Search

Introduction: This study evaluated 10-year results of implanting one iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent during cataract surgery in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. Methods: This retrospective, non-randomized study examined 10-year outcomes of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation with cataract surgery by one surgeon in eyes with OAG [including primary OAG (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG)] or ocular hypertension at a multi-specialty German ophthalmology center. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and at 2.5, 3, 5, and 10 years postoperatively; examinations included intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), and adverse events. Results: A total of 63 eyes of 45 patients with OAG (n = 60 eyes) or ocular hypertension (n = 3 eyes) and data through 10 years were analyzed. Mean preoperative IOP was 18.6 ± 4.4 mmHg on 1.83 ± 1.03 mean medications. At study visits through 10 years postoperative, mean IOP reduced by 12.9–19.0% (p < 0.005 at all points), and mean medication burden reduced by 37.8–51.4% (p ≤ 0.006 at all points). At 10 years postoperatively, 77.8% of eyes had IOP ≤ 18 mmHg and 47.6% had IOP ≤ 15 mmHg (vs. 50.8% and 25.4% preoperatively, respectively; p = 0.016). One-third (33.3%) of eyes were medication-free vs. 3.2% preoperatively (p < 0.001); 17.5% were on 2–5 medications (vs. 55.6% preoperatively, p = 0.005); and 93.7% of eyes were on the same or fewer medications vs. preoperative. Post-phacoemulsification CDVA improvement was maintained; no filtering surgeries were completed over 10-year follow-up. Conclusions: Significant and safe IOP and medication reductions were observed through 10 years after iStent implantation with cataract surgery in patients with OAG or ocular hypertension. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction This study evaluated 10-year results of implanting one iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent during cataract surgery in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension. Methods This retrospective, non-randomized study examined 10-year outcomes of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent implantation with cataract surgery by one surgeon in eyes with OAG [including primary OAG (POAG) and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG)] or ocular hypertension at a multi-specialty German ophthalmology center. Study visits were conducted preoperatively and at 2.5, 3, 5, and 10 years postoperatively; examinations included intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected-distance visual acuity (CDVA), and adverse events. Results A total of 63 eyes of 45 patients with OAG (n = 60 eyes) or ocular hypertension (n = 3 eyes) and data through 10 years were analyzed. Mean preoperative IOP was 18.6 ± 4.4 mmHg on 1.83 ± 1.03 mean medications. At study visits through 10 years postoperative, mean IOP reduced by 12.9–19.0% (p

Introduction: This study reports the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®; Glaukos Corp., San Clemente, CA, USA) for medically controlled open-angle glaucoma in Korean patients. Methods: This retrospective observational study included 42 eyes of 35 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). All subjects underwent single first-generation iStent® implantation with phacoemulsification by a single surgeon with 5 years follow-up. The primary outcomes were changes in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications compared to the preoperative values. The secondary outcome was the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, ≤ 15 mmHg without medication, and ≤ 18 mmHg with or without medication. Adverse events and need for secondary glaucoma surgery were also recorded. Results: The mean IOP decreased from 15.8 ± 2.8 to 13.8 ± 1.7 mmHg and the mean number of medications was reduced from 2.24 ± 1.18 to 0.83 ± 1.12, respectively, at year 5. At 3 and 5 years, 80.6% and 78.6% of eyes, respectively, were receiving fewer medications than preoperative numbers. In contrast, only 50% of eyes on four preoperative medications showed medication reductions at 5 years. At years 3 and 5, 61.3% and 53.5% of eyes achieved IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, whereas 90.3% and 89.3% of eyes achieved ≤ 18 mmHg regardless of medication use, respectively. Four eyes required additional glaucoma surgery (two Ahmed glaucoma valve implantations, one trabeculectomy, and one XEN 45 Gel Stent implantation), and all were receiving four preoperative antiglaucoma medications. Transient IOP elevation (14.3%) was the most common complication, followed by five hyphema, one stent obstruction, one stent malposition, and one severe anterior chamber reaction. Conclusion: This study demonstrated a good safety profile and sustained IOP reduction after the implantation of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®) with phacoemulsification in Korean patients. The majority of subjects with POAG showed a relatively good response; however, eyes receiving a higher number of medications preoperatively (especially four medications) had difficulty achieving a low target IOP. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of the study was to compare the quantity, type of glaucoma surgeries, and the disease stage before and during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. This was a retrospective, single-centre consecutive case series that included medical records of patients who underwent glaucoma surgery at the University Hospital in Białystok between 4 September, 2018, and 3 March, 2020 (pre-pandemic group) and compared it with patients treated between 4 March, 2020, and 4 September, 2021 (pandemic group). Adult patients with primary or secondary open-angle or closed-angle glaucoma who underwent surgery were included in this study. Finally, 534 operated eyes (362 and 172 eyes operated on before and during the pandemic, respectively) were examined. The number of glaucoma surgeries dropped by 50% during the pandemic compared to a similar pre-pandemic period, with a significant difference in the kind of procedure between the two groups (p < 0.001). The most common procedures in the pre-pandemic group were Ex-Press implantation (33.7%) and trabeculectomy (31.5%). Within the pandemic group, half of the eyes underwent trabeculectomy (50.0%), followed by Preserflo microshunt (11.6%), iStent (8.7%), and transscleral cyclophotocoagulation (TSCP) (8.7%). A significant difference in the average intraocular pressure was revealed among patients who qualified for surgery. The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a decrease in the number of extended antiglaucoma procedures and an increase in the number of short procedures performed, such as TSCP and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery. Our study has shown the negative impact of the COVID-19 pandemic in reducing the number of antiglaucoma procedures. The number of glaucoma surgeries dropped by 50% during the pandemic compared to those in a similar pre-pandemic period, and the type of performed procedures has changed. The COVID-19 pandemic is associated with a decrease in the number of combined antiglaucoma procedures, in opposite: the number of minimally invasive glaucoma surgeries increased due to safety reasons. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Introduction This study reports the long-term intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®; Glaukos Corp., San Clemente, CA, USA) for medically controlled open-angle glaucoma in Korean patients. Methods This retrospective observational study included 42 eyes of 35 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG). All subjects underwent single first-generation iStent® implantation with phacoemulsification by a single surgeon with 5 years follow-up. The primary outcomes were changes in IOP and the number of antiglaucoma medications compared to the preoperative values. The secondary outcome was the proportion of eyes with IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, ≤ 15 mmHg without medication, and ≤ 18 mmHg with or without medication. Adverse events and need for secondary glaucoma surgery were also recorded. Results The mean IOP decreased from 15.8 ± 2.8 to 13.8 ± 1.7 mmHg and the mean number of medications was reduced from 2.24 ± 1.18 to 0.83 ± 1.12, respectively, at year 5. At 3 and 5 years, 80.6% and 78.6% of eyes, respectively, were receiving fewer medications than preoperative numbers. In contrast, only 50% of eyes on four preoperative medications showed medication reductions at 5 years. At years 3 and 5, 61.3% and 53.5% of eyes achieved IOP ≤ 18 mmHg without medication, whereas 90.3% and 89.3% of eyes achieved ≤ 18 mmHg regardless of medication use, respectively. Four eyes required additional glaucoma surgery (two Ahmed glaucoma valve implantations, one trabeculectomy, and one XEN 45 Gel Stent implantation), and all were receiving four preoperative antiglaucoma medications. Transient IOP elevation (14.3%) was the most common complication, followed by five hyphema, one stent obstruction, one stent malposition, and one severe anterior chamber reaction. Conclusion This study demonstrated a good safety profile and sustained IOP reduction after the implantation of a single trabecular microbypass stent (iStent®) with phacoemulsification in Korean patients. The majority of subjects with POAG showed a relatively good response; however, eyes receiving a higher number of medications preoperatively (especially four medications) had difficulty achieving a low target IOP.

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. Methods A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. Results There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were − 0.64 ± 1.4 and − 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were − 2.1 ± 3.3 and − 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). Conclusion LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups.

Isabella V Wagner,1 Bryan Ang,2 Leticia Checo,1 Derya Simsek,3 Christian Draper,1 Syril Dorairaj1 1Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, FL, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, Singapore; 3Department of Ophthalmology, Baskent University Medical School, Ankara, TurkeyCorrespondence: Syril Dorairaj, Department of Ophthalmology, Mayo Clinic, 4500 San Pablo Road, Jacksonville, FL, USA, Tel +1 904-953-2377, Fax +1 904-953-7040, Email dorairaj.syril@mayo.eduAbstract: Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has revolutionized glaucoma care with its favorable safety profile and ability to delay or minimize the need for traditional, bleb-based procedures. Microstent device implantation is a type of angle-based MIGS, which reduces intraocular pressure (IOP) through bypass of the juxtacanalicular trabecular meshwork (TM) and facilitation of aqueous outflow into the Schlemm’s canal. Although there are limited microstent devices on the market, multiple studies have evaluated the safety and efficacy of iStent® (Glaukos Corp.), iStent Inject® (Glaukos Corp.), and Hydrus® Microstent (Alcon) in the treatment of mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma, with and without concurrent phacoemulsification. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive evaluation of injectable angle-based microstent MIGS devices in the treatment of glaucoma.Keywords: microstent injection, Schlemm’s canal, Hydrus microstent, iStent, glaucoma, aqueous outflow

Abstract Background We report a case with two connected stents ejected simultaneously during an iStent inject W surgery, a modified second-generation iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass System. Case presentation A 57-year-old woman with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent a combined cataract and iStent inject W surgery in her left eye. After the trabecular meshwork/Schlemm’s canal was pierced by the trocar of injector, the delivery button was pressed a first time, but the stent was not ejected. After the button was pressed a second time, connected two stents were ejected. After removing the dislocated stents from the anterior chamber, two stents were implanted into the desired places using another injector. Except for mild hyphema, no postoperative complication occurred. Stereomicroscopic observation showed that the two stents were connected by a broken trocar shaft. An X-ray showed that the trocar shaft was broken at the part referred to as the “sprayed trocar”. Scanning electron microscopy showed that the surface features of the broken trocar and trocar tip represented tensile failure. Conclusions Although rare, considering that the damage was seen at the structurally weak part (i.e., sprayed trocar), the same phenomenon can happen. For patient safety, surgeons are recommended to inspect the device when the deployment of either the first or second stent is unsuccessful during the iStent inject surgery.

PurposeMicro-invasive glaucoma surgery involves a group of treatment methods associated with a low rate of side effects and good effectiveness outcomes. One of the most frequently performed procedures belonging to this group is iStent microstent implantation. The aim of this study was to perform a retrospective evaluation of the safety and efficacy of a combined procedure involving cataract phacoemulsification and single iStent microstent implantation, performed simultaneously.Materials and methodsThe complete medical records of 62 patients (91 eyes) were analyzed retrospectively, including the best corrected visual acuity, intraocular pressure, the mean defect of visual fields, and the number of active substances used in eye drops. The follow-up times were 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after the surgical procedure.ResultsA significant improvement in the best corrected visual acuity and a reduction of the intraocular pressure were achieved after the surgery. On average, after 12 months, the best corrected visual acuity improved from 0.70 (0.25) to 0.91 (0.18; p = 0.001), the intraocular pressure reduced from 17.76 (3.95) to 14.91 (3.04; p = 0.0001), and the number of active substances used in eye drops reduced from 2.07 (1.08) to 0.70 (0.06; p = 0001). In addition, we found that patients who initially showed higher intraocular pressure values did not benefit from surgery in the aspect of the number of active substances used in their eye drops. Intraoperative and postoperative adverse events were transient and ultimately did not affect the outcomes.ConclusionSimultaneous cataract phacoemulsification with single iStent implantation in patients with open-angle glaucoma is a safe and effective method for reducing intraocular pressure and the number of topical medications that must be used. Having initially higher intraocular pressure values may limit the beneficial effects of iStent implantation by subordinating patients from topical treatment; thus, single iStent implantation may not be the most favorable choice in uncontrolled glaucoma cases.

Introduction: The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. Methods: A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. Results: There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were − 0.64 ± 1.4 and − 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were − 2.1 ± 3.3 and − 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). Conclusion: LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

This prospective, non-randomized, interventional clinical study evaluated the efficacy and safety profile of first-generation iStent bypass implantation versus ab externo canaloplasty, both combined with phacoemulsification, in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) after 12-month follow-up. A total of 138 patients with POAG and their 138 eyes (69 phaco-iStent and 69 phacocanaloplasty) were included. Postoperatively at 12 months, the mean intraocular pressure (IOP) decreased from 18.44 ± 3.88 to 15.51 ± 2.50 mmHg and from 17.20 ± 4.04 to 14.97 ± 2.37 mmHg in the phaco-iStent (PiS) and phacocanaloplasty (PC) groups, respectively (p = 0.480). In both groups, 35.7% achieved >20% IOP reduction from baseline. A total of 86% and 71.4% of the eyes were medication-free at 12 months in the PiS and PC groups, respectively. In both groups, all eyes showed improvement in best-corrected visual acuity compared with baseline and demonstrated similar safety profiles throughout the 12-month follow-up period. This study showed equal hypotensive effects of PiS and PC. Both procedures significantly reduced the IOP and the requirement for IOP-lowering medications for at least 12 months postoperatively, with no significant differences between the groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of one trabecular microbypass stent (first generation iStent) combined with phacoemulsification cataract surgery (phaco) in eyes with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) in a Taiwanese population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One trabecular microbypass stent was implanted after phacoemulsification cataract surgery by one surgeon. Intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, corrected distance visual acuity, complications, and adverse events were evaluated. RESULTS: This case series included 28 eyes of 25 patients with OAG (19 primary open-angle glaucoma [POAG] and 9 normal tension glaucoma [NTG]). None had previous trabeculectomy or laser trabeculoplasty. At 1 year, the mean IOP decreased from 19.34 ± 3.92 mmHg to 15.84 ± 3.05 mmHg, and the mean number of glaucoma medications decreased from 1.82 ± 1.12 to 0.79 ± 1.17 (both P < 0.001). Longer survival was observed in the NTG eyes (NTG: 11.67 ± 1.00 months, POAG: 9.53 ± 3.78 months, P = 0.031). iStent reposition was performed in one eye, and four eyes received laser treatment for stent occlusion. None had secondary glaucoma surgery. CONCLUSION: Combined phacoemulsification and iStent implantations are a safe and effective way in reducing IOP and medication burden in patients with OAG, especially NTG. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The iStent (Glaukos Corporation; Laguna Hills, CA, USA) is one of the minimally invasive glaucoma devices. It can be inserted at the time of phacoemulsification or as a stand-alone procedure to lower the intraocular pressure (IOP). Objective: Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effect of iStent insertion at the time of phacoemulsification with phacoemulsification alone in patients with ocular hypertension or open-angle glaucoma. Methods: We searched EMBASE, MEDLINE (OVID and PubMed), CINAHL, and Cochrane Library for articles published between 2008 and June 2022 (PRISMA 2020 for the checklist). Studies comparing the IOP-lowering effect of iStent with phacoemulsification versus phacoemulsification alone were included. The endpoints were IOP reduction (IOPR) and the mean reduction in the number of glaucoma drops. A quality-effects model was used to compare both surgical groups. Results: Ten studies were included, reporting on 1,453 eyes. Eight hundred fifty three eyes had the combined iStent and phacoemulsification, and 600 eyes underwent phacoemulsification alone. IOPR was higher in the combined surgery at of 4.7 ± 2 mm Hg compared to 2.8 ± 1.9 mm Hg in phacoemulsification alone. A greater decrease in postoperative eye drops was noted in the combined group having a decrease of 1.2 ± 0.3 eye drops versus of 0.6 ± 0.6 drops in isolated phacoemulsification. The quality effect model showed an IOPR weighted mean difference (WMD) of 1.22 mm Hg (confidence interval [CI]: [–0.43, 2.87]; Q = 315.64; p < 0.01; I2 = 97%) and decreased eye drops WMD 0.42 drops (CI: [0.22, 0.62]; Q = 42.6; p < 0.01; I2 = 84%) between both surgical groups. Subgroup analysis shows that the new generation iStent may be more effective in reducing IOP. Conclusion: iStent has a synergetic effect with phacoemulsification. The reduction of IOP and glaucoma eye drops was higher when iStent is combined with phacoemulsification compared with isolated phacoemulsification. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: We report a case with two connected stents ejected simultaneously during an iStent inject W surgery, a modified second-generation iStent Trabecular Micro-Bypass System. Case presentation: A 57-year-old woman with primary open-angle glaucoma underwent a combined cataract and iStent inject W surgery in her left eye. After the trabecular meshwork/Schlemm's canal was pierced by the trocar of injector, the delivery button was pressed a first time, but the stent was not ejected. After the button was pressed a second time, connected two stents were ejected. After removing the dislocated stents from the anterior chamber, two stents were implanted into the desired places using another injector. Except for mild hyphema, no postoperative complication occurred. Stereomicroscopic observation showed that the two stents were connected by a broken trocar shaft. An X-ray showed that the trocar shaft was broken at the part referred to as the "sprayed trocar". Scanning electron microscopy showed that the surface features of the broken trocar and trocar tip represented tensile failure. Conclusions: Although rare, considering that the damage was seen at the structurally weak part (i.e., sprayed trocar), the same phenomenon can happen. For patient safety, surgeons are recommended to inspect the device when the deployment of either the first or second stent is unsuccessful during the iStent inject surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Evaluate effectiveness and safety outcomes for patients treated with canaloplasty and trabeculotomy previously treated with a trabecular microbypass stent (TBS). Methods: Retrospective, multicenter, IRB approved study. Patients treated with TBS (iStent/iStent inject, Glaukos) and subsequently with OMNI surgical system (OSS) (Sight Sciences). From 5 practices in 5 US states. Open-angle glaucoma (OAG), minimum 3 months follow-up after OSS surgery, Pre-OSS IOP ≥ 17 mmHg on ≥ 1 medication. No glaucoma procedures between TBS and OSS. Endpoints: proportion with ≥ 20% reduction in IOP, IOP between 6 and 18 mmHg, mean IOP, change in IOP, mean number of medications. Adverse events and secondary surgical interventions (SSI). Mann–Whitney rank sum test compared pre-OSS IOP and medications with follow-up. Results: Twenty seven patients. Average age (SD) 72.2 (10.8), 22/27 primary OAG (82%), mean MD − 6.2 (7.0) dB. Mean IOP before OSS 22.3 (4.3) mmHg on 2.2 (1.3) medications. At last follow-up (mean 11 months) IOP was 17.2 mmHg on 1.8 medications, − 5.1 mmHg (− 23%, p <.001), − 0.4 meds (− 18%, p =.193); ≥ 20% IOP reduction (41%), IOP ≤ 18 (56%). Adverse events were non-serious. Hyphema > 1 mm (3, 11%), BCVA decrease (4, 15%), IOP spike (2, 7%). SSI (4, 15%) had higher pre-OSS IOP (23.4 mmHg) and worse MD (− 9.6 dB). Conclusion: Patients uncontrolled by medication and a prior TBS would once have been candidates for trabeculectomy and tube shunts. OSS offered a minimally invasive option that provided IOP control and avoidance of traditional surgery for the majority over follow-up averaging 11 months and up to 42 months. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Louis Cantor,1 Dan Lindfield,2 Federico Ghinelli,3 Anna W &Sacute;wider,3 Francesca Torelli,3 Carolyn Steeds,3 Jaime E Dickerson Jr,4,5 Dan Q Nguyen6 1Eugene and Marilyn Glick Eye Institute, Indiana School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA; 2Royal Surrey County Hospital, Guildford, England, UK; 3Valid Insight, Macclesfield, England, UK; 4Sight Sciences, Menlo Park, CA, USA; 5North Texas Eye Research Institute, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; 6Mid-Cheshire Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Crewe, UKCorrespondence: Francesca Torelli, Valid Insight, Ropewalks, Newton St, Macclesfield, SK11 6QJ, UK, Tel +44 203 750 9833 Ext 703, Email ftorelli@validinsight.comIntroduction: Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) are increasingly used options for mild-to-moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG) care. While most MIGS devices are indicated for use in combination with cataract surgery only, with phacoemulsification playing a role in lowering IOP, newer technologies can also be used as standalone glaucoma surgery.Methods: This systematic literature review (SLR) aimed to assess the clinical, economic, and humanistic outcomes of MIGS and SLT for the treatment of OAG and was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. Studies that assessed MIGS or SLT in at least one treatment arm versus any other glaucoma treatment in adults with mild-to-moderate OAG were included. Clinical, humanistic (health-related quality of life [HRQoL] and patient burden), and economic data were extracted, and the methodological quality of included studies was evaluated.Results: A total of 2720 articles were screened, and 81 publications were included. Fifty-eight reported clinical outcomes. The majority assessed iStent or iStent inject (n=41), followed by OMNI (n=9), gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or the Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) (n=7), Hydrus (n=6), SLT (n=5), Xen Gel Stent (n=2), PreserFlo (n=1), and iTrack (n=1). IOP reduction was observed across prospective studies, varying from − 31% to − 13.7% at month 6 and from − 39% to − 11.4% at year 1 versus baseline. Most adverse events were transient and non-serious. Limited humanistic and economic data were identified.Conclusion: Given their established efficacy and safety, there is a rationale for wider use of MIGS in mild-to-moderate OAG. Of the MIGS devices, iStent and OMNI have the largest clinical evidence base supporting their sustained effectiveness.Keywords: intraocular pressure, IOP, iStent, MIGS, OMNI, SLT

Nonadherence to glaucoma medication and poor follow-up is a global health concern. Glaucoma remains one of the largest causes of irreversible blindness worldwide. Traditional treatment guidelines suggest topical eye drop medication as first-line therapy followed by addition of supplementary medications before proceeding to more invasive glaucoma surgeries. Unfortunately, poor glaucoma self-management remains high, leading to disease progression and blindness. Recent advancements in the field of pharmacotherapies, surgeries, and behavioral approaches have taken aim at increasing support for glaucoma self-management. We review the current and emerging approaches toward glaucoma management, with the exception of bleb-based surgical approaches, to investigate if they have had an impact on adherence. Literature searches were conducted via MEDLINE (PubMed), Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library (Wiley), and Preprints from 1 January 2018 to 26 January 2023. The ability to offer patients a multitude of choices enables patients to tailor their glaucoma treatment to their values and lifestyle. Offering personalized patient education and coaching to support chronic glaucoma self-management would better enable patient engagement in whichever treatment path is chosen. Currently, literature regarding the impact of these new advancements on treatment engagement is lacking; this field is ripe for additional intervention and assessment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: To compare outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with endoscopic cyclophotocoagulation (phaco/ECP), first generation iStent implantation (phaco/iStent), or both (phaco/iStent/ECP) in patients with open-angle glaucoma. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed on patients at the University of Colorado Department of Ophthalmology. Outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP), medication use, best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and surgical complications were analyzed. Success was defined as IOP reduction of ≥ 20% and/or reduction by at least one glaucoma medication. Results: A total of 394 eyes were included in the study. There were 170 eyes (43.1%) in the phaco/ECP group, 175 eyes (44.4%) in the phaco/iStent group, and 49 eyes (12.4%) in the phaco/iStent/ECP group. The mean pre-operative IOP was 15.9 mmHg for phaco/ECP, 15.8 mmHg for phaco/iStent, and 15.2 mmHg for phaco/iStent/ECP. At 24 months, the mean IOP was 13.7 mmHg (p < 0.0001), 14.2 mmHg (p = 0.0001), and 13.0 mmHg (p = 0.0007), respectively. The mean pre-operative number of glaucoma medications was 2.0 for phaco/ECP, 1.4 for phaco/iStent, and 2.2 for phaco/iStent/ECP and at 24 months post-surgery decreased to, 1.8 (p = 0.011), 0.9 (p < 0.0001), and 1.7 (p = 0.01), respectively. The success rate at 24 months was 54.4% for phaco/ECP, 75.3% for phaco/iStent, and 55.6% for phaco/iStent/ECP. Conclusion: Phacoemulsification when combined with ECP, iStent, or both, lowered IOP and glaucoma medication reliance at 24 months. The success rate for phaco/iStent was significantly higher than phaco/ECP. When iStent was added to phaco/ECP, the success rate was higher at earlier postoperative visits compared to the phaco/ECP alone. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

AIM: To evaluate the effectuality and safety of cataract surgery combined with either ab interno trabeculotomy by the microhook (μLOT) or a single iStent® trabecular bypass implantation (iStent) in eyes with cataract and mild-to-moderate glaucoma. METHODS: This study enrolled subjects with mild-to-moderate open angle glaucoma with visually significant cataract who used two or more ophthalmic antiglaucoma agents between 60 and 90y of age. Patients underwent cataract surgery cooperated with either implantation of an iStent (iStent-phaco) or excisional goniotomy with the μLOT (μLOT-phaco). Patients underwent μLOT-phaco in the eye with lower the mean deviation, according to the Humphrey field analyzer, while iStent-phaco was carried out on the other eye. Intraocular pressure (IOP) pre- and post-surgery, alterations in anterior chamber flare (ACF), and corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) were estimated. RESULTS: Twenty subjects were enrolled (mean age: 73.6±7.3y). The mean medicated preoperative IOP was 16.7 mm Hg in the μLOT and 16.2 mm Hg in the iStent eyes. The mean final IOP at 12mo was 13.6 mm Hg in the μLOT eyes and 13.6 mm Hg in the iStent eyes, representing a 17.8% and 17.2% reduction, respectively. The preoperative ACF in the μLOT eyes was 9.5 pc/ms and it returned to normal in 30d postoperatively, with a value of 11.4 pc/ms. In the iStent eyes, ACF was 9.6 pc/ms preoperatively and it returned to normal by 7d postoperatively (11.2 pc/ms at day 7), demonstrating that postoperative inflammation was less in the iStent eyes. The corneal ECD in both groups was not significantly decreased. CONCLUSION: In this study, iStent and μLOT are both effective through 12mo of follow-up. Safety is more favorable in the iStent eyes, based on early anterior chamber inflammation.

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery procedures are newly developed surgical modalities for the management of glaucoma. Their target is to lower intraocular pressure with minimal eye trauma and fewer complications. The first-generation iStent® (Glaukos Corp, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) is the first minimally invasive glaucoma surgery device to be approved for the treatment of openangle glaucoma. It allows aqueous humour to be drained directly from the anterior chamber to Schlemm's canal, bypassing the trabecular meshwork, which is believed to be the main site of outflow resistance. The second-generation iStent inject® (Glaukos Corp, Laguna Hills, CA, USA) is a smaller implant that allows simultaneous implantation of two stents, which could theoretically result in lower intraocular pressure. The Hydrus® Microstent (Alcon, Geneva, Switzerland) is another trabecular implant that dilates and scaffolds Schlemm's canal. This articles reviews publications about all trabecular meshwork bypass stents, comparing them in terms of their efficacy and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a subset of glaucoma surgery that is known for its low rate of complications both intraoperatively and postoperatively compared to traditional filtering surgery. We present a case of a patient who, after receiving uncomplicated cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and concurrent iStent trabecular bypass stent implantation, experienced recurrent episodes of spontaneous microhyphema and inflammation in the late postoperative period. The patient, who had a history of mild asymmetric exfoliative glaucoma but no identifiable sources of trauma, underwent extensive examination to investigate causes of his episodic anterior segment bleeding and mild inflammation with concurrent elevated intraocular pressure. Given the circumstances of the patient’s recurrent symptoms and a negative workup for conventional causes of recurrent hyphema, it was suspected that the patient’s iStent was interacting with the patient’s peripheral iris, causing microtrauma and hyphema. We hypothesized that this contact was potentially exacerbated by pre-existing exfoliation syndrome, which caused zonular weakness and subsequent anterior movement of the lens-iris diaphragm. After the patient’s third recurrence of microhyphema and inflammation, the patient underwent removal of iStent and concurrent OMNI canaloplasty for glaucoma. Six months post-iStent explantation, the patient has had complete resolution of symptoms without recurrence of hyphema. In this case report, we outline the course of this patient’s symptoms and diagnosis, discuss the potential of MIGS devices such as iStent to cause recurrent hyphema, and explore treatment options following removal.

Incisional filtration surgery with bleb formation has been the mainstay of glaucoma surgery for decades and is particularly useful in progressing or advanced glaucoma. However, the flipside of these procedures is the sight-threatening complications that may occur. Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery has made in-roads in the past two decades – these are known to be high on the safety aspect and therefore can be used much earlier on in the disease spectrum. Some of these relatively new devices and procedures are now available in India also.

Abstract Background The short- and medium-term outcomes of iStent have been extensively studied; however, only few studies have investigated its long-term outcomes. Here, we assessed the long-term efficacy and safety of two iStents with concomitant cataract surgery in glaucomatous eyes while also evaluating measures of disease stability using visual field and optical coherence tomography (OCT) of the optic nerve and the macula throughout 8 years of follow-up. Methods This longitudinal, single-center consecutive case series included glaucomatous eyes that underwent implantation of two first-generation trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent) with concomitant cataract surgery. Eight-year efficacy outcomes included mean intraocular pressure (IOP) and medications, as well as surgical success. Eight-year safety outcomes included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), visual field mean deviation (VF-MD), cup-to-disc ratio (CDR), retinal nerve fiber layer (RNFL) thickness, ganglion cell-inner plexiform layer (GC-IPL) thickness, and adverse events. Results A total of 62 eyes with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) were included. At 8 years postoperative, IOP reduced by 26% from 19.2 ± 3.9 mmHg preoperatively to 14.2 ± 2.4 mmHg (P

Introduction: We report 2-year outcomes after implantation of iStent trabecular micro-bypass stent with phacoemulsification, in Japanese patients with mild–moderate open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods: This was a 24-month, prospective, longitudinal, observational, post-marketing study conducted between July 2017 and September 2020. Patients consisted of adults with OAG on antiglaucoma medications who had cataract surgery combined with one iStent implantation. Outcome measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), antiglaucoma medications, treatment success rates (defined as eyes having lower IOP with same or reduced number of medications from baseline, or same IOP with reduced number of medications from baseline, and not requiring secondary glaucoma surgeries postoperatively), and safety. Outcomes were analyzed in the overall cohort and in glaucoma subtypes: primary OAG, normal-tension glaucoma, and exfoliative glaucoma. Results: Overall, 232 eyes were enrolled. At 24 months, mean ± standard deviation IOP decreased from 17.6 ± 4.0 mmHg preoperatively to 14.3 ± 3.0 mmHg (p < 0.05), and mean number of medications reduced from 2.2 ± 1.2 preoperatively to 0.7 ± 1.2 (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed across glaucoma subtypes. In the overall cohort, 96.7%, 95.3%, and 93.7% of patients achieved treatment success at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. There were 67.6% medication-free eyes at 24 months compared to 3.2% medication-free eyes preoperatively (p < 0.0001). Safety profile was favorable over the 2-year period. Conclusions: Following iStent implantation with phacoemulsification, clinically relevant and statistically significant reductions in IOP and number of medications were observed in Japanese eyes with OAG over 2 years, with favorable safety profile. These reductions were observed across all glaucoma subtypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the impact of trabecular micro bypass stents (iStent Inject) on refractive outcomes with toric intraocular lens (IOL) in glaucomatous eyes. Methods: We identified glaucomatous eyes receiving a toric IOL between October 2017 and December 2020. Eyes with iStent implantation were included in the study group and eyes undergoing isolated phacoemulsification served as controls. Corrected and uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, intraocular pressure (IOP), and number of hypotensive drugs three months after surgery were evaluated. Results: 26 eyes comprised the study group and 41 eyes the control group. Mean postoperative refractive cylinder was 0.26D in the control and 0.11D in the iStent group, with 63% and 85% of eyes with a cylinder of 0 and 85% and 92% of eyes with a cylinder ≤ 0.5D respectively. The mean absolute difference between target and outcome spherical equivalent was 0.26D in the control and 0.22D in the iStent group, with all eyes within 0.75D of target. LogMar uncorrected postoperative vision in eyes targeted for emmetropia was 0.04 in the control and 0.03 in the iStent group. There was a statistically significant reduction in IOP and number of hypotensive drugs in both groups, with a mean decrease in IOP of 8.6% in the control and 15.7% in the iStent group. The number of hypotensive drugs dropped from 1.63 ± 0.80 to 1.34 ± 0.91 in the control group and from 2.12 ± 0.65 to 0.44 ± 0.71 in the iStent group. Conclusion: Toric IOLs provide predictable refractive outcomes in glaucomatous eyes undergoing combined phacoemulsification with iStent implantation, reducing postoperative spectacle dependence. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To evaluate the real-world efficacy and safety of iStent implanted standalone or combined with phacoemulsification in open-angle glaucoma (OAG) patients., Methods: This is a retrospective observational study of OAG patients who underwent standalone or combined iStent procedures were reviewed. Inclusion criteria included age over 18 years and open angle on gonioscopy. Exclusion criteria were prior incisional glaucoma surgeries, missing data, or follow-up shorter than 6 months. The primary outcome was surgical success between the two groups after one year. Secondary outcomes included differences in IOP reduction and medication use., Results: We included 48 eyes with primary (n = 44) and secondary OAG (n = 4). Nineteen eyes had standalone while 29 eyes had combined procedures. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed overall surgical success in 31.3% of eyes after one year. Qualified success was higher in the combined group than the standalone group [62.5% (10 eyes) vs 27.3% (3 eyes), p = 0.239]. At 24 months, mean IOP reduced by 2.2 ± 2.5 mmHg vs 3.3 ± 2.9 mmHg, p = 0.333), and the number of medications reduced by 1.1 ± 1.2 vs 1.3 ± 0.1, p < 0.001) in the standalone and combined group, respectively. Stent occlusion occurred in two eyes., Conclusions: While both standalone and combined iStent procedures provide safe IOP reduction throughout 12 months, there was no statistically significant difference in surgical success between them., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Ricardo Augusto Paletta Guedes,1 Daniela Marcelo Gravina,1 Vanessa Maria Paletta Guedes,1 Alfredo Chaoubah2 1Glaucoma Department, Paletta Guedes Eye Institute, Juiz de Fora, MG, Brazil; 2Statistics Department, Federal University of Juiz De Fora, Juiz de Fora, MG, BrazilCorrespondence: Ricardo Augusto Paletta GuedesGlaucoma Department, Paletta Guedes Eye Institute, 79, Oscar Vidal streeet, Juiz de Fora, MG, 36010-060, BrazilTel: +55 32 3213-1927Email palettaguedes@yahoo.comIntroduction: This retrospective comparative study assessed real-world effectiveness and safety of first-generation (iStent®) and second-generation (iStent inject®) trabecular micro-bypass stents with cataract surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).Material and Methods: Through a 24-month postoperative follow-up, the effectiveness was quantified by intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction; mean glaucoma medication reduction; proportional analysis of eyes meeting IOP cutoffs (< 18, < 15, < 12 mmHg) either with or without medications; and proportional analysis of medication burden. Safety measures included visual acuity, adverse events, and secondary surgery.Results: A total of 82 consecutive eyes (39 iStent, 43 iStent inject) with a 24-month follow-up were analyzed. Most eyes (74.4%) had primary open-angle glaucoma, with the remainder having pseudoexfoliative or pigmentary glaucoma; all eyes had mild-to-moderate disease. At 24 months postoperative, the mean IOP was lower, and the percent reduction from baseline was greater, in iStent inject eyes (26.0% reduction, 17.7mmHg to 13.1mmHg) than in iStent eyes (9.8% reduction, 16.4mmHg to 14.8mmHg) (between-groups comparison, p=0.019). Within each group, the postoperative IOP reduction was greater in eyes with higher baseline IOP (p< 0.001). Medication burden decreased significantly in both groups, from 1.74 to 0.51 mean medications for iStent (70.7% reduction, p< 0.0001), and 2.19 to 0.65 for iStent inject (70.3% reduction, p< 0.0001). Both groups exhibited excellent safety.Conclusion: iStent or iStent inject with phacoemulsification produced significant IOP and medication reductions, with effects enduring for two years. IOP reductions were greater for iStent inject than for iStent. Within each group, higher preoperative IOP was associated with greater postoperative IOP reduction.Keywords: iStent, iStent inject, trabecular micro-bypass, micro-invasive, MIGS

The iStent is a popular device designed for glaucoma treatment, functioning by creating an artificial fluid pathway in the trabecular meshwork (TM) to drain aqueous humor. The assessment of iStent implantation surgery is clinically important. However, current tools offer limited information. We aim to develop innovative assessment strategies for iStent implantation using optical coherence tomography (OCT) to evaluate the position and orientation of the iStent and its biomechanical impact on outflow system dynamics. We examined four iStents in the two eyes of a glaucoma patient. Three-dimensional (3D) OCT structural imaging was conducted for each iStent, and a semi-automated algorithm was developed for iStent segmentation and visualization, allowing precise measurement of position and orientation. In addition, phase-sensitive OCT (PhS-OCT) imaging was introduced to measure the biomechanical impact of the iStent on the outflow system quantified by cumulative displacement (CDisp) of pulse-dependent trabecular TM motion. The 3D structural image processed by our algorithm definitively resolved the position and orientation of the iStent in the anterior segment, revealing substantial variations in relevant parameters. PhS-OCT imaging demonstrated significantly higher CDisp in the regions between two iStents compared to locations distant from the iStents in both OD (p=0.0075) and OS (p=0.0437). Our proposed structural imaging technique improved the characterization of the iStent's placement. The imaging results revealed inherent challenges in achieving precise control of iStent insertion. Furthermore, PhS-OCT imaging unveiled potential biomechanical alterations induced by the iStent. This unique methodology shows potential as a valuable clinical tool for evaluating iStent implantation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This retrospective consecutive study compared standalone implantation of multiple (2–3) trabecular micro-bypass stents (iStent inject ± iStent) (Multi-Stent group) vs trabeculectomy + mitomycin C (Trab group) in moderate to severe open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Methods: Eligible patients underwent Multi-Stent or Trab surgery from 2018 to 2020 and had at least 3-month follow-up; visual field mean deviation (VF MD) − 6 dB or worse; inadequate prior response to maximum medications ± laser procedures; and had trabeculectomy as their next planned intervention. Primary effectiveness, safety-adjusted treatment success, was defined as ≥ 20% intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction on the same or fewer medications, without clinically significant safety events (severe complications, secondary surgeries, reinterventions). Secondary effectiveness included mean IOP and medications; qualified and complete attainment of target IOP (≤ 21/18/15/12 mmHg and > 6 mmHg); health-economic and quality-of-life (QoL) measures; and 2-vs-3-stent subgroup analysis. Results: The baseline groups (n = 70 Multi-Stent/40 Trab) were similar: mean IOP (21.1 mmHg/22.3 mmHg); medications (2.87/3.10 medications); disease stage (30%/35% severe); VF MD (− 10.1 dB/− 10.4 dB); and mean last follow-up (LFU, 13.1 months/15.7 months) (all differences non-significant). Primary effectiveness: treatment success at LFU was 62.9% vs 30.0% in Multi-Stent vs Trab eyes, respectively (p = 0.001). Secondary effectiveness: At LFU in Multi-Stent vs Trab groups, respectively: mean IOP decreased by 31% to 14.2 mmHg (p < 0.001) vs by 43% to 12.5 mmHg (p < 0.001); mean medications decreased by 51% to 1.31 medications (p < 0.001) vs by 84% to 0.43 medications (p < 0.001). Multi-Stent eyes, compared to Trab eyes, had fewer visits ± reinterventions within 3 months (3.6 vs 6.1, p < 0.001); longer time to first reintervention (12.2 months vs 4.5 months, p = 0.01); fewer total reinterventions (0.26 vs 0.75, p = 0.006); and earlier lifting of postoperative restrictions (12.6 vs 32.1 days, p < 0.001). In 2-vs-3-stent analysis, there was a trend toward more 3-stent eyes achieving target IOP than 2-stent eyes. Visual fields remained stable in both Multi-Stent and Trab eyes. Conclusion: Implanting 2–3 trabecular micro-bypass stents was a viable alternative to trabeculectomy for moderate-to-severe OAG, with clinically appropriate IOP/medication reductions and higher safety-adjusted treatment success vs trabeculectomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of iStent vs. iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification. Methods: This single center retrospective comparative case series included subjects with open angle glaucoma who underwent iStent or iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification with ≥1 year follow-up. The main outcome measures were in-group and between-group changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication number, proportion of eyes that achieved IOP ≤15 mmHg, and surgical success defined as 20% IOP reduction from baseline at 6/12 months. Univariate/multivariate regression analyses were done to identify predictors of surgical failure. Results: One hundred ninety-seven eyes of 148 patients were included (122 iStent, 75 iStent inject). Both groups achieved significant IOP and medication reduction at months 6/12 (P < 0.05). At month 6, IOP was significantly lower in iStent inject vs. iStent eyes (P = 0.003), but the difference was insignificant by month 12 (P = 0.172). Medication number was comparable in both groups at months 6/12 (P > 0.05). More iStent inject eyes achieved IOP ≤15 mmHg at month 6 (P = 0.003) and 12 (P = 0.047). Surgical success was comparable in both groups at months 6/12 (P > 0.05). Kaplan–Meier survival analysis showed similar cumulative rate of surgical failure at year-1 in both groups (P = 0.644). The multivariate model identified older age (P = 0.017) and lower baseline IOP (P = 0.002) as the strongest predictors of surgical failure. Conclusion: Compared to iStent, iStent inject achieved lower IOP at month 6 and higher proportion of eyes achieved IOP ≤15 mmHg at month 6/12. However, surgical success was similar in both groups. Predictors of surgical failure were older age and lower baseline IOP rather than the stent type.

Minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) is a subset of glaucoma surgery that is known for its low rate of complications both intraoperatively and postoperatively compared to traditional filtering surgery. We present a case of a patient who, after receiving uncomplicated cataract extraction with posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation and concurrent iStent trabecular bypass stent implantation, experienced recurrent episodes of spontaneous microhyphema and inflammation in the late postoperative period. The patient, who had a history of mild asymmetric exfoliative glaucoma but no identifiable sources of trauma, underwent extensive examination to investigate causes of his episodic anterior segment bleeding and mild inflammation with concurrent elevated intraocular pressure. Given the circumstances of the patient's recurrent symptoms and a negative workup for conventional causes of recurrent hyphema, it was suspected that the patient's iStent was interacting with the patient's peripheral iris, causing microtrauma and hyphema. We hypothesized that this contact was potentially exacerbated by pre-existing exfoliation syndrome, which caused zonular weakness and subsequent anterior movement of the lens-iris diaphragm. After the patient's third recurrence of microhyphema and inflammation, the patient underwent removal of iStent and concurrent OMNI canaloplasty for glaucoma. Six months post-iStent explantation, the patient has had complete resolution of symptoms without recurrence of hyphema. In this case report, we outline the course of this patient's symptoms and diagnosis, discuss the potential of MIGS devices such as iStent to cause recurrent hyphema, and explore treatment options following removal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Interest in micro-invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) has exploded over the last 8 years with an increase in MIGS procedures of at least 400% in the United States, according to Medicare data. MIGS is an umbrella term that can cover many different types of surgeries. This review focuses on peer-reviewed evidence for Trabectome®, iStent inject®, Kahook Dual Blade®, XEN® Gel Stent, and Hydrus®. Methods: We present key recent studies evaluating the efficacy and safety of MIGS in various types of glaucoma patients with different stages of disease. Conclusion: We conclude that MIGS is generally safe and efficacious, although only some MIGS have been studied through randomized clinical trials. When comparing and contrasting the different MIGS procedures, large prospective studies are not yet the norm. High-quality large prospective studies involving MIGS will be an important next step as ophthalmologists decide how to incorporate MIGS into their surgical armamentarium. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Koji Nitta,1 Yutaro Yamada,1 Satomi Morokado,1 Kazuhisa Sugiyama2 1Department of Ophthalmology, Fukui-Ken Saiseikai Hospital, Fukui, Fukui Prefecture, Japan; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Kanazawa University, Kanazawa, Ishikawa Prefecture, JapanCorrespondence: Koji NittaFukui-Ken Saiseikai Hospital, Funabashi 7-1, Wadanaka-Cho, Fukui City, Fukui 918-8503, JapanTel +81 776 23 1111Email nitta.koji7001@fukui.saiseikai.or.jpIntroduction: This study assesses two-year efficacy and safety following implantation of a single trabecular micro-bypass stent (iStent®) with concomitant phacoemulsification cataract surgery in Japanese patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG).Materials and Methods: This retrospective, consecutive case series included eyes that underwent iStent implantation with phacoemulsification and were followed for 24 months postoperative. Efficacy and safety measures included intraocular pressure (IOP), number of glaucoma medications, adverse events, secondary surgeries, visual fields, and endothelial cell counts.Results: Of 73 operated eyes, 53 eyes had 24 months of follow-up and are analyzed. Diagnoses included primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG, n=25), normal-tension glaucoma (NTG, n=16), and pseudoexfoliative glaucoma (PXG, n=12). At 24 months, mean IOP reduced by 18% to 13.6± 3.0 mmHg versus 16.5± 3.4 mmHg preoperatively (p< 0.0001), and mean medication number reduced by 81% to 0.37± 0.74 versus 1.96± 0.98 preoperatively (p< 0.0001). The percentage of medication-free eyes was 77% versus 0% preoperatively, and 81% of eyes had IOP ≤ 15 mmHg versus 42% preoperatively. Results were similarly favorable across glaucoma subtypes (POAG, NTG, PXG). Notably, mean IOP in NTG eyes decreased to 12.8± 1.4 mmHg from 14.4± 3.0 mmHg preoperatively (p=0.03), and medications decreased by 87% to 0.31± 0.70 versus 2.38± 0.72 preoperatively (p< 0.0001). At 24 months, 81% of NTG eyes were medication-free (versus 0% preoperatively); 2 NTG eyes (13%) were on ≥ 2 medications (versus 100% preoperatively). Throughout the follow-up, visual fields and endothelial cell counts remained stable; 1 eye (1.9%) underwent filtration surgery.Discussion: Favorable safety and significant IOP and mediation reductions were achieved through two years following iStent implantation with phacoemulsification in a Japanese population. These gains were achieved across all glaucoma subtypes (including POAG, NTG, PXG).Conclusion: This real-world study supports the viability of iStent implantation to treat Japanese patients with glaucoma and shows that the benefits extend to those with NTG or PXG in addition to POAG.Keywords: microinvasive glaucoma surgery, MIGS, iStent, trabecular micro-bypass, Japanese, normal-tension glaucoma

Ahmed Al Habash,1 Ahmed A Nagshbandi2 1Department of Ophthalmology, College of Medicine, King Fahd Hospital of the University, Imam Abdulrahman Bin Faisal University, Dammam, Saudi Arabia; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Prince Mohammed Bin Abdulaziz Hospital in Riyadh, Riyadh, Saudi ArabiaCorrespondence: Ahmed Al Habash P.O Box 31010, Khobar 31952, Saudi ArabiaTel +00966507017777Email ahmedalhabash@gmail.comPurpose: To determine the quality of life (QOL) in glaucoma patients undergoing combined cataract and minimally invasive glaucoma surgery from various perspectives ranging from personal, social, occupational life, and economic status.Settings and Design: A cross-sectional study design at King Fahd Hospital of the University, Khobar, Saudi Arabia.Methods: Patients undergoing phacoemulsification in conjunction with various forms of minimally invasive glaucoma surgery (MIGS) for each patient, including either Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) goniotomy, iStent, iStent inject and gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT), were included in the study between 2018 and 2019. Data were collected through a self-administered questionnaire based on the Visual Function Questionnaire (VFQ-25) for the 25-item National Eye Institute.Results: The study included 93 eyes of 78 patients (40 males and 38 females) who had MIGS: 50 KDB, 13 iStent, 23 iStent inject, and 7 GATT. An overall reduction in the number of anti-glaucoma medications (p< 0.001) was statistically significant. In the study, 36.6% of patients had a better social life, but 85.2% had no change in occupational life. Eventually, 86% were satisfied with the operation’s outcome, and 79% confirmed that the overall quality of life improved after the procedure.Conclusion: Evaluating QOL is a crucial component of glaucoma treatment. More research is needed on MIGS and their relationship to QOL. In the future, MIGS may provide the desired outcomes in controlling glaucoma and improving the QOL.Keywords: glaucoma, quality of life, goniotomy, Kahook Dual Blade, iStent, iStent inject, gonio-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy, combined phacoemulsification, MIGS, Schlemm’s canal

AIM: To compare surgical outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with glaucoma surgical techniques performed with either Kahook Dual Blade (KDB) or iStent for Japanese patients with either primary open angle glaucoma or exfoliation glaucoma. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated the surgical outcomes of 129 eyes of 84 Japanese patients with glaucoma who underwent KDB or 44 eyes of 34 patients who underwent phacoemulsification with iStent procedures combined with cataract surgery. The primary outcome was surgical success or failure [with surgical failure being indicated by 18 mm Hg as criterion A; IOP>14 mm Hg as criterion B on two consecutive study visits; or reoperation requirement]. In addition, we assessed the number of postoperative glaucoma medications and the resulting complications. RESULTS: The probability of success was significantly higher in the KDB group than in the iStent group for criterion A (60.2% vs 46.4%, P=0.019). In the KDB group, the mean preoperative IOP of 19.8±7.3 mm Hg decreased significantly to 13.0±3.1 mm Hg (P

Purpose: Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and complication rates of phacoemulsification cataract surgery when combined with either gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy (GATT) or iStent Inject. Methods: This is a retrospective case-control study to compare the surgical outcomes of combined phacoemulsification cataract surgery with either GATT (phaco-GATT) or iStent Inject (phaco-iStent). Both groups had at least 1-year follow-up. The primary outcome measures were IOP and number of glaucoma medications (NGMs) at 1 year. Secondary outcomes measures were best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and intra- or postoperative complications within the first year of follow-up. Success was defined as intraocular pressure (IOP) < 21 mmHg and ≥ 20% reduction in IOP at 1 year regardless of the NGM. Results: Each group included 37 patients. The median baseline IOP (24 vs 17) and NGM (3 vs 2) were higher in the phaco-GATT group (p < 0.001). Phaco-GATT achieved a 38% (p < 0.0001) reduction in IOP compared to 13.2% (p < 0.001) in the phaco-iStent group at 1-year follow-up. The reduction in IOP and NGM was significantly higher in the phaco-GATT group (p < 0.01). After adjusting for baseline IOP, the reduction in IOP at 12 months was still significantly higher in the phaco-GATT group (p = 0.042). At 1 year, 86.4% of patients in the phaco-GATT group met the success criteria compared to 35.1% in the phaco-iStent group. Safety outcomes were slightly favourable in the phaco-iStent group. Conclusion: Phaco-GATT and phaco-iStent showed a significant reduction in IOP and NGM, with phaco-GATT having a significantly higher reduction. Phaco-iStent appears to have a higher safety profile and is probably preferable in monocular patients and those with a high risk of bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: To compare the outcomes of iStent vs. iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification.Methods: This single center retrospective comparative case series included subjects with open angle glaucoma who underwent iStent or iStent inject implantation combined with phacoemulsification with ≥1 year follow-up. The main outcome measures were in-group and between-group changes in intraocular pressure (IOP) and medication number, proportion of eyes that achieved IOP ≤15 mmHg, and surgical success defined as 20% IOP reduction from baseline at 6/12 months. Univariate/multivariate regression analyses were done to identify predictors of surgical failure.Results: One hundred ninety-seven eyes of 148 patients were included (122 iStent, 75 iStent inject). Both groups achieved significant IOP and medication reduction at months 6/12 (P < 0.05). At month 6, IOP was significantly lower in iStent inject vs. iStent eyes (P = 0.003), but the difference was insignificant by month 12 (P = 0.172). Medication number was comparable in both groups at months 6/12 (P > 0.05). More iStent inject eyes achieved IOP ≤15 mmHg at month 6 (P = 0.003) and 12 (P = 0.047). Surgical success was comparable in both groups at months 6/12 (P > 0.05). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis showed similar cumulative rate of surgical failure at year-1 in both groups (P = 0.644). The multivariate model identified older age (P = 0.017) and lower baseline IOP (P = 0.002) as the strongest predictors of surgical failure.Conclusion: Compared to iStent, iStent inject achieved lower IOP at month 6 and higher proportion of eyes achieved IOP ≤15 mmHg at month 6/12. However, surgical success was similar in both groups. Predictors of surgical failure were older age and lower baseline IOP rather than the stent type. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: This retrospective comparative study assessed real-world effectiveness and safety of first-generation (iStent®) and second-generation (iStent inject®) trabecular micro-bypass stents with cataract surgery in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG). Material and Methods: Through a 24-month postoperative follow-up, the effectiveness was quantified by intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction; mean glaucoma medication reduction; proportional analysis of eyes meeting IOP cutoffs (< 18, < 15, < 12 mmHg) either with or without medications; and proportional analysis of medication burden. Safety measures included visual acuity, adverse events, and secondary surgery. Results: A total of 82 consecutive eyes (39 iStent, 43 iStent inject) with a 24-month follow-up were analyzed. Most eyes (74.4%) had primary open-angle glaucoma, with the remainder having pseudoexfoliative or pigmentary glaucoma; all eyes had mild-to-moderate disease. At 24 months postoperative, the mean IOP was lower, and the percent reduction from baseline was greater, in iStent inject eyes (26.0% reduction, 17.7mmHg to 13.1mmHg) than in iStent eyes (9.8% reduction, 16.4mmHg to 14.8mmHg) (between-groups comparison, p=0.019). Within each group, the postoperative IOP reduction was greater in eyes with higher baseline IOP (p< 0.001). Medication burden decreased significantly in both groups, from 1.74 to 0.51 mean medications for iStent (70.7% reduction, p< 0.0001), and 2.19 to 0.65 for iStent inject (70.3% reduction, p< 0.0001). Both groups exhibited excellent safety. Conclusion: iStent or iStent inject with phacoemulsification produced significant IOP and medication reductions, with effects enduring for two years. IOP reductions were greater for iStent inject than for iStent. Within each group, higher preoperative IOP was associated with greater postoperative IOP reduction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Dayeong Lee,1 Joshua King,1 Samuel Thomsen,1,2 Matthew Hirabayashi,1 Jella An1,2 1School of Medicine, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, Mason Eye Institute, University of Missouri School of Medicine, Columbia, MO, USACorrespondence: Jella AnMason Eye Institute - University Eye Institute East, 3215 Wingate Court, Columbia, MO 65201, USATel +1573-529-1077Fax +1573-884-4868Email anja@health.missouri.eduPurpose: To compare 6-month surgical outcomes of patients who underwent phacoemulsification (Phaco) combined with iStent implantation (iStent) versus excisional goniotomy using Kahook Dual Blade (KDB).Methods: Retrospective comparative case series of 58 iStent-Phaco eyes and 44 KDB-Phaco eyes operated upon by a single surgeon between 2016 and 2018. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP-lowering medication data were collected. The primary outcome was the proportion of eyes using ≥1 fewer IOP-lowering medication at Month 6 while maintaining IOP ≤ 18 mmHg.Results: Baseline IOP was 17.2 (standard error 0.7) in the KDB-Phaco group using a mean of 1.9 (0.2) medications; at Month 6, mean IOP was 14.8 mmHg P=0.002) on 1.0 (0.2) medications (P0.05). Significantly more KDB-Phaco eyes than iStent-Phaco eyes (43.2% vs 17.2%, P=0.004) were using ≥1 fewer medications while maintaining IOP ≤18 mmHg at Month 6. Adverse events were uncommon and similar in nature and frequency between groups with the exception that more KDB-Phaco eyes than iStent-Phaco eyes (8 [18.2%] versus 1 [1.7%]) experienced an IOP elevation presumed to be related to steroid use.Conclusion: KDB-Phaco and iStent-Phaco provided comparable IOP and medication reductions. The proportion of eyes able to discontinue 1 or more medications while maintaining IOP ≤ 18 mmHg was significantly greater in eyes undergoing KDB-Phaco.Keywords: glaucoma, intraocular pressure, minimally invasive glaucoma surgery, iStent, Kahook Dual Blade

Abstract Introduction This real-world retrospective case series assessed 12-month effectiveness and safety following implantation of iStent® or iStent inject ® trabecular micro-bypass with cataract surgery. Methods Consecutive patients were implanted with either iStent (comprising 1 stent) or iStent inject (comprising 2 stents), together with cataract surgery. Most patients had primary open-angle glaucoma. Effectiveness outcomes through 12 months included intraocular pressure (IOP) and glaucoma medications. Proportional analyses were completed for eyes achieving IOP ≤ 18 mmHg, IOP ≤ 15 mmHg, or IOP reduction ≥ 20% from preoperative; and eyes on 0 medications or ≥ 2 medications. Safety outcomes included adverse events, secondary surgeries, visual acuity, and visual fields. Results This analysis included 137 eyes (67 iStent, 70 iStent inject) with cataract and mild to moderate glaucoma or ocular hypertension. Over 73% of eyes in both groups had early disease, and ~ 22% had prior glaucoma surgery. At 12 months postoperatively, mean IOP decreased from 18.4 ± 4.2 mmHg to 14.2 ± 2.5 mmHg in iStent eyes (p

The Micro-invasive glaucoma surgery(MIGS)group of operations has been developed in the recent years to reduce some of complications of most standard glaucoma procedures such as trabculectomy. In order to increase the surgical effect, a new group of surgical manners has emerged that seeks to decrease IOP with lower associated rates of complications. The MIGS of the latest technique and devices are presented by three manners of reducing IOP: aqueous reduction surgery(Endoscopic Cyclophotocoagulation, Ultrasound Cyclo-Plasty); external filtering surgery(Implantation of EX-PRESS miniature glaucoma device, CANALOPLASTY); internal filtering surgery(Trabecular microbypass stent, Ab Interno Trabeculectomy). The article will summarize clinically relevant information of the glaucoma treatment and to describe indications, advantages and disadvantages of the MIGS.

Mark J Gallardo,1,2 Richard A Supnet11El Paso Eye Surgeons, PA, El Paso, TX, USA; 2Department of Ophthalmology, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USAPurpose: To present long-term, real-world outcomes after implanting one trabecular micro-bypass stent with cataract surgery for primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) in a predominantly Hispanic patient population.Patients and methods: This retrospective, consecutive case series evaluated intraocular pressure (IOP), medications, and safety through 36 months after implanting one iStent®, during phacoemulsification cataract surgery. Eyes were stratified into 2 subgroups classified by preoperative IOP and surgical goal. The Controlled Group had IOP

Abstract Introduction In this real-world, retrospective, comparative study we evaluated 6-month performance and safety in consecutive eyes following implantation of the iStent® or iStent inject® trabecular micro-bypass device with concomitant cataract surgery. Methods Performance outcomes included intraocular pressure (IOP) reduction; glaucoma medication reduction; proportions of eyes achieving an IOP of