1. Spine segmentation from C-arm CT data sets: application to region-of-interest volumes for spinal interventions
- Author
-
Drazenko Babic, Christian Buerger, Judy M. Racadio, Cristian Lorenz, Michael Grass, Jurgen J. L. Hoppenbrouwers, Rami Nachabe, and Robert Johannes Frederik Homan
- Subjects
musculoskeletal diseases ,business.industry ,Computer science ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Image segmentation ,Lumbar vertebrae ,musculoskeletal system ,Spinal column ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,Vertebra ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Region of interest ,Spinal fusion ,medicine ,Segmentation ,Computer vision ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Volume (compression) - Abstract
Spinal fusion is a common procedure to stabilize the spinal column by fixating parts of the spine. In such procedures, metal screws are inserted through the patients back into a vertebra, and the screws of adjacent vertebrae are connected by metal rods to generate a fixed bridge. In these procedures, 3D image guidance for intervention planning and outcome control is required. Here, for anatomical guidance, an automated approach for vertebra segmentation from C-arm CT images of the spine is introduced and evaluated. As a prerequisite, 3D C-arm CT images are acquired covering the vertebrae of interest. An automatic model-based segmentation approach is applied to delineate the outline of the vertebrae of interest. The segmentation approach is based on 24 partial models of the cervical, thoracic and lumbar vertebrae which aggregate information about (i) the basic shape itself, (ii) trained features for image based adaptation, and (iii) potential shape variations. Since the volume data sets generated by the C-arm system are limited to a certain region of the spine the target vertebra and hence initial model position is assigned interactively. The approach was trained and tested on 21 human cadaver scans. A 3-fold cross validation to ground truth annotations yields overall mean segmentation errors of 0.5 mm for T1 to 1.1 mm for C6. The results are promising and show potential to support the clinician in pedicle screw path and rod planning to allow accurate and reproducible insertions.
- Published
- 2017
- Full Text
- View/download PDF