Back to Search Start Over

Association and performance of polygenic risk scores for breast cancer among French women presenting or not a familial predisposition to the disease.

Authors :
Jiao Y
Truong T
Eon-Marchais S
Mebirouk N
Caputo SM
Dondon MG
Karimi M
Le Gal D
Beauvallet J
Le Floch É
Dandine-Roulland C
Bacq-Daian D
Olaso R
Albuisson J
Audebert-Bellanger S
Berthet P
Bonadona V
Buecher B
Caron O
Cavaillé M
Chiesa J
Colas C
Collonge-Rame MA
Coupier I
Delnatte C
De Pauw A
Dreyfus H
Fert-Ferrer S
Gauthier-Villars M
Gesta P
Giraud S
Gladieff L
Golmard L
Lasset C
Lejeune-Dumoulin S
Léoné M
Limacher JM
Lortholary A
Luporsi É
Mari V
Maugard CM
Mortemousque I
Mouret-Fourme E
Nambot S
Noguès C
Popovici C
Prieur F
Pujol P
Sevenet N
Sobol H
Toulas C
Uhrhammer N
Vaur D
Venat L
Boland-Augé A
Guénel P
Deleuze JF
Stoppa-Lyonnet D
Andrieu N
Lesueur F
Source :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990) [Eur J Cancer] 2023 Jan; Vol. 179, pp. 76-86. Date of Electronic Publication: 2022 Nov 13.
Publication Year :
2023

Abstract

Background: Three partially overlapping breast cancer polygenic risk scores (PRS) comprising 77, 179 and 313 SNPs have been proposed for European-ancestry women by the Breast Cancer Association Consortium (BCAC) for improving risk prediction in the general population. However, the effect of these SNPs may vary from one country to another and within a country because of other factors.<br />Objective: To assess their associated risk and predictive performance in French women from (1) the CECILE population-based case-control study, (2) BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) pathogenic variant (PV) carriers from the GEMO study, and (3) familial breast cancer cases with no BRCA1/2 PV and unrelated controls from the GENESIS study.<br />Results: All three PRS were associated with breast cancer in all studies, with odds ratios per standard deviation varying from 1.7 to 2.0 in CECILE and GENESIS, and hazard ratios varying from 1.1 to 1.4 in GEMO. The predictive performance of PRS <subscript>313</subscript> in CECILE was similar to that reported in BCAC but lower than that in GENESIS (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.67 and 0.75, respectively). PRS were less performant in BRCA2 and BRCA1 PV carriers (AUC = 0.58 and 0.54 respectively).<br />Conclusion: Our results are in line with previous validation studies in the general population and in BRCA1/2 PV carriers. Additionally, we showed that PRS may be of clinical utility for women with a strong family history of breast cancer and no BRCA1/2 PV, and for those carrying a predicted PV in a moderate-risk gene like ATM, CHEK2 or PALB2.<br />Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: DS-L and LG coordinated the genotyping of SNPs included in the PRS of the MammoRisk® test commercialized by Predilife until December 2021. This genotyping was performed in the Department of Genetics of the Institut Curie. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.<br /> (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
1879-0852
Volume :
179
Database :
MEDLINE
Journal :
European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
36509001
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2022.11.007