Search

This entire experiment evaluates and contrasts the material removal rate (MRR) and the roundness error of the drilled hole produced by two distinct drill bits—HSS and M35—operating in a CNC vertical machining centre at a constant speed of 2200 revolutions per minute and a feed rate of 180 millimetres per minute. Both the Materials and the Methods: The novel aluminium alloy AA5182, which contains 4.5 percent magnesium and is used as the base work material throughout the entirety of the drilling operation, was the material of choice. The CNC drilling operation makes use of drill bits that are HSS and M35 twist drill tools. These drill bits have a diameter of 10 millimetres and a drill bit nose angle of 118 degrees. In this study, different types of drill bits are evaluated for use in drilling operations with a depth of 10 millimetres at a constant cutting speed of 2200 revolutions per minute and a cutting feed rate of 180 millimetres per minute. These parameters are input variables that are programmed into a CNC vertical machining centre. In order to calculate the 95 percent confidence interval, 20 samples of the novel aluminium alloy AA5182 workpiece are taken for each drill bit. These samples are used to compare the material removal rate and the roundness error. When the material removal rate that was measured was compared between HSS and M35 drill tools, the results showed that the mean value of each tool's 20 samples was 233.056 and 240.183 respectively. The roundness error of the two drill bits, on the other hand, is 0.009 and 0.007 respectively. The statistical analysis was carried out with a probability value of 0.05 (p0.05), and the significance value for the variance was found to be 0.039 for the material removal rate. The significance value for roundness error was found to be 0.004, and the difference between the two groups was found to be statistically significant. When the material removal rates of the M35 twist drill bit and the HSS drill tool were compared over the AA5182 workpiece within the limits of the input parameters and the machining conditions, the results showed that the M35 twist drill bit resulted in a higher material removal rate than the HSS drill tool. Additionally, the M35 drilled workpiece had less roundness error than the HSS drilled workpiece did at the same working parameters. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surface roughness was measured on CNC-drilled Aluminum Alloy AA1100 using both HSS M35 and TiN-coated tools. HSS M35 twist drills and Titanium Nitride drills are used in this study. Holes are cut into certain AA1100 aluminium. In this study, both control and experimental groups are used. Drill bits coated with TiN and controls made from HSS M35 will be used in this experiment. Twenty samples from each group were deemed sufficient for analysis using an A G power calculator. Twenty samples from each tool are drilled in a controlled experiment. Speed, feed rate, and cutting depth dials. The parameters used were 2200 RPM, 200 IPM, and 10 mm of depth of cut. Using a Mitutoyo Surface tester SJ-410, we measured the surface roughness of 20 samples and analysed the data using SPSS with a 95% confidence interval. HSS M35 drill bits had a value of 2.89445, whereas the TiN-coated drill bits had a value of 0.95726. Findings are statistically significant (p=0.024) in this study. The surface roughness of the TiN-coated tool was better than that of the HSS M35 tool at the same input speed, feed, and depth of cut. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This study's objective is to determine how well HSS M35 and Novel Chromium-Nitride coated tools perform in novel CNC drilling operations on Aluminum Alloy AA6351-T6. Specifically, the research will look at how well these tools drill. Both the Materials and the Methods: In this particular research endeavour, both HSS M35 twist drill bits and Novel Chromium-Nitride coated twist drills were utilised. The drilling operation is carried out on a specimen made of the aluminium alloy AA6351-T6, which serves as the substrate. On drilling operations, each group of 20 specimens was calculated with the same amount of g power and subjected to the same experiments. There were three controlled variables: the feed rate (in mm3/rev), the speed (in rpm), and the depth of cut (in mm). The input speed controls the cut speed, which was set at 2200, while the feed rate was set at 200, and the depth of cut was set at 10. The findings obtained through the use of each instrument were then entered into the statistical programme SPSS in order to be analysed. In the process of drilling, the material removal rate recorded to be highest for Chromium Nitride is 378.770, while the rate recorded to be highest for HSS M35 is 242.616. The level of significance between the two groups is 0.002 (p0.05), which indicates that there is a significant difference between them. The higher material removal rate in Aluminum Alloy AA6351-T6 can be attributed to the chromium-coated drill bit that contains hard ceramics. In this investigation, it was found that Novel Chromium-Nitride coated tools performed better than HSS M35 tools when input speed, feed rate, and depth of cut were all held constant. This was the case when comparing CrN coated tools to HSS M35 tools. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This experimental study's goal is to evaluate and contrast the drilled hole surface roughness of AA5182 material that has been processed following drilling operations utilising HSS drill tools and M35 twist drill tools in a cutting-edge CNC vertical machining centre with & without lubricant. Aluminium Alloy 5182 containing 4.5% of magnesium as alloy is used as base material to perform CNC drilling operation using HSS drill tool and M35 twist drill bits of 10mm drill bit diameter and 118° drill bit nose angle. In this work, drill bits are compared for drilling operations of 10 mm depth with constant cutting speed of 2200 rpm and cutting feed of 180 mm/min as input variables programmed in novel CNC vertical machining center without lubricant as dry drilling operation. For each drill bit, 20 samples of AA5182 drilled holes surface roughness were measured in MitutoyoSurftest SJ-410 equipment. Sample size is calculated using GPower with 95% confidence interval and threshold value of 0.05. On comparing the surface roughness measured, mean value of HSS drill tool and M35 drill tools were 0.824 and 0.308 respectively. Between two groups there is a significant difference in variance with a value of 0.002 (p<0.05). On comparing the surface roughness of M35 and HSS drill bit over workpiece AA5182 within the limits of input parameter and machining conditions, twist drill bit M35 resulted in better surface quality than HSS drill bit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The purpose of this study is to examine the Material Removal Rate of HSS M35 and TiN coated tools in novel CNC drilling operations on Aluminium Alloy AA6351-T6. The drill bits used in this investigation are HSS M35 and TiN coated twist drill bits. On Aluminium Alloy AA6351-T6, the specimen on which the drilling operation is performed. This experiment consists of two groups of 20 specimens, each drilled with both instruments. Speed (rpm), depth of cut (mm) and feed rate (mm3/rev) were all controlled variables. The cut speed, controlled by the input speed, feed rate and depth of cut were 2200, 200 and 10 respectively. The observed results for each tool were recorded and analyzed using SPSS v.26 software. According to the final mean MRR for HSS M35 was 224.54420 with a standard deviation of 12.741088, while the TiN coated tool had a mean MRR of 308.64255 with a standard deviation of 35.759401. The significance value of these results was 0.010, which is less than 0.05. Material Removal Rate values of TiN coated tool were found to be higher in this investigation when compared to HSS M35 tool for the same input speed, feed rate and depth of cut. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The main aim of the goal in this study is to examine the surface roughness of HSS M35 and CrN coated tools in drilling operation of Aluminium Alloy AA6351-T6 material in order to reduce the surface roughness. HSS M35 and CrN coated twist drill bits were utilised in this experiment. Aluminium Alloy AA6351-T6 is the specimen on which the drilling operation is performed. There are two sets of 20 specimens in this study. Drilling operations were carried out using both drill bits. Variables that can be controlled included speed (rpm), depth of cut (mm) and feed rate (mm3/rev). 2200,200 and 10 were the input speed, feed and depth of cut respectively. The surface roughness values of each specimen were recorded and analyzed using SPSS software. The mean value for HSS M35 was 2.88970 with a standard deviation of 0.089856, while mean value for CrN was 1.181405 with standard deviation of 0.117861. The significance value for this study was 0.048 which is less than the P<0.05. Within the limitations of this study, surface roughness values are found to be lower in the CrN coated tool than the HSS M35 tool in this investigation for the speed, feed rate and depth of cut. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]