Back to Search
Start Over
Testing Effect: A Further Examination of Open-Book and Closed-Book Test Formats
- Source :
-
Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education . Fall 2018 1(1):20-36. - Publication Year :
- 2018
-
Abstract
- If assessment is the purpose of testing, open-book tests may defeat the purpose. However, a goal of education is to build knowledge, and based on the literature, open-book tests may not be inferior to closed-book tests in promoting long-term retention of information. Participants studied Swahili-English pairs and either re-studied or took an initial quiz, which was cued recall or recognition in an open-book or closed-book format. One week later, the final closed-book recognition test showed higher performance in the quizzed conditions than in the study-twice condition, replicating the testing effect. However, performance was similar across the quizzed conditions, indicating that testing promoted long-term retention regardless of test format (open-book versus closed-book) and test type (cued recall versus recognition). Open-book tests are not inferior to closed-book tests in building knowledge and can be particularly useful in online classes because preventing cheating is difficult when closed-book tests are administered online.
Details
- Language :
- English
- ISSN :
- 2578-7608
- Volume :
- 1
- Issue :
- 1
- Database :
- ERIC
- Journal :
- Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education
- Publication Type :
- Academic Journal
- Accession number :
- EJ1196226
- Document Type :
- Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research