Back to Search Start Over

Impact of virtual reality simulation on learning barriers of phacoemulsification perceived by residents.

Authors :
Ng, Danny Siu-Chun
Sun, Zihan
Young, Alvin Lerrmann
Ko, Simon Tak-Chuen
Lok, Jerry Ka-Hing
Lai, Timothy Yuk-Yau
Sikder, Shameema
Tham, Clement C
Source :
Clinical Ophthalmology; May2018, Vol. 12, p885-893, 9p
Publication Year :
2018

Abstract

Objective: To identify residents’ perceived barriers to learning phacoemulsification surgical procedures and to evaluate whether virtual reality simulation training changed these perceptions. Design: The ophthalmology residents undertook a simulation phacoemulsification course and proficiency assessment on the Eyesi system using the previously validated training modules of intracapsular navigation, anti-tremor, capsulorrhexis, and cracking/chopping. A cross-sectional, multicenter survey on the perceived difficulties in performing phacoemulsification tasks on patients, based on the validated International Council of Ophthalmology’s Ophthalmology Surgical Competency Assessment Rubric (ICO-OSCAR), using a 5-point Likert scale (1 =least and 5 = most difficulty), was conducted among residents with or without prior simulation training. Mann–Whitney U tests were carried out to compare the mean scores, and multivariate regression analyses were performed to evaluate the association of lower scores with the following potential predictors: 1) higher level trainee, 2) can complete phacoemulsification most of the time (.90%) without supervisor’s intervention, and 3) prior simulation training. Setting: The study was conducted in ophthalmology residency training programs in five regional hospitals in Hong Kong. Results: Of the 22 residents, 19 responded (86.3%), of which 13 (68.4%) had completed simulation training. Nucleus cracking/chopping was ranked highest in difficulty by all respondents followed by capsulorrhexis completion and nucleus rotation/manipulation. Respondents with prior simulation training had significantly lower difficulty scores on these three tasks (nucleus cracking/chopping 3.85 vs 4.75, P= 0.03; capsulorrhexis completion 3.31 vs 4.40, P= 0.02; and nucleus rotation/manipulation 3.00 vs 4.75, P= 0.01). In multivariate analyses, simulation training was significantly associated with lower difficulty scores on these three tasks. Conclusion: Residents who had completed Eyesi simulation training had higher confidence in performing the most difficult tasks perceived during phacoemulsification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
11775467
Volume :
12
Database :
Complementary Index
Journal :
Clinical Ophthalmology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
130462479
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S140411