Back to Search Start Over

Sacubitril/valsartan compared to ramipril in high-risk post-myocardial infarction patients stratified according to use of mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists: Insight from the PARADISE MI trial.

Authors :
Schou M
Claggett B
Miao ZM
Fernandez A
Filippatos G
Granger C
Jering K
Maggioni AP
McCausland F
Villota JN
Rouleau JL
Mody FV
van der Meer P
Vinereanu D
McGrath M
Zhou Y
Mann DL
Solomon SD
Steg PG
Braunwald E
McMurray JJV
Pfeffer MA
Køber L
Source :
European journal of heart failure [Eur J Heart Fail] 2024 Jan; Vol. 26 (1), pp. 130-139. Date of Electronic Publication: 2023 Nov 29.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Aim: It is unknown whether safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan (an angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor [ARNI]) are affected by mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRA) in high-risk myocardial infarction (MI) patients. The aim of this study was to examine whether MRA modifies safety and clinical endpoints by use of sacubitril/valsartan in patients with a MI and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) and/or pulmonary congestion.<br />Methods and Results: Patients (n = 5661) included in the PARADISE MI trial (Prospective ARNI vs. ACE Inhibitor Trial to Determine Superiority in Reducing Heart Failure Events After MI) were stratified according to MRA. Primary outcomes in this substudy were worsening heart failure or cardiovascular death. Safety was defined as symptomatic hypotension, hyperkalaemia >5.5 mmol/L, or permanent drug discontinuation. A total of 2338 patients (41%) were treated with MRA. Safety of ARNI compared to ramipril was not altered significantly by ± MRA, and both groups had similar increase in symptomatic hypotension with ARNI. In patients taking MRA, the risk of hyperkalaemia or permanent drug discontinuation was not significantly altered by ARNI (p > 0.05 for all comparisons). The effect of ARNI compared with ramipril was similar in those who were and were not taking MRA (hazard ratio [HR] <subscript>MRA</subscript> 0.96, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.77-1.19 and HR <subscript>MRA-</subscript> 0.87, 95% CI 0.71-1.05, for the primary endpoint; p = 0.51 for interaction [Clinical Endpoint Committee adjudicated]); similar findings were observed if investigator-reported endpoints were evaluated (p = 0.61 for interaction).<br />Conclusions: Use of a MRA did not modify safety or clinical endpoints related to initiation of ARNI compared to ramipril in the post-MI setting in patients with LVSD and/or congestion.<br /> (© 2023 European Society of Cardiology.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0844
Volume :
26
Issue :
1
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of heart failure
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
37933184
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.3079