Search

Predation is a crucial ecosystem function, transferring nutrients and shaping the abundance and diversity of animals within communities. On coral reefs, fish-fish predation (i.e., piscivory) is arguably one of the best known ecosystem functions, yet is also one of the least well quantified. Recent work has suggested that the prey capture performance of piscivorous fishes may differ when feeding on actively swimming vs. cryptobenthic fish prey. However, the extent of this difference remains unquantified. Our goal, therefore, was to conduct performance-based experiments comparing piscivorous fishes feeding on two different fish prey types, namely, actively swimming vs. cryptobenthic prey (i.e., prey sitting on the benthos). While predators were able to immediately detect actively swimming prey, when feeding on cryptobenthic prey, predators were generally unable to detect the prey until it moved. Both focal predators, the grabber Pseudochromis fuscus and the engulfer Pterois volitans were less successful at capturing cryptobenthic prey (mean 28% probability of capture), compared to actively swimming prey (85%). Overall, our study demonstrates the heterogeneous nature of fish predation on coral reefs, and the challenges of feeding on different prey functional groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The ability of echolocating toothed whales to detect and classify prey at long ranges enables efficient searching and stalking of sparse prey in these time-limited dives. However, nonecholocating deep-diving seals such as elephant seals appear to have much less sensory advantage over their prey. Both elephant seals and their prey rely on visual and hydrodynamic cues that may be detectable only at short ranges in the deep ocean, leading us to hypothesize that elephant seals must adopt a less efficient reactive mode of hunting that requires high prey densities. To test that hypothesis, we deployed high-resolution sonar and movement tags on 25 females to record simultaneous predator and prey behavior during foraging interactions. We demonstrate that elephant seals have a sensory advantage over their prey that allows them to potentially detect prey 5 to 10 s before striking. The corresponding prey detection ranges of 7 to 17 m enable stealthy approaches and prey-specific capture tactics. In comparison, prey react at a median range of 0.7 m, close to the neck extension range of striking elephant seals. Estimated search swathes of 150 to 900 m² explain how elephant seals can locate up to 2,000 prey while swimming more than 100 km per day. This efficient search capability allows elephant seals to subsist on prey densities that are consonant with the deep scattering layer resources estimated by hydroacoustic surveys but which are two orders of magnitude lower than the prey densities needed by a reactive hunter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Within the predator–prey relationship, predator behavior is less studied. Even in natural populations, it shows great diversity, and the factors influencing this are even less known. Among these factors, the personality type of the individual, (including exploration, and neophilia) and the practice significantly influence the success of adapting to a changing environment and switching to new prey types. In the present study, we investigated the first five consecutive foraging trials on live fish prey in naïve pikeperch individuals, which previously consumed or refused pelleted food. We hypothesized that individuals which were willing to consume alternative (pelleted) food would also show higher foraging success on living prey and that the practice would influence the learning process. Our results show that the timing of prey detection is influenced by exploratory behavior, the latency of the first attack by the aptitude for consuming pellets, and both traits by the individual's practice. However, neither of the factor affects the latency and success rate of capturing the prey, suggesting that predation is an independent behavioral trait. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Foraging animals must contend with fluctuating environmental variables that affect foraging success, including conditions like wind noise, which could diminish the usefulness of particular sensory modes. Although the documented impact of anthropogenic noise on animal behavior has become clear, there is limited research on natural noise and its potential influence on mammalian behavior. We investigated foraging behavior in the myrmecophagous bat-eared fox (Otocyon megalotis), a species known to rely predominantly on hearing for prey detection. For a year, we monitored the foraging behavior of 18 bat-eared foxes from a habituated population in South Africa, amidst varying wind speeds (0–15.5 km/h). In contrast to expectations, foraging rates did not generally decline with increasing wind speed, except for foraging rate outside termite patches in fall. Furthermore, wind speed had little correlation with time spent in patches. In winter, however, we observed an increase in foraging rate with increasing wind speed both within and outside patches. At the observed wind speeds, these acoustically driven insectivores continue to forage effectively despite potentially distracting or masking noises. With anthropogenic noise producing sound across a broader frequency range, it is important to examine the responses of these canids to artificial sources of acoustic disturbance as well. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Understanding the sensory ecology of species is vital if we are to predict how they will function in a changing environment. Visual cues are fundamentally important for many predators when detecting and capturing prey. However, many marine areas have become more turbid through processes influenced by climate change, potentially affecting the ability of marine predators to detect prey. We performed the first study that directly relates a pelagic seabird species's foraging behaviour to oceanic turbidity. We collected biologging data from 79 foraging trips and 5472 dives of a visually dependent, pursuit-diving seabird, the Manx shearwater (Puffinus puffinus). Foraging behaviour was modelled against environmental variables affecting underwater visibility, including water turbidity, cloud cover and solar angle. Shearwaters were more likely to initiate area-restricted search and foraging dives in clearer waters. Underwater visibility also strongly predicted dive rate and depth, suggesting that fine-scale prey capture was constrained by the detectability of prey underwater. Our novel use of dynamic descriptors of underwater visibility suggests that visual cues are vital for underwater foraging. Our data indicate that climate change could negatively impact seabird populations by making prey more difficult to detect, compounded by the widely reported effects of reduced prey populations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Wood mouse Apodemus sylvaticus and striped field mouse A. agrarius are the most abundant mouse species in Central Europe coexisting in several habitats not only such as in forests but also in rural and urban areas. Their basic colours are similar, but the striped field mouse has a pronounced black stripe on its back. The biological function of this phenotypic difference is unexplored; therefore, our goal was to study the impact of fur pattern as well as the scent on the survival of these species. In our study, we used plasticine models mimicking wood mouse and striped field mouse. For imitating mouse scent, cotton pads saturated with mouse urine were placed under the models. In spring 2016, 200 plasticine mice divided into four types (non‐striped with scent, non‐striped without scent, striped with scent, striped without scent) were placed randomly in four sampling sites in the mid‐sized city, Pécs, Hungary. During 4 weeks of exposure, we recorded predation on 71 plasticine models. Birds (51%) and large mammals (25%) were the most common predators, and in 24% of the cases, the models disappeared. Considering predation only by large mammals, we found that the daily survival rate of both striped and non‐striped models with scent decreased in comparison to models without scent. Thus, large mammalian predators could discover plasticine models sooner than avian predators, which suggests a strong impact of scent. Despite the high rate of bird predation, we did not detect an effect of fur pattern suggesting that it may not be related to survival but might have other functional roles. With the dummy mouse experiment, we showed that fur pattern may play a minor role in mice detection by predators, thus further studies are needed to discover its ecological function. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study was conducted to determine the senses that facilitate prey detection in the marble goby (Oxyeleotris marmorata) larvae. The ingestion ratios of live (generate chemical and mechanical stimuli) or frozen Artemia nauplii (generate chemical but no mechanical stimuli) by the intact or free neuromast (mechanoreceptor)-ablated O. marmorata larvae (11 mg/L streptomycin treatment before feeding) under the light or dark (fish vision was obstructed) condition were examined. Vision, mechano-, and chemoreceptions were all found to be essential in prey detection of the O. marmorata larvae. Prey movement has a significant influence as a visual stimuli on the O. marmorata larval feeding as the Artemia nauplii ingestion ratio was approximately 40% higher with significant (p = 0.001, d = 3.0), when the intact larvae were fed with the live (78.1 ± 1.5%), rather than the frozen (40.9 ± 2.8%) Artemia nauplii, under the light condition. This result was assured when no significant difference (p = 0.572, d = 0.2) was found between the ingestion ratios of frozen Artemia nauplii by the intact O. marmorata larvae under light and dark conditions. These findings demonstrate that prey detection in the O. marmorata larvae was facilitated by multi-modal senses, allowing O. marmorata larvae to survive in their natural habitats. • Vision is essential in prey detection of O. marmorata larvae. • Mechano- and chemoreceptions are also involved in prey detection of O. marmorata larvae. • O. marmorata larvae are attracted to prey movement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

World experiences involve multisensory stimulation that arises simultaneously from multiple sources. Yet, we experience a coherent and unified world. Many studies have focused on how sensory information from distinct modalities are integrated and showed that numerous behavioural and cognitive benefits are provided by multisensory processes. Much work has been done with mammalian models but research on avian species also expands our knowledge on multisensory processes. Avian species exhibit a great diversity of behaviours and these species have provided evidence that multisensory processes benefit by the learning that occurs in natural situations. Cross-modal influences on the control of sensorimotor processes occur in circumstances of sensory loss. Also, studies suggest pervasive multisensory influences throughout the avian brain. This review summarizes research done on the imprinting behaviour of precocial bird species, on the ability of barn owls to detect prey and on the vocal communication of songbirds. • Avian groups exhibit a large range of natural behaviours that rely on multisensory processing. • Multisensory exposure fosters different kinds of learning. • Social interactions through multisensory information benefit to learning processes. • Line of evidence for a role of information from different modalities in circumstances of sensory loss. • Multisensory interactions in the avian brain challenge the view that each modality processes information independently. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The 'evolutionary arms race' between predator and prey is responsible for many physiological, morphological, and behavioural adaptations and some of the most compelling examples relate to the generation and detection of visual signals. Better understanding of adaptations can arise from approaching predator-prey dynamics from the point of view of the animals themselves, such as through animal-borne cameras. As we learn more about an animal's visual system, we can take this further and analyse visual scenes through their eyes. In this study video cameras mounted on tiger sharks were used to analyse motion cues of sea turtles using two-dimensional motion detector (2DMD) models. Sharks were also equipped with tri-axial motion-sensors to compare visual motion cues to behaviour, using the behavioural metrics of overall dynamic body acceleration (ODBA), path tortuosity, tailbeat frequency and tailbeat acceleration signal amplitude. When comparing the behaviours of sharks in the minute before and after interactions with sea turtles, we found lower ODBA of sharks associated with sea turtles that produced greater visual motion cues. These turtles also invoked swimming by sharks that was more tortuous than when no turtle was encountered. Together, these behaviours suggest that tiger sharks may potentially stalking turtles that produced greater motion cues. Many sea turtles did not stand out from the background motion suggesting they remain motionless as a form of camouflage. This study provides insights into the use of visual cues in prey identification by tiger sharks and the camouflage strategies used by sea turtles to avoid predation. • Tiger shark swimming behaviour is altered after interacting with visible sea turtles. • Reduced movement helps to camouflage sea turtles from approaching tiger sharks. • Combining visual perception and animal-borne cameras helps to understand behaviour. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Shark bites on humans are rare but are sufficiently frequent to generate substantial public concern, which typically leads to measures to reduce their frequency. Unfortunately, we understand little about why sharks bite humans. One theory for bites occurring at the surface, e.g. on surfers, is that of mistaken identity, whereby sharks mistake humans for their typical prey (pinnipeds in the case of white sharks). This study tests the mistaken identity theory by comparing video footage of pinnipeds, humans swimming and humans paddling surfboards, from the perspective of a white shark viewing these objects from below. Videos were processed to reflect how a shark's retina would detect the visual motion and shape cues. Motion cues of humans swimming, humans paddling surfboards and pinnipeds swimming did not differ significantly. The shape of paddled surfboards and human swimmers was also similar to that of pinnipeds with their flippers abducted. The difference in shape between pinnipeds with abducted versus adducted flippers was bigger than between pinnipeds with flippers abducted and surfboards or human swimmers. From the perspective of a white shark, therefore, neither visual motion nor shape cues allow an unequivocal visual distinction between pinnipeds and humans, supporting the mistaken identity theory behind some bites.