1. A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Lichtenstein Open Tension-Free Versus Laparoscopic Totally Extrapertioneal Inguinal Hernia Repair.
- Author
-
prasad, Jagdish, Daga, Ram, and sandhu, Parvinder Singh
- Subjects
- *
HERNIA surgery , *INGUINAL hernia , *LAPAROSCOPIC surgery , *SURGICAL complications , *COMPARATIVE studies - Abstract
Background: The research for ideal technique for Hernia correction would have preferably less complication rates and low recurrences. In recent studies laparoscopic hernia repair has been preferred and has gained vast acceptance among surgeons. Both laparoscopic(TEP) repair and open hernia repair have shown to be better outcome in many studies. Material and Methods: This was a hospital based prospective comparative observational study in which 100 (50 each) subjects with a diagnosis of inguinal hernia those were willing to participate were taken for each of two groups i.e. laparoscopic totally extra peritoneal (TEP group) and Lichtenstein open tension-free mesh repair (Lichtenstein group). Results: TEP was associated with shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay and cosmetically better compared to Lichtenstein hernioplasty. The mean pain score in the TEP group was significantly less than the Lichtenstein group on all occasions up to 2nd week post-operatively. There was no conversion from TEP to open Lichtenstein repair. The hospital stay in Lichtenstein group was significantly longer compared to TEP group (p= 0.042). Conclusion: Laparoscopic TEP repair may be done in all uncomplicated inguinal hernias by an experienced surgeon for those desiring less pain, better cosmetic results, less postoperative complications, less hospital stay and early return to work. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024