Search

Elevated concentrations of Lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] is an inherited, causal risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). This study aims to investigate the clinical utility for patients, and the economic benefit to healthcare systems and society of measuring Lp(a) concentrations more widely today.We conducted a structured literature review to identify the economic and health benefits and costs of measuring the Lp(a) concentration, potential barriers hindering the uptake of the measure, and potential solutions to address them. These findings were then discussed in an advisory board attended by experts and patient organisations.It was found that if Lp(a) concentration is measured more widely today, patients, healthcare system and society would experience clinical and economic benefits even before specific Lp(a) lowering pharmacological treatments become available. Furthermore, a wider uptake of the Lp(a) measurement would support the development of epidemiological data.For Lp(a) measurement to be more widely used, key barriers which are hindering its uptake need to be addressed. These include i) the perception that the measure may have limited clinical value, ii) lack of awareness on Lp(a), iii) lack of data on the CV benefit of reducing Lp(a), iv) technical and clinical guidelines barriers, and v) healthcare system barriers. Scientific communities and industry should collaborate to address technical challenges and deficiencies in clinical guidelines. However, policy intervention will be crucial for national ASCVD plans to acknowledge the importance of Lp(a).

Lipoprotein(a) has long been regarded as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease; however, its routine use in clinical practice has been hampered by difficulties inherent in the measurement of this complex lipoprotein. The major challenges relate to its size heterogeneity and related issues including (1) use of appropriate calibrators (2) standardization of calibration protocols (3) traceability and (4) reporting units. In the UK, results from the current EQA schemes for lipoprotein(a) suggest that there is considerable work required to standardize lipoprotein(a) measurement. This is becoming increasingly pertinent with the increasing recognition of lipoprotein(a) as an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease in international guidelines and the emergence of novel antisense therapies to effectively reduce lipoprotein(a). This article raises awareness of the importance of measurement of lipoprotein(a) for the assessment of cardiovascular disease risk and gives guidance to clinical laboratories regarding choice of appropriate assays.

Summary Aims The aims of this study were to determine the diagnostic yield of a dedicated heart failure diagnosis clinic and the impact of using different guideline recommended N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) referral thresholds on diagnosis and referral patterns. Methods and results Patients referred by primary care between September 2011 and May 2013 were included in the analysis. Data collected included baseline characteristics, NT-proBNP levels, echocardiographic and clinical findings, final diagnosis and outcome. The impact of using Newcastle (locally modified age-adjusted NT-proBNP thresholds), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) NT-proBNP thresholds on diagnosis and referrals was determined by applying the different guidelines to this population. A total of 208 patients were referred; median age 77.5 years and 62.5% were women. Thirty-four patients (16.3%) had systolic heart failure, 50 patients (24.0%) had heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. One hundred and six patients (51.0%) did not have heart failure. Using NICE guidelines (NT-proBNP ≥ 400 ng/l) instead of the Newcastle age-adjusted NT-proBNP referral thresholds results in 59 fewer referrals, but eight heart failure diagnoses were missed. Using the ESC cut-off of NT-proBNP ≥ 125 ng/l would result in 88 additional referrals; one diagnosis of heart failure would be missed. Over a mean follow-up of 16.8 ± 6 months there were 21 deaths and 47 hospital admissions. Conclusion The Newcastle age-adjusted thresholds led to more referrals in comparison to NICE guidelines but are more sensitive in diagnosing heart failure. Using ESC recommended thresholds results in a similar diagnostic yield to our age-adjusted thresholds, but has the potential to significantly increase the referrals in patients ≥ 75 years, which may result in a lower diagnostic yield.

Serum total testosterone (tT)9 includes both free testosterone (fT) (0.5%–3% of total and believed to be the biologically active form) and sex hormone–binding globulin (SHBG)- and albumin-bound forms (1). Guidelines for diagnosing and treating male hypogonadism that emphasize measurement of tT (2) may not address the major variations in SHBG and consequent testosterone bioavailability (testosterone bioavailability [BT] either calculated or assayed directly) that are associated with age, obesity, anticonvulsant therapy, and thyroid and liver disease. For these reasons, recent Endocrine Society of Australia guidelines (3) acknowledge the value of measuring SHBG as well as BT, but nevertheless state that, “There is no evidence that free or bioavailable testosterone levels, which are usually not directly measured but calculated…are a better measure of androgen status than total testosterone level. Moreover, reference intervals for these [BT levels] are even less well defined than those for measured testosterone concentrations. Therefore, they [BT levels] are not recommended for clinical decision-making.” Although commercially available direct fT assays are not always robust, calculated fT (c-fT) values from a mass-action …

Introduction The ICON1 study (a study to Improve Cardiovascular Outcomes in high-risk older patieNts with acute coronary syndrome) is a prospective observational study of older patients (≥75 years old) with non-ST-elevation acute coronary syndrome managed by contemporary treatment (pharmacological and invasive). The aim of the study was to determine the predictors of poor cardiovascular outcomes in this age group and to generate a risk prediction tool. Methods and analysis Participants are recruited from 2 tertiary hospitals in the UK. Baseline evaluation includes frailty, comorbidity, cognition and quality-of-life measures, inflammatory status assessed by a biomarker panel, including microRNAs, senescence assessed by telomere length and telomerase activity, cardiovascular status assessed by arterial stiffness, endothelial function, carotid intima media thickness and left ventricular systolic and diastolic function, and coronary plaque assessed by virtual histology intravascular ultrasound and optical coherence tomography. The patients are followed-up at 30 days and at 1 year for primary outcome measures of death, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned revascularisation, bleeding and rehospitalisation. Ethics and dissemination The study has been approved by the regional ethics committee (REC 12/NE/016). Findings of the study will be presented in scientific sessions and will be published in peer-reviewed journals. Trial registration number NCT01933581: Pre-results.

Reducing plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) remains the cornerstone in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, lack of efficacy and adverse effects mean that a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve acceptable LDL-C levels with currently available lipid-lowering drugs. Over the last decade, inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has emerged as a promising therapeutic strategy to reduce residual cardiovascular disease risk. Binding of PCSK9 to the LDL receptor targets the receptor for lysosomal degradation. The recognition that inhibition of PCSK9 increases LDL receptor activity has led to the development of a number of approaches to directly target PCSK9. Numerous monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 are currently being evaluated in phase 3 trials, involving various patient categories on different background lipid-lowering therapies. Current evidence shows reductions in LDL-C levels of up to 70 % may be achieved with PCSK9 inhibition, independent of background statin therapy. This review examines the most recent evidence and future prospects for the use of PCSK9 inhibitors in the prevention of cardiovascular disease.