1. Selenium and bone health: a protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
- Author
-
Yilun Wang, Ning Wang, Jing Wu, Tuo Yang, Dongxing Xie, Ziying Wu, Zidan Yang, and Hongyi He
- Subjects
medicine.medical_specialty ,Osteoporosis ,Cochrane Library ,Bone and Bones ,orthopaedic & trauma surgery ,Selenium ,Meta-Analysis as Topic ,Bone Density ,Medicine ,Humans ,Intensive care medicine ,Nutrition and Metabolism ,business.industry ,Incidence (epidemiology) ,Public health ,public health ,General Medicine ,Publication bias ,medicine.disease ,bone diseases ,Meta-analysis ,Relative risk ,Observational study ,business ,Osteoporotic Fractures - Abstract
IntroductionBone health affects the ability of human body to stay active, and its degradation can cause considerable morbidity and mortality. The factors related to bone health play an important role in preventing osteoporosis and its adverse consequences. However, the risk factors for osteoporosis have not been fully elucidated. Deficiency in the trace element selenium may be one of the risk factors for the development of osteoporosis. Previous studies have investigated the effects of selenium on osteoporosis; however, the results are inconclusive. Therefore, the present study aimed to systematically examine the existing literature on the associations between dietary or serum selenium and bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures, and to quantify such associations through meta-analysis.Methods and analysisPubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library will be searched using a specified search strategy to identify relevant studies up to October 2019. Both interventional and observational studies in humans will be included. The outcomes will include BMD and the prevalence or incidence of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures. For dietary or serum selenium and BMD, osteoporosis or osteoporotic fractures pooled analyses, estimates will be expressed as the mean difference, and the pooled OR, relative risk, HR or beta coefficient, and corresponding 95% CIs. Heterogeneity of the studies and publication bias will be investigated accordingly. To assess the quality and the risk of bias of the included studies, the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Scale or the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool will be used where appropriate.Ethics and disseminationSince no private and confidential patient data will be included in the reporting, approval from an ethics committee is not required. The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal. The study raises no ethical issues.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42019147188.
- Published
- 2020