Search

Multiple small beamlets in the delivery of highly modulated single-isocenter HyperArc VMAT plan can lead to dose delivery errors associated with small-field dosimetry, which can be a major concern for stereotactic radiosurgery for multiple brain lesions. Herein, we describe and compare a clinically valuable dynamic conformal arc (DCA)-based VMAT (DCA-VMAT) approach for stereotactic radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions using flattening filter free beams to minimize this effect. Original single-isocenter HyperArc style VMAT and DCA-VMAT plans were created on 7 patients with 2 to 8 brain lesions (total 35 lesions) for 10 MV- flattening filter free beam. 20 Gy was prescribed to each lesion. For identical planning criteria, DCA-VMAT utilizes user-controlled field aperture shaper before VMAT optimization. Plans were evaluated for conformity and target coverage, low- and intermediate dose spillages to brain volume that received more than 30% (V30%) and 50% (V50%) of prescription dose. Additionally, mean brain dose, V8, V12 and maximal dose to adjacent organs-at-risk (OAR) including hippocampi were reported. Total monitor units, beam modulation factor, treatment delivery efficiency, and accuracy were recorded. Comparing with original VMAT, DCA-VMAT plans provided similar tumor dose, target coverage and conformity, yet tighter radio-surgical dose distribution with lower dose to normal brain V30% (p = 0.009), V50% (p = 0.05) and other OAR including lower dose to hippocampi. Lower total number of monitor units and smaller beam modulation factor reduced beam on time by 2.82 min (p0.001), on average (maximum up to 3.8 min). Beam delivery accuracy was improved by 8%, on average (p0.001) and maximum up to 13% in some cases for DCA-VMAT plans. This novel DCA-VMAT approach provided excellent plan quality, reduced dose to normal brain, and other OAR while significantly reducing beam-on time for radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions-improving patient compliance and clinic workflow. It also provided less MLC modulation through the targets-potentially minimizing small field dosimetry errors as demonstrated by quality assurance results. Incorporating DCA-based VMAT optimization in HyperArc module for radiosurgery of multiple brain lesions merits future investigation.

When Delivery Quality Assurance (DQA) results do not coincide with specific criteria, re-measurement and re-treatment planning are required because incorrect beam delivery to the patient may occur. Therefore, an analysis of the plan parameters to find reasons for failure is essential. In this paper, we examine the effect of plan parameters on the DQA passing rate and clarify the plan parameters that should be adjusted mainly for each Tomotherapy when DQA fails and re-planning is required. Two versions of Tomotherapy treatment machines, Tomotherapy Hi-art and Radixact X9, were used. An independent t-test was performed to confirm the significant difference between the DQA passing rates of Tomotherapy Hi-art and Radixact X9. Also, a regression analysis was performed to analyze the correlation between plan parameters and passing rates. The average passing rate for Radixact X9 was 99.82 (standard deviation [SD] = 0.32) and that for Tomotherapy Hi-art was 98.46 (SD = 1.76). The passing rate of Radixact X9 was significantly higher than that of Tomotherapy Hi-art (P = 0.000). Statistically significant independent variables adopted from Tomotherapy Hi-art were IEC Yf (p = 0.025), the modulation factor (p = 0.003), and the number of control points (p = 0.006). The statistically significant parameter for Radixact X9 was IEC Xf (p = 0.000). According to the results, the new version of Tomotherapy(Radixact X9) has a relatively higher DQA pass rate than the old version (Tomotherapy Hi-art), and if the DQA fails and re-planning is required, each of the plan parameters can be adjusted to achieve a higher pass rate.

Introduction Helical TomoTherapy allows a highly conformal dose distribution to complex target geometries with a good protection of organs at risk. However, the small field sizes associated with this method are a possible source of dosimetrical uncertainties. The IAEA has published detector-specific field output correction factors for static fields of the TomoTherapy in the TRS483. This work investigates the average subfield size of helical TomoTherapy plans. Material and methods A new parameter for helical TomoTherapy was defined – the fluence-weighted average subfield size. The subfield sizes were extracted from the leaf-opening time sinograms in the RT-plan files for 30 clinical prostate and head and neck plans and were put in relation to Delat4 Phantom+ measurement results. Additionally the influence of planning parameters on the subfield size was studied by varying the modulation factor, number of iterations and pitch in the dose optimization and calculation for three different clinical indications H&N, prostate and rectum cancer . Selected plans were dosimetrically verified by Delta4 measurements to examine the reliability in dependence of the average subfield size. Furthermore, the impact of the planning parameters on a) the dose distribution, with regard to the planning target volume and regions at risks, and b) machine characteristics such as delivery time, actual modulation factor and leaf-opening times were evaluated. Results The average equivalent square subfield lengths ( s ¯ e q ) of the two investigated indications did not differ significantly – prostate plans: 2.75 ± 0.14 cm and H&N plans: 2.70 ± 0.16 cm, both with a jaw width of 2.5 cm. No correlation between field size and measured dose deviation was detected. The number of iterations and the modulation factor have a considerable influence on the average subfield size. The higher the planned modulation factor and the more iterations are used during optimization, the smaller is the subfield size. In our pilot study plans were calculated with field sizes s ¯ e q between 4.2 cm and 1.7 cm, with a jaw width of 2.5 cm. Again, the measurement results of Delta4 showed no significant deviation from the doses calculated by the TomoTherapy planning system for the whole range of subfield sizes, and no significant correlation between field sizes and dose deviations was found. As expected, the clinical dose distribution improved with increasing modulation factor and an increasing number of iterations. The compromise between an improved dose distribution and smaller s ¯ e q was shown. Conclusion In this work, a method was presented to determine the average subfield size for helical TomoTherapy plans. The response of the Delta4 did not show any dependence on field size in the range of the field sizes covered by the studied plans. The influence of the subfield sizes on other dosimetry systems remains to be investigated.

Summarization: In this paper, we investigate how the incident power at the tag affects the backscattered signal that reaches the reader. It is shown experimentally and theoretically that the backscattered complex signal, i.e. magnitude and phase, changes significantly with respect to the incident power at the tag’s antenna. This effect is neglected in prior art and is due to the change of the input impedance of the tag’s front end, due to the presence of non-linear components, like the rectifier’s diodes. Measured deviation of 14dBs and phase shift of 100 degrees is reported herein. These variations might lead to large localization errors, depending on the method and the measured quantity, unless the localization algorithm accounts for the expected variability. Παρουσιάστηκε στο: 2021 IEEE International Conference on RFID Technology and Applications

Objectives: Hippocampus-sparing whole-brain radiotherapy (HS-WBRT) using tomotherapy is known to provide a better dose distribution than volumetric-modulated arc therapy but requires an extended irradiation time. The present study aimed to investigate whether irradiation time can be shortened by reducing the modulation factor (MF) without losing the target dose distribution. Methods: Using six tilted computed tomography images in the head area, the planning target volume (PTV) and hippocampal doses, and the irradiation time was investigated with a jaw width of 1 cm, a pitch of 0.200, and the MF changed from 3.0 to 2.6, 2.2, 1.8, and 1.4. Results: No significant changes in the PTV or hippocampus were found with MF in the range from 3.0 to 1.8, but marked deterioration was found with that of 1.4. The irradiation time showed a linear relationship with the MF within the range from 3.0 to 1.8, with 1334, 1158, 986, and 817 s at modulation factors of 3.0, 2.6, 2.2, and 1.8, respectively. However, when the MF was 1.4, the irradiation time was 808 s. Conclusions: When HS-WBRT is performed with a tilted body position and a jaw width of 1 cm, with a MF of 1.8, a favorable balance between dose parameters and irradiation time is achieved, whereas with a MF of 1.4, the quality of the radiotherapy plan deteriorates, and the irradiation time is approximately the same as that with a MF of 1.8.

Background and Purpose: The topotherapy technique was recently suggested as a robust alternative to helical radiation delivery for total body irradiation (TBI). It allows to deliver a discrete number of beams with fixed gantry. A Topotherapy-based low-dose TBI technique was optimized and clinically implemented. Materials and methods: TBI delivery was split in two parts: the first treating from the head to half thigh and the second the remaining legs. An in-silico investigation aimed to optimize plan parameters was first carried out on four patients. For the upper plan, field width and pitch were fixed to 5 cm and 0.5: the combined impact of five modulation factor (MF) values and different field configurations (6/8/12 fields) was investigated. For the lower plan, two anterior/posterior beams (field width: 5 cm; pitch: 0.5; MF:1.5) were used. After assessing the optimal technique, set-up/quality assurance/image-guidance procedures were defined and the technique clinically implemented: 23 patients were treated up to now. Results: The best compromise between treatment time and planning target volume (PTV) coverage/homogeneity was found for MF = 1.5 and 8 fields. All clinical plans were automatically optimized using an “ad-hoc” plan template: excellent PTV coverage (PTV95%>98.5%) and homogeneity (median SD:4%) were found with a median beam-on time of 17/9 min for the upper/lower plan. All patients were successfully treated and transplanted. Conclusions: TBI delivered with the topotherapy approach robustly guarantees adequate coverage and dose homogeneity. Semi-automatic clinical plans can be quickly generated and efficiently delivered. Keywords: TBI, TomoDirect, Tomotherapy, Automatic planning

Protein synthesis is one of the most energy demanding cellular processes. The ability to regulate protein synthesis is essential for cells under normal as well as stress conditions, such as nutrient deficiencies. One mechanism for protein synthesis suppression is the dimerization of ribosomes into hibernation complexes. In most cells, this process is promoted by the hibernating promoting factor (HPF) and in a small group of Gram-negative bacteria (γ-proteobacteria), the dimer formation is induced by a shorter version of HPF (HPFshort ) and by an additional protein, the ribosome modulation factor. In most bacteria, the product of this process is the 100S ribosome complex. Recent advances in cryogenic electron microscopy methods resulted in an abundance of detailed structures of near atomic resolutions 100S complexes that allow for a better understanding of the dimerization process and the way it inhibits protein synthesis. As ribosomal dimerization is vital for cell survival, this process is an attractive target for the development of novel antimicrobial substances that might inhibit or stabilize the complex formation. As different dimerization processes exist among bacteria, including pathogens, this process may provide the basis for species-specific design of antimicrobial agents. Here, we review in detail the various dimerization mechanisms and discuss how they affect the overall dimer structures of the bacterial ribosomes.

Purpose Since the modulation factor (MF) impacts both plan quality and delivery efficiency in tomotherapy Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) treatment planning, the purpose of this study was to demonstrate a technique in determining an efficient MF from the Multileaf Collimator (MLC) leaf-open time (LOT) distribution of a tomotherapy treatment delivery plan. Methods Eight clinical plans of varying complexity were optimized with the highest allowed MF on the Accuracy Precision treatment planning system. Using a central limit theorem argument a range of reduced MFs were then determined from the first two moments of the LOT distribution. A step down approach was used to calculate the reduced-MF plans and plan comparison tools available on the Precision treatment planning system were used to evaluate dose differences with the reference plan. Results A reduced-MF plan that balanced delivery time and dosimetric quality was found from the set of five MFs determined from the LOT distribution of the reference plan. The reduced-MF plan showed good agreement with the reference plan (target and critical organ dose-volume region of interest dose differences were within 1% and 2% of prescription dose, respectively). Discussion Plan evaluation and acceptance criteria can vary depending on individual clinical expectations and dosimetric quality trade-offs. With the scheme presented in this paper a planner should be able to efficiently generate a high-quality plan with efficient delivery time without knowing a good MF beforehand. Conclusion A methodology for deriving a reduced MF from the LOT distribution of a high MF treatment plan using the central limit theorem has been presented. A scheme for finding a reduced MF from a set of MFs that results in a plan balanced in both dosimetric quality and treatment delivery efficiency has also been presented.

TomoTherapy® is a modern radiation treatment technique in which intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is delivered in helical fashion. A two-dimensional (2D) array which has been existing for IMRT patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA) verifications for many years is I'MatriXX. Our objectives were to validate this I'MatriXX and to evaluate it for different patient sites and fractionation schedules of TomoTherapy treatment. Twenty-five plans were created with virtual target for different possible pitch values and field widths for validation. Gamma index criteria of 3%/2% dose differences and 3/2 mm distance to agreement were used. QA plans of 26 different treatment sites and different fractionation schedules were used. Results indicated that the matrix response is independent of field width, pitch, and modulation factor of TomoTherapy with 3%, 3 mm criteria. High passing rate ranging from 99.7% to 90.7% was observed for selected patient plans. We found that I'MatriXX 2D array can be utilized for easy and quick TomoTherapy PSQA.

WOS:000649198300002 Background: The aim of this study was to compare the dosimetric values of TomoHelical (TH) plans using modulation factors 3 and 5 in patients with breast cancer. Materials and Methods: Two different radiotherapy treatment plans, including modulation factors 3 and 5, were generated retrospectively for 12 consecutive intact breast cancer patients. Twelve different plans in terms of the modulation factor were generated. Other optimization parameters (i.e., pitch and field width) were the same for all plans. Results: No differences were found between the conformity index (CI) and homogeneity index (HI) values of both plans (p>0.05). The values of D mean, V5, and V20 of the ipsilateral lung in the TomoHelical plan with modulation factor 5 (TH5) were significantly lower than with modulation factor 3 (TH3) for all 12 patients (4.9 Gy, 20.14%, 3.23%. Vs, 10.95 Gy, 58.9%, 18.7%; p=0.01, p=0.00, p=0.002, respectively). Also, the values of Dmean and V5 of the heart in TH5 were significantly lower than in TH3 (6.45 Gy, 34.33%, vs. 7.12 Gy, 64.22%; p=0.004, p=0.00, respectively). Conclusion: Both the TH5 and TH3 plans provided adequate coverage of the intact breast. TH5 delivered a decreased dose to the ipsilateral organs at risk (OARs), especially in the lung and heart volume, which is the main cause of long-term toxicity. The novelty of this work is the obvious reduction in same-sided lung volume irradiation by increasing the modulation factor.

There is no ideal detector-phantom combination to perform patient specific quality assurance (PSQA) for Total Marrow (TMI) and Lymphoid (TMLI) Irradiation plan. In this study, 3D dose reconstruction using mega voltage computed tomography detectors measured Leaf Open Time Sinogram (LOTS) was investigated for PSQA of TMI/TMLI patients in helical tomotherapy. The feasibility of this method was first validated for ten non-TMI/TMLI patients, by comparing reconstructed dose with (a) ion-chamber (IC) and helical detector array (ArcCheck) measurement and (b) planned dose distribution using 3Dγ analysis for 3%@3mm and dose to 98% (D98%) and 2% (D2%) of PTVs. Same comparison was extended for ten treatment plans from five TMI/TMLI patients. In all non-TMI/TMLI patients, reconstructed absolute dose was within ± 1.80% of planned and IC measurement. The planned dose distribution agreed with reconstructed and ArcCheck measured dose with mean (SD) 3Dγ of 98.70% (1.57%) and 2Dγ of 99.48% (0.81%). The deviation in D98% and D2% were within 1.71% and 4.10% respectively. In all 25 measurement locations from TMI/TMLI patients, planned and IC measured absolute dose agreed within ± 1.20%. Although sectorial fluence verification using ArcCHECK measurement for PTVs chest from the five upper body TMI/TMLI plans showed mean ± SD 2Dγ of 97.82% ± 1.27%, the reconstruction method resulted poor mean (SD) 3Dγ of 92.00% (± 5.83%), 64.80% (± 28.28%), 69.20% (± 30.46%), 60.80% (± 19.37%) and 73.2% (± 20.36%) for PTVs brain, chest, torso, limb and upper body respectively. The corresponding deviation in median D98% and D2% of all PTVs were 98% and D2%

Aim: The aim of the study was to find the most balanced plan with an optimal combination of planning parameters in helical tomotherapy (HT) for bilateral breast irradiation by evaluating dosimetric indices and time factors. In particular, we investigated the best combination of field width (FW), pitch, and modulation factor (MF). Materials and Methods: A total of 90 plans (18 plans for each patient) was created in this study, with different combination of planning parameters (FW: 2.5 cm [F1] and 5 cm [F2]; pitch: 0.215 [P1], 0.287 [P2], and 0.43 [P3]; and MF: 2.0 [M1], 2.5 [M2], and 3.0 [M3]). Plans were analyzed using several dosimetric indices: homogeneity index, conformity index, dose near minimum D98%, dose near maximum D2%, and the coverage by D95% of the target. Organ at risk (OAR) doses were evaluated by mean dose, V5Gy and V25Gy for the heart and mean dose V5Gy and V20Gy for both the lungs. Treatment time was also reported for all plans. Results: Reducing FW from 5 cm to 2.5 cm increased the treatment time by 40%–50% and improved homogeneity of the target. Tightening the pitch value from 0.43 to 0.215 improved target as well as OAR doses without increasing the treatment time. Increasing MF from 2 to 3 improved all the dosimetric indices and also increased treatment time. Conclusions: On the basis of our analysis, a plan with FW 5 cm, pitch 0.215, and MF 2.5 can be considered as an optimal combination of planning parameters for bilateral breast irradiation in HT technique.

We demonstrate terahertz single-pixel imaging is improved by using a photomodulator based on silicon passivated with SiO 2 . By exploring various SiO 2 thicknesses, we show that the modulation factor of the as-fabricated terahertz photomodulator can reach 0.9, three times that based on bare silicon. This improvement originates from chemical passivation, as well as anti-reflection. Single-pixel imaging experiments based on the compressed sensing method show that reconstructed images adopting the new photomodulator have better quality than the conventional terahertz modulator based on bare silicon. Since the passivation process is routine and low cost, we expect this work will reduce the cost of terahertz photomodulator and single-pixel THz imaging, and advance their applications.

The energy balance (EB) model of a primary side regulation (PSR) fly‐back converter in the discontinuous conduction mode (DCM) is discussed in this paper. Based on this EB model, the stability of a PSR fly‐back converter in the pulse skipping mode (PSM) is analyzed, and a self‐adapting modulation factor control strategy is proposed. Theoretical analysis and simulation results show that by saving an optocoupler and correlative circuits, which are necessary in traditional PSM fly‐back converters, the modulation factor tolerance controlled by this method is 1.26% on average, corresponding to the ideal value. Compared with traditional fly‐back PSM controllers, the power saved in the sampler/comparator modules is 87% on average for a load range of 1 Ω to 1 kΩ.

Stress is ubiquitous for bacteria and can convert a subpopulation of cells into a dormant state known as persistence, in which cells are tolerant to antimicrobials. These cells revive rapidly when the stress is removed and are likely the cause of many recurring infections such as those associated with tuberculosis, cystic fibrosis, and Lyme disease. However, how persister cells are formed is not understood well. Here we propose the ppGpp ribosome dimerization persister (PRDP) model in which the alarmone guanosine pentaphosphate/tetraphosphate (henceforth ppGpp) generates persister cells directly by inactivating ribosomes via the ribosome modulation factor (RMF), the hibernation promoting factor (Hpf), and the ribosome-associated inhibitor (RaiA). We demonstrate that persister cells contain a large fraction of 100S ribosomes, that inactivation of RMF, HpF, and RaiA reduces persistence and increases single-cell persister resuscitation and that ppGpp has no effect on single-cell persister resuscitation. Hence, a direct connection between ppGpp and persistence is shown along with evidence of the importance of ribosome dimerization in persistence and for active ribosomes during resuscitation.

Several studies have reported changes in dose distribution and delivery time based on the value of specific planning parameters [field width (FW), pitch, and modulation factor (MF)] in tomotherapy. However, the variation in the parameters between different facilities is unknown. The purpose of this study was to determine standard values of the above parameters for cases of head and neck cancer (HNC) and prostate cancer (PC) in Japan. In this survey, a web-based questionnaire was sent to 48 facilities performing radiation therapy with tomotherapy in March 2016. The deadline for data submission was April 2016. In the questionnaire, the values of the planning parameters usually used were requested and 23 responses were received, representing a response rate of 48% (23/48). The FW selected was 2.5 cm in most facilities, and facilities with a tomoEDGE license used dynamic FW rather than fixed FW. Facilities changed the pitch based on FW, dose per fraction, or target offset more frequently in HNC than in PC. In contrast, >50% of the facilities used the magic number proposed by Kissick et al. Median preset MFs (range, min to max) in HNC and PC were 2.4 (1.8-2.8) and 2.0 (1.8-3.0), respectively, and MF values showed large variations between the facilities. Our results are likely to be useful to several facilities designing treatment plans in tomotherapy.

One-pot systems are an interesting proposal to carry out multi-enzymatic reactions, though this strategy implies establishing an optimal balance between the activity and operability of the involved enzymes. This is crucial for enzymes with marked differences in their operational stability, such as one-pot production of lactofructose syrup from cheese whey permeate, which involves two enzymes—β-galactosidase (β-gal) and glucose isomerase (GI). The aim of this work was to study the behavior of one-pot sequential batch production of lactofructose syrup considering both enzymes immobilized individually, in order to evaluate and design a strategy of replacement of the catalysts according to their stabilities. To this end, the modelling and simulation of the process was carried out, considering simultaneously the kinetics of both reactions and the kinetics of inactivation of both enzymes. For the latter, it was also considered the modulating effect that sugars present in the medium may have on the stability of β-gal, which is the less stable enzyme. At the simulated reaction conditions of 40 °C, pH 7, and 0.46 (IUGI/IUβ-gal), the results showed that considering the stability of β-gal under non-reactive conditions, meaning in absence of the effect of modulation, it is necessary to carry out four replacements of β-gal for each cycle of use of GI. On the other hand, when considering the modulation caused by the sugars on the β-gal stability, the productivity increases up to 23% in the case of the highest modulation factor studied (η = 0.8). This work shows the feasibility of conducting a one-pot operation with immobilized enzymes of quite different operational stability, and that a proper strategy of biocatalyst replacement increases the productivity of the process.

A low modulation factor (MF) maintaining a good dose distribution contributes to the shortening of the delivery time and efficiency of the treatment plan in helical tomotherapy. The purpose of this study was to reduce the delivery time using initial values and the upper limit values of MF. First, patients with head and neck cancer (293 cases) or prostate cancer (181 cases) treated between June 2011 and July 2015 were included in the analysis of MF values. The initial MF value (MF initial) was defined as the average MF actual value, and the upper limit of the MF value (MFUL) was defined according the following equation: MFUL = 2 × standard deviation of MF actual value + the average MF actual Next, a treatment plan was designed for patients with head and neck cancer (62 cases) and prostate cancer (13 cases) treated between December 2015 and June 2016. The average MF actual value for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases decreased from 2.1 to 1.9 (p = 0.0006), 1.9 to 1.6 (p < 0.0001), 2.0 to 1.7 (p < 0.0001), and 1.8 to 1.6 (p = 0.0004) by adapting the MF initial and the MFUL values, respectively. The average delivery time for the nasopharynx, oropharynx, hypopharynx, and prostate cases also decreased from 19.9 s cm−1 to 16.7 s cm−1 (p < 0.0001), 15.0 s cm−1 to 13.9 s cm−1 (p = 0.025), 15.1 s cm−1 to 13.8 s cm−1 (p = 0.015), and 23.6 s cm−1 to 16.9 s cm−1 (p = 0.008) respectively. The delivery time was shortened by the adaptation of MF initial and MFUL values with a reduction in the average MF actual for head and neck cancer and prostate cancer cases.

The workload for shielding purposes of modern linear accelerators (linacs) consists of primary and scatter radiation which depends on the dose delivered to isocenter (cGy) and leakage radiation which depends on the monitor units (MUs). In this study, we report on the workload for 10 treatment vaults in terms of dose to isocenter (cGy), monitor units delivered (MUs), number of treatment sessions (Txs), as well as, use factors (U) and modulation factors (CI) for different treatment techniques. The survey was performed for the years between 2006 and 2015 and included 16 treatment machines which represent different generations of Varian linear accelerators (6EX, 600C, 2100C, 2100EX, and TrueBeam) operating at different electron and x‐ray energies (6, 9, 12, 16 and 20 MeV electrons and, 6 and 15 MV x‐rays). An institutional review board (IRB) approval was acquired to perform this study. Data regarding patient workload, dose to isocenter, number of monitor units delivered, beam energies, gantry angles, and treatment techniques were exported from an ARIA treatment management system (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, Ca.) into Excel spreadsheets and data analysis was performed in Matlab. The average (± std‐dev) number of treatment sessions, dose to isocenter, and number of monitor units delivered per week per machine in 2006 was 119 ± 39 Txs, (300 ± 116) × 102 cGys, and (78 ± 28) × 103 MUs respectively. In contrast, the workload in 2015 was 112 ± 40 Txs, (337 ± 124) × 102 cGys, and (111 ± 46) × 103 MUs. 60% of the workload (cGy) was delivered using 6 MV and 30% using 15 MV while the remaining 10% was delivered using electron beams. The modulation factors (MU/cGy) for IMRT and VMAT were 5.0 (± 3.4) and 4.6 (± 1.6) respectively. Use factors using 90° gantry angle intervals were equally distributed (~0.25) but varied considerably among different treatment techniques. The workload, in terms of dose to isocenter (cGy) and subsequently monitor units (MUs), has been steadily increasing over the past decade. This increase can be attributed to increased use of high dose hypo‐fractionated regimens (SBRT, SRS) and the increase in use of IMRT and VMAT, which require higher MUs per cGy as compared to more conventional treatment (3DCRT). Meanwhile, the patient workload in terms of treatment sessions per week remained relatively constant. The findings of this report show that variables used for shielding purposes still fall within the recommendation of NCRP Report 151.

Acoustic asymmetric transport is important for noise control and communication acoustics. Recent progress on non-Hermitian systems has yielded a scheme to realize asymmetric transport without nonlinear effects or mode conversion. The authors report the experimental realization of an asymmetric diffraction grating based on a cleverly designed passive $P\phantom{\rule{0}{0ex}}T$-symmetric medium, in which loss is introduced as an extra modulation factor, and the energy distribution can be adjusted more freely. Moreover, the designed structure is helpful for further research on non-Hermitian acoustic systems.

This paper presents the design and implementation of a wideband power amplifier (PA) suitable for applications using signals with large peak-to-average-power-ratio (PAPR). The proposed design approach is based on reducing the load modulation factor compared to conventional Doherty PA. To demonstrate the principle, a PA that operates between 2.55 GHz and 3.8 GHz has been implemented and tested. In this frequency range, the measured peak output power is 49.3 ± 0.5 dBm and the measured drain efficiency is between 47-60 % for output power levels corresponding to 8 dB output back-off (OBO).

TomoDirect has been reported to have some advantages over TomoHelical in delivering total body irradiation (TBI). This study aimed to investigate the relationships between the number of ports and the dose evaluation indices in low‐dose TBI in TomoDirect mode using 2–12 ports and to compare these data with those for the TomoHelical mode in a simulation study. Thirteen patients underwent low‐dose TBI in TomoHelical mode from June 2015 to June 2016. We used the same computed tomography data sets for these patients to create new treatment plans for upper‐body parts using TomoDirect mode with 2–12 beam angles as well as TomoHelical mode. The prescription was 4 Gy in two equal fractions. For the TomoDirect data, we generated plans with 2–12 ports with approximately equally spaced angles; the modulation factor, field width, and pitch were 2.0, 5.0 cm, and 0.500, respectively. For the TomoHelical plans, the modulation factor, field width, and pitch were 2.0, 5.0 cm, and 0.397, respectively. D2, D98, D50, and the homogeneity index (HI) were evaluated to compare TomoDirect plans having 2–12 ports with the TomoHelical plan. Using TomoDirect plans, D2 with four ports or fewer, D98 with 10 ports or fewer, D50 with four ports or fewer and HI with five ports or fewer showed statistically significantly worse results than the TomoHelical plan. With the TomoDirect plans, D2 with seven ports or more, D50 with eight ports or more, and HI with eight ports or more showed statistically significant improvement compared with the TomoHelical plan. All of the dose evaluation indices of the TomoDirect plans showed a tendency to improve as the number of ports increased. TomoDirect plans showed statistically significant improvement of D2, D50, and HI compared with the TomoHelical plan. Therefore, we conclude that TomoDirect can provide better dose distribution in low‐dose TBI with TomoTherapy.

Nonlinear acoustic coefficients have a close relationship with structural cracks. A nonlinear ultrasonic modulation method for micro-crack quantitative evaluation is developed. The influence of phase threshold on the crack evaluation is discussed. Ultrasonic modulation using a unilateral incentive model is applied to the quantitative evaluation of micro-cracks for different specimens. The experimental results indicate that the method can be beneficially applied for micro-cracks detection. A proper phase threshold can improve the reliability of the method based on nonlinear ultrasonic modulation. The presented modulation factor can be used to quantitatively evaluate the structural cracks, and it is suitable for small-crack quantitative evaluation.

Background This study investigated planned MLC distribution and treatment region specific plan parameters to recommend optimal delivery parameters based on statistical process techniques. Methods A cohort of 28 head and neck, 19 pelvic and 23 brain pre-treatment plans were delivered on a helical tomotherapy system using 2.5 cm field width. Parameters such as gantry period, leaf open time (LOT), actual modulation factor, LOT sonogram, treatment duration and couch travel were investigated to derive optimal range for plans that passed acceptable delivery quality assurance. The results were compared against vendor recommendations and previous publications. Results No correlation was observed between vendor recommended gantry period and percentage of minimum leaf open times. The range of gantry period (min–max) observed was 16–21 s for head and neck, 15–22 s for pelvis and 13–18 s for brain plans respectively. It was also noted that the highest percentage (average ( X - ) ± SD) of leaf open times for a minimum time of 100 ms was seen for brain plans (53.9 ± 9.2%) compared to its corresponding head and neck (34.5 ± 4.2%) and pelvic (32.0 ± 9.4%) plans respectively. Conclusions We have proposed that treatment site specific delivery parameters be used during planning that are based on the treatment centre and have detailed recommendations and limitations for the studied cohort. This may enable to improve efficiency of treatment deliveries by reducing inaccuracies in MLC distribution.

Aim: To study the effect of various planning parameters viz field width (FW), pitch factor (PF) on breast tumor and evaluate the relation among these parameters and their influence on the quality of plan and the treatment time. Material and method: Nine plans for each of the ten breast cancer patients were created taking various combinations of field width (FW) and pitch keeping the Modulation factor (MF) constant 3. The reference plan selected for the study is field width of 1, pitch 0.215. Other plans were created keeping the same constraints and penalty as the reference plan and 1000 iterations. Target coverage was evaluated in terms of conformity index (CN) and homogeneity index (HI) while the sparing of organs at risk (OARs) were evaluated in terms of mean, maximum and relevant dose volumes. Low dose spillages in normal tissues were also evaluated. The plans are compared with the reference plan using the Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test. Concept of plan Quality index is also used to evaluate the plans qualitatively. Results: The mean treatment delivery time for 5, 2.5 and 1.0 cm FW plans were 5.04 ± 0.4, 8.51 ± 0.87 and 20.67 ± 2.02 minutes respectively. There was no significant variation in doses for OARs and COIN and HI of targets for 1 cm and 2.5 cm plans except for 5 cmplans. But the low dose spillage increased by 9-14% and 23-43% for 2.5 and 5 cm respectively. Conclusion: Dose to the OARs was not significantly higher for 2.5_FW plans from the reference plan but, significantly higher for 5_FW. Larger the FW and higher the pitch, spillage were more. On the basis of our analysis, 2.5_0.215 plan with MF=3, can be considered as the optimum plan for unilateral breast treatment using Tomotherapy.

Purpose Hippocampal avoidance during irradiation is hypothesized to reduce the risk of memory function decline. This study is designed to evaluate the dosimetric and clinical results of Helical Tomotherapy (HT) whole brain radiotherapy with hippocampal avoidance (WBHA) and Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB). Methods A total of 19 patients with 1 to 4 brain metastases (BM), diameter ⩽3 cm, absent or controlled extracranial disease were planned for WBHA with SIB using HT, from September 2014 to November 2017. The hippocampus was contoured on diagnostic T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) which had been registered with the planning CT image set. The hippocampal Planning Risk Volume was generated using a 5 mm uniform margin around the hippocampi. The BM were contoured on T1-weighted MRI registered with the planning computed tomography (CT), and the BM-PTV was the BM expanded 3 mm in all directions. The whole-brain planning target volume (WB-PTV) was defined as the whole-brain tissue volume, expanded 3 mm in all directions, minus hippocampal PRV and BM-PTVs. HT plans were generated with the following parameters: field width set at 1.05 cm, pitch 0.287, modulation factor (MF) set in the range 2–3 leading to a final value of 2 on average (range 1.3–2.8). Prescription dose was 30 Gy for WB-PTV and 40 Gy for each BM-PTVs in 10 fractions. Results Dosimetric result were reported in Table 1: all the parameter analysed were very promising and in accord to the RTOG 0933 trial [1] . The mean treatment time was 8.7 min (range 6.5–12.6 min). Conclusions HT plans achieved three objectives: quite homogeneous whole brain dose distribution; conformal hippocampal avoidance; and high coverage to the BM. Download : Download high-res image (323KB) Download : Download full-size image

Purpose Classical Kaposi’s sarcoma (KS) was usually treated with large parallel and opposed photon beam. To spare muscles and bones, a patient with an extended KS (from limbs to fits on both legs) was treated with Helical Tomotherapy (HT). Because of the skin involvement two polyurethane foam cushions (PFC) were applied as immobilization device and as bolus material, in a “shell” configuration. Methods The patient was positioned inside a PFC shell: the inner surface of the shell fitted the skin, in order to act as a bolus material. The CTV extended at least 5 mm inside legs; the PTV was the CTV expanded of 5 mm in all directions. A core structure distant 2 mm from the PTV was created for each leg and completely blocked in order to force HT to deliver only tangential beams to the PTV. The prescription was 60 Gy in 30 fraction; because of the length of target (1 m) the larger field width (5.02 cm), a pitch of 0.430, and a modulation factor of 2.0 were used. The irradiation time resulted in 15 min and the time required for the positioning and the MVCT was about 20 min. The surface doses was measured on the first session by means of EBT3 films: 24 films (2 cm × 2.5 cm) were placed all over the skin of the legs and feet. Results The dosimetric results were reported in Table 1. The density of PFC was measured from the CT and resulted in 0.0066 g/cm3. The measured doses ranged from 83% to 94% with a mean value of 88% (1.75 Gy). Conclusions In KS irradiation, the combination of a core blocked HT and the PSC shell offered an adequate dose coverage on the whole target, including the skin, spearing at the same time the muscles and skeleton. Download : Download high-res image (169KB) Download : Download full-size image

Quality assurance (QA) of the image quality for image‐guided localization systems is crucial to ensure accurate visualization and localization of regions of interest within the patient. In this study, the temporal stability of selected image parameters was assessed and evaluated for kV CBCT mode, planar radiographic k V, and MV modes. The motivation of the study was to better characterize the temporal variability in specific image‐quality parameters. The CATPHAN, QckV‐1, and QC‐3 phantoms were used to evaluate the image‐quality parameters of the imaging systems on a Varian Novalis Tx linear accelerator. The planar radiographic images were analyzed in PIPSpro with high‐contrast spatial resolution (f30,f40,f50lp/mm) being recorded. For OBI kV CBCT, high‐quality head full‐fan acquisition and pelvis half‐fan acquisition modes were evaluated for uniformity, noise, spatial resolution, HU constancy, and geometric distortion. Dose and X‐ray energy for the OBI were recorded using the Unfors RaySafe Xi system with the R/F High Detector for kV planar radiographic and the CT detector for kV CBCT. Dose for the MV EPID was recorded using a PTW975 Semiflex ion chamber, PTW UNIDOS electrometer, and CNMC Plastic Water. For each image‐quality parameter, values were normalized to the mean, and the normalized standard deviations were recorded to evaluate the parameter's temporal variability. For planar radiographic modes, the normalized standard deviations of the spatial resolution (f30,f40,& f50) were 0.015, 0.008, 0.004 lp/mm and 0.006, 0.009, 0.018 lp/mm for the kV and MV, respectively. The normalized standard deviation of dose for kV and MV were 0.010 mGy and 0.005 mGy, respectively. The standard deviations for full‐and half‐fan kV CBCT modes were averaged together. The following normalized standard deviations for each kV CBCT parameter were: 0.075 HU (uniformity), 0.071 HU (noise), 0.006 mm (AP‐geometric distortion), 0.005 mm (LAT‐geometric distortion), 0.058 mm (slice thickness), 0.124 (f50), 0.031 (HU constancy – Lung), 0.063 (HU constancy – Water), 0.020 (HU constancy – Bone), 0.006 mGy (Dose – Center), 0.004 mGy (Dose –Periphery). Using control chart analysis, institutional QA tolerances were reported as warning and action thresholds based on 1σ and 2σ thresholds. A study was performed to characterize the stability of image‐quality parameters recommended by AAPM Task Group‐142 for the Varian OBI and EPID imaging systems. Both imaging systems show consistent imaging and dosimetric properties over the evaluated time frame. PACS number: 87.10.‐e