Back to Search Start Over

Testing Effect: A Further Examination of Open-Book and Closed-Book Test Formats

Authors :
Senkova, Olesya
Otani, Hajime
Skeel, Reid L.
Babcock, Renée L.
Source :
Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education. Fall 2018 1(1):20-36.
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

If assessment is the purpose of testing, open-book tests may defeat the purpose. However, a goal of education is to build knowledge, and based on the literature, open-book tests may not be inferior to closed-book tests in promoting long-term retention of information. Participants studied Swahili-English pairs and either re-studied or took an initial quiz, which was cued recall or recognition in an open-book or closed-book format. One week later, the final closed-book recognition test showed higher performance in the quizzed conditions than in the study-twice condition, replicating the testing effect. However, performance was similar across the quizzed conditions, indicating that testing promoted long-term retention regardless of test format (open-book versus closed-book) and test type (cued recall versus recognition). Open-book tests are not inferior to closed-book tests in building knowledge and can be particularly useful in online classes because preventing cheating is difficult when closed-book tests are administered online.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
2578-7608
Volume :
1
Issue :
1
Database :
ERIC
Journal :
Journal of Effective Teaching in Higher Education
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
EJ1196226
Document Type :
Journal Articles<br />Reports - Research