Search

Background: Rhabdoid tumors (RT) are aggressive, rare tumors predominantly affecting young children, characterized by bi-allelic SMARCB1 gene inactivation. While most SMARCB1 alterations are acquired de novo, a third of cases exhibit germline alterations, defining Rhabdoid Tumors Predisposition Syndrome (RTPS1). With increased sensitivity of next-generation sequencing (NGS), mosaicisms in genes linked to genetic diseases are more detectable. This study focuses on exploring SMARCB1 germline alterations, notably mosaicism in blood samples of children with RT and in parents, using a custom NGS panel., Methods: A cohort of 280 children and 140 parents with germline analysis was studied. Germline DNA from 111 children with RT and 32 parents were re-analyzed with a custom NGS panel with 1,500X average depth targeting the SMARCB1 gene to identify intragenic variants not detected with conventional low-sensitivity methods. Follow-up data was obtained for 77 patients., Results: Nine previously undetected mosaicism cases were identified, totaling 17/280 patients with a mosaic variant (6.1%) in the cohort, with variant allele frequencies between 0.9% and 33%, thus highlighting the prior underestimation of its prevalence. Follow-up data showed that 4 out of 7 survivors with mosaic variants developed distinct novel tumors, two sharing SMARCB1 alterations with the initial tumor, emphasizing the potential clinical impact of SMARCB1 mosaicism., Conclusions: The hitherto underestimated rate of SMARCB1 mosaicism in RT underscores the need for optimized genetic counseling and oncological monitoring. The findings have significant medical implications, considering the dire prognosis of RT., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Neuro-Oncology. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: ELP1 pathogenic variants (PV) have been recently identified as the most frequent variants predisposing to Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) medulloblastomas (MB); however, guidelines are still lacking for genetic counseling in this new syndrome., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed clinical and genetic data of a French series of 29 ELP1 -mutated MB., Results: All patients developed SHH-MB, with a biallelic inactivation of PTCH1 found in 24 tumors. Other recurrent alterations encompassed the TP53 pathway and activation of MYCN/MYCL signaling. The median age at diagnosis was 7.3 years (range: 3-14). ELP1 -mutated MB behave as sporadic cases, with similar distribution within clinical and molecular risk groups and similar outcomes (5 y - OS = 86%); no unusual side effect of treatments was noticed. Remarkably, a germline ELP1 PV was identified in all patients with available constitutional DNA ( n  = 26); moreover, all tested familial trio ( n  = 11) revealed that the PVs were inherited. Two of the 26 index cases from the French series had a family history of MB; pedigrees from these patients and from 1 additional Dutch family suggested a weak penetrance. Apart from MB, no cancer was associated with ELP1 PVs; second tumors reported in 4 patients occurred within the irradiation fields, in the usual time-lapse for expected radiotherapy-induced neoplasms., Conclusions: The low penetrance, the "at risk' age window limited to childhood and the narrow tumor spectrum, question the actual benefit of genetic screening in these patients and their family. Our results suggest restricting ELP1 germline sequencing to patients with SHH-MB, depending on the parents" request., Competing Interests: None declared., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press, the Society for Neuro-Oncology and the European Association of Neuro-Oncology.)

Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared.

Background: Despite recent advances in prenatal genetic diagnosis, medical geneticists still face considerable difficulty in interpreting the clinical outcome of copy-number-variant duplications and defining the mechanisms underlying the formation of certain chromosomal rearrangements. Optical genome mapping (OGM) is an emerging cytogenomic tool with proved ability to identify the full spectrum of cytogenetic aberrations., Methods: Here, we report on the use of OGM in a prenatal diagnosis setting. Detailed breakpoint mapping was used to determine the relative orientations of triplicated and duplicated segments in two unrelated foetuses harbouring chromosomal aberrations: a de novo 15q23q24.2 triplication and a paternally inherited 13q14.2 duplication that overlapped partially with the RB1 gene., Results: OGM enabled us to suggest a plausible mechanism for the triplication and confirmed that the RB1 duplication was direct oriented and in tandem. This enabled us to predict the pathogenic consequences, refine the prognosis and adapt the follow-up and familial screening appropriately., Conclusion: Along with an increase in diagnostic rates, OGM can rapidly highlight genotype-phenotype correlations, improve genetic counselling and significantly influence prenatal management., (© 2024 The Authors. Molecular Genetics & Genomic Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

About half of the human genome is composed of repeated sequences derived from mobile elements, mainly retrotransposons, generally without pathogenic effect. Familial forms of retinoblastoma are caused by germline pathogenic variants in RB1 gene. Here, we describe a family with retinoblastoma affecting a father and his son. No pathogenic variant was identified after DNA analysis of RB1 gene coding sequence and exon-intron junctions. However, RB1 mRNA analysis showed a chimeric transcript with insertion of 114 nucleotides from HPF1 gene inside RB1 gene. This chimeric transcript led to an insertion of 38 amino acids in functional domain of retinoblastoma protein. Subsequent DNA analysis in RB1 intron 17 revealed the presence of a full-length HPF1 retrogene insertion in opposite orientation. Functional assay shows that this insertion has a deleterious impact on retinoblastoma protein function. This is the first report of a full-length retrogene insertion involved in human Mendelian disease leading to a chimeric transcript and a non-functional chimeric protein. Some retrogene insertions may be missed by standard diagnostic genetic testing, so contribution of retrogene insertions to human disease may be underestimated. The increasing use of whole genome sequencing in diagnostic settings will help to get a more comprehensive view of retrogenes., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

In breast or ovarian cancer (BC/OC) patients with evocative personal and/or family history, multigene panel sequencing is performed on blood to diagnose hereditary predispositions. Additionally, BRCA1/BRCA2 testing can be performed on tumor sample for therapeutic purpose. The accuracy of multigene panel tumor analysis on BC/OC to detect predisposing germline pathogenic variants (gPV) has not been precisely assessed. By comparing sequencing data from blood and fresh-frozen tumor we show that tumor genomic instability causes pitfalls to consider when performing tumor testing to detect gPV. Even if loss of heterozygosity increases germline signal in most cases, somatic copy number variants (CNV) can mask germline CNV and collapse point gPV variant allele frequency (VAF). Moreover, VAF does not allow an accurate distinction between germline and somatic pathogenic variants., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Three partially overlapping breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) comprising 77, 179 and 313 SNPs have been proposed for European-ancestry women by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) for improving risk prediction in the general population. However, the effect of these SNPs may vary from one country to another and within a country because of other factors., Objective: To assess their associated risk and predictive performance in French women from (1) the CECILE population-based case-control study, (2) BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variant (PV) carriers from the GEMO study, and (3) familial breast cancer cases with no BRCA1/2 PV and unrelated controls from the GENESIS study., Results: All three PRS were associated with breast cancer in all studies, with odds ratios per standard deviation varying from 1.7 to 2.0 in CECILE and GENESIS, and hazard ratios varying from 1.1 to 1.4 in GEMO. The predictive performance of PRS 313 in CECILE was similar to that reported in BCAC but lower than that in GENESIS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.67 and 0.75, respectively). PRS were less performant in BRCA2 and BRCA1 PV carriers (AUC = 0.58 and 0.54 respectively)., Conclusion: Our results are in line with previous validation studies in the general population and in BRCA1/2 PV carriers. Additionally, we showed that PRS may be of clinical utility for women with a strong family history of breast cancer and no BRCA1/2 PV, and for those carrying a predicted PV in a moderate-risk gene like ATM, CHEK2 or PALB2., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: DS-L and LG coordinated the genotyping of SNPs included in the PRS of the MammoRisk® test commercialized by Predilife until December 2021. This genotyping was performed in the Department of Genetics of the Institut Curie. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To provide precise age-specific risk estimates of cancers other than female breast and ovarian cancers associated with pathogenic variants (PVs) in BRCA1 and BRCA2 for effective cancer risk management., Methods: We used data from 3,184 BRCA1 and 2,157 BRCA2 families in the Consortium of Investigators of Modifiers of BRCA1/2 to estimate age-specific relative (RR) and absolute risks for 22 first primary cancer types adjusting for family ascertainment., Results: BRCA1 PVs were associated with risks of male breast (RR = 4.30; 95% CI, 1.09 to 16.96), pancreatic (RR = 2.36; 95% CI, 1.51 to 3.68), and stomach (RR = 2.17; 95% CI, 1.25 to 3.77) cancers. Associations with colorectal and gallbladder cancers were also suggested. BRCA2 PVs were associated with risks of male breast (RR = 44.0; 95% CI, 21.3 to 90.9), stomach (RR = 3.69; 95% CI, 2.40 to 5.67), pancreatic (RR = 3.34; 95% CI, 2.21 to 5.06), and prostate (RR = 2.22; 95% CI, 1.63 to 3.03) cancers. The stomach cancer RR was higher for females than males (6.89 v 2.76; P = .04). The absolute risks to age 80 years ranged from 0.4% for male breast cancer to approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer for BRCA1 carriers and from approximately 2.5% for pancreatic cancer to 27% for prostate cancer for BRCA2 carriers., Conclusion: In addition to female breast and ovarian cancers, BRCA1 and BRCA2 PVs are associated with increased risks of male breast, pancreatic, stomach, and prostate (only BRCA2 PVs) cancers, but not with the risks of other previously suggested cancers. The estimated age-specific risks will refine cancer risk management in men and women with BRCA1/2 PVs., Competing Interests: Timothy R. RebbeckHonoraria: AstraZeneca (I)Consulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca (I) Andrew LeeEmployment: IlluminaPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: I am an inventor of the BOADICEA model that is licensed to Cambridge Enterprise (part of the University of Cambridge) for commercialization. I have received royalties from Cambridge Enterprise. Norbert ArnoldHonoraria: AstraZeneca Åke BorgHonoraria: Roche, AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, AstraZeneca Sandrine CaputoResearch Funding: AstraZeneca/France (Inst) Wendy K. ChungConsulting or Advisory Role: RegeneronResearch Funding: Biogen Chrystelle ColasConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/Merck, Pfizer Miguel de la HoyaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaResearch Funding: AstraZeneca D. Gareth EvansHonoraria: AstraZeneca Tanja N. FehmConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Novartis, Pfizer, AstraZeneca, Daiichi Sankyo, MSD OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche George FountzilasStock and Other Ownership Interests: GENPREX Inc (I), ARIAD (I), Deciphera Pharmaceuticals Inc (I), Daiichi Sankyo, RFL Holdings, FORMYCONHonoraria: AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Pfizer, Roche, NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Roche (I), LEO Pharma (I), Pfizer (I)Travel, Accommodations, Expenses: Merck (I), Pfizer (I), K.A.M Oncology/Hematology (I) Megan FronePatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Receive royalties for being a codeveloper of CancerGene Connect Eric HahnenConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca Helen HansonHonoraria: Pfizer Beth Y. KarlanConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche Pharma AG, Merck, Mercy Bioanalytics, GRAILResearch Funding: GOG Foundation (Inst), NCI-NRG Oncology (Inst), Genentech/Roche (Inst)Patents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: US and EU patent on gene signatureOther Relationship: Elsevier Irene KonstantopoulouSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZenecaResearch Funding: AstraZeneca Ava KwongHonoraria: Stryker, AstraZeneca Taiwan Limited, Roche Singapore, Pfizer, AstraZeneca Hong Kong Ltd Joanne Ngeow Yuen YieResearch Funding: AstraZeneca Rita K. SchmutzlerHonoraria: AstraZeneca, Clovis, MSD/AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca, MSD/AstraZenecaResearch Funding: Amgen Leigha SenterConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MerckSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca/Merck Christian F. SingerHonoraria: Novartis, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbHConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Daiichi-Sankyo, Gilead Sciences, Sanofi/Aventis, NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Novartis, AstraZeneca/MedImmuneResearch Funding: Novartis, Sanofi, Myriad Genetics, Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmuneTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche, Novartis Dominique Stoppa-LyonnetHonoraria: AstraZeneca/Merck (Inst) Soo Hwang TeoSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Roche Sebastian A. WagnerConsulting or Advisory Role: Bayer Antonis C. AntoniouPatents, Royalties, Other Intellectual Property: Inventor of the BOADICEA model, which has been licensed to Cambridge Enterprise for commercialization. May receive royalties if commercialization is realized.No other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

DICER1 syndrome is a rare paediatric autosomal dominant inherited disorder predisposing to various benign and malignant tumours. It is caused by a germline pathogenic variant in DICER1 , and the second hit for tumour development is usually a missense hotspot pathogenic variant in the DICER1 ribonuclease IIIb domain. While DICER1 predisposing variants account for about 60% of ovarian Sertoli-Leydig cell tumours, no DICER1 -related testicular stromal tumours have been described. Here we report the first two cases of testicular stromal tumours in children carrying a DICER1 germline pathogenic variant: a case of Sertoli cell tumour and a case of Leydig cell tumour diagnosed at 2 and 12 years of age, respectively. A somatic DICER1 hotspot pathogenic variant was detected in the Sertoli cell tumour. This report extends the spectrum of DICER1 -related tumours to include testicular Sertoli cell tumour and potentially testicular Leydig cell tumour. Diagnosis of a testicular Sertoli cell tumour should prompt DICER1 genetic testing so that patients with a DICER1 germline pathogenic variant can benefit from established surveillance guidelines. DICER1 genetic evaluation may be considered for testicular Leydig cell tumour. Our findings suggest that miRNA dysregulation underlies the aetiology of some testicular stromal tumours., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: DICER1 syndrome is an autosomal dominant inherited syndrome predisposing to various benign and malignant tumors, mainly occurring in children and young adults, requiring broad surveillance starting at birth with repeated irradiating imaging exams and sedations for young patients. It is caused by monoallelic germline pathogenic variants in the DICER1 gene. More than 90% of tumors bear an additional somatic DICER1 missense hotspot mutation, as a second hit, involving 1 of 6 codons clustered in exons 24 and 25. We designed and in vitro validated a drop-off droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) system to scan all DICER1 hotspot codons, allowing for a liquid biopsy test, an alternative to sedation and radiation exposure., Methods: Three drop-off ddPCR assays were designed, with 2 TaqMan probes per assay, 1 complementary to the wild-type sequence of the region containing hotspots and another 1 used as a reference. Eight tumor-derived DNAs and 5 synthetic oligonucleotides bearing DICER1 hotspot mutations were tested., Results: All tested mutations were detected, with a limit of detection ranging from 0.07% to 0.31% for codons p. E1705, p. D1709, and p. D1713 in exon 24 and from 0.06% to 0.15% for codons p. G1809, p. D1810, and p. E1813 in exon 25., Conclusions: The high sensitivity of this method is compatible with its use for plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis for early tumor detection in DICER1 syndrome patients. It may reduce the need for radiation exposure and sedation in surveillance protocols and may also improve patient prognosis. Clinical trials are needed to evaluate ctDNA analysis in these patients., (© American Association for Clinical Chemistry 2021. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Retinoblastoma is a malignant tumor of the infant retina. Nearly half of patients are predisposed to retinoblastoma by a germline RB1 pathogenic variant. Nonhereditary retinoblastoma is mainly caused by inactivation of both RB1 alleles at a somatic level. Several polymorphisms have been reported as biomarkers of retinoblastoma risk, aggressiveness, or invasion. The most informative genetic testing is obtained from tumor DNA. Historically, access to tumor DNA has been warranted by the frequent indication of enucleation, which has decreased because of advances in conservative approaches. Recent studies showed that tumor cell-free DNA can be analyzed in aqueous humor from retinoblastoma patients. This report describes a next-generation sequencing method relying on unique molecular identifiers for a highly sensitive detection of retinoblastoma genetic predisposition and biomarkers in a single analysis. It is the first use of unique molecular identifiers for retinoblastoma genetics. This gene panel enables the detection of RB1 point variants, large genome rearrangements, and loss of heterozygosity. It is adapted for genomic DNA extracted from blood or tumor DNA extracted from tumor fragment, aqueous humor, or plasma. The access to tumor cell-free DNA improves the diagnosis of genetic predisposition in case of conservative ocular therapy and provides access to biomarkers guiding the treatment strategy. The analysis of a gene panel is cost-effective and can be easily implemented in diagnostic laboratories., (Copyright © 2021 Association for Molecular Pathology and American Society for Investigative Pathology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Up to 80% of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic variants remain of uncertain clinical significance (VUSs). Only variants classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic can guide breast and ovarian cancer prevention measures and treatment by PARP inhibitors. We report the first results of the ongoing French national COVAR (cosegregation variant) study, the aim of which is to classify BRCA1/2 VUSs. The classification method was a multifactorial model combining different associations between VUSs and cancer, including cosegregation data. At this time, among the 653 variants selected, 101 (15%) distinct variants shared by 1,624 families were classified as pathogenic/likely pathogenic or benign/likely benign by the COVAR study. Sixty-six of the 101 (65%) variants classified by COVAR would have remained VUSs without cosegregation data. Of note, among the 34 variants classified as pathogenic by COVAR, 16 remained VUSs or likely pathogenic when following the ACMG/AMP variant classification guidelines. Although the initiation and organization of cosegregation analyses require a considerable effort, the growing number of available genetic tests results in an increasing number of families sharing a particular variant, and thereby increases the power of such analyses. Here we demonstrate that variant cosegregation analyses are a powerful tool for the classification of variants in the BRCA1/2 breast-ovarian cancer predisposition genes., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests D.S.-L. and the Institut Curie have received honoraria for her participation in education meetings organized by AstraZeneca or Tesaro. The remaining authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 American Society of Human Genetics. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Retinoblastoma is the most frequent intraocular malignancy in children, originating from a maturing cone precursor in the developing retina. Little is known on the molecular basis underlying the biological and clinical behavior of this cancer. Here, using multi-omics data, we demonstrate the existence of two retinoblastoma subtypes. Subtype 1, of earlier onset, includes most of the heritable forms. It harbors few genetic alterations other than the initiating RB1 inactivation and corresponds to differentiated tumors expressing mature cone markers. By contrast, subtype 2 tumors harbor frequent recurrent genetic alterations including MYCN-amplification. They express markers of less differentiated cone together with neuronal/ganglion cell markers with marked inter- and intra-tumor heterogeneity. The cone dedifferentiation in subtype 2 is associated with stemness features including low immune and interferon response, E2F and MYC/MYCN activation and a higher propensity for metastasis. The recognition of these two subtypes, one maintaining a cone-differentiated state, and the other, more aggressive, associated with cone dedifferentiation and expression of neuronal markers, opens up important biological and clinical perspectives for retinoblastomas., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose: The analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), a fraction of total cell-free DNA (cfDNA), might be of special interest in retinoblastoma patients. Because the accessibility to tumor tissue is very limited in these patients, either for histopathological diagnosis of suspicious intraocular masses (biopsies are proscribed) or for somatic RB1 studies and genetic counseling (due to current successful conservative approaches), we aim to validate the detection of ctDNA in plasma of non-hereditary retinoblastoma patients by molecular analysis of RB1 gene., Experimental Design: In a cohort of 19 intraocular unilateral non-hereditary retinoblastoma patients for whom a plasma sample was available at diagnosis, we performed high-deep next-generation sequencing (NGS) of RB1 in cfDNA. Two different bioinformatics/statistics approaches were applied depending on whether the somatic RB1 status was available or not., Results: Median plasma sample volume was 600 μL [100-1000]; median cfDNA plasma concentration was 119 [38-1980] and 27 [11-653] ng/mL at diagnosis and after complete remission, respectively. In the subgroup of patients with known somatic RB1 alterations (n = 11), seven of nine somatic mutations were detected (median allele fraction: 6.7%). In patients without identified somatic RB1 alterations (n = 8), six candidate variants were identified for seven patients., Conclusions: Despite small tumor size, blood-ocular barrier, poor ctDNA blood release and limited plasma sample volumes, we confirm that it is possible to detect ctDNA with high-deep NGS in plasma from patients with intraocular non-hereditary retinoblastoma. This may aid in diagnosis of suspicious cases, family genetic counseling or follow-up of residual intraocular disease., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)