcomes were the composite of HF hospitalization (HFH) or cardiovascular death, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death. A total of 30 baseline candidate variables were selected in a stepwise fashion using multivariable analyses to create the models. Data were analyzed from January 2023 to June 2023., Exposures: Models to estimate the 1-year and 2-year risk of cardiovascular death or hospitalization for heart failure, cardiovascular death, and all-cause death., Results: Data from 6263 individuals in the DELIVER trial were used to derive the prediction model and data from 4796 individuals in the PARAGON-HF trial and 4128 individuals in the I-PRESERVE trial were used to validate it. The final prediction model for the composite outcome included 11 variables: N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) level, HFH within the past 6 months, creatinine level, diabetes, geographic region, HF duration, treatment with a sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, transient ischemic attack/stroke, any previous HFH, and heart rate. This model showed good discrimination (C statistic at 1 year, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.71-0.75) in both validation cohorts (C statistic at 1 year, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.69-0.74 in PARAGON-HF and 0.75; 95% CI, 0.73-0.78 in I-PRESERVE) and calibration. The model showed similar discrimination to a biomarker-driven model including high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T and significantly better discrimination than the Meta-Analysis Global Group in Chronic (MAGGIC) risk score (C statistic at 1 year, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.58-0.63; delta C statistic, 0.13; 95% CI, 0.10-0.15; P < .001) and NT-proBNP level alone (C statistic at 1 year, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.64-0.68; delta C statistic, 0.07; 95% CI, 0.05-0.08; P < .001). Models derived for the prediction of all-cause and cardiovascular death also performed well. An online calculator was created to allow calculation of an individual's risk., Conclusions and Relevance: In this prognostic study, a robust prediction model for clinical outcomes in HFpEF was developed and validated using routinely collected variables. The model performed better than NT-proBNP level alone. The model may help clinicians to identify high-risk patients and guide treatment decisions in HFpEF.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
18. Clinical implications of subclinical left ventricular dysfunction in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: The PARAGON-HF study.
- Author
-
Minamisawa M, Inciardi RM, Claggett B, Cikes M, Liu L, Prasad N, Biering-Sørensen T, Lam CSP, Shah SJ, Zile MR, O'Meara E, Redfield MM, McMurray JJV, Solomon SD, and Shah AM
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Aged, Aminobutyrates therapeutic use, Biphenyl Compounds, Tetrazoles therapeutic use, Natriuretic Peptide, Brain blood, Peptide Fragments blood, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Prognosis, Heart Ventricles physiopathology, Heart Ventricles diagnostic imaging, Aged, 80 and over, Drug Combinations, Heart Failure physiopathology, Heart Failure complications, Stroke Volume physiology, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left physiopathology, Valsartan therapeutic use, Echocardiography methods, Hospitalization statistics & numerical data
- Abstract
Aims: Left ventricular (LV) subclinical impairment has been described in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We assessed the relationship between LV myocardial deformation by strain imaging and recurrent hospitalization for heart failure (HF) or cardiovascular death in a large international HFpEF population., Methods and Results: We assessed two-dimensional speckle-tracking based global longitudinal strain (GLS) in 790 patients (mean age 74 ± 8 years, 54% female) with adequate image quality enrolled in the PARAGON-HF echocardiography study. We examined the relationship of GLS with total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular death (the primary composite outcome) after accounting for clinical confounders. Approximately 47% of the population had evidence of LV subclinical dysfunction, defined as absolute GLS <16%. Impaired GLS was significantly associated with higher values of circulating baseline N-terminal pro-B-type-natriuretic peptide. After a median follow-up of 3.0 years, there were 407 total HF hospitalizations and cardiovascular deaths. After multivariable adjustment, worse GLS was associated with a greater risk for the primary composite outcome (adjusted hazard ratio per 1% decrease: 1.06; 95% confidence interval 1.02-1.11; p = 0.008). GLS did not modify the treatment effect of sacubitril/valsartan compared with valsartan for the composite outcome (p for interaction >0.1)., Conclusions: In a large HFpEF population, impaired LV function was observed even among patients with preserved ejection fraction, and was associated with an increased risk of total HF hospitalizations or cardiovascular death, accounting for clinical confounders. These findings highlight the key role of subtle LV systolic impairment in the pathophysiology of HFpEF., (© 2024 European Society of Cardiology.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
19. Individualized Treatment Effect Prediction with Machine Learning - Salient Considerations.
- Author
-
Desai RJ, Glynn RJ, Solomon SD, Claggett B, Wang SV, and Vaduganathan M
- Subjects
- Aged, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Algorithms, Precision Medicine methods, Stroke Volume drug effects, Treatment Outcome, Heart Failure drug therapy, Heart Failure mortality, Heart Failure physiopathology, Machine Learning, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Spironolactone therapeutic use
- Abstract
Background: Machine learning-based approaches that seek to accomplish individualized treatment effect prediction have gained traction; however, some salient challenges lack wider recognition., Methods: We describe key methodologic considerations for individualized treatment effect prediction models using data from the Treatment of Preserved Cardiac Function Heart Failure with an Aldosterone Antagonist Trial for spironolactone in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. The causal survival forest algorithm was used for model development. Calibration and discrimination were evaluated using a bootstrapping-based internal validation procedure. Observed benefits were described for predicted benefit quartiles and quartiles of a known effect modifier: ejection fraction. A negative control analysis with noncardiovascular death as the outcome was implemented to detect confounding., Results: Among 3445 participants, 671 events occurred over a median of 3.3 years of follow-up. In internal validation, a higher average observed benefit was noted among patients in the highest quartile of predicted benefit. The median (interquartile range) of the observed restricted mean survival time difference at 3.3 years at the highest quartile of model-predicted benefit was 62 days (32 to 83) and was 47 days (26 to 67) at the lowest quartile of ejection fraction. Body-mass index had higher contribution to prediction of benefit relative to other included measures (33.7% vs. glomerular filtration rate [27.3%], ejection fraction [15.1%], and younger age [12.8%]) No benefit was observed for noncardiovascular death at higher model-predicted benefit quartiles, although benefit for noncardiovascular death was observed at lower quartiles., Conclusions: Carefully applied and validated predictive models hold promise in identifying heterogeneous treatment effects and are useful for hypothesis generation regarding the role of phenotypic characteristics in modifying the benefit of experimental interventions in clinical trials. (Funded by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00094302.).
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
20. Insulin resistance, and not β-cell impairment, mediates association between Mycobacterium tuberculosis sensitization and type II diabetes mellitus among US adults.
- Author
-
Magodoro IM, Aluoch A, Claggett B, Nyirenda MJ, Siedner MJ, Wilkinson KA, Wilkinson RJ, and Ntusi N
- Abstract
Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a long-term sequela of infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis (M.tb) by mechanisms that remain to be fully explained. We evaluated association between M.tb sensitization and T2DM among U.S adults and, via formal mediation analysis, the extent to which this association is mediated by insulin resistance and/or β-cell failure. These evaluations accounted for demographic, socio-economic, behavioral and clinical characteristics. T2DM was assessed by fasting plasma glucose, 2-hour oral glucose tolerance testing and HbA1c; homoeostasis model assessment 2 (HOMA2) was used to estimate β-cell dysfunction (HOMA2-B) and insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR); while M.tb sensitization status was ascertained by tuberculin skin testing (TST). Exposure to M.tb was associated with increased risk for T2DM, likely driven by an increase in insulin resistance. Definitive prospective studies examining incident T2DM following tuberculosis are warranted., Research in Context: What is already known about this subject?: Accumulating evidence suggests that pre-diabetes and new-onset type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) may be a long-term complication of exposure to Mycobacterium tuberculosis ( M.tb ) via mechanisms that remain to be unraveled What is the key question?: To what extent do insulin resistance and β-cell failure mediate the association between M.tb sensitization with T2DM among US adults? What are the new findings?: M.tb sensitization is characterized by distinct glucose metabolic disturbances manifesting as increased risk of T2DM and isolated impaired fasting glucose (IFG) Insulin resistance, and not β-cell impairment, likely independently mediate the observed diabetogenic effects of M.tb sensitization How might this impact on clinical and/or public health practice in the foreseeable future?: If corroborated by prospective studies, both TB programs and individual clinical care must incorporate monitoring of serum glucose and long-term metabolic outcomesThis will be particularly urgent in sub-Saharan Africa and South-East Asia where scarce health resources coincide with overlapping endemic TB and epidemic T2DM.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
21. Cardioprotective effects of antiretroviral treatment in adolescents with perinatal HIV infection are heterogeneous depending on age at treatment initiation.
- Author
-
Magodoro IM, Guerrero-Chalela CE, Claggett B, Jermy S, Samuels P, Myer L, Zar H, Jao J, Ntsekhe M, Siedner MJ, and Ntusi NA
- Abstract
The cardioprotective effects of antiretroviral treatment (ART) in adolescents with perinatal HIV infection (APHIV) may depend on age at ART initiation. We used cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) to characterize and compare residual cardiac changes in apparently healthy APHIV with early and delayed ART initiation compared to sex- and age-similar HIV uninfected peers. We defined early and delayed ART as, respectively, treatment initiated at <5 years and ≥5 years of age. Cardiac function, mechanical deformation, geometry and tissue composition were assessed. APHIV had distinct albeit subclinical cardiac phenotypes depending on timing of ART initiation. For example, changes in early ART suggested comparatively worse diastology with preserved systolic function while delayed ART was associated with comparatively increased diffuse fibrosis and LV dilatation with reduced systolic function. The long-term clinical significance of these changes remains to be determined.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
22. Angiotensin Receptor-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With STEMI vs NSTEMI.
- Author
-
Mann DL, Nicolas J, Claggett B, Miao ZM, Granger CB, Kerkar P, Køber L, Lewis EF, McMurray JJV, Maggioni AP, Núñez J, Ntsekhe M, Rouleau JL, Sim D, Solomon SD, Steg PG, van der Meer P, Braunwald E, Pfeffer MA, and Mehran R
- Subjects
- Humans, Neprilysin, Ramipril, Angiotensins, Receptors, Angiotensin, Prospective Studies, Tetrazoles pharmacology, Treatment Outcome, Valsartan, Aminobutyrates pharmacology, Biphenyl Compounds, Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors therapeutic use, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists pharmacology, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction drug therapy, Non-ST Elevated Myocardial Infarction drug therapy, Heart Failure, Myocardial Infarction drug therapy, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left chemically induced
- Abstract
Background: Patients who sustain an acute myocardial infarction (AMI), including ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI), remain at high risk for heart failure (HF), coronary events, and death. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors have been shown to significantly decrease the risk for cardiovascular events in both STEMI and NSTEMI patients., Objectives: The objectives were to determine whether angiotensin-receptor blockade and neprilysin inhibition with sacubitril/valsartan, compared with ramipril, has impact on reducing cardiovascular events according to the type of AMI., Methods: The PARADISE-MI (Prospective ARNI versus ACE inhibitor trial to DetermIne Superiority in reducing heart failure Events after Myocardial Infarction) trial enrolled patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction and/or pulmonary congestion and at least 1 risk-enhancing factor. Patients were randomized to either sacubitril/valsartan or ramipril. The primary endpoint was death from cardiovascular causes or incident HF. In this prespecified analysis, we stratified patients according to AMI type., Results: Of 5,661 enrolled patients, 4,291 (75.8%) had STEMI. These patients were younger and had fewer comorbidities and cardiovascular risk factors than NSTEMI patients. After adjustment for potential confounders, the risk for the primary outcome was marginally higher in NSTEMI vs STEMI patients (adjusted HR: 1.19; 95% CI: 1.00-1.41), with borderline statistical significance (P = 0.05). The primary composite outcome occurred at similar rates in patients randomized to sacubitril/valsartan vs ramipril in STEMI (10% vs 12%; HR: 0.87; 95% CI: 0.73-1.04; P = 0.13) and NSTEMI patients (17% vs 17%; HR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.75-1.25; P = 0.80; P interaction = 0.53)., Conclusions: Compared with ramipril, sacubitril/valsartan did not significantly decrease the risk for cardiovascular death and HF in patients with AMI complicated by left ventricular dysfunction, irrespective of the type of AMI. (Prospective ARNI vs ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI; NCT02924727)., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The PARADISE-MI trial was funded by Novartis. Dr Braunwald has received research grants through his institution from AstraZeneca, Daiichi-Sankyo, Merck, and Novartis; and has consultancies with Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim/Lilly, Cardurion, and Verve. Dr Claggert has received consultancy fees from Novartis, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cardurion, Corvia, and Myokardia. Dr Granger has received research grants from AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Daiichi-Sankyo, Duke Clinical Research Institute, FDA, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen Pharmaceutical Products, L.P., Medtronic Foundation, Novartis Pharmaceutic Company, and Pfizer; has received consulting fees from Abbvie, Abiomed, Alnylam Pharm, Bayer Corporation US, Boehringer Ingelheim, Boston Scientific Corporation, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardionomic, CeleCor Therapeutics, HengRui USA, Janssen Pharmaceutica Products, L.P., Medscape, LLC, Medtronic Inc, Merck, NIH, Novo Nordisk, Novartis Pharmaceutic Company, Pfizer, Phillips, and REATA; and owns equity in Tenac.io. Dr Kerkar has received speaker fees from Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bayer Zydus, Boehringer Ingelheim, Cipla, Dr Reddy’s, Emcure, Intas, Johnson and Johnson, Mankind, Pfizer, Torrent, and USV. Dr Kober has received speaker honorarium from Nova, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Bayer, and Boehringer. Dr Lewis has received personal fees from Amgen and Dal-Cor. Dr Maggioni has received personal fees for participation in committees of studies supported by Bayer, Novartis, AstraZeneca, and Fresenius, outside the present work. Dr Mann has received consulting fees from Cardurion, HAYA Therapeutics, Tenaya, and Novo Nordisk. Dr Mehran has received institutional research payments from Abbott, Abiomed, Alleviant Medical, AM-Pharma, Applied Therapeutics, Arena, AstraZeneca, BAIM, Bayer, Beth Israel Deaconess, Biosensors, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, Bristol Myers Squibb, CardiaWave, CellAegis, CeloNova, CERC, Chiesi, Concept Medical, CSL Behring, Cytosorbents, DSI, Duke University, Element Science, Faraday, Humacyte, Idorsia, Insel Gruppe AG, Magenta, Medtronic, Novartis, OrbusNeich, Philips, RenalPro, Vivasure, and Zoll; has received personal fees from Cine-Med Research and WebMD; has received consulting fees paid to the institution from Abbott, Janssen, Medtronic, and Novartis; has equity <1% in Applied Therapeutics, Elixir Medical, STEL, and CONTROLRAD (spouse); and is on the Scientific Advisory Board for AMA, ACC (BOT Member), SCAI (Women in Innovations Committee Member), and JAMA Associate Editor; and Faculty CRF (no fee). Dr McMurray has received payments through Glasgow University from work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GSK, KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; has received personal consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharma, Bayer, BMS, George Clinical PTY Ltd, Ionis Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharma, and River 2 Renal Corporation; has received personal lecture fees from Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, AstraZeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd., Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharma. Ltd, Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of CME, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica health, Intas Pharma, J.B. Chemicals & Pharma. Ltd, Lupin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharma., The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy; and he is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. Dr Nunez has received personal fees from or is on the advisory boards for Alleviant, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Cytokinetics, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Rovi, and Vifor Pharma. Dr Pfeffer has received research grant support through his institution from Novartis; has been a consultant to Alnylam, AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim and Eli Lilly Alliance, Corvidia, DalCor, GlaxoSmithKline, Lexicon, NHLBI CONNECTs (Master Protocol Committee), Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Peerbridge, and Sanofi; and has equity in DalCor. Dr Rouleau has received consultant fees from Novartis, BMS, Bayer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Sim has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, BMS, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GSK, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, NIH/NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, BMS, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GSK, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellProThera, Moderna, American Regent, Sarepta, Lexicon, Anacardio, Akros, and Puretech Health. Dr Solomon has received research grants from Actelion, Alnylam, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bellerophon, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celladon, Cytokinetics, Eidos, Gilead, GlaxoSmithKline, Ionis, Lilly, Mesoblast, MyoKardia, National Institutes of Health/NHLBI, Neurotronik, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Respicardia, Sanofi Pasteur, Theracos, and US2.AI; and has consulted for Abbott, Action, Akros, Alnylam, Amgen, Arena, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cardior, Cardurion, Corvia, Cytokinetics, Daiichi-Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline, Lilly, Merck, Myokardia, Novartis, Roche, Theracos, Quantum Genomics, Cardurion, Janssen, Cardiac Dimensions, Tenaya, Sanofi-Pasteur, Dinaqor, Tremeau, CellPro-Thera, Moderna, American Regent, and Sarepta. Dr Steg has received research grants from Amarin, Bayer, Sanofi, and Servier; and has received speaker or consultant fees from Amarin, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Kowa, Idorsia, Lexicon, Merck, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, PhaseBio, Pfizer, Regeneron, Sanofi, and Servier. Dr Van der Meer has received consultancy fees and/or grants, through the University Medical Center Groningen, from Novartis, Pharmacosmos, Vifor Pharma, AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Pharma Nord, BridgeBio, Novo Nordisk, Daiichi-Sankyo, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Ionis. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Crown Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
23. Reply: Rethinking eGFR Comparisons in SGLT2 Inhibitor Research.
- Author
-
Chatur S, Vaduganathan M, Claggett B, and Solomon SD
- Subjects
- Humans, Hypoglycemic Agents, Sodium-Glucose Transporter 2 Inhibitors therapeutic use, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 drug therapy
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
24. Dapagliflozin and Mode of Death in Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: A Post Hoc Analysis of the DELIVER Trial.
- Author
-
Vardeny O, Desai AS, Jhund PS, Fang JC, Claggett B, de Boer RA, Hernandez AF, Inzucchi SE, Kosiborod MN, Lam CSP, Martinez FA, Shah SJ, Mc Causland FR, Petrie MC, Vaduganathan M, McMurray JJV, and Solomon SD
- Subjects
- Humans, Stroke Volume, Sodium-Glucose Transport Proteins therapeutic use, Ventricular Function, Left, Heart Failure, Benzhydryl Compounds, Glucosides
- Abstract
Importance: Heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF), defined as prior left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 40% or lower that has increased to greater than 40%, is understudied., Objective: To examine mode of death and the association of dapagliflozin with reductions in cause-specific death in patients with HFimpEF., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a post hoc analysis from the Dapagliflozin Evaluation to Improve the Lives of Patients With Preserved Ejection Fraction Heart Failure (DELIVER) randomized clinical trial, conducted from August 2018 to December 2020. The trial randomly assigned patients with HF with LVEF greater than 40%, New York Heart Association class II to IV symptoms, and elevated natriuretic peptides to treatment with dapagliflozin (10 mg, once daily) or placebo. The presence of HFimpEF was captured through study case report forms. The primary outcome was a composite of worsening HF events (hospitalization or urgent HF visits) or cardiovascular death. Clinical outcomes were adjudicated by a blinded clinical end points committee. Data were analyzed from May 2022 to August 2023., Intervention: Dapagliflozin vs placebo., Main Outcomes and Measures: The mode of death in relation to HFimpEF status was examined, as well as the association of randomized treatment with cause-specific death in Cox regression models., Results: Of 1151 patients with HFimpEF in DELIVER, 190 (16.5%) died, compared with 833 patients (16.3%) of 5112 with LVEF consistently greater than 40%. The overall distribution of mode of death was similar in those with HFimpEF compared with those with LVEF consistently greater than 40% (noncardiovascular death: 103 of 190 [54%] vs 428 of 833 [51%]; cardiovascular death: 87 of 190 [46%] vs 405 of 833 [49%], respectively). Most deaths in individuals with HFimpEF were noncardiovascular (103 of 180 [54%]). For cardiovascular deaths, sudden deaths were most common (36 of 190 events [19%]), followed by HF-related (29 of 190 events [15%]). Among patients with HFimpEF, treatment with dapagliflozin was associated with lower rates of cardiovascular death relative to placebo, a difference primarily due to lower rates of sudden death (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.18-0.79; P for interaction = .01)., Conclusions and Relevance: The findings in this study support current guideline recommendations for use of sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor therapy, and further suggest that the addition of a sodium-glucose transport protein 2 inhibitor therapy to other guideline-directed medical therapies may help reduce cardiovascular mortality in patients with HFimpEF., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03619213.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
25. Large-Scale Proteomics Identifies Novel Biomarkers and Circulating Risk Factors for Aortic Stenosis.
- Author
-
Shelbaya K, Arthur V, Yang Y, Dorbala P, Buckley L, Claggett B, Skali H, Dufresne L, Yang TY, Engert JC, Thanassoulis G, Floyd J, Austin TR, Bortnick A, Kizer J, Freitas RCC, Singh SA, Aikawa E, Hoogeveen RC, Ballantyne C, Yu B, Coresh J, Blaha MJ, Matsushita K, and Shah AM
- Subjects
- Humans, Middle Aged, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Matrix Metalloproteinase 12, Risk Factors, Aortic Valve diagnostic imaging, Biomarkers, Proteomics, Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve pathology, Calcinosis
- Abstract
Background: Limited data exist regarding risk factors for aortic stenosis (AS). The plasma proteome is a promising phenotype for discovery of novel biomarkers and potentially causative mechanisms., Objectives: The aim of this study was to discover novel biomarkers with potentially causal associations with AS., Methods: We measured 4,877 plasma proteins (SomaScan aptamer-affinity assay) among ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk In Communities) study participants in mid-life (visit 3 [V3]; n = 11,430; age 60 ± 6 years) and in late-life (V5; n = 4,899; age 76 ± 5 years). We identified proteins cross-sectionally associated with aortic valve (AV) peak velocity (AVmax) and dimensionless index by echocardiography at V5 and with incident AV-related hospitalization after V3 with the use of multivariable linear and Cox proportional hazard regression. We assessed associations of candidate proteins with changes in AVmax over 6 years and with AV calcification with the use of cardiac computed tomography, replicated analysis in an independent sample, performed Mendelian randomization, and evaluated gene expression in explanted human AV tissue., Results: Fifty-two proteins cross-sectionally were associated with AVmax and dimensionless index at V5 and with risk of incident AV-related hospitalization after V3. Among 3,413 participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study, 6 of those proteins were significantly associated with adjudicated moderate or severe AS, including matrix metalloproteinase 12 (MMP12), complement C1q tumor necrosis factor-related protein 1 (C1QTNF1), and growth differentiation factor-15. MMP12 was also associated with greater increase in AVmax over 6 years, greater degree of AV calcification, and greater expression in calcific compared with normal or fibrotic AV tissue. C1QTNF1 had consistent potential causal effects on both AS and AVmax according to Mendelian randomization analysis., Conclusions: These findings identify MMP12 as a potential novel circulating biomarker of AS risk and C1QTNF1 as a new putative target to prevent AS progression., Competing Interests: Funding Support and Author Disclosures The ARIC study has been funded in whole or in part with federal funds from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI), National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Health and Human Services, under contract nos. HHSN268201700001I, HHSN268201700002I, HHSN268201700003I, HHSN268201700005I, and HHSN268201700004I. This study was also supported by NIH/NHLBI grants R01HL135008, R01HL143224, R01HL150342, R01HL148218, R01HL160025, and K24HL152008 to Dr Shah; R01HL136592 to Drs Matsushita and Blaha; R01HL141917 and R01 HL147095 to Dr Aikawa; K23HL146982 to Dr Bortnick; R01HL144483 to Dr Austin; R01HL142599 and R01HL149706 to Dr Floyd; R01HL128550 to Dr Thanassoulis; and K23HL150311, ASN/KidneyCure Carl W. Gottschalk Research Scholar Grant, and BWH Khoury Innovation Fund to Dr Buckley. Dr Thanassoulis is a Chercheur Boursier Clinicien—Senior from the Fonds de Recherche du Québec—Santé and holds operating grants from the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Drs Thanassoulis and Engert hold an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes for Health Research. Dr Skali has received consulting fees from Astellas; and has received research support from ABT Associates. Dr Thanassoulis has received consulting fees or participated in advisory boards or speakers bureau for Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Amgen, Sanofi, Novartis, HLS Therapeutics, New Amsterdam, and Silence. Dr Bortnick was the site principal investigator for a clinical trial by CSL-Behring; has received an unrestricted educational grant to her institution from Zoll; and has received a modest honorarium from ClearView Healthcare, outside the present work. Dr Kizer has stock ownership in Abbott, Bristol Myers Squibb, Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic, Merck, and Pfizer. Dr Aikawa is a Scientific Advisory Board member for Elastrin Therapeutics. Dr Hoogeveen has received consulting fees and research funds from Denka Seiken through Baylor College of Medicine, outside the present work. Dr Coresh is a member of the SomaLogic Scientific Advisory Board. Dr Blaha has Advisory Board membership for Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Bayer, Roche, Merck, Vectura, Boehringer Ingelheim, 89BioConsulting, Kowa, and Scene Health. Dr Matsushita has received honoraria from Fukuda Denshi and Kowa, outside the present work. Dr Shah has received consulting fees from Philips Ultrasound; and has received research funds from Novartis through Brigham and Women’s Hospital. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of this study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or decision to submit the manuscript for publication. All other authors have reported that they have no relationships relevant to the contents of this paper to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
26. Natural Language Processing for Adjudication of Heart Failure in a Multicenter Clinical Trial: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.
- Author
-
Cunningham JW, Singh P, Reeder C, Claggett B, Marti-Castellote PM, Lau ES, Khurshid S, Batra P, Lubitz SA, Maddah M, Philippakis A, Desai AS, Ellinor PT, Vardeny O, Solomon SD, and Ho JE
- Abstract
Importance: The gold standard for outcome adjudication in clinical trials is medical record review by a physician clinical events committee (CEC), which requires substantial time and expertise. Automated adjudication of medical records by natural language processing (NLP) may offer a more resource-efficient alternative but this approach has not been validated in a multicenter setting., Objective: To externally validate the Community Care Cohort Project (C3PO) NLP model for heart failure (HF) hospitalization adjudication, which was previously developed and tested within one health care system, compared to gold-standard CEC adjudication in a multicenter clinical trial., Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a retrospective analysis of the Influenza Vaccine to Effectively Stop Cardio Thoracic Events and Decompensated Heart Failure (INVESTED) trial, which compared 2 influenza vaccines in 5260 participants with cardiovascular disease at 157 sites in the US and Canada between September 2016 and January 2019. Analysis was performed from November 2022 to October 2023., Exposures: Individual sites submitted medical records for each hospitalization. The central INVESTED CEC and the C3PO NLP model independently adjudicated whether the cause of hospitalization was HF using the prepared hospitalization dossier. The C3PO NLP model was fine-tuned (C3PO + INVESTED) and a de novo NLP model was trained using half the INVESTED hospitalizations., Main Outcomes and Measures: Concordance between the C3PO NLP model HF adjudication and the gold-standard INVESTED CEC adjudication was measured by raw agreement, κ, sensitivity, and specificity. The fine-tuned and de novo INVESTED NLP models were evaluated in an internal validation cohort not used for training., Results: Among 4060 hospitalizations in 1973 patients (mean [SD] age, 66.4 [13.2] years; 514 [27.4%] female and 1432 [72.6%] male]), 1074 hospitalizations (26%) were adjudicated as HF by the CEC. There was good agreement between the C3PO NLP and CEC HF adjudications (raw agreement, 87% [95% CI, 86-88]; κ, 0.69 [95% CI, 0.66-0.72]). C3PO NLP model sensitivity was 94% (95% CI, 92-95) and specificity was 84% (95% CI, 83-85). The fine-tuned C3PO and de novo NLP models demonstrated agreement of 93% (95% CI, 92-94) and κ of 0.82 (95% CI, 0.77-0.86) and 0.83 (95% CI, 0.79-0.87), respectively, vs the CEC. CEC reviewer interrater reproducibility was 94% (95% CI, 93-95; κ, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.80-0.89])., Conclusions and Relevance: The C3PO NLP model developed within 1 health care system identified HF events with good agreement relative to the gold-standard CEC in an external multicenter clinical trial. Fine-tuning the model improved agreement and approximated human reproducibility. Further study is needed to determine whether NLP will improve the efficiency of future multicenter clinical trials by identifying clinical events at scale.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
27. Pulmonary Congestion and Left Ventricular Dysfunction After Myocardial Infarction: Insights From the PARADISE-MI Trial.
- Author
-
Petrie MC, Rouleau JL, Claggett B, Jering K, van der Meer P, Køber L, Miao ZM, Lewis E, Granger C, De Pasqulae CG, Mann D, Steg PG, Maggioni A, Amir O, Lefkowitz M, Braunwald E, Solomon SD, McMurray JJV, and Pfeffer MA
- Subjects
- Humans, Pulmonary Circulation, Pulmonary Edema, Myocardial Infarction complications, Ventricular Dysfunction, Left etiology
- Abstract
Competing Interests: Disclosures Dr Petrie reports receiving research funding from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, SQ Innovations, AstraZeneca, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, Boston Scientific, Pharmacosmos, 3R LifeSciences; participating in consultancy and clinical trial committees, outside the submitted work, for Boehringer Ingelheim, Novartis, Roche, Corvia, AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk, Medtronic, AbbVie, Bayer, Takeda, Cardiorentis, Pharmacosmos, and Siemens. Dr Rouleau reports receiving consultant fees from Novartis, BMS, Bayer, and AstraZeneca. Dr Køber reports receiving speaker fees from Novartis, Novo, AstraZeneca, Boehringer, and Bayer. Dr De Pasquale reports receiving speaker honoraria and consulting fees from AstraZeneca, Novartis, Vifor, Otsuka, St Jude, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Lilly, Roche, Servier, and American Regent. Dr Mann reports receiving consulting fees from Bristol Myers Squibb and NovoNordisk. Dr Steg reports receiving research grants from Amarin, Bayer, Sanofi, and Servier; serving on clinical trials (Steering Committee, Clinical Endpoint Committee, Data Safety Monitoring Board) for Amarin, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Idorsia, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Servier; and receiving consultant or speaker fees from Amarin, Amgen, BMS/MyoKardia, Novartis, Novo Nordisk, and Regeneron. He is Senior Associate Editor at Circulation. Dr Maggioni reports receiving personal fees outside of the present work for participation in committees of studies supported by Bayer, Novartis, Astra Zeneca, and Fresenius. Dr Lefkowitz is an employee of Novartis Pharmaceutical Corporation. Dr Braunwald reports receiving research grants from AstraZeneca (to Brigham and Womens Hospital), Daiichi Sankyo, Merck, and Novartis; and consulting fees from Amgen, Bristol Myers Squibb (MyoKardia), Boehringer-Ingelheim/Lilly, Cardurion, and Verve. Dr McMurray reports receiving payments through Glasgow University from work on clinical trials, consulting, and other activities from Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Cardurion, Cytokinetics, GSK, KBP Biosciences, and Novartis; personal consultancy fees from Alnylam Pharma., Bayer, Bristol Myers Squibb, George Clinical PTY Ltd, Ionis Pharma, Novartis, Regeneron Pharma, and River 2 Renal Corporation; and personal lecture fees Abbott, Alkem Metabolics, AstraZeneca, Blue Ocean Scientific Solutions Ltd, Boehringer Ingelheim, Canadian Medical and Surgical Knowledge, Emcure Pharma Ltd, Eris Lifesciences, European Academy of Continuing Medical Education, Hikma Pharmaceuticals, Imagica Health, Intas Pharma, JB Chemicals & Pharma Ltd, Lupin Pharma, Medscape/Heart.Org, ProAdWise Communications, Radcliffe Cardiology, Sun Pharma, The Corpus, Translation Research Group, and Translational Medicine Academy. He is a director of Global Clinical Trial Partners Ltd. The other authors have nothing to disclose.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
28. Large scale plasma proteomics identifies novel proteins and protein networks associated with heart failure development.
- Author
-
Shah AM, Myhre PL, Arthur V, Dorbala P, Rasheed H, Buckley LF, Claggett B, Liu G, Ma J, Nguyen NQ, Matsushita K, Ndumele C, Tin A, Hveem K, Jonasson C, Dalen H, Boerwinkle E, Hoogeveen RC, Ballantyne C, Coresh J, Omland T, and Yu B
- Subjects
- Humans, Proteomics, Risk Factors, Phenotype, Carrier Proteins genetics, Glycoproteins genetics, Extracellular Matrix Proteins genetics, Heart Failure, Atherosclerosis
- Abstract
Heart failure (HF) causes substantial morbidity and mortality but its pathobiology is incompletely understood. The proteome is a promising intermediate phenotype for discovery of novel mechanisms. We measured 4877 plasma proteins in 13,900 HF-free individuals across three analysis sets with diverse age, geography, and HF ascertainment to identify circulating proteins and protein networks associated with HF development. Parallel analyses in Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities study participants in mid-life and late-life and in Trøndelag Health Study participants identified 37 proteins consistently associated with incident HF independent of traditional risk factors. Mendelian randomization supported causal effects of 10 on HF, HF risk factors, or left ventricular size and function, including matricellular (e.g. SPON1, MFAP4), senescence-associated (FSTL3, IGFBP7), and inflammatory (SVEP1, CCL15, ITIH3) proteins. Protein co-regulation network analyses identified 5 modules associated with HF risk, two of which were influenced by genetic variants that implicated trans hotspots within the VTN and CFH genes., (© 2024. The Author(s).)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
29. Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Insight from the PARADISE MI trial.
- Author
-
Schou M, Claggett B, Miao ZM, Fernandez A, Filippatos G, Granger C, Jering K, Maggioni AP, McCausland F, Villota JN, Rouleau JL, Mody FV, van der Meer P, Vinereanu D, McGrath M, Zhou Y, Mann DL, Solomon SD, Steg PG, Braunwald E, McMurray JJV, Pfeffer MA, and Køber L
- Subjects
- Humans, Ramipril therapeutic use, Ramipril pharmacology, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists therapeutic use, Mineralocorticoid Receptor Antagonists pharmacology, Prospective Studies, Tetrazoles therapeutic use, Tetrazoles pharmacology, Angiotensin Receptor Antagonists adverse effects, Valsartan therapeutic use, Biphenyl Compounds therapeutic use, Aminobutyrates adverse effects, Drug Combinations, Stroke Volume, Heart Failure, Hyperkalemia drug therapy, Hypotension chemically induced, Myocardial Infarction complications, Myocardial Infarction drug therapy
- Abstract
Aim: It is unknown whether safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan (an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) are affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether MRA modifies safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or pulmonary congestion., Methods and Results: Patients (n = 5661) included in the PARADISE MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI) were stratified according to MRA. Primary outcomes in this substudy were worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalaemia >5.5 mmol/L, or permanent drug discontinuation. A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with MRA. Safety of ARNI compared to ramipril was not altered significantly by ± MRA, and both groups had similar increase in symptomatic hypotension with ARNI. In patients taking MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not significantly altered by ARNI (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The effect of ARNI compared with ramipril was similar in those who were and were not taking MRA (hazard ratio [HR]
MRA 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.19 and HRMRA- 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.05, for the primary endpoint; p = 0.51 for interaction [Clinical Endpoint Committee adjudicated]); similar findings were observed if investigator-reported endpoints were evaluated (p = 0.61 for interaction)., Conclusions: Use of a MRA did not modify safety or clinical endpoints related to initiation of ARNI compared to ramipril in the post-MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion., (© 2023 European Society of Cardiology.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
30. Electrocardiographic deep learning for predicting post-procedural mortality: a model development and validation study.
- Author
-
Ouyang D, Theurer J, Stein NR, Hughes JW, Elias P, He B, Yuan N, Duffy G, Sandhu RK, Ebinger J, Botting P, Jujjavarapu M, Claggett B, Tooley JE, Poterucha T, Chen JH, Nurok M, Perez M, Perotte A, Zou JY, Cook NR, Chugh SS, Cheng S, and Albert CM
- Subjects
- Humans, Risk Assessment methods, Algorithms, Prognosis, Electrocardiography, Deep Learning
- Abstract
Background: Preoperative risk assessments used in clinical practice are insufficient in their ability to identify risk for postoperative mortality. Deep-learning analysis of electrocardiography can identify hidden risk markers that can help to prognosticate postoperative mortality. We aimed to develop a prognostic model that accurately predicts postoperative mortality in patients undergoing medical procedures and who had received preoperative electrocardiographic diagnostic testing., Methods: In a derivation cohort of preoperative patients with available electrocardiograms (ECGs) from Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (Los Angeles, CA, USA) between Jan 1, 2015 and Dec 31, 2019, a deep-learning algorithm was developed to leverage waveform signals to discriminate postoperative mortality. We randomly split patients (8:1:1) into subsets for training, internal validation, and final algorithm test analyses. Model performance was assessed using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values in the hold-out test dataset and in two external hospital cohorts and compared with the established Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) score. The primary outcome was post-procedural mortality across three health-care systems., Findings: 45 969 patients had a complete ECG waveform image available for at least one 12-lead ECG performed within the 30 days before the procedure date (59 975 inpatient procedures and 112 794 ECGs): 36 839 patients in the training dataset, 4549 in the internal validation dataset, and 4581 in the internal test dataset. In the held-out internal test cohort, the algorithm discriminates mortality with an AUC value of 0·83 (95% CI 0·79-0·87), surpassing the discrimination of the RCRI score with an AUC of 0·67 (0·61-0·72). The algorithm similarly discriminated risk for mortality in two independent US health-care systems, with AUCs of 0·79 (0·75-0·83) and 0·75 (0·74-0·76), respectively. Patients determined to be high risk by the deep-learning model had an unadjusted odds ratio (OR) of 8·83 (5·57-13·20) for postoperative mortality compared with an unadjusted OR of 2·08 (0·77-3·50) for postoperative mortality for RCRI scores of more than 2. The deep-learning algorithm performed similarly for patients undergoing cardiac surgery (AUC 0·85 [0·77-0·92]), non-cardiac surgery (AUC 0·83 [0·79-0·88]), and catheterisation or endoscopy suite procedures (AUC 0·76 [0·72-0·81])., Interpretation: A deep-learning algorithm interpreting preoperative ECGs can improve discrimination of postoperative mortality. The deep-learning algorithm worked equally well for risk stratification of cardiac surgeries, non-cardiac surgeries, and catheterisation laboratory procedures, and was validated in three independent health-care systems. This algorithm can provide additional information to clinicians making the decision to perform medical procedures and stratify the risk of future complications., Funding: National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests DO reports support from the National Institute of Health (NIH; NHLBI R00HL157421) and Alexion, and consulting or honoraria for lectures from EchoIQ, Ultromics, Pfizer, InVision, the Korean Society of Echo, and the Japanese Society of Echo. JWH reports funding from the National Science Foundation (DGE-1656518). PE reports research support from the NIH (T32HL007854-21) and serves on the American College of Cardiology Innovation Council. BC reports consulting from Alnylam, Cardurion, Corvia, CVRX, Cytokinetics, Intellia, and Rocket. TP reports stock in Abbot and Baxter, and research support from the American Heart Association, Eido, Pfizer, Edwards, and the New York Academy of Medicine. JHC reports research funding from NIH/National Institute of Aging (AI17812101), NIH/National Institute on Drug Abuse (UG1DA015815-CTN-0136), AIMI-HAI Partnership, Doris Duke Charitable Foundation (20211260), Google (SPO136094), American Heart Association, and Clinical and Translational Sciences Awards Program by the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (R56LM013365); is a co-founder of Reaction Explorer; and receives consulting fees from Sutton Pierce and Younker Hyde MacFarlane. MP reports research support from the NIH (HL136390), patents for ECG-based cardiac arrhythmia detection (WO2014205310A3), and consulting fees from Apple, Biotronik, Boston Scientific, QALY, Johnson and Johnson, and Bristol Myers Squibb. CMA reports support from NIH (HL165840), consulting fees from Medtronic, Novartis, Illumina, and Medtronic, and participation in advisory boards for Boston Scientific, Medtronic, and Element Science; and is a trustee on the board for the Heart Rhythm Society. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.