Back to Search Start Over

Which is More Effective and Safer? Comparison of Propensity Score-Matched Microhook Ab Interno Trabeculotomy and iStent Inject

Authors :
Ryo Asaoka
Shunsuke Nakakura
Tsukasa Mochizuki
Akiko Ishida
Yuri Fujino
Kaori Ishii
Akira Obana
Masaki Tanito
Yoshiaki Kiuchi
Source :
Ophthalmology and Therapy, Vol 12, Iss 5, Pp 2757-2768 (2023)
Publication Year :
2023
Publisher :
Adis, Springer Healthcare, 2023.

Abstract

Abstract Introduction The purpose of this study was to compare the surgical outcomes between ab interno trabeculotomy (LOT) and iStent inject W implantation (iStent) both combined with cataract surgery, matching the background factors including age, intraocular pressure (IOP), medication score, central corneal thickness (CCT), and axial length. Methods A total of 100 eyes from 75/79 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma were included in the LOT/iStent groups. The background factors were matched between the two groups using the propensity score. Results There were no significant differences in age, IOP, medication score, CCT, and axial length, preoperatively. The postoperative medication scores were 1.3 ± 1.2 and 1.2 ± 1.2 in the LOT and iStent groups. The postoperative IOPs were 12.8 ± 2.8 and 13.1 ± 2.4 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the medication score were − 0.64 ± 1.4 and − 0.44 ± 1.6 in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. The changes in the IOP were − 2.1 ± 3.3 and − 1.5 ± 3.0 mmHg in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively. These values were not significantly different between the two groups. The postoperative IOP and changes in the IOP were significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT. There was no significant difference in the occurrence of postoperative complications (hyphema, 11.0% and 6.0%, and transient ocular hypertension, 8.0% and 5.0%, in the LOT and iStent groups, respectively). Conclusion LOT and iStent have similar surgical outcomes with sufficient safety. Postoperative IOP was significantly associated with preoperative IOP and CCT in both groups.

Details

Language :
English
ISSN :
21938245 and 21936528
Volume :
12
Issue :
5
Database :
Directory of Open Access Journals
Journal :
Ophthalmology and Therapy
Publication Type :
Academic Journal
Accession number :
edsdoj.7c4338e9fdaf4503b5824b95833b3946
Document Type :
article
Full Text :
https://doi.org/10.1007/s40123-023-00777-y