Search

GRK2 and arrestin3, key players in the functional regulation of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), are ubiquitinated by Mdm2, a nuclear protein. The agonist-induced increase in arrestin3 ubiquitination occurs in the nucleus, underscoring the crucial role of its nuclear translocation in this process. The ubiquitination of arrestin3 occurs in the nucleus, highlighting the pivotal role of its nuclear translocation in this process. In contrast, GRK2 cannot translocate into the nucleus; thus, facilitation of the cytosolic translocation of nuclear Mdm2 is required to ubiquitinate GRK2 in the cytosol. Among the explored cellular components and processes, arrestin, Gβγ, clathrin, and receptor phosphorylation were found to be required for the nuclear import of arrestin3, the ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus, nuclear export of Mdm2, and the ubiquitination of GRK2 in the cytosol. In conclusion, our findings demonstrate that agonist-induced ubiquitination of arrestin3 in the nucleus is interconnected with cytosolic GRK2 ubiquitination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Interleukin-4 (IL-4)- exposed microglia acquire neuroprotective properties, but their functions and regulation in Parkinson's disease (PD) are poorly understood. In this study, we demonstrate that IL-4 enhances anti-inflammatory microglia reactivity, ameliorates the pathological features of PD, and reciprocally affects expression of β-arrestin 1 and β-arrestin 2 in microglia in PD mouse models. We also show that manipulation of two β-arrestins produces contrary effects on the anti-inflammatory states and neuroprotective action of microglia induced by IL-4 in vivo and in vitro. We further find that the functional antagonism of two β-arrestins is mediated through sequential activation of sterile alpha motif domain containing 4 (Samd4), mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR), and mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation (OXPHOS). Collectively, these data reveal opposing functions of two closely related β-arrestins in regulating the IL-4-induced microglia reactivity via the Samd4/mTOR/OXPHOS axis in PD mouse models and provide important insights into the pathogenesis and therapeutics of PD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose: Pancreatic islets are modulated by cross‐talk among different cell types and paracrine signalling plays important roles in maintaining glucose homeostasis. Urocortin 3 (UCN3) secreted by pancreatic β cells activates the CRF2 receptor (CRF2R) and downstream pathways mediated by different G protein or arrestin subtypes in δ cells to cause somatostatin (SST) secretion, and constitutes an important feedback circuit for glucose homeostasis. Experimental Approach: Here, we used Arrb1−/−, Arrb2−/−, Gsfl/fl and Gqfl/fl knockout mice, the G11‐shRNA‐GFPfl/fl lentivirus, as well as functional assays and pharmacological characterization to study how the coupling of Gs, G11 and β‐arrestin1 to CRF2R contributed to UCN3‐induced SST secretion in pancreatic δ cells. Key Results: Our study showed that CRF2R coupled to a panel of G protein and arrestin subtypes in response to UCN3 engagement. While RyR3 phosphorylation by PKA at the S156, S2706 and S4697 sites may underlie the Gs‐mediated UCN3‐ CRF2R axis for SST secretion, the interaction of SYT1 with β‐arrestin1 is also essential for efficient SST secretion downstream of CRF2R. The specific expression of the transcription factor Stat6 may contribute to G11 expression in pancreatic δ cells. Furthermore, we found that different UCN3 concentrations may have distinct effects on glucose homeostasis, and these effects may depend on different CRF2R downstream effectors. Conclusions and Implications: Collectively, our results provide a landscape view of signalling mediated by different G protein or arrestin subtypes downstream of paracrine UCN3‐ CRF2R signalling in pancreatic β‐δ‐cell circuits, which may facilitate the understanding of fine‐tuned glucose homeostasis networks. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The OPRM1 gene codes for the mu opioid receptor (MOR) and polymorphisms are associated with complex patient clinical responses. The most studied single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) in OPRM1 is adenine (A) substituted by guanine (G) at position 118 (118A>G, rs1799971) leading to a substitution of asparagine (Asn) for aspartic acid (Asp) at position 40 in the N terminus of the resulting protein. To date, no structural explanation for the associated clinical responses resulting from the 118A>G polymorphism has been proposed. We utilized computational modeling paired with functional cellular assays to predict unstructured N‐ and C‐terminal regions of MOR‐1. Using molecular docking and post‐docking energy minimizations with morphine, we show that the extracellular substitution of Asn at position 40 alters the cytoplasmic C‐terminal conformation, while leaving the G‐protein binding interface unaffected. A real‐time BRET assay measuring G‐protein and β‐arrestin association with MOR r generated data that tested this prediction. Consistent with this in silico prediction, we show changes in morphine‐mediated β‐arrestin association with receptor variants with little change in morphine‐mediated G‐protein association comparing MOR‐1 wild type (WT) to MOR‐1118A>G. We tested the system with different opioid agonists, the OPRM1 118A>G SNP, and different MOR splice variants (MOR‐1 and MOR‐1O). These results are consistent with the observation that patients with the 118A>G OPRM1 allele respond more readily to fentanyl than to morphine. In conclusion, the 118A>G substitution alters receptor responses to opioids through variable C‐terminal domain movements that are agonist and splice variant dependent. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) control intracellular signaling cascades via agonist-dependent coupling to intracellular transducers including heterotrimeric G proteins, GPCR kinases (GRKs), and arrestins. In addition to their critical interactions with the transmembrane core of active GPCRs, all three classes of transducers have also been reported to interact with receptor C-terminal domains (CTDs). An underexplored aspect of GPCR CTDs is their possible role as lipid sensors given their proximity to the membrane. CTD-membrane interactions have the potential to control the accessibility of key regulatory CTD residues to downstream effectors and transducers. Here, we report that the CTDs of two closely related family C GPCRs, metabotropic glutamate receptor 2 (mGluR2) and mGluR3, bind to membranes and that this interaction can regulate receptor function. We first characterize CTD structure with NMR spectroscopy, revealing lipid composition-dependent modes of membrane binding. Using molecular dynamics simulations and structure-guided mutagenesis, we then identify key conserved residues and cancer-associated mutations that modulate CTD-membrane binding. Finally, we provide evidence that mGluR3 transducer coupling is controlled by CTD-membrane interactions in live cells, which may be subject to regulation by CTD phosphorylation and changes in membrane composition. This work reveals an additional mechanism of GPCR modulation, suggesting that CTD-membrane binding may be a general regulatory mode throughout the broad GPCR superfamily. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are mainly regulated by GPCR kinase (GRK) phosphorylation and subsequent β-arrestin recruitment. The ubiquitously expressed GRKs are classified into cytosolic GRK2/3 and membrane-tethered GRK5/6 subfamilies. GRK2/3 interact with activated G protein βγ-subunits to translocate to the membrane. Yet, this need was not linked as a factor for bias, influencing the effectiveness of β-arrestin-biased agonist creation. Using multiple approaches such as GRK2/3 mutants unable to interact with Gβγ, membrane-tethered GRKs and G protein inhibitors in GRK2/3/5/6 knockout cells, we show that G protein activation will precede GRK2/3-mediated β-arrestin2 recruitment to activated receptors. This was independent of the source of free Gβγ and observable for Gs-, Gi- and Gq-coupled GPCRs. Thus, β-arrestin interaction for GRK2/3-regulated receptors is inseparably connected with G protein activation. We outline a theoretical framework of how GRK dependence on free Gβγ can determine a GPCR's potential for biased agonism. Due to this inherent cellular mechanism for GRK2/3 recruitment and receptor phosphorylation, we anticipate generation of β-arrestin-biased ligands to be mechanistically challenging for the subgroup of GPCRs exclusively regulated by GRK2/3, but achievable for GRK5/6-regulated receptors, that do not demand liberated Gβγ. Accordingly, GRK specificity of any GPCR is foundational for developing arrestin-biased ligands. Using cytosolic or membrane-tethered GRK2/3 mutants and G protein inhibitors, authors show that G protein activation, releasing free Gβγ, and GRK2/3-mediated β-arrestin recruitment are inseparably intertwined. This adds to the concept of biased agonism. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ferroptosis suppressor protein 1（FSP1） is another major ferroptosis regulator besides glutathione peroxidase 4, which can scavenge intracellular reactive oxygen species and lipid peroxides and inhibit ferroptosis. In view of the key role of the liver in iron and lipid metabolism and its susceptibility to oxidative damage, more and more evidence has shown that FSP1 plays an important role in liver diseases such as metabolic associated fatty liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma, acute liver failure, and alcoholic liver disease, and the related targets of FSP1 are expected to become a potential treatment option. This article comprehensively reviews FSP1, with a focus on the role of FSP1 in the pathophysiology of several common liver diseases and the potential of FSP1 as a target of liver diseases, in order to provide new ideas for the treatment of liver diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Purpose Experimental Approach Key Results Conclusions and Implications The gut hormone glucose‐dependent insulinotropic polypeptide (GIP) signals via the GIP receptor (GIPR), resulting in postprandial potentiation of glucose‐stimulated insulin secretion. The translation of results from rodent studies to human studies has been challenged by the unexpected effects of GIPR‐targeting compounds. We, therefore, investigated the variation between species, focusing on GIPR desensitization and the role of the receptor C‐terminus.The GIPR from humans, mice, rats, pigs, dogs and cats was studied in vitro for cognate ligand affinity, G protein activation (cAMP accumulation), recruitment of beta‐arrestin and internalization. Variants of the mouse, rat and human GIPRs with swapped C‐terminal tails were studied in parallel.The human GIPR is more prone to internalization than rodent GIPRs. Despite similar agonist affinities and potencies for Gαs activation, especially, the mouse GIPR shows reduced receptor desensitization, internalization and beta‐arrestin recruitment. Using an enzyme‐stabilized, long‐acting GIP analogue, the species differences were even more pronounced. ‘Tail‐swapped’ human, rat and mouse GIPRs were all fully functional in their Gαs coupling, and the mouse GIPR regained internalization and beta‐arrestin 2 recruitment properties with the human tail. The human GIPR lost the ability to recruit beta‐arrestin 2 when its own C‐terminus was replaced by the rat or mouse tail.Desensitization of the human GIPR is dependent on the C‐terminal tail. The species‐dependent functionality of the C‐terminal tail and the different species‐dependent internalization patterns, especially between human and mouse GIPRs, are important factors influencing the preclinical evaluation of GIPR‐targeting therapeutic compounds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Several branches of arrestin-mediated signaling are initiated by G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-bound arrestins. Numerous other signaling functions are mediated by free arrestins, including the mutants that cannot bind GPCRs. Biased ligands and receptor barcoding by phosphorylation patterns can only affect arrestin functions that depend on their binding to GPCRs. Manipulation of receptor-independent arrestin functions requires molecules that directly act on arrestins. Biological activity of free arrestins is often overlooked. Based on available data, we compare arrestin-mediated signaling that requires and does not require binding to G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Receptor-bound arrestins activate ERK1/2, Src, and focal adhesion kinase (FAK). Yet, arrestin-3 regulation of Src family member Fgr does not appear to involve receptors. Free arrestin-3 facilitates the activation of JNK family kinases, preferentially binds E3 ubiquitin ligases Mdm2 and parkin, and facilitates parkin-dependent mitophagy. The binding of arrestins to microtubules and calmodulin and their function in focal adhesion disassembly and apoptosis also do not involve receptors. Biased GPCR ligands and the phosphorylation barcode can only affect receptor-dependent arrestin signaling. Thus, elucidation of receptor dependence or independence of arrestin functions has important scientific and therapeutic implications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Mini-G proteins are engineered, thermostable variants of Gα subunits designed to stabilize G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) in their active conformations. Because of their small size and ease of use, they are popular tools for assessing GPCR behaviors in cells, both as reporters of receptor coupling to Gα subtypes and for cellular assays to quantify compartmentalized signaling at various subcellular locations. Here, we report that overexpression of mini-G proteins with their cognate GPCRs disrupted GPCR endocytic trafficking and associated intracellular signaling. In cells expressing the Gαs-coupled GPCR glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R), coexpression of mini-Gs, a mini-G protein derived from Gαs, blocked β-arrestin 2 recruitment and receptor internalization and disrupted endosomal GLP-1R signaling. These effects did not involve changes in receptor phosphorylation or lipid nanodomain segregation. Moreover, we found that mini-G proteins derived from Gαi and Gαq also inhibited the internalization of GPCRs that couple to them. Finally, we developed an alternative intracellular signaling assay for GLP-1R using a nanobody specific for active Gαs:GPCR complexes (Nb37) that did not affect GLP-1R internalization. Our results have important implications for designing methods to assess intracellular GPCR signaling. Editor's summary: Mini-G proteins are engineered forms of Gα subunits that stably interact with activated G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) and are often used to investigate GPCR signaling from specific subcellular compartments. Manchanda et al. found that mini-G proteins interfered with GPCR internalization and compartmentalized signaling. Overexpression of a mini-G protein derived from Gαs prevented agonist-induced β-arrestin 2 recruitment to the glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor (GLP-1R), which inhibited receptor internalization and signaling at endosomes. Other GPCRs also showed reduced internalization when the mini-G versions of their cognate Gα subunits were overexpressed. These potentially confounding effects indicate that results from experiments using mini-G proteins to measure compartmentalized GPCR signaling should be interpreted cautiously. —Annalisa M. VanHook [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The stabilization of different active conformations of G protein–coupled receptors is thought to underlie the varying efficacies of biased and balanced agonists. Here, profiling the activation of signal transducers by angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) agonists revealed that the extent and kinetics of β-arrestin binding exhibited substantial ligand-dependent differences, which were lost when receptor internalization was inhibited. When AT1R endocytosis was prevented, even weak partial agonists of the β-arrestin pathway acted as full or near-full agonists, suggesting that receptor conformation did not exclusively determine β-arrestin recruitment. The ligand-dependent variance in β-arrestin translocation was much larger at endosomes than at the plasma membrane, showing that ligand efficacy in the β-arrestin pathway was spatiotemporally determined. Experimental investigations and mathematical modeling demonstrated how multiple factors concurrently shaped the effects of agonists on endosomal receptor–β-arrestin binding and thus determined the extent of functional selectivity. Ligand dissociation rate and G protein activity had particularly strong, internalization-dependent effects on the receptor–β-arrestin interaction. We also showed that endocytosis regulated the agonist efficacies of two other receptors with sustained β-arrestin binding: the V2 vasopressin receptor and a mutant β2-adrenergic receptor. In the absence of endocytosis, the agonist-dependent variance in β-arrestin2 binding was markedly diminished. Our results suggest that endocytosis determines the spatiotemporal bias in GPCR signaling and can aid in the development of more efficacious, functionally selective compounds. Editor's summary: Biased agonists of GPCRs stimulate signaling through either G proteins or β-arrestins, which is clinically relevant if one pathway is therapeutic and the other produces side effects. Tóth et al. found that the endocytosis of the angiotensin II receptor AT1R and other GPCRs determined signaling strength through the β-arrestin pathway. Blocking endocytosis elicited responses from weak β-arrestin–biased agonists that resembled those generated by full agonists. As a result, ligand efficacy in β-arrestin signaling may be determined more by spatiotemporal regulation than by the induction of different receptor conformations at the plasma membrane by distinct agonists. These findings may guide the development of GPCR-targeting drugs that more effectively produce only the desired therapeutic response. —John F. Foley [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Activated GPCRs are phosphorylated and internalized mostly via clathrin-mediated endocytosis (CME), which are then sorted for recycling or degradation. We investigated how differential activation of the same GPCR affects its endocytic trafficking in vivo using rhodopsin as a model in pupal photoreceptors of flies expressing mCherry-tagged rhodopsin 1 (Rh1-mC) or GFP-tagged arrestin 1 (Arr1-GFP). Upon blue light stimulation, activated Rh1 recruited Arr1-GFP to the rhabdomere, which became co-internalized and accumulated in cytoplasmic vesicles of photoreceptors. This internalization was eliminated in shits1 mutants affecting dynamin. Moreover, it was blocked by either rdgA or rdgB mutations affecting the PIP2 biosynthesis. Together, the blue light-initiated internalization of Rh1 and Arr1 belongs to CME. Green light stimulation also triggered the internalization and accumulation of activated Rh1-mC in the cytoplasm but with faster kinetics. Importantly, Arr1-GFP was also recruited to the rhabdomere but not co-internalized with Rh1-mC. This endocytosis was not affected in shits1 nor rdgA mutants, indicating it is not CME. We explored the fate of internalized Rh1-mC following CME and observed it remained in cytoplasmic vesicles following 30 min of dark adaptation. In contrast, in the non-CME Rh1-mC appeared readily recycled back to the rhabdomere within five min of dark treatment. This faster recycling may be regulated by rhodopsin phosphatase, RdgC. Together, we demonstrate two distinct endocytic and recycling mechanisms of Rh1 via two light stimulations. It appears that each stimulation triggers a distinct conformation leading to different phosphorylation patterns of Rh1 capable of recruiting Arr1 to rhabdomeres. However, a more stable interaction leads to the co-internalization of Arr1 that orchestrates CME. A stronger Arr1 association appears to impede the recycling of the phosphorylated Rh1 by preventing the recruitment of RdgC. We conclude that conformations of activated rhodopsin determine the downstream outputs upon phosphorylation that confers differential protein-protein interactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The first member of the arrestin family, visual arrestin-1, was discovered in the late 1970s. Later, the other three mammalian subtypes were identified and cloned. The first described function was regulation of G protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) signaling: arrestins bind active phosphorylated GPCRs, blocking their coupling to G proteins. It was later discovered that receptor-bound and free arrestins interact with numerous proteins, regulating GPCR trafficking and various signaling pathways, including those that determine cell fate. Arrestins have no enzymatic activity; they function by organizing multi-protein complexes and localizing their interaction partners to particular cellular compartments. Today we understand the molecular mechanism of arrestin interactions with GPCRs better than the mechanisms underlying other functions. However, even limited knowledge enabled the construction of signaling-biased arrestin mutants and extraction of biologically active monofunctional peptides from these multifunctional proteins. Manipulation of cellular signaling with arrestin-based tools has research and likely therapeutic potential: re-engineered proteins and their parts can produce effects that conventional small-molecule drugs cannot. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lysophosphatidic acid (LPA) type 3 (LPA3) receptor mutants were generated in which the sites detected phosphorylated were substituted by non-phosphorylatable amino acids. Substitutions were made in the intracellular loop 3 (IL3 mutant), the carboxyl terminus (Ctail), and both domains (IL3/Ctail). The wild-type (WT) receptor and the mutants were expressed in T-REx HEK293 cells, and the consequences of the substitutions were analyzed employing different functional parameters. Agonist- and LPA-mediated receptor phosphorylation was diminished in the IL3 and Ctail mutants and essentially abolished in the IL3/Ctail mutant, confirming that the main phosphorylation sites are present in both domains and their role in receptor phosphorylation eliminated by substitution and distributed in both domains. The WT and mutant receptors increased intracellular calcium and ERK 1/2 phosphorylation in response to LPA and PMA. The agonist, Ki16425, diminished baseline intracellular calcium, which suggests some receptor endogenous activity. Similarly, baseline ERK1/2 phosphorylation was diminished by Ki16425. An increase in baseline ERK phosphorylation was detected in the IL3/Ctail mutant. LPA and PMA-induced receptor interaction with β-arrestin 2 and LPA3 internalization were severely diminished in cells expressing the mutants. Mutant-expressing cells also exhibit increased baseline proliferation and response to different stimuli, which were inhibited by the antagonist Ki16425, suggesting a role of LPA receptors in this process. Migration in response to different attractants was markedly increased in the Ctail mutant, which the Ki16425 antagonist also attenuated. Our data experimentally show that receptor phosphorylation in the distinct domains is relevant for LPA3 receptor function [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

GPR84 is an understudied rhodopsin‐like class A G protein‐coupled receptor, which is arousing particular interest from a therapeutic perspective. Not least this reflects that gpr84 expression is significantly up‐regulated following acute inflammatory stimuli and in inflammatory diseases, and that receptor activation plays a role in regulating pro‐inflammatory responses and migration of cells of the innate immune system such as neutrophils, monocytes, macrophages and microglia. Although most physiological responses of GPR84 reflect receptor coupling to Gαi/o‐proteins, several studies indicate that agonist‐activated GPR84 can recruit arrestin adaptor proteins and this regulates receptor internalisation and desensitisation. To date, little is known on the patterns of either basal or ligand regulated GPR84 phosphorylation and how these might control these processes. Here, we consider what is known about the regulation of GPR84 signalling with a focus on how G protein receptor kinase‐mediated phosphorylation regulates arrestin protein recruitment and receptor function. LINKED ARTICLES: This article is part of a themed issue GPR84 Pharmacology. To view the other articles in this section visit http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/bph.v181.10/issuetoc [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent advancements in structural biology have facilitated the elucidation of complexes involving G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and their associated signal transducers, including G proteins and arrestins. A comprehensive analysis of these structures provides profound insights into the dynamics of signaling mechanisms. These structural revelations can potentially guide the development of drugs to minimize side effects through targeted and selective signaling. Understanding the binding modes of different signal-selective ligands is imperative for future drug research and development. Here, we conduct a comparative examination of the structural details of various GPCR–signal transducer complexes and delve into the molecular basis of the currently proposed signal selectivity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arrestins are known to be involved not only in the desensitization and internalization of G protein-coupled receptors but also in the G protein-independent activation of mitogen-activated protein (MAP) kinases, such as extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and c-Jun N-terminal kinase (JNK), to regulate cell proliferation and inflammation. Our previous study revealed that the histamine H1 receptor-mediated activation of ERK is dually regulated by Gq proteins and arrestins. In this study, we investigated the roles of Gq proteins and arrestins in the H1 receptor-mediated activation of JNK in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells expressing wild-type (WT) human H1 receptors, the Gq protein-biased mutant S487TR, and the arrestin-biased mutant S487A. In these mutants, the Ser487 residue in the C-terminus region of the WT was truncated (S487TR) or mutated to alanine (S487A). Histamine significantly stimulated JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR but not S487A. Histamine-induced JNK phosphorylation in CHO cells expressing WT and S487TR was suppressed by inhibitors against H1 receptors (ketotifen and diphenhydramine), Gq proteins (YM-254890), and protein kinase C (PKC) (GF109203X) as well as an intracellular Ca2+ chelator (BAPTA-AM) but not by inhibitors against G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRK2/3) (cmpd101), β-arrestin2 (β-arrestin2 siRNA), and clathrin (hypertonic sucrose). These results suggest that the H1 receptor-mediated phosphorylation of JNK is regulated by Gq-protein/Ca2+/PKC-dependent but GRK/arrestin/clathrin-independent pathways. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) mediate diverse cell signaling cascades after recognizing extracellular ligands. Despite the successful history of known GPCR drugs, a lack of mechanistic insight into GPCR challenges both the deorphanization of some GPCRs and optimization of the structure–activity relationship of their ligands. Notably, replacing a small substituent on a GPCR ligand can significantly alter extracellular GPCR–ligand interaction patterns and motion of transmembrane helices in turn to occur post-binding events of the ligand. In this study, we designed 3D multilevel features to describe the extracellular interaction patterns. Subsequently, these 3D features were utilized to predict the post-binding events that result from conformational dynamics from the extracellular to intracellular areas. To understand the adaptability of GPCR ligands, we collected the conformational information of flexible residues during binding and performed molecular featurization on a broad range of GPCR–ligand complexes. As a result, we developed GPCR–ligand interaction patterns, binding pockets, and ligand features as score (GPCR-IPL score) for predicting the functional selectivity of GPCR ligands (agonism versus antagonism), using the multilevel features of (1) zoomed-out 'residue level' (for flexible transmembrane helices of GPCRs), (2) zoomed-in 'pocket level' (for sophisticated mode of action) and (3) 'atom level' (for the conformational adaptability of GPCR ligands). GPCR-IPL score demonstrated reliable performance, achieving area under the receiver operating characteristic of 0.938 and area under the precision-recall curve of 0.907 (available in gpcr-ipl-score.onrender.com). Furthermore, we used the molecular features to predict the biased activation of downstream signaling (Gi/o, Gq/11, Gs and β-arrestin) as well as the functional selectivity. The resulting models are interpreted and applied to out-of-set validation with three scenarios including the identification of a new MRGPRX antagonist. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arrestin domain containing 2 and 3 (Arrdc2/3) are genes whose mRNA contents are decreased in young skeletal muscle following mechanical overload. Arrdc3 is linked to the regulation of signaling pathways in nonmuscle cells that could influence skeletal muscle size. Despite a similar amino acid sequence, Arrdc2 function remains undefined. The purpose of this study was to further explore the relationship of Arrdc2/Arrdc3 expression with changes in mechanical load in young and aged muscle and define the effect of Arrdc2/3 expression on C2C12 myotube diameter. In young and aged mice, mechanical load was decreased using hindlimb suspension whereas mechanical load was increased by reloading previously unloaded muscle or inducing high-force contractions. Arrdc2 and Arrdc3 mRNAs were overexpressed in C2C12 myotubes using adenoviruses. Myotube diameter was determined 48-h posttransfection, and RNA sequencing was performed on those samples. Arrdc2 and Arrdc3 mRNA content was higher in the unloaded muscle within 1 day of disuse and remained higher up through 10 days. The induction of Arrdc2 mRNA was more pronounced in aged muscle than young muscle in response to unloading. Reloading previously unloaded muscle of young and aged mice restored Arrdc2 and Arrdc3 levels to ambulatory levels. Increasing mechanical load beyond normal ambulatory levels lowered Arrdc2 mRNA, but not Arrdc3 mRNA, in young and aged muscle. Arrdc2 overexpression only was suf- ficient to lower myotube diameter in C2C12 cells in part by altering the transcriptome favoring muscle atrophy. These data are consistent with Arrdc2 contributing to disuse atrophy, particularly in aged muscle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background/Aim: The presence of a monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) even in small amounts may trigger tissue damage through immunological or other mechanisms, irrespective of the potential for malignant transformation. The aim of the study was to present a case of monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance with ocular manifestations and discuss relevant literature. Case Report: In our case, a patient presented with vision disturbances that was eventually attributed to the underlying IgM MGUS after extensive workup to exclude other potential etiologies. The patient showed a clinical response with the fixed-duration DRC (dexamethasone, rituximab, cyclophosphamide) regimen that persisted for at least 1.5 years. Herein, we present, in detail, the patient management and discuss the underlying pathophysiology of this rare entity with few available published data in this field. Conclusion: A high level of clinical suspicion is necessary in order to detect the association between MGUS and a clinical sign or symptom that cannot be attributed elsewhere. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

T‐2 toxin causes renal dysfunction with proteinuria and glomerular podocyte damage. This work explores the role of metabolic disorder/reprogramming‐mediated epigenetic modification in the progression of T‐2 toxin‐stimulated podocyte injury. A metabolomics experiment is performed to assess metabolic responses to T‐2 toxin infection in human podocytes. Roles of protein O‐linked‐N‐acetylglucosaminylation (O‐GlcNAcylation) in regulating T‐2 toxin‐stimulated podocyte injury in mouse and podocyte models are assessed. O‐GlcNAc target proteins are recognized by mass spectrometry and co‐immunoprecipitation experiments. Moreover, histone acetylation and autophagy levels are measured. T‐2 toxin infection upregulates glucose transporter type 1 (GLUT1) expression and enhances hexosamine biosynthetic pathway in glomerular podocytes, resulting in a significant increase in β‐arrestin‐1 O‐GlcNAcylation. Decreasing β‐arrestin‐1 or O‐GlcNAc transferase (OGT) effectively prevents T‐2 toxin‐induced renal dysfunction and podocyte injury. Mechanistically, O‐GlcNAcylation of β‐arrestin‐1 stabilizes β‐arrestin‐1 to activate the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) pathway as well as to inhibit autophagy during podocyte injury by promoting H4K16 acetylation. To sum up, OGT‐mediated β‐arrestin‐1 O‐GlcNAcylation is a vital regulator in the development of T‐2 toxin‐stimulated podocyte injury via activating the mTOR pathway to suppress autophagy. Targeting β‐arrestin‐1 or OGT can be a potential therapy for T‐2 toxin infection‐associated glomerular injury, especially podocyte injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Physiologically G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) are an important class of cell surface proteins capable of sensing the exogenous signals across the cell membrane through G-protein-dependent and independent pathways. Activated GPCRs initiate diverse G-protein-independent signalling through interaction with arrestin. Arrestins comprise a family of four proteins that act as signal regulators of GPCRs. Arrestin specificity and assembly orientation with a particular GPCR depend on the finger loop's residues. Recent cryo-EM structural elucidation of neurotensin receptor-1(NTSR1)-ß-arrestin1complex reveals its striking difference from Rhodopsin-visual-Arrestin by a 90° rotation of ß-Arrestin1 concerning the receptor. Alignment of neurotensin receptor 1(NTSR1)-ß-Arrestin1 assembly with 5-HTR1B (Serotonin receptor) structure shows an ionic interaction mediated complex formation between receptor binding cleft and finger loop of arrestin. Mutational analysis of finger loop residues R65, D67, and D69 of ß-Arrestin1 by tango assay confirms its possible interaction with an electropositive pocket of K79 and R161 in 5-HTR1B. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Proteins exert their function through protein–protein interactions. In Drosophila, G protein-coupled receptors like rhodopsin (Rh1) interact with a G protein to activate visual signal transduction and with arrestins to terminate activation. Also, membrane proteins like Rh1 engage in protein–protein interactions during folding within the endoplasmic reticulum, during their vesicular transport and upon removal from the cell surface and degradation. Here, we expressed a Rh1-TurboID fusion protein (Rh1::TbID) in Drosophila photoreceptors to identify in vivo Rh1 interaction partners by biotin proximity labeling. We show that Rh1::TbID forms a functional rhodopsin that mediates biotinylation of arrestin 2 in conditions where arrestin 2 interacts with rhodopsin. We also observed biotinylation of Rh1::TbID and native Rh1 as well as of most visual signal transduction proteins. These findings indicate that the signaling components in the rhabdomere approach rhodopsin closely, within a range of ca. 10 nm. Furthermore, we have detected proteins engaged in the maturation of rhodopsin and elements responsible for the trafficking of membrane proteins, resembling potential interaction partners of Rh1. Among these are chaperons of the endoplasmic reticulum, proteins involved in Clathrin-mediated endocytosis as well as previously unnoticed contributors to rhodopsin transportation, such as Rab32, Vap33, or PIP82. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The α-arrestins form a large family of evolutionally conserved modulators that control diverse signaling pathways, including both G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR)-mediated and non-GPCR-mediated pathways, across eukaryotes. However, unlike β-arrestins, only a few α-arrestin targets and functions have been characterized. Here, using affinity purification and mass spectrometry, we constructed interactomes for 6 human and 12 Drosophila α-arrestins. The resulting high-confidence interactomes comprised 307 and 467 prey proteins in human and Drosophila, respectively. A comparative analysis of these interactomes predicted not only conserved binding partners, such as motor proteins, proteases, ubiquitin ligases, RNA splicing factors, and GTPase-activating proteins, but also those specific to mammals, such as histone modifiers and the subunits of V-type ATPase. Given the manifestation of the interaction between the human α-arrestin, TXNIP, and the histone-modifying enzymes, including HDAC2, we undertook a global analysis of transcription signals and chromatin structures that were affected by TXNIP knockdown. We found that TXNIP activated targets by blocking HDAC2 recruitment to targets, a result that was validated by chromatin immunoprecipitation assays. Additionally, the interactome for an uncharacterized human α-arrestin ARRDC5 uncovered multiple components in the V-type ATPase, which plays a key role in bone resorption by osteoclasts. Our study presents conserved and species-specific protein-protein interaction maps for α-arrestins, which provide a valuable resource for interrogating their cellular functions for both basic and clinical research. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis show a strongly upregulated expression of chemokine CXCL14, whose target is still unknown. Screening of CXCL14 in a panel of human G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) revealed its potent and selective activation of the orphan MAS-related GPCR X2 (MRGPRX2). This receptor is expressed on mast cells and − like CXCL14 − upregulated in bronchial inflammation. CXCL14 induces robust activation of MRGPRX2 and its putative mouse ortholog MRGPRB2 in G protein-dependent and β-arrestin recruitment assays that is blocked by a selective MRGPRX2/B2 antagonist. Truncation combined with mutagenesis and computational studies identified the pharmacophoric sequence of CXCL14 and its presumed interaction with the receptor. Intriguingly, C-terminal domain sequences of CXCL14 consisting of 4 to 11 amino acids display similar or increased potency and efficacy compared to the full CXCL14 sequence (77 amino acids). These results provide a rational basis for the future development of potential idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis therapies. This study reveals that the proinflammatory chemokine CXCL14 activates MAS-related G protein-coupled receptor MRGPRX2; these results provide a rational basis for the future development of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

β-arrestins (βarrs) are multifunctional proteins involved in signaling and regulation of seven transmembrane receptors (7TMRs), and their interaction is driven primarily by agonist-induced receptor activation and phosphorylation. Here, we present seven cryo–electron microscopy structures of βarrs either in the basal state, activated by the muscarinic receptor subtype 2 (M2R) through its third intracellular loop, or activated by the βarr-biased decoy D6 receptor (D6R). Combined with biochemical, cellular, and biophysical experiments, these structural snapshots allow the visualization of atypical engagement of βarrs with 7TMRs and also reveal a structural transition in the carboxyl terminus of βarr2 from a β strand to an α helix upon activation by D6R. Our study provides previously unanticipated molecular insights into the structural and functional diversity encoded in 7TMR-βarr complexes with direct implications for exploring novel therapeutic avenues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aim: Earlier studies have shown that peptide glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R) agonists with reduced β‐arrestin recruitment show enhanced anti‐hyperglycaemic efficacy through avoidance of GLP‐1R desensitization. However, the ligand modifications needed to decrease β‐arrestin recruitment usually also reduces GLP‐1R affinity, therefore higher doses are needed. Here we aimed to develop new, long‐acting, G protein‐biased GLP‐1R agonists with acute signalling potency comparable with semaglutide, to provide insights into specific experimental and therapeutic scenarios. Materials and Methods: New GLP‐1R agonist peptides were assessed using a variety of in vitro and in vivo assays. Results: First, we show that very substantial reductions in β‐arrestin recruitment efficacy are required to realize fully the benefits of GLP‐1R agonism on blood glucose lowering in mice, with more moderate reductions being less effective. Secondly, our lead compound (SRB107) performs substantially better than semaglutide for effects on blood glucose and weight loss, which may be jointly attributable to its biased agonist action and protracted pharmacokinetics. Thirdly, we show that biased agonist‐specific GLP‐1R internalization profiles occur at clinically relevant pharmacological concentrations. Finally, we show that SRB107 cAMP signalling is differentially modulated by single and double GLP1R coding variants seen in human populations, with implications for GLP‐1R agonist pharmacogenomics. Conclusions: Completely abolishing β‐arrestin recruitment improves the anti‐hyperglycaemic effects of GLP‐1R agonists in mice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In contrast to G protein-coupled receptors or receptor tyrosine kinases, the mechanism underlying ERK activation through nicotine acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs), members of the ligand-gated ion channel family, remains poorly elucidated. This study aimed to delineate the signaling pathway responsible for ERK activation by the α4β2 nAChR subtype, which is implicated in nicotine addiction and various mental disorders. Loss-of-function strategies and mutants of arrestin2/PKCβII with distinct functional characteristics were employed to identify the cellular components and processes involved in ERK activation. ERK activation via α4β2 nAChR was observed within the nucleus and necessitated the nuclear translocation of arrestin2 and PKCβII, which exhibited mutual augmentation. Activation of PKCβII by α4β2 nAChR stimulation facilitated the nuclear translocation of arrestin2 by enhancing its interaction with importin β1. Apart from scaffolding ERK activation in the nucleus, arrestin2, in cooperation with GRK2, facilitated the activation of the Src/Syk/PKCβII signaling cascade, leading to the nuclear entry of PKCβII in a Gβγ-dependent manner. Upon nuclear localization, PKCβII underwent ubiquitination by Mdm2 and interacted with MEK1, resulting in ERK activation. In summary, α4β2 nAChR-mediated ERK activation in the nucleus involves the nuclear translocation of arrestin2 and PKCβII, which is reciprocally facilitated via positive feedback augmentation. As α4β2 nAChRs play a pivotal role in various cellular processes including drug addiction and mental disorders, our findings will offer insights into understanding the pathogenesis of α4β2 nAChR-related disorders and may facilitate the development of targeted therapeutic interventions. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) exist within a landscape of interconvertible conformational states and in dynamic equilibrium between monomers and higher-order oligomers, both influenced by ligand binding. Here, we show that a homobivalent ligand formed by equal chromenopyrazole moieties as pharmacophores, connected by 14 methylene units, can modulate the dynamics of the cannabinoid CB 2 receptor (CB 2 R) homodimerization by simultaneously binding both protomers of the CB 2 R-CB 2 R homodimer. Computational and pharmacological experiments showed that one of the ligand pharmacophores binds to the orthosteric site of one protomer, and the other pharmacophore to a membrane-oriented pocket between transmembranes 1 and 7 of the partner protomer. This results in unique pharmacological properties, including increased potency in G i -mediated signaling and enhanced recruitment of β-arrestin. Thus, by modulating dimerization dynamics, it may be possible to fine-tune CB 2 R activity, potentially leading to improved therapeutic outcomes. [Display omitted] • A homobivalent ligand of CB 2 R (PM369) modulates the dynamics of receptor homodimerization. • PM369 binds to the orthosteric site of one protomer and to a complementary, membrane-facing, site of the other protomer. • PM369 triggers CB 2 R homodimerization via the TM 1/7 interface that provides unique pharmacological properties. • PM369 potentiates signaling, increases potency in G i binding and increases recruitment of β-arrestin. • These results disclose new approaches to modulating GPCR signaling. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Two recently discovered DRD2 mutations, c.634A > T, p.Ile212Phe and c.1121T > G, p.Met374Arg, cause hyperkinetic movement disorders that have overlapping features but apparently differ in severity. The two known carriers of the Met374Arg variant had early childhood disease onset and more severe motor, cognitive, and neuropsychiatric deficits than any known carriers of the Ile212Phe variant, whose symptoms were first apparent in adolescence. Here, we evaluated if differences in the function of the two variants in cultured cells could explain differing pathogenicity. Both variants were expressed less abundantly than the wild type receptor and exhibited loss of agonist-induced arrestin binding, but differences in expression and arrestin binding between the variants were minor. Basal and agonist-induced activation of heterotrimeric G i/o/z proteins, however, showed clear differences; agonists were generally more potent at Met374Arg than at the Ile212Phe or wild type variants. Furthermore, all Gα subtypes tested were constitutively activated more by Met374Arg than by Ile212Phe. Met374Arg produced greater constitutive inhibition of cyclic AMP accumulation than Ile212Phe or the wild type D2 receptor. Met374Arg and Ile212Phe were more sensitive to thermal inactivation than the wild type D2 receptor, as reported for other constitutively active receptors, but Ile212Phe was affected more than Met374Arg. Additional pharmacological characterization suggested that the mutations differentially affect the shape of the agonist binding pocket and the potency of dopamine, norepinephrine, and tyramine. Molecular dynamics simulations provided a structural rationale for enhanced constitutive activation and agonist potency. Enhanced constitutive and agonist-induced G protein-mediated signaling likely contributes to the pathogenicity of these novel variants. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Arrestins interact with phosphorylated G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) and regulate the homologous desensitization and internalization of GPCRs. The gate loop in arrestins is a critical region for both stabilization of the basal state and interaction with phosphorylated receptors. We investigated the roles of specific residues in the gate loop (K292, K294, and H295) using β-arrestin-1 and phosphorylated C-tail peptide of vasopressin receptor type 2 (V2Rpp) as a model system. We measured the binding affinity of V2Rpp and analyzed conformational dynamics of β-arrestin-1. Our results suggest that K294 plays a critical role in the interaction with V2Rpp without influencing the overall conformation of the V2Rpp-bound state. The residues K292 and H295 contribute to the stability of the polar core in the basal state and form a specific conformation of the finger loop in the V2Rpp-bound state. [Display omitted] • The roles of specific residues in the gate loop for β-arrestin activation are analyzed • K294 is essential for V2Rpp interaction, without affecting the active conformation • K292 and H295 are important for maintaining the stability of the basal state Kim et al. explored the roles of specific residues (K292, K294, and H295) in the gate loop for β-arrestin-1 activation. They elucidated that while K294 is crucial for V2Rpp interaction, K292 and H295 help stabilize the polar core in the basal state. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • IGF1R and GPCRs can be co-regulated in Alzheimer's disease by non-coding RNAs. • A combined network of IGF1R with nine GPCRs, eight miRs, and seven lncRNAs was created to represent the interactions which led to a set of core regulators of the network, IGF1R, hsa-miR-16-5p, and NEAT1. • IGF1R mediated signaling feeds forward towards increase of NEAT1 expression in Alzheimer's disease. • NEAT1 co-regulate GPCRs, HTR2A, ADRB2 and IGF1R. The study is based on the complexity of Insulin like growth factor receptor (IGF1R) signaling and its regulation by noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). IGF1R signaling is an important cascade in Alzheimer's disease (AD); however, its regulation and roles are poorly understood. Due to the presence of β-arrestin and GPCR Receptor Kinase binding sites, this protein has been termed a 'functional hybrid', as it can take part in both kinase and GPCR signaling pathways, further adding to its complexity. The objective of this study is to understand the underlying ncRNA regulation controlling IGF1R and GPCRs in AD to find commonalities in the network. We found through data mining that 45 GPCRs were reportedly deregulated in AD and built clusters based on GO/KEGG pathways to show shared functionality with IGF1R. Eight miRs were further discovered that could coregulate IGF1R and GPCRs. We validated their expression in an AD cell model and probed for common lncRNAs downstream that could regulate these miRs. Seven such candidates were identified and further validated. A combined network comprising IGF1R with nine GPCRs, eight miRs, and seven lncRNAs was created to visualize the interconnectivity within pathways. Betweenness centrality analysis showed a cluster of NEAT1, hsa-miR-15a-5p, hsa-miR-16-5p, and IGF1R to be crucial form a competitive endogenous RNA-based (ceRNA) tetrad that could relay information within the network, which was further validated by cell-based studies. NEAT1 emerged as a master regulator that could alter the levels of IGF1R and associated GPCRs. This combined bioinformatics and experimental study for the first time explored the regulation of IGF1R through ncRNAs from the perspective of neurodegeneration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Arrestins are key negative regulators of G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) through mediation of G protein desensitisation and receptor internalisation. Arrestins can also contribute to signal transduction by scaffolding downstream signalling effectors for activation. GPCR kinase (GRK) enzymes phosphorylate the intracellular C-terminal domain, or intracellular loop regions of GPCRs to promote arrestin interaction. There are seven different GRK subtypes, which may uniquely phosphorylate the C-terminal tail in a type of 'phosphorylation barcode,' potentially differentially contributing to arrestin translocation and arrestin-dependent signalling. Such contributions may be exploited to develop arrestin-biased ligands. Here, we examine the effect of different GRK subtypes on the ability to promote translocation of arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 to the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor (CB 1) with a range of ligands. We find that most GRK subtypes (including visual GRK1) can enhance arrestin-2 and -3 translocation to CB 1 , and that GRK-dependent changes in arrestin-2 and arrestin-3 translocation were broadly shared for most agonists tested. GRK2/3 generally enhanced arrestin translocation more than the other GRK subtypes, with some small differences between ligands. We also explore the interplay between G protein activity and GRK2/3-dependent arrestin translocation, highlighting that high-efficacy G protein agonists will cause GRK2/3 dependent arrestin translocation. This study supports the hypothesis that arrestin-biased ligands for CB 1 must engage GRK5/6 rather than GRK2/3, and G protein-biased ligands must have inherently low efficacy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]