Search

In addition to zinc oxide-based cements, resin-based materials are also available for temporary cementation. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of the different material compositions on temporary bonds. In nine test series (n = 30), temporary bis-acrylate single-tooth crowns were bonded onto prefabricated titanium abutments with nine different temporary luting materials. After simulating an initial (24 h, distilled water, 37 °C), a short-term (7 days, distilled water, 37 °C) and a long-term provisional restoration period (12h, distilled water, 37 °C; thermocycling: 5000 cycles) in subgroups (n = 10), the bond strength was examined using a combined tensile–shear test. Statistical analysis was performed by univariate analysis of variance or a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by post hoc tests. Of the three resin-based materials, two showed significantly higher bond strength values compared to all other materials (p < 0.001), regardless of the storage procedure. The resin-based materials were followed by eugenol-free and eugenol-containing zinc oxide materials. Significant intragroup differences were observed between the composite-based materials after all storage periods. This was only observed for some of the zinc oxide-based materials. The results show that under in vitro conditions, not only the composition of the temporary luting materials but also the different storage conditions have a significant influence on temporary bonds. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Provisional fixed partial dentures represent a critical phase in dental treatment, necessitating heightened mechanical durability, particularly in comprehensive and extended treatment plans. Strengthening these structures with various reinforcing materials offers a method to enhance their resilience. Utilizing a three-point testing methodology on standardized trial specimens allows for a comparative assessment of various materials and reinforcement techniques for pre-prosthetic applications. This study aims to validate and assess the significance of integrating different reinforcing materials into standardized test bodies. The study focuses on test specimens comprising three types of unreinforced laboratory and clinical polymers for provisional constructions (n = 6)—heat-cured PMMA (Superpont C+B, Spofa Dental, Czech Republic), CAD-CAM prefabricated PMMA (DD temp MED, Dental Direkt, Germany), CAD-CAM printing resin (Temporary CB Resin, FormLabs, USA), self-polymerizing PEMA (DENTALON plus, Kulzer, Germany), light-polymerizing composite (Revotek LC, GC, Japan), and dual-polymerizing composite (TempSpan, Pentron, USA). Additionally, laboratory polymers are evaluated in groups with five types of reinforcing filaments (n = 15)—Glass Fiber (Fiber Splint One-Layer, Polydentia, Switzerland), Polyethylene thread (Ribbond Regular 4.0 mm, Ribbond Inc., USA), triple-stranded chrome-cobalt wire for splinting 015″ (Leone S.p.a., Italy), Aesthetic ligature wire 012″ (Leone S.p.a., Italy), and Glass Fiber coated with light-cured composite 8.5 × 0.2 mm (Interlig, Angelus, Brazil). Analysis of the data using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) reveals that the experimental bodies, produced via the subtractive digital method using PMMA (DD temp MED, Dental Direkt GmbH, Germany) as the polymer and glass filaments as the reinforcement, exhibit superior mechanical properties, particularly when pre-wetted with Interlig liquid composite (Angelus, Brazil). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In addition to zinc oxide-based cements, resin-based materials are also available for temporary cementation. The aim of this in vitro study was to determine the influence of the different material compositions on temporary bonds. In nine test series (n = 30), temporary bis-acrylate single-tooth crowns were bonded onto prefabricated titanium abutments with nine different temporary luting materials. After simulating an initial (24 h, distilled water, 37 °C), a short-term (7 days, distilled water, 37 °C) and a long-term provisional restoration period (12h, distilled water, 37 °C; thermocycling: 5000 cycles) in subgroups (n = 10), the bond strength was examined using a combined tensile–shear test. Statistical analysis was performed by univariate analysis of variance or a non-parametric Kruskal–Wallis test, followed by post hoc tests. Of the three resin-based materials, two showed significantly higher bond strength values compared to all other materials (p < 0.001), regardless of the storage procedure. The resin-based materials were followed by eugenol-free and eugenol-containing zinc oxide materials. Significant intragroup differences were observed between the composite-based materials after all storage periods. This was only observed for some of the zinc oxide-based materials. The results show that under in vitro conditions, not only the composition of the temporary luting materials but also the different storage conditions have a significant influence on temporary bonds.

Provisional fixed partial dentures represent a critical phase in dental treatment, necessitating heightened mechanical durability, particularly in comprehensive and extended treatment plans. Strengthening these structures with various reinforcing materials offers a method to enhance their resilience. Utilizing a three-point testing methodology on standardized trial specimens allows for a comparative assessment of various materials and reinforcement techniques for pre-prosthetic applications. This study aims to validate and assess the significance of integrating different reinforcing materials into standardized test bodies. The study focuses on test specimens comprising three types of unreinforced laboratory and clinical polymers for provisional constructions (n = 6)—heat-cured PMMA (Superpont C+B, Spofa Dental, Czech Republic), CAD-CAM prefabricated PMMA (DD temp MED, Dental Direkt, Germany), CAD-CAM printing resin (Temporary CB Resin, FormLabs, USA), self-polymerizing PEMA (DENTALON plus, Kulzer, Germany), light-polymerizing composite (Revotek LC, GC, Japan), and dual-polymerizing composite (TempSpan, Pentron, USA). Additionally, laboratory polymers are evaluated in groups with five types of reinforcing filaments (n = 15)—Glass Fiber (Fiber Splint One-Layer, Polydentia, Switzerland), Polyethylene thread (Ribbond Regular 4.0 mm, Ribbond Inc., USA), triple-stranded chrome-cobalt wire for splinting 015″ (Leone S.p.a., Italy), Aesthetic ligature wire 012″ (Leone S.p.a., Italy), and Glass Fiber coated with light-cured composite 8.5 × 0.2 mm (Interlig, Angelus, Brazil). Analysis of the data using Generalized Linear Models (GLMs) reveals that the experimental bodies, produced via the subtractive digital method using PMMA (DD temp MED, Dental Direkt GmbH, Germany) as the polymer and glass filaments as the reinforcement, exhibit superior mechanical properties, particularly when pre-wetted with Interlig liquid composite (Angelus, Brazil).

DOI: 10.26650/eor.2018.35588Purpose The present study aimed to evaluate the color stability of provisional restorative materials stored in different mouth rinses and green tea extract for 14 days. Materials and methods Forty cylinders of fixed provisional restoration material of 15-mm diameter and 2-mm thickness were prepared. The samples were separated into four storage solutions (three different mouth rinses and green tea) (n=10). The values of L*, a*, and b* were determined before and after storage in the solutions using a spectrophotometer, and the ΔE* value was calculated. The effect of mouth rinses and green tea extract on the color change of provisional restoration materials was determined with one -way analyses of variance. The Tamhane multiple comparison analysis was used to determine the differences between the groups (p

The present study aimed to evaluate the color stability of provisional restorative materials stored in different mouth rinses and green tea extract for 14 days. Materials and methods Forty cylinders of fixed provisional restoration material of 15-mm diameter and 2-mm thickness were prepared. The samples were separated into four storage solutions (three different mouth rinses and green tea) (n=10). The values of L*, a*, and b* were determined before and after storage in the solutions using a spectrophotometer, and the ΔE* value was calculated. The effect of mouth rinses and green tea extract on the color change of provisional restoration materials was determined with one -way analyses of variance. The Tamhane multiple comparison analysis was used to determine the differences between the groups (p

Purpose The present study aimed to evaluate the color stability of provisional restorative materials stored in different mouth rinses and green tea extract for 14 days. Materials and methods Forty cylinders of fixed provisional restoration material of 15-mm diameter and 2-mm thickness were prepared. The samples were separated into four storage solutions (three different mouth rinses and green tea) (n=10). The values of L*, a*, and b* were determined before and after storage in the solutions using a spectrophotometer, and the ΔE* value was calculated. The effect of mouth rinses and green tea extract on the color change of provisional restoration materials was determined with one -way analyses of variance. The Tamhane multiple comparison analysis was used to determine the differences between the groups (p<0.05). Results The color stability of the provisional restoration materials varies depending on the solution. Listerine mouth rinse showed more color change than Sensodyne or Colgate did. Minimal color change was found in the green tea solution. Conclusion The effect of mouth rinses on the color stability of fixed temporary restorative materials is remarkable. As green tea shows less color change, it can be suggested as an alternative to mouth rinses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: The present study aimed to evaluate the color stability of provisional restorative materials stored in different mouth rinses and green tea extract for 14 days., Materials and Methods: Forty cylinders of fixed provisional restoration material of 15-mm diameter and 2-mm thickness were prepared. The samples were separated into four storage solutions (three different mouth rinses and green tea) (n=10). The values of L*, a*, and b* were determined before and after storage in the solutions using a spectrophotometer, and the ΔE* value was calculated. The effect of mouth rinses and green tea extract on the color change of provisional restoration materials was determined with one-way analyses of variance. The Tamhane multiple comparison analysis was used to determine the differences between the groups (p<0.05)., Results: The color stability of the provisional restoration materials varies depending on the solution. Listerine mouth rinse showed more color change than Sensodyne or Colgate did. Minimal color change was found in the green tea solution., Conclusion: The effect of mouth rinses on the color stability of fixed temporary restorative materials is remarkable. As green tea shows less color change, it can be suggested as an alternative to mouth rinses., Competing Interests: Conflict of Interest: The authors declared that they have no conflict of interest.