Search

The article highlights cases of rent overcharge in New York City as of April 2016. These include the failure of the landlord to apply timely Rent Guidelines Board (RGB) increases, a case wherein the landlord relied on a Rent Stabilization Code (RSC) provision allowing him to charge a first rent that was not based on any preceding rental history, and a case wherein the Dispute Resolution Association (DRA) reduced the base date rent.

The article discusses court cases for passing on apartments in New York City as of April 2016. These include Promesa Housing Development Fund Corp. v. FM wherein an occupant of a rent-stabilized apartment qualified for succession rights from her son, one case wherein a rent-stabilized tenant was sued by his landlord for nonpayment of rent, and a case wherein the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) granted the succession rights claim of a tenant's daughter.

The article discusses rent stabilization cases including Cardew/Chatfield: DHCR Adm. Rev., Sharp/Samukenaite: DHCR Adm. Rev. and Roc-Century Associates LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. In the first case, it is said that a landlord applied for high rent/high-income deregulation of a tenant's rent-stabilized apartment. In the second case, it is said that tenants claimed rent overcharge and in the third case, it is said that a landlord applied for high-rent/high-income deregulation of a tenant's apartment.

The article discusses rent overcharge cases including Altschuler v. Jobman, Jackson: DHCR Adm. Rev. and Arguedas: DHCR Adm. Rev. In the first case, it is said that the court ordered a landlord to refund over 875,000 dollars including triple damages. In the second case, it is said that the rental history from the base date of July 24, 2010 to present must be determined to know the legal regulated rent and overcharges. In the third case, it is said that a landlord is entitled to a rent hike.

This section presents updates on certain upgrades planned by building or apartment owners in New York known as major capital improvements (MCI). The Department of Rent Administrator (DRA) has ruled against the application of a landlord for MCI rent hikes based on elevator upgrading. The DRA has disallowed the cost of a landlord's plan to install a new roof, pointing and waterproofing. The DRA has rejected the application of a landlord for MCI rent hikes based on the replacement of lobby door.

This section offers news briefs on cases involving rent stabilization coverage in New York. The DRA ruled for the landlord in Ferris: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. DN910025RT in which landlord applied for high-rent/high-income deregulation of tenant's rent-stabilized apartment in 2011. The DRA ruled for the landlord in Glass: DHCR Adm. Rev. Docket No. CP410058RT based on the tenant's failure to answer the DRA's notice of landlord's application.

This section offers news briefs on court cases regarding rent overcharge in New York. The Division of Housing and Community Renewal's (DHCR) Tenant Protection Unit (TPU) conducted an Individual Apartment Improvements (IAI) audit for tenant's apartment based on review of rent registration records in National 8301 Realty LP. The DRA ruled for tenant and ordered landlord for a refund of 3,372 U.S. dollars in 1820 Harrison Realty LLC.

The article focuses several court cases regarding rent overcharge by landlords on tenants. It mentions that a tenant complained against landlord in which the New York City Division of Housing & Community Renewal's (DHCR) Office of Rent Administration (DRA) ruled against tenant as tenant was not found to be rent stabilized. It states that a tenant sued landlord for overcharge and DHCR ruled in favor of tenant. It informs that tenant complained for overcharge and DRA ruled for tenant for refund.

The article focuses on several court cases regarding rent stabilization, and tenant's rent deregulation. It mentions that landlord applied for high rent deregulation of tenant for rent stabilized apartments and the New York City Division of Housing & Community Renewal (DHCR) ruled against tenant due to tenant's lack of income verification information. It states that tenant complained for rent overcharge and court ruled against landlord.

The article presents court cases involving tenants and landlords arising from conflicts over rent stabilization coverage. It explores the court judgments over the landlord's application for high-rent/high-income deregulation of rent-stabilized apartments, eviction of unregulated tenant, and rent overcharges. It explains the court orders on rent freeze and exemption based on rent-stabilized status.

The article presents court cases involving tenants and landlords arising from conflicts regarding rent overcharge. It explores the court judgments on a landlord's required proof to justify the cost of individual apartment improvement (IAI) that can be applied to the legal rent resulting in a substantial rent increase. The court ruled that the Tenant Protection Unit (TPU) can bridge the gap to determine rent overcharge.

The article discusses several court cases which involve rent overcharge in New York. Background of the rent overcharge cases filed by various rent-stabilized tenant is offered. The issuance of triple damages by the Dispute Resolution Authority (DRA) and the decision of the Department of Housing and Community Renewal (DCHR) on the cases are also explained.

The article discusses several court cases in New York City. The District Rent Administrator (DRA) ruled for a rent-stabilized tenant complaining of a rent overcharge and disallowed the cost of some of the apartment improvements claimed by landlord. The Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) ruled for tenant and ordered landlord to make a refund for a rent overcharge. A landlord sued to evict rent-stabilized tenant, who claimed a rent overcharge, for nonpayment of rent.

The article highlights court cases on eviction issues in New York City as of April 2016. These include 300 East 64th Street Partners LLC v. Boissevain wherein a tenant refused to be evicted as he was entitled to protection under The Martin Act, Trump Park Avenue LLC v. Summers which ruled for the tenant who paid back his rent, and Andrews v. Acacia Network which ruled for the resident after finding he was illegally removed and was not given due process protections prior to eviction.

The article discusses court cases involving major capital improvements in buildings including Park: DHCR Adm. Rev., Park: DHCR Adm. Rev., and Arsale Realty Co., LLC: DHCR Adm. Rev. In the first and second cases, the District Rent Administrator (DRA) ruled in favor of the landlord who applied for rent hikes based on installation of new floor tiles/new front door entrance. In the third case, DRA partly ruled for the landlord but disallowed costs linked to preparing location of CCTV equipment.

The article discusses several rent overcharge court cases in New York. A tenant of Rania Mesiskli, LLC has complained to the Department of Rent Administrator (DRA) for rent overcharge. A case of rent overcharge has been filed against landlord Zackmaxie, LLC in 2012. In a rent overcharge case filed by a tenant, landlord Aldus St. Associate, LP has claimed that tenant's initial rent was calculated based on the city's Human Resources Administration Advantage Program criteria and tax credit.

The article discusses the U.S. landlord versus tenant cases related to rent stabilization coverage. In the first case the DRA ruled against landlord because the building was receiving J-51 tax benefits while in the second case tenant complained of rent overcharge in which the DRA ruled for landlord due to the apartment properly deregulated after vacancy. In the last case landlord asked the Division of Housing and Community Renewal to determine its building's rent regulation status.

The article discusses the rulings of courts and the New York Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) on cases and claims related to rent overcharge. In several rent overcharge claims, the DHCR ruled in favor of the tenants and ordered their landlords to refund the overcharge with triple damages. In the court case 30 West 130th Street Corp. v. White, the court denied the request of the landlord to dismiss the rent overcharge claim of the tenant.

The article discusses the decisions of the Division of Housing and Dommunity Renewal (DHCR) on the claims of tenants against the Major Capital Improvement (MCI) rent increase applications of landlords in New York. In the first claim cited in the article, the DRA ruled in favor of the landlord as gas repiping can be considered as an MCI. The second claim focused on the approval of a rent increase for balcony and masonry works.

The article presents several court cases related to rent in New York. The Supreme Court has ruled against a landlord in favor of New York City Housing Authority (NYCHA) for the termination of rent subsidy due to failure of meeting the Housing Quality Standards. The Appellate Court has dismissed the appeal of a landlord who sued to evict tenant for chronic nonpayment of rent claiming that the landlord could not base his claim on chronic nonpayment under their settlement agreements.

The article discuss court cases related to rent in New York. It states that a tenant was sued for eviction by a landlord for non-payment of rent in the commercial landlord-tenant, which is part of Civil Court. It says that a rent-stabilized tenant was sued for eviction by a landlord due to nonprimary residence. Moreover, an apartment occupant, who was rent-stabilized tenant's brother, was sued for eviction by a landlord after the tenant has moved out.

The article focuses on several cases related to rent overcharge in New York. It says that the New York State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) District Rent Administrator (DRA) has ruled for tenant who complained rent overcharge, and requests the landlord to refund the said charges. It mentions that the agency has dismissed the complaint of a tenant for rent overcharge claiming that the apartment was deregulated more than four years before the filing of the complaint in 2011.

The article discusses several court cases involving landlords and tenants which dealt with rent stabilization coverage in New York. The District Rent Administrator (DRA) ruled in favor of the landlord who applied for high-rent/high-income deregulation of the apartment of the tenant in 2011. Another tenant appealed the court's decision to dismiss the case citing a rent overcharge. Meanwhile, another landlord failed to prove that the apartment was rent stabilized.

The article offers updates related to major capital investment in apartment buildings in New York. It notes that a landlord has applied for MCI rent hikes based on facade work. It says that a landlord has applied for rent hikes due to the installation of entrance doors and an intercom. It adds that a landlord has applied for rent hikes due to installation of roof and roof railing.

The article discusses the court cases including Croes Nest Realty v. DHCR, Nunez v. Sandler, and Nunez v. Sandler which deal with the stabilization coverage of rent.

The article discusses several court cases between landlords and tenants on major capital improvement (MCI) of properties in New York. The Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) has ruled against the appeal of a tenant on the MCI rent hike approval obtained by his landlord based on gas piping. It also mentions a case of an incomplete pointing and renovation that requires no MCI rent hikes, and another one on MCI rent hikes for installation of entry doors in a new building.

The article presents several court cases on renting law. It says that the District Rent Administrator (DRA) has declined the application of a landlord for major capital improvements (MCI) rent hikes on elevator work since it is only maintenance and repair. It tells that the DRA has also declined the request of a landlord for MCI rent hikes for facade replacement and architect fees. Moreover, DRA rejected the application of a landlord for MCI rent hikes for iron fence and gate installation.

The article discusses several court cases related to rent stabilization coverage in New York. It states that landlord was ordered to refund 9,790 U.S. dollars to tenant who complained to the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) of a rent overcharge. It also mentions that the Directory and Resource Administrator (DRA) dominated against tenant who claimed that she was rent stabilized and complained that landlord refused to renew her lease.

The article reports on court decisions on cases related to rent reduction in New York. A rent-stabilized tenant filed a complaint due to reduction in services based on damaged floor tiles in his apartment. A landlord requested permission from the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to convert from master metering to direct metering of electricity provided to rent-stabilized tenants. A tenant filed a case against a landlord for reduction of services based on window conditions.

The article discusses several court cases related to rent overcharge in apartment houses in New York. Tenant lost her appeal of a rent overcharge as there was no written agreement to prove her claim. Landlord claiming that the overcharge was not willful, appealed and lost and refunded 3,476 dollars to tenant. The ordered refund for rent surcharge was revoked after finding out that there was actually no overcharge.

The article discusses court case in which tenant complained of rent overcharge, finding of New York Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) that there was no proof of a fraudulent scheme to deregulate the apartment and adds application of four-Year Rule to tenant's overcharge claim.

The article discusses the Tribeca Equity Partners, LP v. DHCR court case in which tenant moved into a new building receiving 421-a tax benefits in 1994 and asked the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) to determine his rent stabilization status. It mentions that DHCR ruled for tenant and revoked previous deregulation order. It adds landlord filed an Article 78 appeal, claiming that the DHCR's decision was unreasonable and contrary to law, and lost the appeal .

The article discusses a court case involving a tenant who complained of rent overcharge, mentions that the landlord was ordered to refund and adds amended code provision must be applied to set tenant's rent.

The article discusses the Gerard v. Clermont York Assocs. LLC case in which tenants brought a class action against landlord, seeing a declaration as to their rent-stabilized status and payment of damages for rent overcharges and adds four-rear rule applied to overcharge claims.

The article discusses court case involving tenant in building that started receiving J-51 tax benefits in 2007, complained of rent overcharge and the appeal lost by tenant as the New York state (NYS) Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR) found no reason to investigate the base date rent.

The article discusses the court case regarding complaint of tenant over rent overcharge along with collection of higher security deposits by landlord; and determination of history for pre-base date rent by the New York New York Division of Housing & Community Renewal (DHCR).

The article discusses the court case related to eviction of tenant by landlord over non-payment of rent with claims of tenant for rent assistance from the New York Human Resources Administration (HRA); and involvement of tenant in termination of eviction with attainment of rent from HRA.

The article discusses the New York Supreme Court case Henry Phipps Plaza North Inc. v. Nkrumah, which deals with payment of electrical surcharges as part of house rent.

The article discusses case 215 W 88th Street Holdings LLC v. DHCR which deals rent increment following base method and depicts rent overcharge is applicable in case of rent registration and dated rent.

The article discusses the Court case Hairston v. NYCHA which deals with the eviction of a tenant due to evasion of rent.

The article discusses the decision of a New York's Division of Housing & Community Renewal in case in which the it ruled in favor of tenant who complained of rent overcharge.

The article reports that New York has granted landlord's application for rent hikes based on the installation of new apartment windows, as of October 2016.

The article discusses the New York City landlord-tenant court case which deals on the amendment of annual rent registrations.

The article reports that the District Rent Administrator (DRA) in New York has ruled in favor of a rent-stabilized tenant who complained of rent overcharge and ordered the landlord to refund the amount under a default method of the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (DHCR).

The article discusses a court case regarding the complaint of the son of the rent-stabilized apartment tenant regarding the refusal of the landlord to grant renewal lease when the tenant has moved in a nursing home in Florida in 2013 and died in 2015.

The article discusses a court case in New York City which deals with a landlord's decision to discontinue preferential rent in accordance with lease rider.

The article discusses a case in New York City which deals with a landlord's application for major capital improvement (MCI) rent hikes based on installation of adequate wiring and a new roof.

The article discusses the court case "GLS 8630 LLC: DHCR Adm." in which landlord asked the New York (N.Y.). Division of Housing and Community Renewal for permission to modify building-wide services including intercom system, and also mentions Dispute Resolution Association ruled for landlord.

The article discusses the court case "Corbitt: DHCR Adm." in which landlord applied for high-income deregulation of tenant's rent-stabilized apartment, and also mentions Dispute Resolution Association ruled for landlord based on tenant's failure to respond to its notice of landlord's application.

The article discusses the court case "Montgomery Trading LLC: DHCR Adm." in which landlord applied for high-rent/high-income deregulation of tenant's rent-stabilized apartment.