Search

BACKGROUND: High-power short-duration (HPSD) ablation has emerged as an alternative to conventional standard-power long-duration (SPLD) ablation. We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of HPSD versus SPLD for atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) retrieved from PubMed, WOS, SCOPUS, EMBASE, and CENTRAL were performed through August 2023. We used RevMan V. 5.4 to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023471797. RESULTS: We included six RCTs with a total of 694 patients. HPSD was significantly associated with a decreased total procedure time (MD: -22.88 with 95% CI [-36.13, -9.63], P = 0.0007), pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) time (MD: -19.73 with 95% CI [-23.93, -15.53], P

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a growing health problem that increases morbidity and mortality, and in most patients progresses to more advanced diseases over time. Recent research has examined the underlying mechanisms, risk factors, and progression of AF, leading to updated AF disease classification schemes. Although endocardial catheter ablation is effective for early-stage paroxysmal AF, it consistently achieves suboptimal outcomes in patients with advanced AF. Identification of the factors that lead to the increased risk of treatment failure in advanced AF has spurred the development and adoption of hybrid ablation therapies and collaborative heart care teams that result in higher long-term arrhythmia-free survival. Patients with non-paroxysmal AF, atrial remodeling, comorbidities, or AF otherwise deemed difficult to treat may find hybrid treatment to be the most effective option. Future research of hybrid therapies in advanced AF patient populations, including those with dual diagnoses, may provide further evidence establishing the safety and efficacy of hybrid endo-epicardial ablation as a first line treatment.

AIM: The 2023 ACC/AHA/ACCP/HRS Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation provides recommendations to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search was conducted from May 12, 2022, to November 3, 2022, encompassing studies, reviews, and other evidence conducted on human subjects that were published in English from PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, and other selected databases relevant to this guideline. Additional relevant studies, published through November 2022, during the guideline writing process, were also considered by the writing committee and added to the evidence tables, where appropriate. STRUCTURE: Atrial fibrillation is the most sustained common arrhythmia, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing in the United States and globally. Recommendations from the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation and the 2019 AHA/ACC/HRS Focused Update of the 2014 AHA/ACC/HRS Guideline for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation have been updated with new evidence to guide clinicians. In addition, new recommendations addressing atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic risk assessment, anticoagulation, left atrial appendage occlusion, atrial fibrillation catheter or surgical ablation, and risk factor modification and atrial fibrillation prevention have been developed.

Background: Data comparing the outcomes of loose versus rigorous validation strategies for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) are limited. We aimed to prospectively assess the effectiveness of loose versus rigorous validation for PVI in patients with PAF with a maintained sinus rhythm. Methods: Patients (n = 117) with PAF were randomized to receive either loose validation (n = 59) or rigorous validation (n = 58) after PVI. The presence of dormant conduction in loose validation was assessed only by adenosine administration followed by isoproterenol infusion. The complete absence of pulmonary vein (PV) potentials in rigorous validation was confirmed by the combination of the Lasso catheter with isoproterenol plus adenosine. Dormant conduction, revealed by validation after PVI, was ablated until all reconnections were eliminated. Results: The procedure time in the rigorous validation group was greater than that in the loose validation group (161.3 ± 52.7 min vs. 142.5 ± 37.6 min, p = 0.03, respectively). After successful PVI, the detection of dormant PV reconnections in the rigorous validation group was significantly greater than that in the loose validation group (69.0% vs. 37.3%, p = 0.001). However, after reisolation of the sites of dormant PV conduction, the postablation recurrence rates in 1.3 years were similar between the groups (79.2% vs. 83.6%, p = 0.67). Conclusion: Rigorous validation can reveal dormant conduction in more than two‐thirds of patients with PAF undergoing PVI. However, rigorous validation and additional ablation of the resulting connections do not improve long‐term outcomes when a protocol that includes electrophysiological confirmation and pharmacological validation is used. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

ABSTRACT Background Methods Results Conclusion Trail Registration Atrial fibrillation (AF) inducibility with burst pacing (BP) after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has been reported to be associated with AF recurrence. In contrast, the relevance of inducibility and recurrence after cryoablation (CRA) is unclear.We investigated 367 patients undergoing initial ablation for paroxysmal AF (RFA: 174, CRA: 193). Propensity score matching was conducted, retaining 134 patients in each group. Following pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), the inducibility by BP was tested. Inductions at 250 ppm were defined as low‐frequency burst pacing (LFBP) positive, and those at 300 ppm were classified as medium‐frequency burst pacing (MFBP) positive. They were followed for 600 days.Forty‐eight patients (18%) had AF recurrence. There was no significant difference in the recurrence rate between RFA and CRA (17% vs. 19%, Log‐rank p = 0.79). In RFA, significant differences were observed for both LFBP (Log‐rank p < 0.001) and MFBP (Log‐rank p < 0.001). In contrast, in CRA, there were no significant differences for either LFBP (Log‐rank p = 0.39) or MFBP (Log‐rank p = 0.19). Multivariable analysis revealed that LFBP‐positive (hazards ratio [HR] = 5.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.41–13.7, p < 0.001) was an independent predictor for recurrence with RFA. Acute reconnection (HR = 2.73, 95% CI 1.13–6.56, p = 0.025) was an independent predictor for recurrence with CRA.The inducibility by BP after RFA predicted recurrence at both low and medium frequencies. LFBP‐positive was an independent predictor of recurrence in multivariable analysis. In contrast, the inducibility by BP after CRA was not a predictor of recurrence.This study did not require clinical trial registration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its effects on autonomic function and underlying mechanisms remain poorly understood. This study investigated autonomic and haemodynamic changes following CA and explored their potential implications for patient outcomes. Methods: Seventy-eight patients with AF underwent CA and were followed up at one, three, and six months. Autonomic function was assessed using a combination of head-up tilt (HUT), handgrip (HG), and deep breathing (DB) manoeuvres along with baroreflex sensitivity (BRS) and baroreflex effectiveness index (BEI) evaluation. Heart rate (HR), blood pressure (BP), and their variability were measured at each time point. Results: Significant autonomic alterations were observed after ablation, particularly at one month, with reductions in parasympathetic tone and baroreflex function. These changes gradually normalised by six months. Both pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and cryoablation (CryO) had similar effects on autonomic regulation. Improvements in quality of life, measured by the AFEQT scores, were consistent with these physiological changes. Conclusions: CA for AF induces significant time-dependent autonomic and haemodynamic changes with recovery over six months. These findings underscore the need for ongoing monitoring and personalised post-ablation management. Further research is required to explore the mechanisms driving these alterations and their long-term impacts on patient outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Management of patients with long‐standing persistent atrial fibrillation (LSPAF) presents a clinical challenge. Hybrid convergent ablation has been shown to have superior efficacy compared to endocardial‐only ablation. However, data on concomitant left atrial appendage (LAA) management along with hybrid ablation is sparse. Methods: We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA clipping in patients with LSPAF. We conducted a retrospective analysis of all patients with LSPAF who underwent hybrid surgical ablation with LAA clipping at our institution. The primary endpoint was a recurrence of atrial arrhythmias at 12 months. Further, the durability of surgical left atrial posterior wall ablation was examined during the endocardial catheter ablation using standing electrophysiological criteria. Results: A total of 79 patients were included. Mean age was 63.5 ± 9.6 years, and 71% were males. LAA clipping was performed in 99% of patients. The mean time between the surgical and endocardial stages of the procedure was 2.6 ± 1.7 months. Persistent posterior wall activity was observed in 34.2% (n = 27/79) patients during the endocardial phase of the procedure. Cardiac implantable electronic device was used in 74% of patients for monitoring of recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF). The primary effectiveness of AF freedom at 12 months was 73.8% (45/61). Over a 12‐month follow‐up period, 11.4% (9/79) of patients required repeat catheter ablation, of which 88.9% (8/9) had evidence of persistent posterior wall activity. Conclusion: Concomitant hybrid convergent ablation and LAA exclusion with an atrial clip provides reasonable long‐term AF‐free survival in patients with LSPAF. Persistent posterior wall activity is seen commonly in patients presenting with recurrent AF following hybrid convergent AF ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: High‐frequency low‐tidal‐volume (HFLTV) ventilation during radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) has been shown to be superior to standard ventilation (SV) in terms of procedural efficiency, acute and long‐term clinical outcomes. Our study aimed to compare ablation lesions characteristics utilizing HFLTV ventilation versus SV during RFCA of PAF. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on patients who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for PAF between August 2022 and March 2023, using high‐power short‐duration ablation. Thirty‐five patients underwent RFCA with HFLTV ventilation and were matched with another cohort of 35 patients who underwent RFCA with SV. Parameters including ablation duration, contact force (CF), impedance drop, and ablation index were extracted from the CARTONET database for each ablation lesion. Results: A total of 70 patients were included (HFLTV = 35/2484 lesions, SV = 35/2830 lesions) in the analysis. There were no differences in baseline characteristics between the groups. While targeting the same ablation index, the HFLTV ventilation group demonstrated shorter average ablation duration per lesion (12.3 ± 5.0 vs. 15.4 ± 8.4 s, p <.001), higher average CF (17.0 ± 8.5 vs. 10.5 ± 4.6 g, p <.001), and greater impedance reduction (9.5 ± 4.6 vs. 7.7 ± 4.1 ohms, p <.001). HFLTV ventilation group also demonstrated shorter total procedural time (61.3 ± 25.5 vs. 90.8 ± 22.8 min, p <.001), ablation time (40.5 ± 18.6 vs. 65.8 ± 22.5 min, p <.001), and RF time (15.3 ± 4.8 vs. 22.9 ± 9.7 min, p <.001). Conclusion: HFLTV ventilation during PVI for PAF was associated with improved ablation lesion parameters and procedural efficiency compared to SV. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: CARTONET® enables automatic ablation site classification and reconnection site prediction using machine learning. However, the accuracy of the site classification model and trends of the site prediction model for potential reconnection sites are uncertain. Methods: We studied a total of 396 cases. About 313 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), including a cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (PVI group) and 83 underwent PVI and additional ablation (i.e., box isolation) (PVI+ group). We investigated the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for automatic site classification in the total cohort and compared these metrics for PV lesions versus non‐PV lesions. The distribution of potential reconnection sites and confidence level for each site was also investigated. Results: A total of 29,422 points were analyzed (PV lesions [n = 22 418], non‐PV lesions [n = 7004]). The sensitivity and PPV of the total cohort were 71.4% and 84.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of PV lesions were significantly higher than those of non‐PV lesions (PV lesions vs. non‐PV lesions, %; sensitivity, 75.3 vs. 67.5, p <.05; PPV, 91.2 vs. 67.9, p <.05). CTI and superior vena cava could not be recognized or analyzed. In the potential reconnection prediction model, the incidence of potential reconnections was highest in the posterior, while the confidence was the highest in the roof. Conclusion: The automatic site classification of the CARTONET®R12.1 model demonstrates relatively high accuracy in pulmonary veins excluding the carina. The prediction of potential reconnection sites feature tends to anticipate areas with poor catheter stability as reconnection sites. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims The predictive role of local impedance (LI) drop in lesion formation using a novel contact force sensing ablation catheter was recently described. The purpose of our current study was to assess the temporal characteristics of LI drop during ablation and its correlation with acute lesion efficacy. Methods and results Point-by-point pulmonary vein isolation was performed. The efficacy of applications was determined by pacing along the circular ablation line and assessing loss of capture. Local impedance, contact force, and catheter position data with high resolution were analysed and compared in successful and unsuccessful applications. Five hundred and fifty-nine successful and 84 unsuccessful applications were analysed. The successful applications showed higher baseline LI (P < 0.001) and larger LI drop during ablation (P < 0.001, for all). In case of unsuccessful applications, after a moderate but significant drop from baseline to the 2 s time point (153 vs. 145 Ω, P < 0.001), LI did not change further (P = 0.99). Contradictorily, in case of successful applications, the LI significantly decreased further (baseline–2 s–10 s: 161–150–141 Ω, P < 0.001 for all). The optimal cut-point for the LI drop indicating unsuccessful application was <9 Ω at the 4-s time point [AUC = 0.73 (0.67–0.76), P < 0.001]. Failing to reach this cut-point predicted unsuccessful applications [OR 3.82 (2.34–6.25); P < 0.001]. Conclusion A rapid and enduring drop of the LI may predict effective lesion formation, while slightly changing or unchanged LI is associated with unsuccessful applications. A moderate LI drop during the first 4 s of radiofrequency application predicts ineffective radiofrequency delivery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and Objectives: Atrial fibrillation (AF) significantly impacts the quality of life (QoL) of affected individuals. Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has emerged as a therapeutic approach to manage AF and improve QoL. This study aimed to assess the QoL in patients with AF undergoing PVI. Methods and Materials: A total of 97 AF patients undergoing PVI (radiofrequency 52.6% (n = 51) and cryoablation 47.4% (n = 46)) at Pauls Stradins Clinical University Hospital were included in this study. QoL was measured using the 36-Item Short-Form Survey (SF-36) before PVI and during a follow-up period of 5.98 ± 1.97 months. Results: This study consisted of 60.8% (n = 59) males, with a mean age of 60.06 ± 11.61 years. A total of 67.0% (n = 65) of patients had paroxysmal AF, and 33.0% (n = 32) had persistent AF. The SF-36 questionnaire revealed major improvements across multiple QoL domains post-PVI, reaching a statistical significance of p < 0.01. Patient factors, such as female gender ([estimate 21.26, 95% CI (7.18, 35.35)], p < 0.01), persistent AF ([estimate 15.49, 95% CI (2.83, 28.15)], p = 0.02), and restored sinus rhythm ([estimate 14.35, 95% CI (1.65, 27.06)], p = 0.03), were associated with significantly improved QoL. Conclusions: PVI in patients with AF positively influences various dimensions of QoL, as evidenced by significant improvement across multiple SF-36 domains. These findings emphasize worsened QoL in patients with AF and the potential benefits of PVI enhancing the overall wellbeing of individuals with AF. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) employing cryoballoon (CB) or contact force-guided radiofrequency (CF-RF) catheter ablation has been established as an effective strategy for managing atrial fibrillation (AF). However, its efficacy in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) remains to be further explored. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 60 consecutive AF patients with HCM (average age 67 ± 10 years; 41 men) who were consecutively admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to December 2022 and underwent initial PVI. Results: The patients were treated with CB (26 patients) or CF-RF (34 patients). Successful PVI was achieved in both groups without significant complications. In the CF-RF group, additional ablations were performed on the cavotricuspid isthmus (14.7% of patients) and the anterior line (2.9%). The CB group benefited from reduced procedural times (93 ± 31 vs. 165 ± 60 min, p < 0.05) and decreased saline irrigation requirements (77.5 ± 31.4 vs. 870 ± 281.9 mL, p < 0.0001). Using a contrast medium was exclusive to the CB group (33.8 ± 4.2 mL). In a 12-month follow-up, the atrial tachyarrhythmia recurrence-free rates in the CB and CF-RF groups were comparable (77% and 76%, respectively; p = 0.63 according to the log-rank test). Notably, pulmonary vein reconnection was prevalent in most (7 out of 8) patients requiring a secondary ablation procedure. Conclusion: PVI is feasible as a strategy for AF in patients with HCM employing either CB or CF-RF techniques. While the recurrence-free rates were comparable in both groups, differences were noted in procedure duration, saline usage, and the need for a contrast medium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the cornerstone of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF); however, the results are suboptimal for persistent AF. The left atrial posterior wall (LAPW) is thought to be a major additional area in initiation and perpetuation of persistent AF. Therefore, adjunctive ablation of the posterior wall may reduce AF recurrence in patients with persistent AF. Objective: The objective of this study was to compare outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with persistent AF using PVI alone versus a combination of PVI and LAPW isolation. Methods: Literature search was conducted in PubMed, PubMed Central, Scopus, and Embase since inception to February 2023. Screening of studies was done via Covidence software. Risk of bias assessment was done using appropriate tools. Data extraction and a narrative synthesis were carried out accordingly. Results: Ten studies were included, of which five were randomized controlled trials. PVI with LAPW ablation group had significantly lower recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia (OR 0.47, CI 0.32–0.70) and AF (OR 0.39, CI 0.23–0.69). In sensitivity analysis, freedom from atrial arrhythmias was noted to be significantly higher in the PVI with LAPW ablation group (OR 2.22, CI 1.36–3.64). However, there was no significant difference in occurrence of atrial flutter (OR 1.36, CI 0.86–2.14) or with periprocedural adverse events (OR 1.10, CI 0.60–1.99). Conclusion: LAPW ablation, in addition to PVI, significantly improves the rates of arrhythmia freedom and reduces the recurrence of overall atrial tachyarrhythmia. There was no significant difference in atrial flutter or periprocedural adverse events. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We previously developed an early reconnection/dormant conduction (ERC) prediction model for cryoballoon ablation to avoid a 30-min waiting period with adenosine infusion. We now aimed to validate this model based on time to isolation, number of unsuccessful cryo-applications, and nadir balloon temperature. Methods: Consecutive atrial fibrillation patients who underwent their first cryoballoon ablation in 2018–2019 at the Leiden University Medical Center were included. Model performance at the previous and at a new optimal cutoff value was determined. Results: A total of 201 patients were included (85.57% paroxysmal AF, 139 male, median age 61 years (IQR 53–69)). ERC was found in 35 of 201 included patients (17.41%) and in 41 of 774 veins (5.30%). In the present study population, the previous cutoff value of − 6.7 provided a sensitivity of 37.84% (previously 70%) and a specificity of 89.07% (previously 86%). Shifting the cutoff value to − 7.2 in both study populations resulted in a sensitivity of 72.50% and 72.97% and a specificity of 78.22% and 78.63% in data from the previous and present study respectively. Negative predictive values were 96.55% and 98.11%. Applying the model on the 101 patients of the present study with all necessary data for all veins resulted in 43 out of 101 patients (43%) not requiring a 30-min waiting period with adenosine testing. Two patients (2%) with ERC would have been missed when applying the model. Conclusions: The previously established ERC prediction model performs well, recommending its use for centers routinely using adenosine testing following PVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The VARIPULSE™ variable‐loop circular catheter (VLCC) is a bidirectional, multielectrode catheter that can perform electrophysiological mapping and deliver pulsed field energy through the TRUPULSE™ Generator for the treatment of atrial fibrillation. This ablation system, including the CARTO 3™ three‐dimensional electroanatomical mapping system, represents a fully integrated system. Methods: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) is a novel, primarily cardiac tissue–selective ablation technology with a minimal thermal effect, potentially eliminating the collateral tissue damage associated with radiofrequency ablation or cryoablation. Integration of a mapping system may lead to shorter fluoroscopy times and improve the usability of the system, allowing tracking of energy density and placement to confirm no areas around the vein are left untreated. Results: This step‐by‐step review covers patient selection, mapping, the step‐by‐step ablation workflow, details on catheter repositioning and ensuring contact, considerations for ablation of specific anatomical variations, and discussion of ablation without fluoroscopy based on our initial clinical experience. Conclusions: The VLCC is part of the fully integrated PFA system designed for pulmonary vein isolation, using mapping to guide catheter placement and lesion set creation. The current workflow, which is based on our initial clinical experience, may be further refined as the PFA system is used in real‐world settings. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite advances in ablative therapies, outcomes remain less favorable for persistent atrial fibrillation often due to presence of non-pulmonary vein triggers and abnormal atrial substrates. This review highlights advances in ablation technologies and notable scientific literature on clinical outcomes associated with pursuing adjunctive ablation targets and substrate modification during persistent atrial fibrillation ablation, while also highlighting notable future directions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure frequently coexist. Prediction of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) recovery after catheter ablation (CA) for AF remains difficult. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of biomarkers, alone and in combination with the Antwerp score, to predict LVEF recovery after CA for AF. Patients undergoing CA for AF with depressed LVEF (<50%) were included. Plasma levels of 13 biomarkers were measured immediately before CA. Patients were categorized into "responders" and "nonresponders" in a similar fashion to the Antwerp score performance derivation and validation cohorts. The predictive power of the biomarkers alone and combined in outcome prediction was evaluated. A total of 208 patients with depressed LVEF were included (median age 63 years; 39–19% female; median indexed left atrial volume 42 (33–52) mL/m2; median LVEF 43 (38–46)%). At a median follow-up time of 30 (20–34) months, 161 (77%) were responders and 47 (23%) were nonresponders. Of 13 biomarkers, –4—angiopoietin 2 (ANG2), growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), fibroblast growth factor 23, and myosin binding protein C3—were significantly different between responders and nonresponders (P ≤.001) and their combination could predict the end point with an area under the curve of 0.72 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.64–0.81) overall, 0.69 (95% CI 0.59–0.78) in heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction, and 0.88 (95% CI 0.77–0.98) in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Only ANG2 and GDF15 remained significantly associated with LVEF recovery after adjustment for age, sex, and Antwerp score and significantly improved the accuracy of the Antwerp score predictions (P <.001). The area under the curve of the Antwerp score in the outcome prediction improved from 0.75 (95% CI 0.67–0.83) to 0.78 (95% CI 0.70–0.86). A biomarker panel (ANG2 and GDF15) significantly improved the accuracy of the Antwerp score. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous neuromodulation is emerging as a promising therapeutic approach for atrial fibrillation (AF). This article explores techniques such as ganglionated plexi (GP) ablation, and vagus nerve stimulation, pinpointing their potential in modulating AF triggers and maintenance. Noninvasive methods, such as transcutaneous low-level tragus stimulation, offer innovative treatment pathways, with early trials indicating a significant reduction in AF burden. GP ablation may address autonomic triggers, and the potential for GP ablation in neuromodulation is discussed. The article stresses the necessity for more rigorous clinical trials to validate the safety, reproducibility, and efficacy of these neuromodulation techniques in AF treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Previous clinical studies on pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) with a radiofrequency balloon (RFB) reported safe and effective procedures using conventional ablation settings with 20/60 s RF delivery via posterior/anterior (PST/ANT) electrodes. The latest evidence suggests that reducing the application time to 15 s (s) on the posterior wall when facing the oesophageal region is as effective as applying 20 s. To prospectively assess whether reducing RF time on PST/ANT segments to 15/45 s can ensure sufficient quality of lesion metrics and compare the new shortened ablation settings with the conventional one in terms of safety, and effectiveness at 1-year. Methods and results A total of 641 patients from seven European centres were enrolled in a collaborative registry, with 374 in the conventional RF delivery group and 267 in the shortened RF delivery group. Procedural outcomes, lesion metrics, and safety profiles were assessed and compared between the groups. Freedom of any atrial tachycarrhythmias at one year was 85.4% and 88.2% in the SHRT and CONV groups, respectively. The shortened RF delivery strategy was associated with significantly shorter procedure times (median 63.5 vs. 96.5 min, P < 0.001) and shortened fluoroscopy exposure (median 10.0 vs. 14.0 min, P < 0.001) compared to conventional delivery. Efficacy metrics, including first-pass isolation rates and time to isolation, were comparable between groups. Shortened RF delivery was associated with a lower incidence of procedural complications (1.4% vs. 5.3%, P = 0.04) and optimized thermal characteristics. Conclusion Analyses from the COLLABORATE registry demonstrate that shortening RF energy delivery times to 15/45 s (PST/ANT) during PVI with the RFB resulted in comparable freedom from recurrent atrial tachyarrhythmia compared to conventional delivery times with comparable efficiency and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is an emerging technology to perform pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Initial data demonstrated high safety and efficacy. Data on long-term PVI durability and reconduction patterns in comparison to established energy sources for PVI are scarce. We compare findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first PFA to findings in repeat ablation procedures after a first cryoballoon ablation (CBA) based PVI. Methods and result A total of 550 consecutively enrolled patients underwent PFA or CBA index PVI. Repeat ablations in patients with symptomatic atrial arrhythmia recurrences were analysed. A total of 22/191 (12%) patients after index PFA-PVI and 44/359 (12%) after CBA-PVI underwent repeat ablation. Reconduction of any pulmonary vein (PV) was detected by multipolar spiral mapping catheter at each PV with careful evaluation of PV potentials and by 3D-mapping in 16/22 patients (73%) after PFA-PVI and in 33/44 (75%) after CBA-PVI (P = 1.000). Of 82 initially isolated PVs after PFA-PVI, 31 (38%) were reconducting; of 169 isolated PVs after CBA-PVI, 63 (37%) were reconducting (P = 0.936). Clinical atrial tachycardia occurred similarly in patients after PFA (5/22; 23%) and CBA (7/44; 16%; P = 0.515). Roof lines were set more often after PFA- (8/22; 36%) compared with CBA-PVI (5/44; 11%; P = 0.023). Repeat procedure duration [PFA: 87 (76, 123) min; CBA: 93 (75, 128) min; P = 0.446] was similar and fluoroscopy time [PFA: 11 (9, 14) min; CBA: 11 (8, 14) min; P = 0.739] equal between groups at repeat ablation. Conclusion During repeat ablation after previous PFA- or CBA-based PVI, electrical PV-reconduction rates and patterns were similar. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) is a novel, myocardial-selective, non-thermal ablation modality used to target cardiac arrhythmias. Although prompt electrogram (EGM) signal disappearance is observed immediately after PFA application in the pulmonary veins, whether this finding results in adequate transmural lesions is unknown. The aim of this study is to check whether application repetition and catheter–tissue contact impact lesion formation during PFA. Methods and results A circular loop PFA catheter was used to deliver repeated energy applications with various levels of contact force. A benchtop vegetal potato model and a beating heart ventricular myocardial model were utilized to evaluate the impact of application repetition, contact force, and catheter repositioning on contiguity and lesion depth. Lesion development occurred over 18 h in the vegetal model and over 6 h in the porcine model. Lesion formation was found to be dependent on application repetition and contact. In porcine ventricles, single and multiple stacked applications led to a lesion depth of 3.5 ± 0.7 and 4.4 ± 1.3 mm, respectively (P = 0.002). Furthermore, the greater the catheter–tissue contact, the more contiguous and deeper the lesions in the vegetal model (1.0 ± 0.9 mm with no contact vs. 5.4 ± 1.4 mm with 30 g of force; P = 0.0001). Conclusion Pulsed-field ablation delivered via a circular catheter showed that both repetition and catheter contact led independently to deeper lesion formation. These findings indicate that endpoints for effective PFA are related more to PFA biophysics than to mere EGM attenuation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Non-pulmonary vein (PV) ablation targets such as posterior wall isolation (PWI) have been tested in patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (AF). Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) offers a novel ablation technology possibly able to overcome the obstacles of incomplete PWI and concerns of damage to adjacent structures compared to thermal energy sources. Our aim was to assess procedural characteristics, safety, and mid-term outcomes of patients undergoing PWI using PFA in a clinical setting. Methods: Patients undergoing PFA-PVI with PWI were included. First-pass isolation was controlled using a multipolar mapping catheter. Results: One hundred consecutive patients were included (median age 69 [IQR 63–75] years, 33 females (33%), left atrial size 43 [IQR 39–47] mm, paroxysmal AF 24%). Median procedure time was 66 (IQR 59–77) min, and fluoroscopy time was 11 (8–14) min. PWI using PFA was achieved in 100% of patients with a median of 19 applications (IQR 14–26). There were no major complications. Overall, in 15 patients (15%), recurrent AF/AT was noted during a median follow-up of 144 (94–279) days. Conclusions: PWI using PFA appears safe and results in high acute isolation rates and high arrhythmia survival during mid-term follow-up. Further randomized trials are essential and warranted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Catheter ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) represents a challenge for the electrophysiologist and there are still divergences regarding the best ablative approach to adopt. Create a new map of the duration of atrial bipolar electrograms (Atrial Electrogram DUration Map, AEDUM) to recognize a functional substrate during sinus rhythm and guide a patient-tailored ablative strategy for PsAF. Methods: Forty PsAF subjects were assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either for PVI alone (Group B1) or PVI+AEDUM areas ablation (Group B2). A cohort of 15 patients without AF history undergoing left-sided accessory pathway ablation was used as a control group (Group A). In all patients, voltage and AEDUM maps were created during sinus rhythm. The minimum follow-up was 12 months, with rhythm monitoring via 48-h ECG Holter or by implantable cardiac device. Results: Electrogram (EGM) duration was higher in Group B than in Group A (49±16.2ms vs 34.2±3.8ms; p-value<0.001). In Group B the mean cumulative AEDUM area was 21.8±8.2cm2; no difference between the two subgroups was observed (22.3±9.1cm2 vs 21.2±7.2cm2; p-value=0.45). The overall bipolar voltage recorded inside the AEDUM areas was lower than in the remaining atrial areas [median: 1.30mV (IQR: 0.71–2.38mV) vs 1.54mV (IQR: 0.79–2.97mV); p-value: <0.001)]. Low voltage areas (<0.5mV) were recorded in three (7.5%) patients in Group B. During the follow-up [median 511 days (376–845days)] patients who underwent PVI-only experienced more AF recurrence than those receiving a tailored approach (65% vs 35%; p-value= 0.04). Conclusions: All PsAF patients exhibited AEDUM areas. An ablation approach targeting these areas resulted in a more effective strategy compared with PVI only. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common heart rhythm disorder worldwide. As treatment methods evolve, optimizing personalized therapy based on patient characteristics, such as sex, becomes crucial. This study investigates sex differences in high-power short-duration (HPSD) pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in overweight and obese patients. We analyzed data from 189 overweight and obese patients who underwent HPSD PVI for AF, comparing demographic information, procedural details, outcomes, and complications between male and female patients. Our analysis revealed fewer women underwent PVI compared to men, with women typically older and showing more pronounced changes in the left atrial substrate. Despite these differences, the safety and efficacy of PVI were comparable between sexes, including in the BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2 subgroup and after age adjustment. The findings emphasize the need for early AF screening in women to prevent treatment delays and show that considering sex-specific differences in fat distribution can improve procedural outcomes. These insights support the need for tailored management strategies for AF in overweight and obese populations, addressing sex-specific risks and anatomical variations.

Background: Persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) may require extensive ablation strategies. Left atrial posterior wall isolation (LAPWI) might address potential substrates for recurrence during pulsed-field ablation (PFA). Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the feasibility and effectiveness of LAPWI in addition to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using a pentaspline catheter in PFA for AF. Methods: Comprehensive search was conducted using PubMed, SCOPUS, ScienceDirect, and EuropePMC for studies reporting LAPWI+PVI using a pentaspline catheter in PFA ablation for AF. The primary outcome was atrial tachyarrhythmia (ATa) recurrence, defined as AF/atrial flutter/atrial tachycardia after blanking period. Results: There were 882 patients from 7 studies. The success rate of LAPWI was 100% using mean/median of 16 to 20 added PFA applications with no reported acute left atrial posterior wall reconnection and esophageal complications. In mean follow-up of 240 ± 91 days, ATa recurrence was 21% (95% CI 13%–29%; I2 = 84.8%) in the LAPWI+PVI group. Meta-regression analysis showed that age, left ventricular ejection fraction, and repeat procedure did not significantly influence ATa recurrence (P > .05). Each 1-mm increase in left atrial diameter, increases the chance of ATa recurrence by 6% (R2 = 100%, P < .001, I2 = 0%). Meta-analysis showed no difference in terms of ATa recurrence among LAPWI+PVI patients compared with those without LAPWI (odds ratio 0.78, 95% confidence interval 0.50–1.21, P = .27; I2 = 0%, P = .86). Procedure time and fluoroscopy time did not significantly differ (P > .05). Conclusion: LAPWI using a pentaspline catheter during PFA was feasible and did not prolong the procedure/fluoroscopy but did not reduce ATa recurrence. LAPWI may be considered during PFA, although the benefit is uncertain.

Background: Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is superior to antiarrhythmics for the management of atrial fibrillation, but repeat ablation is often required for durable rhythm control. Factors influencing first-pass isolation (FPI) and whether FPI predicts durable isolation are not well known. Objective: The study sought to determine factors associated with FPI and rates of chronic reconnection among those with and without FPI at index PVI in patients undergoing repeat ablation. Methods: We retrospectively identified 483 patients at our institution who underwent first-time PVI in 2021. Of these, 63 who had repeat ablation between 2021 and 2023 were included in the study. Logistic regression was used for statistical analysis for predictors of FPI during index PVI. Results: The mean age was 65 years, 67% of patients were male, 90% were White, and 73% had persistent atrial fibrillation. At index PVI, FPI was achieved in 58% of left pulmonary veins (PVs), 48% of right PVs, and 25% of posterior wall isolations. Bilateral FPI was achieved in 35% of patients. At redo PVI, the right superior PV (47%) was most frequently reconnected. Lack of PFI of the right PVs at index PVI was associated with a 14-fold risk of chronic reconnection. Elevated left atrial voltage predicted the absence of FPI of the right PVs but not the left PVs. Conclusion: Increased left atrial voltage predicts a lack of FPI in the right PVs but not in the left PVs. Lack of FPI of right PVs predicts chronic reconnection.

Abstract Background CARTONET® enables automatic ablation site classification and reconnection site prediction using machine learning. However, the accuracy of the site classification model and trends of the site prediction model for potential reconnection sites are uncertain. Methods We studied a total of 396 cases. About 313 patients underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), including a cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablation (PVI group) and 83 underwent PVI and additional ablation (i.e., box isolation) (PVI+ group). We investigated the sensitivity and positive predictive value (PPV) for automatic site classification in the total cohort and compared these metrics for PV lesions versus non‐PV lesions. The distribution of potential reconnection sites and confidence level for each site was also investigated. Results A total of 29,422 points were analyzed (PV lesions [n = 22 418], non‐PV lesions [n = 7004]). The sensitivity and PPV of the total cohort were 71.4% and 84.6%, respectively. The sensitivity and PPV of PV lesions were significantly higher than those of non‐PV lesions (PV lesions vs. non‐PV lesions, %; sensitivity, 75.3 vs. 67.5, p

This paper presents a novel approach to gap mapping in pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) for atrial fibrillation (AF) treatment, utilizing the real-time Ripple (RR) technique. Radiofrequency (RF) catheter ablation, particularly encircling PVI, is a common intervention for AF. Identifying left atrium–pulmonary vein conduction gaps is crucial for achieving PVI with minimal additional ablation if first-pass PVI is unsuccessful. However, identifying conduction gaps can be relatively challenging, often necessitating manual electrocardiogram reannotation due to the limitations of local activation time (LAT) maps. In the case of a 63-year-old patient with drug-resistant symptomatic persistent AF, the RR technique was utilized to identify conduction gaps during RF ablation. The technique involved pausing fast anatomical mapping (FAM), activating Ripple map (RM) feature on the CARTO 3 system and acquiring points with an ultrahigh-resolution mapping catheter. This approach revealed that the actual site of earliest activation differs from the LAT map indication, enabling successful PVI.The RM feature's capability to reflect actual excitation propagation without reliance on map annotations was crucial for precise conduction gap identification, overcoming inter-operator variability and inaccuracies of conventional methods. The RR technique not only facilitated real-time analysis during gap mapping but also significantly reduced the procedure time, minimizing potential complications.This case report highlights the efficacy of the RR technique in real-time gap mapping, demonstrating its value in cases where first-pass PVI is unsuccessful. The integration of this technique into PVI procedures can enhance both the accuracy and efficiency of catheter ablation for AF.

Patent foramen ovale (PFO) affects 20%–34% of adults and is associated with strokes and other disorders. The conventional treatment of PFO-related strokes is a closure procedure. The metal device is associated with some adverse events. Our aim was to investigate the efficacy and safety of PFO closure using cryoablation without implantation in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) who underwent pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). We divided the 22 patients with both PFO and AF who underwent PVI via cryoablation into 2 groups: standard PVI + atrial septal (AS) cryoablation group (group 1, n = 11) and standard PVI group (group 2, n = 11). The guidewire accesses the left atrium through the PFO without AS puncture during the procedure. Standard PVI via cryoablation was performed. The cryoballoon was retracted to the right atrium and inflated against the AS post-PVI. Patients in group 1 had cryoablation for 120–150 seconds, whereas patients in group 2 received sham ablation. The co-primary end points were the PFO closure rate and a composite of AF recurrence and stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) events. There were no differences in procedure-related adverse events between the 2 groups. Neither group had an ischemic stroke report at 1-year follow-up. The PFO closure rate at 6 months in group 1 was significantly higher than that in group 2 (7 [63.6%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P =.002). AF recurrence post ablation was comparable in both groups at 3 months (3 [27.3%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P =.269), 6 months (0 vs 0), and 12 months (2 [18.2%%] vs 1 [9.1%]; P =.534) of follow-up. Cryoablation is a safe and effective approach to close PFO in patients with AF undergoing PVI in a single procedure. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The benefit of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) is well established; its efficacy in patients with heart failure preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is less clear. Objective: The objective of the study was to compare AF and heart failure (HF) rehospitalizations after PVI in patients with HFpEF vs HFrEF. Methods: The IBM MarketScan Database was used to identify patients undergoing PVI for AF. Patients were categorized by HF status: absence of HF, presence of HFrEF, or presence of HFpEF. Primary outcomes were HF and arrhythmia hospitalizations after PVI. Results: A total of 32,524 patients were analyzed: 27,900 with no HF (86%), 2948 with HFrEF (9%), and 1676 with HFpEF (5%). Compared with those with no HF, both patients with HFrEF and HFpEF were more likely to be hospitalized for HF (hazard ratio [HR] 7.27; P < .01 for HFrEF and HR 9.46; P < .01 for HFpEF) and for AF (HR 1.17; P < .01 for HFrEF and HR 1.74; P < .01 for HFpEF) after PVI. In matched analysis, 23% of patients with HFrEF and 24% patients with HFpEF demonstrated a reduction in HF hospitalizations (P = .31) and approximately one-third demonstrated decreased arrhythmia rehospitalizations (P = .57) in the 6 months after PVI. Compared with those with HFrEF in longer-term follow-up (>1 year), patients with HFpEF were more likely to have HF (HR 1.30; P < .01) and arrhythmia (HR 1.19; P < .01) rehospitalizations. Conclusion: Reductions in HF and arrhythmia hospitalizations are observed early after PVI across all patients with HF, but patients with HFpEF demonstrate higher HF rehospitalization and arrhythmia recurrence in longer-term follow-up than do patients with HFrEF.

Abstract Background Currently, two types of cryoballoon (CB) systems are available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the POLARx (Boston Scientific) is softer during freezing than the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA‐Pro; Medtronic), it tends to go more deeply into the pulmonary vein (PV), risking PV stenosis. Methods Ninety‐one patients underwent initial CB ablation for paroxysmal AF (AFA‐Pro 56; POLARx 35). Twenty‐six from each group were extracted using propensity score matching. The PV cross‐sectional area (PVA) was measured by tracing the area within the PV plane at 5‐mm intervals from the PV ostium in a distal direction for 20 mm or to the bifurcation in each PV. The PVA was compared before and 3 months after ablation. Results Time to balloon temperatures of −30 and − 40°C was significantly shorter and the nadir temperature was significantly lower with POLARx than with AFA‐Pro. In the left inferior (LI) PV and right superior (RS) PV, the freezing balloon position was significantly deeper in POLARx than in AFA‐pro. The freezing position in RSPV with mild to moderate narrowing was deeper than those without (10.2 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.2 ± 1.8 mm, p = .01). In RSPV, the reduction of PVA tended to be greater with the POLARx than with the AFA‐Pro (26.1% ± 14.1% vs. 19.9% ± 10.3%, p = .07). Conclusion There was no significant difference in the incidence of PV stenosis between POLARx and AFA‐Pro. However, if POLARx goes deep into the PVs, we will still have to be careful.

Abstract Background Despite improvement in treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), a significant proportion of patients still experience recurrence after ablation. This study aims to propose a novel algorithm based on Transformer using surface electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and clinical features can predict AF recurrence. Methods Between October 2018 to December 2021, patients who underwent index radiofrequency ablation for AF with at least one standard 10-second surface ECG during sinus rhythm were enrolled. An end-to-end deep learning framework based on Transformer and a fusion module was used to predict AF recurrence using ECG and clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F1-score. Results A total of 920 patients (median age 61 [IQR 14] years, 66.3% male) were included. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 253 patients (27.5%) experienced AF recurrence. A single deep learning enabled ECG signals identified AF recurrence with an AUROC of 0.769, sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 61.1%, F1 score of 55.6% and overall accuracy of 65.2%. Combining ECG signals and clinical features increased the AUROC to 0.899, sensitivity to 81.1%, specificity to 81.7%, F1 score to 71.7%, and overall accuracy to 81.5%. Conclusions The Transformer algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in predicting AF recurrence. Integrating ECG and clinical features enhanced the models’ performance and may help identify patients at low risk for AF recurrence after index ablation.

Objective: The CABANA study shows that atrial fibrillation (AF) paitents younger than 65 years benefit more from the AF radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFCA) procedure. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of inherent patent foramen ovale (PFO) with a Left-to-Right Shunt on the RFCA procedure in young AF patients. Methods: Based on the presence or absence of inherent PFO, the AF patients were divided into the PFO groups and the non-PFO group. Clinical follow-up was also investigated. Results: A total of 285 AF patients were enrolled. PFO was detected by TEE in 42 patients. The age of patients at initial AF onset was younger in the PFO group than in the non-PFO group (58.3 ± 8.9 vs. 62.3 ± 9.6 years, P = 0.012). There were more AF patients aged

Abstract Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) stands as a widely practiced cardiac ablation procedure on a global scale, conventionally guided by fluoroscopy. The concurrent application of electroanatomical mapping systems (EAMS) and intracardiac echocardiography offers a means to curtail radiation exposure. This study aimed to compare procedural outcomes between conventional and our initial zero-fluoroscopy cases in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing point-by-point PVI. Our prospective observational study included 100 consecutive patients with AF who underwent point-by-point radiofrequency PVI. The standard technique was used in the first 50 cases (Standard group), while the fluoroless technique was used in the subsequent 50 patients (Zero group). The zero-fluoroscopy approach exhibited significantly shorter procedural time (59.6 ± 10.7 min vs. 74.6 ± 13.2 min, p

Abstract Background Persistent Atrial Fibrillation (PeAF) is a challenging case for rhythm control modalities. Catheter ablation is the mainstay in PeAF management; however, data regarding the comparative safety and efficacy of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) versus radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for PeAF is still limited. We aim to compare the safety and efficacy of CBA versus RFA for PeAF ablation. Methods We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing randomized controlled trials (RCTs), which were retrieved by systematically searching PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Cochrane through October 2023. RevMan version 5.4 software was used to pool dichotomous data using risk ratio (RR) and continuous data using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). PROSPERO ID: CRD42023480314. Results Three RCTs with 400 patients were included. There was no significant difference between RFA and CBA regarding AF recurrence (RR: 0.77, 95% CI [0.50, 1.20], P = 0.25), atrial tachycardia or atrial flutter recurrence (RR: 0.54, 95% CI [0.11, 2.76], P = 0.46), and any arrhythmia recurrence (RR: 0.96, 95% CI [0.70, 1.31], P = 0.80). CBA was significantly associated with decreased total procedure duration (MD: − 45.34, 95% CI [− 62.68, − 28.00], P

Abstract Background Periesophageal vagal nerve injury (PNI) is an unpredictable and serious complication of atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. We aimed to identify the factors associated with symptomatic PNI. Methods This study included 1391 patients who underwent ablation index‐guided pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using the CARTO system. The target ablation index was set at 550, except for the left atrial (LA) posterior wall near the esophagus, where radiofrequency (RF) power and duration were limited. Ten patients (0.72%) were diagnosed with symptomatic PNI. We randomly selected 40 patients without PNI (1:4 ratio) matched based on age, sex, body mass index, LA diameter, type of AF, and esophageal location. We measured the shortest distance from the RF lesions to the esophagus (LED) and classified the RF lesions according to the LED into four groups: 0–5, 5–10, 10–15, and 15–20 mm. We conducted a comparative analysis of classified RF lesions between patients with PNI (n = 10) and those without (n = 40). Results The contact force at LED 0–5 mm was significantly higher in patients with PNI than in those without (14.6 ± 1.7 vs. 12.0 ± 2.9 g; p = .01). Multivariate logistic analysis revealed that the independent factor for PNI was contact force at an LED of 0–5 mm (odds ratio: 1.506; 95% confidence interval: 1.053–2.153; p = .025). Conclusions The symptomatic PNI was significantly associated with a higher contact force near the esophagus. Strategies for regulating contact force near the esophagus may aid in the prevention of PNI.

Background: Despite improvement in treatment strategies for atrial fibrillation (AF), a significant proportion of patients still experience recurrence after ablation. This study aims to propose a novel algorithm based on Transformer using surface electrocardiogram (ECG) signals and clinical features can predict AF recurrence. Methods: Between October 2018 to December 2021, patients who underwent index radiofrequency ablation for AF with at least one standard 10-second surface ECG during sinus rhythm were enrolled. An end-to-end deep learning framework based on Transformer and a fusion module was used to predict AF recurrence using ECG and clinical features. Model performance was evaluated using areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy and F1-score. Results: A total of 920 patients (median age 61 [IQR 14] years, 66.3% male) were included. After a median follow-up of 24 months, 253 patients (27.5%) experienced AF recurrence. A single deep learning enabled ECG signals identified AF recurrence with an AUROC of 0.769, sensitivity of 75.5%, specificity of 61.1%, F1 score of 55.6% and overall accuracy of 65.2%. Combining ECG signals and clinical features increased the AUROC to 0.899, sensitivity to 81.1%, specificity to 81.7%, F1 score to 71.7%, and overall accuracy to 81.5%. Conclusions: The Transformer algorithm demonstrated excellent performance in predicting AF recurrence. Integrating ECG and clinical features enhanced the models' performance and may help identify patients at low risk for AF recurrence after index ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The underlying risks of asymptomatic embolization during high‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate microembolic signals (MESs) during HPSD ablation with power settings of 50 and 90 W in comparison with those during cryoballoon (CB) ablation using a novel carotid ultrasound‐Doppler system that classifies solid and air bubble signals using real‐time monitoring. Methods and Results: Forty‐seven patients underwent HPSD ablation using radiofrequency (RF), and 13 underwent CB ablation. MESs were evaluated using a novel pastable soft ultrasound probe equipped with a carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation. We compared the detailed MESs and their timing between RF and CB ablations. The number of MESs and solid signals were significantly higher in the RF group than in CB group (209 ± 229 vs. 79 ± 32, p =.047, and 83 ± 89 vs. 28 ± 17, p =.032, respectively). In RF ablation, the number of MESs, solid, and bubble signals per ablation point, or per second, was significantly higher at 90 W than at 50 W ablation. The MESs, solid, and bubble signals were detected more frequently in the bottom and anterior walls of the left pulmonary vein (LPV) ablation. In contrast, many MESs were observed before the first CB application and decreased chronologically as the procedure progressed. Signals were more prevalent during the CB interval rather than during the freezing time. Among the 28 patients, 4 exhibited a high‐intensity area on postbrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI‐positive group showed a trend of larger signal sizes than did the MRI‐negative group. Conclusion: The number of MESs was higher in the HPSD RF group than in the CB group, with this risk being more pronounced in the 90 W ablation group. The primary detection site was the anterior wall of the LPV in RF and the first interval in CB ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Currently, two types of cryoballoon (CB) systems are available for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF). Since the POLARx (Boston Scientific) is softer during freezing than the Arctic Front Advance Pro (AFA‐Pro; Medtronic), it tends to go more deeply into the pulmonary vein (PV), risking PV stenosis. Methods: Ninety‐one patients underwent initial CB ablation for paroxysmal AF (AFA‐Pro 56; POLARx 35). Twenty‐six from each group were extracted using propensity score matching. The PV cross‐sectional area (PVA) was measured by tracing the area within the PV plane at 5‐mm intervals from the PV ostium in a distal direction for 20 mm or to the bifurcation in each PV. The PVA was compared before and 3 months after ablation. Results: Time to balloon temperatures of −30 and − 40°C was significantly shorter and the nadir temperature was significantly lower with POLARx than with AFA‐Pro. In the left inferior (LI) PV and right superior (RS) PV, the freezing balloon position was significantly deeper in POLARx than in AFA‐pro. The freezing position in RSPV with mild to moderate narrowing was deeper than those without (10.2 ± 3.3 mm vs. 8.2 ± 1.8 mm, p =.01). In RSPV, the reduction of PVA tended to be greater with the POLARx than with the AFA‐Pro (26.1% ± 14.1% vs. 19.9% ± 10.3%, p =.07). Conclusion: There was no significant difference in the incidence of PV stenosis between POLARx and AFA‐Pro. However, if POLARx goes deep into the PVs, we will still have to be careful. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

During pulsed field ablation (PFA), electrode-tissue proximity optimizes lesion quality. A novel "single-shot" map-and-ablate spherical multielectrode PFA array catheter that is able to verify electrode-tissue contact was recently studied in a first-in-human trial of atrial fibrillation (AF). The aim of this study was to report lesion durability data, safety, and 12-month effectiveness outcomes. The spherical PFA catheter, an all-in-one mapping and ablation system, was used to render anatomy and to deliver biphasic pulses (ungated 1.7 kV pulses; ∼40 seconds/application). Ablation sites included pulmonary veins (PVs) and, in selected patients, posterior wall and mitral isthmus. Follow-up was invasive remapping at ∼3 months, electrocardiograms, Holter monitoring at 6 and 12 months, and symptomatic and scheduled transtelephonic monitoring. The primary and secondary efficacy end points were acute PV isolation (PVI), PVI durability, and atrial arrhythmia recurrence. In the 48-patient AF cohort (paroxysmal, 48%; persistent, 52%), lesion sets included PVI (n = 48; 1.2 applications/PV), posterior wall (n = 20; 3.6 applications/posterior wall), and mitral isthmus (n = 11; 2.9 applications/mitral isthmus). Lesions were acutely successful for all 187 of 187 PVs (100%), 20 of 20 posterior walls (100%), and 10 of 11 mitral isthmuses (91%). Pulse delivery time, left atrial catheter dwell time, and procedure time were 61.5 ± 32.8 seconds, 53.9 ± 26.5 minutes, and 87.8 ± 29.8 minutes, respectively. Remapping (43/48 patients [89.5%]) revealed that 158 of 169 PVs (93.5%) were durably isolated. The only complication was a drug-responsive pericarditis. The 1-year Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from atrial arrhythmia were 84.2% (paroxysmal AF) and 80.0% (persistent AF). The single-shot spherical array PFA catheter can safely achieve durable lesions, translating into good clinical efficacy. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulsed-field ablation (PFA) has shown promising data in terms of safety and procedural efficiency for pulmonary vein isolation (PVI), with similar long-term outcomes compared to radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and cryoballoon ablation (CBA) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF). The purpose of this study was to compare the procedural and long-term outcomes in patients with persistent AF undergoing PVI using PFA, CBA, or RFA. Consecutive patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI with PFA, CBA, or RFA were included. Patients underwent 7-day Holter electrocardiography at 3, 6, and 12 months postablation. The primary outcome was recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia after a 90-day blanking period. Safety outcomes included the composite of in-hospital major adverse events. A total of 533 patients with persistent AF underwent PVI using PFA (n = 214, 39%), CBA (n = 190, 36%), or RFA (n = 129, 24%). Procedures with PFA guided by fluoroscopy were shorter than those with CBA (median 60 minutes; interquartile range [IQR] 53–80 minutes vs 84 minutes; IQR 68–101 minutes; P ≤.001), and procedures with PFA in combination with 3-dimensional electroanatomic mapping were shorter than those with RFA (median 101 minutes; IQR 85–126 minutes vs 171 minutes; IQR 141–204 minutes; P <.001). Acute safety events occurred in 2.3%, 2.6%, and 0.8% in the PFA, CBA, and RFA groups, respectively (P =.545). The 1-year confounder-adjusted estimate for freedom from atrial arrhythmias was 62.1% for CBA, 55.3% for PFA, and 48.3% for RFA (CBA vs PFA: P =.79; CBA vs RFA: P =.009; PFA vs RFA: P =.010). In patients with persistent AF undergoing first PVI, 1-year confounder-adjusted outcomes are better with PFA and CBA than with RFA. [Display omitted] [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background and objectives: Long-term oral anticoagulation (OAC) following successful catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) remains controversial. Prospective data are missing. The ODIn-AF study aimed to evaluate the effect of OAC on the incidence of silent cerebral embolic events and clinically relevant cardioembolic events in patients at intermediate to high risk for embolic events, free from AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). Methods: This prospective, randomized, multicenter, open-label, blinded endpoint interventional trial enrolled patients who were scheduled for PVI to treat paroxysmal or persistent AF. Six months after PVI, AF-free patients were randomized to receive either continued OAC with dabigatran or no OAC. The primary endpoint was the incidence of new silent micro- and macro-embolic lesions detected on brain MRI at 12 months of follow-up compared to baseline. Safety analysis included bleedings, clinically evident cardioembolic, and serious adverse events (SAE). Results: Between 2015 and 2021, 200 patients were randomized into 2 study arms (on OAC: n = 99, off OAC: n = 101). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of new cerebral microlesions between the on OAC and off OAC arm [2 (2%) versus 0 (0%); P = 0.1517] after 12 months. MRI showed no new macro-embolic lesion, no clinical apparent strokes were present in both groups. SAE were more frequent in the OAC arm [on OAC n = 34 (31.8%), off OAC n = 18 (19.4%); P = 0.0460]; bleedings did not differ. Conclusion: Discontinuation of OAC after successful PVI was not found to be associated with an elevated risk of cerebral embolic events compared with continued OAC after a follow-up of 12 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Although previous studies have shown the isolated areas after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) using cryoballoons (CB) (CB-PVI), no studies have investigated the association between the isolated area and recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and atrial tachycardia (AT). This single-center observational study investigated the association between the ablated area and recurrence rate after durable CB-PVI for paroxysmal AF. Methods: This study included 76 patients with paroxysmal AF who underwent CB-PVI and established durable PVI with a second procedure, regardless of AF/AT recurrence, 6 months after the first procedure. To compare the ablated zones, we quantified the left- and right-sided PV antral isolation areas and non-ablated posterior wall (PW) area. We examined non-ablated areas of the PW and AF/AT recurrence in the chronic phase. Results: In total, 16 of the 76 patients had AF/AT recurrence. The mean follow-up duration was 34 months. The non-ablated PW area (14.0 ± 4.6 cm2 vs. 11.5 ± 3.7 cm2; p = 0.0213) and the ratio of the non-ablated PW area to the whole PW area (NAPW) (52.9 ± 9.1% vs. 44.8 ± 9.8%; p = 0.003) were significantly higher in the AF/AT recurrence group than in the AF/AT non-recurrence group. NAPW > 50% was an independent predictor of AF/AT recurrence. Conclusion: The NAPW after durable CB-PVI is associated with AF/AT recurrence. PW isolation or additional applications on the PV antrum with cryoballoon may be considered in addition to PVI in paroxysmal AF, especially in patients with dilated left atria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) stands as a widely practiced cardiac ablation procedure on a global scale, conventionally guided by fluoroscopy. The concurrent application of electroanatomical mapping systems (EAMS) and intracardiac echocardiography offers a means to curtail radiation exposure. This study aimed to compare procedural outcomes between conventional and our initial zero-fluoroscopy cases in patients with paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation (AF), undergoing point-by-point PVI. Our prospective observational study included 100 consecutive patients with AF who underwent point-by-point radiofrequency PVI. The standard technique was used in the first 50 cases (Standard group), while the fluoroless technique was used in the subsequent 50 patients (Zero group). The zero-fluoroscopy approach exhibited significantly shorter procedural time (59.6 ± 10.7 min vs. 74.6 ± 13.2 min, p < 0.0001), attributed to a reduced access time (17 [16; 20] min vs. 31 [23; 34.5] min, p < 0.001). Comparable results were found for the number of RF applications, total ablation energy, and left atrial dwelling time. In the Zero group, all procedures were achieved without fluoroscopy, resulting in significantly lower fluoroscopy time (0 [0; 0] sec vs. 132 [100; 160] sec, p < 0.0001) and dose (0 [0; 0] mGy vs. 4.8 [4.1; 8.2] mGy, p < 0.0001). The acute success rate was 100%, with no major complications. Zero-fluoroscopy PVI is feasible, safe, and associated with shorter procedure times compared to the standard approach, even in cases without prior experience in zero-fluoroscopy PVI. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Management of atrial fibrillation (AF) in very severe obese patients is challenging. Cryoballoon ablation (CBA) represents an effective rhythm control strategy. However, data in this patient group were limited. Methods: Highly symptomatic AF patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥ 40 kg/m2 who had failed antiarrhythmic drug therapy and electrocardioversion and failure to achieve targeted body‐weight‐reduction underwent CBA. Results: Data of 72 very severe obese AF patients (Group A) and 129 AF patients with normal BMI (Group B, BMI < 25 kg/m2) were consecutively collected. Group A had significantly younger age (60.6 ± 10.4 vs. 69.2 ± 11.2 years), higher BMI (44.3 ± 4.3 vs. 22.5 ± 1.6 kg/m2). Procedural pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) was successful in all patients (2 touch‐up ablation in Group A). Compared to Group B, Group A had similar procedural (61.3 ± 22.6 vs. 57.5 ± 19 min), similar fluoroscopy time (10.1 ± 5.5 vs. 9.2 ± 4.8 min) but significantly higher radiation dose (2852 ± 2095 vs. 884 ± 732 µGym2). We observed similar rates of real‐time‐isolation (78.6% vs. 78.5%), single‐shot‐isolation (86.5% vs. 88.8%), but significantly longer time‐to‐sustained‐isolation (53.5 ± 33 vs. 43.2 ± 25 s). There was significantly higher rate of puncture‐site‐complication (6.9% vs. 1.6%) in Group A. One‐year clinical success in paroxysmal AF was (Group A: 69.4% vs. Group B: 80.2%; p <.001), in persistent AF was (Group A: 58.1% vs. Group B: 62.8%; p =.889). In Re‐Do procedures Group A had a numerically lower PVI durability (75.0% vs. 83.6%, p =.089). Conclusion: For very severe obese AF patients, CBA appears feasible, leads to relatively good clinical outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: According to current guidelines, pulmonary vein isolation as first‐line therapy should be considered for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), however, optimal timing of the procedure is still unknown in patients with heart failure (HF). We aimed to evaluate the effect of early catheter ablation (CA) in patients with HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below 50%. Methods: We analyzed data from a structured registry comprising 227 patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and HF with LVEF < 50% who underwent radiofrequency CA between 2015 and 2022. Early CA was defined as a procedure performed within 12 months of AF diagnosis. The median follow‐up duration was 1748 (1176.3–2353.5) days, with a minimum follow‐up of 365 days. Our endpoints were AF recurrence after a 3‐months blanking period and all‐cause mortality. Results: Among the 227 patients with a median age of 64.3 years, 97 (42.7%) experienced AF recurrence and 55 (24.2%) died during the follow‐up period. The median LVEF was 40% for early CA and 38% for delayed CA (p =.053). Early CA significantly reduced AF recurrence (HR = 0.25 [0.15–0.42], p <.001), however, the timing of procedure did not affect all‐cause mortality (p =.16). These findings were consistent regardless of AF subtype or the burden of comorbidities, as assessed by the CHA2DS2‐VASc score. Conclusion: The timing of CA of AF appears to be an important factor in patients with HF. Early CA reduced AF recurrence, although it does not impact all‐cause mortality. We found similar results regardless of AF subtype or burden of comorbidities. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Numerous P‐wave indices have been explored as biomarkers to assess atrial fibrillation (AF) risk and the impact of therapy with variable success. Objective: We investigated the utility of P‐wave alternans (PWA) to track the effects of pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) and to predict atrial arrhythmia recurrence. Methods: This medical records study included patients who underwent PVI for AF ablation at our institution, along with 20 control subjects without AF or overt cardiovascular disease. PWA was assessed using novel artificial intelligence‐enabled modified moving average (AI‐MMA) algorithms. PWA was monitored from the 12‐lead ECG at ~1 h before and ~16 h after PVI (n = 45) and at the 4‐ to 17‐week clinically indicated follow‐up visit (n = 30). The arrhythmia follow‐up period was 955 ± 112 days. Results: PVI acutely reduced PWA by 48%–63% (p <.05) to control ranges in leads II, III, aVF, the leads with the greatest sensitivity in monitoring PWA. Pre‐ablation PWA was ~6 µV and decreased to ~3 µV following ablation. Patients who exhibited a rebound in PWA to pre‐ablation levels at 4‐ to 17‐week follow‐up (p <.01) experienced recurrent atrial arrhythmias, whereas patients whose PWA remained reduced (p =.85) did not, resulting in a significant difference (p <.001) at follow‐up. The AUC for PWA's prediction of first recurrence of atrial arrhythmia was 0.81 (p <.01) with 88% sensitivity and 82% specificity. Kaplan–Meier analysis estimated atrial arrhythmia‐free survival (p <.01) with an adjusted hazard ratio of 3.4 (95% CI: 1.47–5.24, p <.02). Conclusion: A rebound in PWA to pre‐ablation levels detected by AI‐MMA in the 12‐lead ECG at standard clinical follow‐up predicts atrial arrhythmia recurrence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]