Back to Search Start Over

Evaluation of microembolic signals on carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation with high‐power short‐duration and cryoballoon ablations: When and where do bubble and solid emboli arise?

Authors :
Mizutani, Yoshiaki
Yanagisawa, Satoshi
Ichikawa, Mizuki
Nishio, Keisuke
Sakai, Hiroya
Nonokawa, Daishi
Makino, Yuichiro
Suzuki, Hitomi
Ichimiya, Hitoshi
Uchida, Yasuhiro
Watanabe, Junji
Kanashiro, Masaaki
Inden, Yasuya
Murohara, Toyoaki
Source :
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology. Aug2024, Vol. 35 Issue 8, p1589-1600. 12p.
Publication Year :
2024

Abstract

Introduction: The underlying risks of asymptomatic embolization during high‐power short‐duration (HPSD) ablation for atrial fibrillation remain unclear. We aimed to evaluate microembolic signals (MESs) during HPSD ablation with power settings of 50 and 90 W in comparison with those during cryoballoon (CB) ablation using a novel carotid ultrasound‐Doppler system that classifies solid and air bubble signals using real‐time monitoring. Methods and Results: Forty‐seven patients underwent HPSD ablation using radiofrequency (RF), and 13 underwent CB ablation. MESs were evaluated using a novel pastable soft ultrasound probe equipped with a carotid ultrasound during pulmonary vein isolation. We compared the detailed MESs and their timing between RF and CB ablations. The number of MESs and solid signals were significantly higher in the RF group than in CB group (209 ± 229 vs. 79 ± 32, p =.047, and 83 ± 89 vs. 28 ± 17, p =.032, respectively). In RF ablation, the number of MESs, solid, and bubble signals per ablation point, or per second, was significantly higher at 90 W than at 50 W ablation. The MESs, solid, and bubble signals were detected more frequently in the bottom and anterior walls of the left pulmonary vein (LPV) ablation. In contrast, many MESs were observed before the first CB application and decreased chronologically as the procedure progressed. Signals were more prevalent during the CB interval rather than during the freezing time. Among the 28 patients, 4 exhibited a high‐intensity area on postbrain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The MRI‐positive group showed a trend of larger signal sizes than did the MRI‐negative group. Conclusion: The number of MESs was higher in the HPSD RF group than in the CB group, with this risk being more pronounced in the 90 W ablation group. The primary detection site was the anterior wall of the LPV in RF and the first interval in CB ablation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
10453873
Volume :
35
Issue :
8
Database :
Academic Search Index
Journal :
Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
178782787
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.16337