Search

Humans can extract high‐level spatial features from visual signals, but spatial representations in the brain are complex and remain unclear. The unsupervised capsule neural network (U‐CapsNet) is sensitive to the spatial location and relationship of the object, contains a special recurrent mechanism and uses a self‐supervised generation strategy to represent images, which is similar to the computational principle in the human brain. Therefore, we hypothesized that U‐CapsNet can help us understand how the human brain processes spatial information. First, brain activities were studied using functional magnetic resonance imaging during spatial working memory in which participants had to remember the locations of circles for a short time. Then, U‐CapsNet served as a computational model of the brain to perform tasks that are identical to those performed by humans. Finally, the representational models were used to compare the U‐CapsNet with the brain. The results showed that some human‐defined spatial features naturally emerged in the latent space of U‐CapsNet. Moreover, representations in U‐CapsNet captured the response structure of two types of brain regions during different activity patterns, as well as important factors associated with human behavior. Together, our study not only provides a computationally feasible framework for modeling how the human brain encodes spatial features but also provides insights into the representational format and goals of the human brain. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Research on the neural mechanisms of perceptual decisionmaking has typically focused on simple categorical choices, say between two alternative motion directions. Studies on such discrete alternatives have often suggested that choices are encoded either in a motor-based or in an abstract, categorical format in regions beyond sensory cortex. Methods: In this study, we used motion stimuli that could vary anywhere between 0° and 360° to assess how the brain encodes choices for features that span the full sensory continuum. We employed a combination of neuroimaging and encoding models based on Gaussian process regression to assess how either stimuli or choices were encoded in brain responses. Results: We found that single-voxel tuning patterns could be used to reconstruct the trial-by-trial physical direction of motion as well as the participants' continuous choices. Importantly, these continuous choice signals were primarily observed in early visual areas. The tuning properties in this region generalized between choice encoding and stimulus encoding, even for reports that reflected pure guessing. Discussion: We found only little information related to the decision outcome in regions beyond visual cortex, such as parietal cortex, possibly because our task did not involve differential motor preparation. This could suggest that decisions for continuous stimuli take can place already in sensory brain regions, potentially using similar mechanisms to the sensory recruitment in visual working memory. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Encoding models based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) predict BOLD responses to natural scenes in the human visual system more accurately than many other currently available models. However, DCNN-based encoding models fail to predict a significant amount of variance in the activity of most voxels in all visual areas. This failure could reflect limitations in the data (e.g., a noise ceiling), or could reflect limitations of the DCNN as a model of computation in the brain. Understanding the source and structure of the unexplained variance could therefore provide helpful clues for improving models of brain computation. Here, we characterize the structure of the variance that DCNN-based encoding models cannot explain. Using a publicly available dataset of BOLD responses to natural scenes, we determined if the source of unexplained variance was shared across voxels, individual brains, retinotopic locations, and hierarchically distant visual brain areas. We answered these questions using voxel-to-voxel (vox2vox) models that predict activity in a target voxel given activity in a population of source voxels. We found that simple linear vox2vox models increased within-subject prediction accuracy over DCNN-based models for any pair of source/target visual areas, clearly demonstrating that the source of unexplained variance is widely shared within and across visual brain areas. However, vox2vox models were not more accurate than DCNN-based encoding models when source and target voxels came from different brains, demonstrating that the source of unexplained variance was not shared across brains. Importantly, control analyses demonstrated that the source of unexplained variance was not encoded in the mean activity of source voxels, or the activity of voxels in white matter. Interestingly, the weights of vox2vox models revealed preferential connection of target voxel activity to source voxels with adjacent receptive fields, even when source and target voxels were in different functional brain areas. Finally, we found that the prediction accuracy of the vox2vox models decayed with hierarchical distance between the source and target voxels but showed detailed patterns of dependence on hierarchical relationships that we did not observe in DCNNs. Given these results, we argue that the structured variance unexplained by DCNN-based encoding models is unlikely to be entirely caused by non-neural artifacts (e.g., spatially correlated measurement noise) or a failure of DCNNs to approximate the features encoded in brain activity; rather, our results point to a need for brain models that provide both mechanistic and computational explanations for structured ongoing activity in the brain. Keywords: fMRI, encoding models, deep neural networks, functional connectivity [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Encoding models based on deep convolutional neural networks (DCNN) predict BOLD responses to natural scenes in the human visual system more accurately than many other currently available models. However, DCNN-based encoding models fail to predict a significant amount of variance in the activity of most voxels in all visual areas. This failure could reflect limitations in the data (e.g., a noise ceiling), or could reflect limitations of the DCNN as a model of computation in the brain. Understanding the source and structure of the unexplained variance could therefore provide helpful clues for improving models of brain computation. Here, we characterize the structure of the variance that DCNN-based encoding models cannot explain. Using a publicly available dataset of BOLD responses to natural scenes, we determined if the source of unexplained variance was shared across voxels, individual brains, retinotopic locations, and hierarchically distant visual brain areas. We answered these questions using voxel-to-voxel (vox2vox) models that predict activity in a target voxel given activity in a population of source voxels. We found that simple linear vox2vox models increased within-subject prediction accuracy over DCNN-based models for any pair of source/target visual areas, clearly demonstrating that the source of unexplained variance is widely shared within and across visual brain areas. However, vox2vox models were not more accurate than DCNN-based encoding models when source and target voxels came from different brains, demonstrating that the source of unexplained variance was not shared across brains. Importantly, control analyses demonstrated that the source of unexplained variance was not encoded in the mean activity of source voxels, or the activity of voxels in white matter. Interestingly, the weights of vox2vox models revealed preferential connection of target voxel activity to source voxels with adjacent receptive fields, even when source and target voxels were in different functional brain areas. Finally, we found that the prediction accuracy of the vox2vox models decayed with hierarchical distance between the source and target voxels but showed detailed patterns of dependence on hierarchical relationships that we did not observe in DCNNs. Given these results, we argue that the structured variance unexplained by DCNN-based encoding models is unlikely to be entirely caused by non-neural artifacts (e.g., spatially correlated measurement noise) or a failure of DCNNs to approximate the features encoded in brain activity; rather, our results point to a need for brain models that provide both mechanistic and computational explanations for structured ongoing activity in the brain. Keywords: fMRI, encoding models, deep neural networks, functional connectivity

Analyzing functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data from the encoding perspective provides a powerful tool to explore human vision. Using voxel-wise encoding models, previous studies predicted the brain activity evoked by external stimuli successfully. However, these models constructed a regularized regression model for each single voxel separately, which overlooked the intrinsic spatial property of fMRI data. In this work, we proposed a multi-target regression model that predicts the activities of adjacent voxels simultaneously. Different from the previous models, the spatial constraint is considered in our model. The effectiveness of the proposed model is demonstrated by comparing it with two state-of-the-art voxel-wise models on a publicly available dataset. Results indicate that the proposed method can predict voxel responses more accurately than the competing methods. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A challenging goal for cognitive neuroscience researchers is to determine how mental representations are mapped onto the patterns of neural activity. To address this problem, functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) researchers have developed a large number of encoding and decoding methods. However, previous studies typically used rather limited stimuli representation, like semantic labels and Wavelet Gabor filters, and largely focused on voxel-based brain patterns. Here, we present a new fMRI encoding model to predict the human brain's responses to free viewing of video clips which aims to deal with this limitation. In this model, we represent the stimuli using a variety of representative visual features in the computer vision community, which can describe the global color distribution, local shape and spatial information and motion information contained in videos, and apply the functional connectivity to model the brain's activity pattern evoked by these video clips. Our experimental results demonstrate that brain network responses during free viewing of videos can be robustly and accurately predicted across subjects by using visual features. Our study suggests the feasibility of exploring cognitive neuroscience studies by computational image/video analysis and provides a novel concept of using the brain encoding as a test-bed for evaluating visual feature extraction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Representation invariance plays a significant role in the performance of deep convolutional neural networks (CNNs) and human visual information processing in various complicated image-based tasks. However, there has been abounding confusion concerning the representation invariance mechanisms of the two sophisticated systems. To investigate their relationship under common conditions, we proposed a representation invariance analysis approach based on data augmentation technology. Firstly, the original image library was expanded by data augmentation. The representation invariances of CNNs and the ventral visual stream were then studied by comparing the similarities of the corresponding layer features of CNNs and the prediction performance of visual encoding models based on functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) before and after data augmentation. Our experimental results suggest that the architecture of CNNs, combinations of convolutional and fully-connected layers, developed representation invariance of CNNs. Remarkably, we found representation invariance belongs to all successive stages of the ventral visual stream. Hence, the internal correlation between CNNs and the human visual system in representation invariance was revealed. Our study promotes the advancement of invariant representation of computer vision and deeper comprehension of the representation invariance mechanism of human visual information processing. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]