Search

The article focuses on the "Washington-Merry-Go-Round" column, by columnist Jack Anderson, which stirs the attention of his audience as he disclosed the private policy discussions regarding the Administration action in the India-Pakistan war by the Washington Security Action Group which consist of experts from the National Security Council, State Department and Pentagon. It says that the papers have done less on strong support of U.S. President Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger for Pakistan against India; however, it did provide detail on the decision-making processes and ideas of the administration. It mentions that Anderson attempts to make his acquisition of information appear as a victory of the free press over official censorship.

The article reports that a new agreement inked among India and Pakistan in March 1951 in Karachi, Pakistan has ended a 17 month long trade war between both countries.

The article discusses political and business problems in India and Pakistan in the wake of the assassination of peace activist Mahatma Gandhi. Socialists are calling for the resignation of the cabinet of Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru. Socialists refused to call of a strike in Bombay to protest the government's labor policy. The government's removal of price controls off food grains and cotton resulted in higher food prices. India's jute processors are protesting the export tax imposed by Pakistan on all jute going into India.

Focuses on the conflict between India and Pakistan. Discussion on the possible consequences of Beijing's control of the Indian subcontinent and the Himalayas; Information that the Chinese Communists are certainly aware that contingency plans for these operations exist, and for that reason they will restrict their maneuvers to the controlled provocations, troop deployments, demands and threats that they have lately been using.

The article reports on the war threats to India by Pakistani president General Agha Mohammed Yahya Khan . Khan had threatened that, Pakistan was almost on the verge of losing patience and that a war was inevitable. Earlier in a white issued by him stated that India was assisting the East Pakistan's strongest political party Awami League. However, the Indian administration believed that Yahya's charges of Indian collusion were a buildup for a jihad against predominantly Hindu India.

The article focuses on India-Pakistan conflict in 1965. It states that many are killed and wounded brought by war, attacking one another with bombs, supersonic jets, and other weaponry. President Mohammed Ayub Khan notes that India is not willing to reconcile to have an independent Pakistan, while India's Prime Minister Lal Bahadur Shastri has become resilient opponent in war. It adds that the United Nations (UN) ordered a plebiscite that will control or take over Kashmir in India.

Behind India and, Pakistan's acceptance of the "cease-fire" are a number of critically important developments. But the paradox of the cease-fire, in a sense, is the fact that China is perhaps the power primarily responsible for it. The conclusion increasingly reached is that this war cannot be just, essentially because it is immoral to fight a war in the midst of a civilian population that has never clearly expressed itself one way or the other on the so-called issues. It is basically a great-power struggle, and since it cannot be fought except with the most horrible consequences to people who are in effect bystanders, it is inherently and irremediably immoral.

Focuses on the foreign relations between Pakistan and U.S. government. Trade agreement between Pakistan and Peking; Negotiations between the Soviet Union and Pakistan; Views of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, External Affairs Minister, towards the foreign policies of Pakistan; Description of the economic condition in Pakistan; Reference to the resolving of Kashmir, India, issue between India and Pakistan.

Focuses on the Soviet Union's international policy towards India in order to concentrate in Asia. Views that Indian leaders have been waiting for the end of former Russian leader Joseph Stalin's regime in order to improve their relation with Soviets; Response of Indian politicians towards the reversal of post-Stalin policy towards South Asia; Opinion expressed by Russian leader Nikita Khrushchev towards the 1947 Indian Partition during his visit in Kashmir; Tactics of Khrushchev to exploit feelings of Indians by focusing on partition of India and the U.S. policy towards Pakistan; Agreement between Russian and Indian governments for construction of a steel mill and import of finished steel.

The article focuses on the fiscal problems which will persist in multiplicity and the whole set of new problems that must be faced as a result of East Bengal's emergence as the sovereign state of Bangladesh. Theoretically, Bangladesh is dependent upon India; in fact, it is dependent upon the United States. But the most far-reaching possible consequence of Bangladesh, is a somewhat "philosophical" one: namely, the threat posed to the very existence of Pakistan itself as a sovereign state. It follows that Bangladesh is a threat-in-being to the entire subcontinent. The subcontinent might be fragmented and reformed into a number of new states taking little cognizance of present Indian- Pakistani-Kashmiri-Bangladeshi, or whatever, borders.

Discusses issues related to the war between India and Pakistan. Support of the Soviet Union to the cause of India in the 1965 War with Pakistan; Mediation by the Soviet Union to end the war; Addition to the tensions with millions of refugees which has existed all the years since partition; Interest of the superpowers in maintaining peace between the two countries.

Covers a range of issues related to politics as of December 31, 1971. Breakdown of votes on the nomination of William Rehnquist as an Associate Justice in the U.S.; Russian bloc in UN General Assembly that voted against a resolution for ceasefire between India and Pakistan; Plan of China to build a port in Nouakchott, Mauritania.

The article focuses on the ceasefire of the battle between Pakistan and India through the cooperation between the U.S., and the national leaders from both nations. It says that Pakistani President Mohammed Ayub Khan sent a telegram to Foreign Minister Zulfikar Ali Bhutto expressing an interest on international peace ordering the Pakistani armed forces to stop fighting on October 1965. However, U.S. President Lyndon Johnson did not receive a public praise from Ayub for its role in the ceasefire.

The article focuses on the effort of the United Nations (UN) to arrange a ceasefire between India and Pakistan and the encircling revolution in Asia. It says that the battle between India and Pakistan arises due to long-disputed Kashmir. U.N. Secretary-General U Thant conducted a meeting in Rawalpindi, Pakistan to weaken disputes between Pakistan and India. Moreover, U.S. President Lyndon Johnson announced that his administration will take a viable peace and economic aid in every nation in Asia.

The article focuses on the guerrilla warfare of forces between India and Pakistan in Chhamb and Dewa in the southwestern Kashmir, India. It states that the Indian troops crossed the cease-fire line set by the United Nations and invaded fully 25 miles droving Pakistani from their outposts. It mentions that the seizure of Pakistan-controlled territory by Indian forces moved Pakistani President Mohammed Ayub Khan to make its military answer by deploying 70 tanks on the lands of Chhamb.

The article highlights Pakistan's complaint before the United Nations (UN) against India's alleged attempt to deprive 76 million people of the waters of the Indus basin, by which they live. Pakistan claimed that India has dried up 11 canals by diverting water from the Punjabi head-streams to its irrigation schemes. The conflict, like most feuds between India and Pakistan, is being attributed to the partition drawn by Great Britain's Cyril Radcliffe in 1947 to separate Hindu from Moslem.

The article focuses on the joint currency plan adopted in India following its partition with Pakistan. It mentions about the economic confusion prevailing in the country and informs that under the joint currency plan, that is divided into two stages, a common currency will be used in the fist stage and in the second stage Pakistan will use notes from Reserve Bank of India as legal tender only in Pakistan. It states about the plans of both the countries towards railroad and industrial expansion.

Presents letters to the editor related to education and development issues in the United States. Southern Conference Educational Fund, Inc., engaged in fight for the abolition of discriminations against American citizens; Pakistan and India analyzed for communist infiltration.

The article focuses on the independence of Bangladesh and its conflict with Pakistan's Zulfikar Ali Bhutto, who refuses to acknowledge the country. It states that a summit meeting organized by Bhutto and Indira Gandhi of India will be held in New Delhi to discuss various issues such as the restoration of diplomatic relations. Meanwhile, it says that Bangladesh Prime Minister Sheik Mujibur Rahman's refusal to attend the summit could impede the regulation of the Indian subcontinent affairs.

The article focuses on the rioting between Hindus and Moslems in Bengal, India which adds to the tension between Pakistan and India. The crisis has prompted Indian Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru and Pakistani Prime Minister Liaquat Ali Khan to meet to diffuse tensions between their countries. Following the partition of Bengal, Calcutta's population has increased from 2,000,000 to 7,000,000. It is noted that the riots in Calcutta has benefited the extremist Hindu Mahasabha Party.

Expresses opinion on the 1971 India-Pakistan conflict and its impact on the global equilibrium. Impact of the India-Pakistan war on China; Presence of Soviet operation in the war and its implication for the Soviet Indian Ocean strategy; Effect on the petroleum market.