Search

The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and has been related to more than 7 million deaths globally since 2019. The association of high levels of IL-6 with severe cases led to the early evaluation of the anti-IL6 inhibitor tocilizumab as a potential treatment, which unfortunately failed to improve survival in many trials. Moreover, little is known about the development of COVID-19 sequelae, and biomarkers are needed to understand and anticipate these processes. Because extracellular vesicles (EVs) play an important role in viral infection and immune response, they could potentially serve as predictive and prognostic biomarkers. We isolated EVs from 39 patients with severe COVID-19, from which 29 received tocilizumab and 10 were considered controls. Blood samples, which were collected at hospitalisation before treatment, at Day 7, and Day 15 during follow-up, were assessed by immunoblot for longitudinal expression of spike (S) and nucleocapsid (N) proteins. Dynamic expression was calculated and compared with clinicopathological and experimental variables. Expression of EV S was validated by immunogold and imaging flow-cytometry, revealing an enrichment in CD9+ EVs. As a result, decreasing expression of EV viral proteins was observed in patients treated with tocilizumab. Moreover, higher increase in EV S was observed in patients with lower antibody response, hyperfibrinogenemia, lower respiratory function, higher blood pressure and shorter outcomes. These findings lay the foundation for future studies characterizing the role of EVs in multiorgan assessment and identifying biomarkers in patients with severe COVID-19 and possible long COVID., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Extracellular Vesicles published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Society for Extracellular Vesicles.)

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) enumeration and molecular profiling hold promise in revolutionizing the management of solid tumors. Their understanding has evolved significantly over the past two decades, encompassing pivotal biological discoveries and clinical studies across various malignancies. While for some tumor types, such as breast, prostate, and colorectal cancer, CTCs are ready to enter clinical practice, for others, additional research is required. CTCs serve as versatile biomarkers, offering insights into tumor biology, metastatic progression, and treatment response. This review summarizes the latest advancements in CTC research and highlights future directions of investigation. Special attention is given to concurrent evaluations of CTCs and other circulating biomarkers, particularly circulating tumor DNA. Multi-analyte assessment holds the potential to unlock the full clinical capabilities of liquid biopsy. In conclusion, CTCs represent a transformative biomarker in precision oncology, offering extraordinary opportunities to translate scientific discoveries into tangible improvements in patient care., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Singhal S. has received consulting fees from Oncohost. Fusco N. has received honoraria for consulting, advisory role, speaker bureau, travel, and/or research grants from Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), Merck, Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Menarini, Daiichi Sankyo, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK), Gilead, Adicet Bio, Sysmex, Reply, Veracyte Inc., Sakura, Leica Biosystems, Lilly. Cristofanilli M reports personal fees from Lilly, Sermonix, Data Genomics, Foundation Medicine, Guardant Health, Celcuity, Iylon, and Ellipses and grants and personal fees from Pfizer, AZ and Menarini. The other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. Rolfo C. is a speaker for Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, COR2ED, Daiichi Sankyo, Physicians Education Resource, and Roche (CH); has research collaborations (nonfinancial support) with Guardant Health; advisory board activity: Archer, Inivata, Bayer U.C. LLC, Boston pharmaceutical, CEA, MD Serono, General Dynamics, MedStar, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme-Regeneron. Provides expert testimony to Intellisphere, scientific board for Imagene, and is a coordinating PI for MD Serono Global PI LUNG itrapid@024 trial. Research grant from LCRF-Pfizer unrelated to the current work. Gandara D.R. received honoraria from Merck, research funding from Merck, Amgen, Genentech, AstraZeneca, Astex Pharmaceuticals, and has consulting or advisory role for AstraZeneca, Guardant Health, OncoCyte, IO Biotech, Roche/Genentech, and Adagene. Kasi P.M. reports personal fees from Foundation Medicine, MSD Oncology/Merck, Tempus, Bayer, Lilly, Delcath Systems, QED Therapeutics, Servier, Taiho Oncology, Exact Sciences, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Eisai, Seattle Genetics, SAGA Diagnostics, Illumina, BostonGene, Guardant Health, and Taiho; personal fees and other support from Elicio Therapeutics; other support from Precision Biosensors Inc.; and grants from Merck, Novartis, and Agenus Bio. Malapelle U. received personal fees (consultant and/or speaker bureau) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientifics, Eli Lilly, Diaceutics, GSK, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Diatech, Novartis, and Hedera. The other authors declare no competing interest., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most common type of lung neoplasm. Despite surgical resection, it has a high relapse rate, accounting for 30-55% of all cases. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) based on a customized gene panel and the analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) can help identify heterogeneity, stratify high-risk patients, and guide treatment decisions. In this descriptive study involving a small prospective cohort, we focus on the phenotypic characterization of CTCs, particularly concerning EZH2 expression (a member of the Polycomb Repression Complex 2), as well as on the mutation profiles of the tissue using a customized gene panel and their association with poor outcomes in NSCLC., Methods: Isolation and characterization of EZH2 on CTCs were evaluated before surgical resection (CTC1) and one month after surgery (CTC2) in resectable NSCLC patients. Targeted NGS was performed using a customized 50-gene panel on tissue samples from a subset of patients., Results: 76 patients with resectable NSCLC were recruited. The top mutated genes in the cohort included TP53, FLT1, MUC5AC, EGFR, and NLRP3. Pair of genes that had mutually exclusive mutations was TP53-RIN3, and pairs of genes with co-occurring mutations were CD163-TLR4, FGF10-FOXP2, ADAMTSL3-FLT1, ADAMTSL3-MUC5AC and MUC5AC-NLRP3. CTCs decreased significantly between the two time points CTC1 and CTC2 (p<0.0001), and CTCs+ patients with high EZH2 expression had an 87% increased risk of death (p=0.018)., Conclusions: Integrating molecular profiling of tumors and CTC characterization can provide valuable insights into tumor heterogeneity and improve patient stratification for resectable NSCLC., (Copyright © 2024 SEPAR. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer (LC) is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide and the second most common cancer in both men and women. In addition to smoking, other risk factors, such as environmental tobacco smoke, air pollution, biomass combustion, radon gas, occupational exposure, lung disease, family history of cancer, geographic variability, and genetic factors, play an essential role in developing LC. Current screening guidelines and eligibility criteria have limited efficacy in identifying LC cases (50 %), as most screening programs primarily target subjects with a smoking history as the leading risk factor. Implementing LC screening programs in people who have never smoked (PNS) can significantly impact cancer-specific survival and early disease detection. However, the available evidence regarding the feasibility and effectiveness of such programs is limited. Therefore, further research on LC screening in PNS is warranted to determine the necessary techniques for accurately identifying individuals who should be included in screening programs., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: OA reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Lilly that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Merck & Co Inc that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Bristol Myers Squibb Co that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. OA reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Merck Sharp & Dohme that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with FICMAC that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Pfizer that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Celldex that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Novartis that includes: funding grants. AFC reports a relationship with Lilly that includes: funding grants. MA-H reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. MA-H reports a relationship with Bristol that includes: funding grants. MA-H reports a relationship with Roche that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Merck sharp & Dohme that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Bristol-Myers Squibb that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with AstraZeneca that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with MegaLabs that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Boehringer Ingelheim that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with GSK that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Bayer that includes: funding grants. LV reports a relationship with Sanofi that includes: funding grants. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Pleural mesothelioma (PM) is an aggressive tumor still considered incurable, in part due to the lack of predictive biomarkers. Little is known about the clinical implications of molecular alterations in resectable PM tissues and blood. Here, we characterized genetic alterations to identify prognostic and predictive biomarkers in patients with resected PM., Experimental Design: Targeted next-generation sequencing was performed in retrospective pleural tumor tissue and paired plasma samples from stage IB-IIIB resected PM. Association between prognosis and presence of specific mutations was validated in silico., Results: Thirty PM tissues and paired blood samples from 12 patients were analyzed. High tissue tumor mutational burden (TMB) (>10 mutations/Mb), tissue median minor allele frequency (MAF) (>9 mutations/Mb), and blood TMB (>6 mutations/Mb), tissue KMT2C, PBRM1, PKHD1,EPHB1 and blood LIFR mutations correlated with longer disease-free survival and/or overall survival. High concordance (>80%) between tissue and blood was found for some mutations., Conclusions: Tissue TMB and MAF, blood TMB, and specific mutations correlated with outcomes in patients with resected PM and should be further studied to validate their role as prognostic biomarkers and potentially predictive factors for combinations with immune-checkpoint inhibitors. This suggest that molecular profiling could identify longer survivors in patients with resected PM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest Umberto Malapelle has received personal fees (as consultant and/or speaker bureau) from Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, MSD, Amgen, Thermo Fisher Scientifics, Eli Lilly, Diaceutics, GSK, Merck, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Diatech, Novartis and Hedera unrelated to the current work. Pasquale Pisapia has received personal fees as speaker bureau from Novartis, for work performed outside of the current study. Giancarlo Troncone reports personal fees (as speaker bureau or advisor) from Roche, MSD, Pfizer, Boehringer Ingelheim, Eli Lilly, BMS, GSK, Menarini, AstraZeneca, Amgen, and Bayer unrelated to the current work. Alessandro Russo reports advisory board role/consultancy from AstraZeneca, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, BMS, Roche, and Amgen unrelated to the current work. Andres F. Cardona discloses financial research support from Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Foundation Medicine, Roche Diagnostics, Thermo Fisher, Broad Institute, BioNTech, Amgen, Flatiron Health, Teva Pharma, Rochem Biocare, Bayer, INQBox and The Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research – FICMAC; advisor role to EISAI, Merck Serono, Jannsen Pharmaceutical, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Boehringer Ingelheim, Roche, Bristol‐Myers Squibb, Pfizer, Novartis, Celldex Therapeutics, Foundation Medicine, Eli Lilly, Guardant Health, Illumina, and Foundation for Clinical and Applied Cancer Research – FICMAC outside the submitted work. Marzia Del Re has received research grants from Astellas and AstraZeneca, consulting fees from Janssen, AstraZeneca, Astellas, discloses speaker bureau role for AstraZeneca, Astellas, Janssen, Novartis, Roche, Daiicho Sankyo, Takeda, advisory board role for Novartis, Roche, and Amgen outside the submitted work. Ashutosh Sachdeva reports consulting fees from AMBU and MERIT, advisory board role for AMBU not related to the submitted work. Fred R. Hirsch reports advisory boards consultancy for Bristol‐Myers Squibb, AstraZeneca/Daiichi, Sanofi/Regeneron, Novartis, Amgen, OncoCyte, Genentech, and Nectin Therapeutics unrelated to the current work. Christian Rolfo is a speaker for Merck Sharp and Dohme, AstraZeneca, COR2ED, Daiichi Sankyo, Physicians Education Resource, and Roche (CH); has research collaborations (nonfinancial support) with Guardant Health; advisory board activity: Archer, Inivata, Bayer U.C. LLC, Boston pharmaceutical, CEA, MD Serono, General Dynamics, MedStar, Novartis, Sanofi Genzyme‐Regeneron. Provides expert testimony to Intellisphere, scientific board for Imagene, and is a coordinating PI for MD Serono Global PI LUNG itrapid@ 024 trial. Research grant from LCRF‐Pfizer unrelated to the current work. The other authors declare no competing interest., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Immune dysregulation and cancer treatment may affect SARS-CoV-2 vaccination protection. Antibody production by B-cells play a vital role in the control and clearance of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study prospectively explores B-cell seroconversion following SARS-CoV-2 immunization in healthy individuals and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing oncological treatment. 92 NSCLC patients and 27 healthy individuals' blood samples were collected after receiving any COVID-19 vaccine. Serum and mononuclear cells were isolated, and a serum surrogate virus neutralization test kit evaluated SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. B-cell subpopulations on mononuclear cells were characterized by flow cytometry. Patients were compared based on vaccination specifications and target mutation oncological treatment. A higher percentage of healthy individuals developed more SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibodies than NSCLC patients (63% vs. 54.3%; p = 0.03). NSCLC patients receiving chemotherapy (CTX) or tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) developed antibodies in 45.2% and 53.7%, of cases, respectively, showing an impaired antibody generation. CTX patients exhibited trends towards lower median antibody production than TKIs (1.0, IQR 83 vs. 38.23, IQR 89.22; p = 0.069). Patients receiving immunotherapy did not generate antibodies. A sub-analysis revealed that those with ALK mutations exhibited non-significant trends towards higher antibody titers (63.02, IQR 76.58 vs. 21.78, IQR 93.5; p = 0.1742) and B-cells quantification (10.80, IQR 7.52 vs. 7.22, IQR 3.32; p = 0.1382) against the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein than EGFR patients; nonetheless, these differences were not statistically significant. This study shows that antibodies against SARS-CoV-2 may be impaired in patients with NSCLC secondary to EGFR-targeted TKIs compared to ALK-directed treatment.

Objectives: Predictive biomarkers of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have been extensively studied in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with controversial results. Recently, gene-network analysis emerged as a new tool to address tumor biology and behavior, representing a potential tool to evaluate response to therapies., Methods: Clinical data and genetic profiles of 644 advanced NSCLCs were retrieved from cBioPortal and the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA); 243 ICI-treated NSCLCs were used to identify an immunotherapy response signatures via mutated gene network analysis and K-means unsupervised clustering. Signatures predictive values were tested in an external dataset of 242 cases and assessed versus a control group of 159 NSCLCs treated with standard chemotherapy., Results: At least two mutations in the coding sequence of genes belonging to the chromatin remodelling pathway (A signature), and/or at least two mutations of genes involved in cell-to-cell signalling pathways (B signature), showed positive prediction in ICI-treated advanced NSCLC. Signatures performed best when combined for patients undergoing first-line immunotherapy, and for those receiving combined ICIs., Conclusions: Alterations in genes related to chromatin remodelling complexes and cell-to-cell crosstalk may force dysfunctional immune evasion, explaining susceptibility to immunotherapy. Therefore, exploring mutated gene networks could be valuable for determining essential biological interactions, contributing to treatment personalization., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Lung cancer is responsible for 1.8 million annual deaths. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) represent 85% of lung cancer tumors. While surgery is an effective early-stage treatment, the majority of newly identified US lung cancer cases are stage III/IV. Immunotherapy, using programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) or programmed death 1 (PD-1) receptor antibody therapeutics, has increased survival for patients with NSCLC. PD-L1 protein expression is widely used as a predictive biomarker informing treatment decisions. However, only a minority of patients (27%-39%) respond to PD-L1/PD-1 treatment. PD-L1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry assay has deficiencies in identifying responding and refractory patients. Given the different characteristics of squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC, the predictability of PD-L1 levels in determining which patients would benefit from immunotherapy could vary between the 2 histologies. We analyzed 17 phase-III clinical studies and a retrospective study to determine if the predictive capability of PD-L1 expression varies between squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC. For patients with NSCLC treated with mono or dual-immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), PD-L1 expression was more predictive of benefit for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC than squamous NSCLC. Patients with nonsquamous histology and PD-L1 high tumor proportion scores (TPS) survived 2.0x longer compared to those with low TPS, when treated with monotherapy ICI. Among patients with squamous NSCLC, that difference was 1.2 to 1.3x. For patients treated with ICIs and chemotherapy, there was no clear difference in the predictive value of PD-L1 levels between histologies. We encourage future researchers to analyze the predictability of PD-L1 biomarker expression separately for squamous and nonsquamous NSCLC., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations (EGFRm) represent one of the most common genomic alterations identified among patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Several targeted agents for patients with EGFRm have been proven safe and effective, including the third-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) osimertinib. Nonetheless, some patients will present with or develop EGFR-TKI resistance mechanisms., Objective: We characterized the genomic landscape of primary resistance to osimertinib among Hispanic patients with EGFR-mutant NSCLC., Methods: An observational longitudinal cohort study was conducted with two groups of patients, those with intrinsic resistance (cohort A) and those with long-term survival (cohort B). All patients were treated and followed between January 2018 and May 2022. All patients were assessed for Programmed Cell Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression and Bcl-2-like protein 11 (BIM)/AXL mRNA expression before starting TKI. After 8 weeks of treatment, a liquid biopsy was performed to determine the presence of circulating free DNA (cfDNA), and next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used to identify mutations at the time of progression. In both cohorts, overall response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were evaluated., Results: We found a homogeneous distribution of EGFR-sensitizing mutations in both cohorts. For cohort A, exon 21 mutations were more common than exon 19 deletions (ex19dels) for cohort B (P = 0.0001). The reported ORR for osimertinib was 6.3% and 100% for cohorts A and B, respectively (P = 0.0001). PFS was significantly higher in cohort B (27.4 months vs. 3.1 months; P = 0.0001) and ex19del patients versus L858R (24.5 months, 95% confidence interval [CI] 18.2-NR), vs. 7.6 months, 95% CI 4.8-21.1; P = 0.001). OS was considerably lower for cohort A (20.1 months vs. 36.0 months; P = 0.0001) and was better for patients with ex19del, no brain metastasis, and low tumor mutation burden. At the time of progression, more mutations were found in cohort A, identifying off-target alterations more frequently, including TP53, RAS, and RB1., Conclusion: EGFR-independent alterations are common among patients with primary resistance to osimertinib and significantly impact PFS and OS. Our results suggest that among Hispanic patients, other variables associated with intrinsic resistance include the number of commutations, high levels AXL mRNA, and low levels of BIM mRNA, T790M de novo, EGFR p.L858R presence, and a high tumoral mutational burden., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are an effective therapeutic strategy, improving the survival of patients with lung cancer compared with conventional treatments. However, novel predictive biomarkers are needed to stratify which patients derive clinical benefit because the currently used and highly heterogenic histological PD-L1 has shown low accuracy. Liquid biopsy is the analysis of biomarkers in body fluids and represents a minimally invasive tool that can be used to monitor tumor evolution and treatment effects, potentially reducing biases associated with tumor heterogeneity associated with tissue biopsies. In this context, cytokines, such as transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β), can be found free in circulation in the blood and packaged into extracellular vesicles (EVs), which have a specific delivery tropism and can affect in tumor/immune system interaction. TGF-β is an immunosuppressive cytokine that plays a crucial role in tumor immune escape, treatment resistance, and metastasis. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the predictive value of circulating and EV TGF-β in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer receiving ICIs., Methods: Plasma samples were collected in 33 patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer before and during treatment with ICIs. EV were isolated from plasma by serial ultracentrifugation methods and circulating and EV TGF-β expression levels were evaluated by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay., Results: Baseline high expression of TGF-β in EVs was associated with nonresponse to ICIs as well as shorter progression-free survival and overall survival, outperforming circulating TGF-β levels and tissue PD-L1 as a predictive biomarker., Conclusion: If validated, EV TGF-β could be used to improve patient stratification, increasing the effectiveness of treatment with ICIs and potentially informing combinatory treatments with TGF-β blockade., Plain Language Summary: Treatment with immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has improved the survival of some patients with lung cancer. However, the majority of patients do not benefit from this treatment, making it essential to develop more reliable biomarkers to identify patients most likely to benefit. In this pilot study, the expression of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) in blood circulation and in extracellular vesicles was analyzed. The levels of extracellular vesicle TGF-β before treatment were able to determine which patients would benefit from treatment with ICIs and have a longer survival with higher accuracy than circulating TGF-β and tissue PD-L1, which is the currently used biomarker in clinical practice., (© 2022 American Cancer Society.)

Lung cancer has a high morbidity and mortality rate, and affected patients have a poor prognosis and low survival. The therapeutic approaches for lung cancer treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, are not completely effective, due to late diagnosis. Although the identification of genetic drivers has contributed to the improvement of lung cancer clinical management, the discovery of new diagnostic and prognostic tools remains a critical issue. Liquid biopsy (LB) represents a minimally invasive approach and practical alternative source to investigate tumor-derived alterations and to facilitate the selection of targeted therapies. LB allows for the testing of different analytes such as circulating tumor cells, extracellular vesicles (EVs), tumor-educated platelets, and cell-free nucleic acids including DNAs, RNAs, and noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs). Several regulatory factors control the key cellular oncogenic pathways involved in cancers. ncRNAs have a wide range of regulatory effects in lung cancers. This review focuses on emerging regulatory ncRNAs, freely circulating in body fluids or shuttled by EVs, such as circular-RNAs, small nucleolar-RNAs, small nuclear-RNAs, and piwi-RNAs, as new biomarkers for early detection, prognosis, and monitoring of therapeutic strategy of lung cancer treatment., Competing Interests: C. R. declares conflict of interest, he is a speaker for Roche, Guardant health, MSD and Astra Zeneca, advisory board for ARCHER, Novartis, Nivata, BMS, Boston Pharmaceutical, EMD Serono, Pfizer. C.R. has research collaboration with LC Research Foundation-Pfizer Grant. All other authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (© The Author(s), 2022.)

Background: Mutations in STK11 (STK11 Mut ) and, frequently co-occurring, KEAP1 mutations (KEAP1 Mut ) are associated with poor survival in metastatic Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy. However, there are limited data regarding the prognostic or predictive significance of these genomic alterations among Hispanics., Methods: This retrospective study analyzed a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 103) diagnosed with mNSCLC from the US and seven Latin American countries (LATAM) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) alone or in combination as first-line (Cohort A). All cases were treated in routine care between January 2016 and December 2021. The main objectives were to determine the association of mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 in these patients' tumors with overall (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), presence of KRAS mutations, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and other relevant clinical variables. To compare outcomes with a STK11 Wt /KEAP1 Wt population, historical data from a cohort of Hispanic patients (N = 101) treated with first-line ICI was used, matching both groups by country of origin, gender, and Programed Death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression level (Cohort B)., Results: Most tumors had mutations only in STK11 or KEAP1 (45.6%) without KRAS co-mutation or any other genomic alteration. Besides, 35%, 8.7%, 6.8%, and 3.9% were KRAS Mut  + STK11 Mut , KRAS Mut  + STK11 Mut  + KEAP1 Mut , STK11 Mut  + KEAP1 Mut , and KRAS Mut  + KEAP1 Mut , respectively. Based on KRAS status, STK11 alterations were associated with significantly lower PD-L1 expression among those with KRAS Wt (p = 0.023), whereas KEAP1 mutations were predominantly associated with lower PD-L1 expression among KRAS Mut cases (p = 0.047). Tumors with KRAS Mut  + KEAP1 Mut had significantly higher median TMB when compared to other tumors (p = 0.040). For Cohort A, median PFS was 4.9 months (95%CI 4.3-5.4), slightly longer in those with KEAP1 mut 6.1 months versus STK11 Mut 4.7 months (p = 0.38). In the same cohort, PD-L1 expression and TMB did not influence PFS. OS was significantly longer among patients with tumors with PD-L1 ≥ 50% (30.9 months), and different from those with PD-L1 1-49% (22.0 months), and PD-L1 < 1% (12.0 months) (p = 0.0001). When we compared the cohorts A and B, OS was significantly shorter for patients carrying STK1 [STK11 Mut 14.2 months versus STK11 Wt 27.0 months (p = 0.0001)] or KEAP1 [KEAP1 Mut 12.0 months versus KEAP1 Wt 24.4 months (p = 0.005)] mutations. PD-L1 expression significantly affected OS independently of the presence of mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or KRAS. TMB-H favored better OS., Conclusions: This is the first large Hispanic cohort to study the impact of STK11 and KEAP1 mutations in NSCLC patient treated with ICI. Our data suggest that mutations in the above-mentioned genes are associated with PD-L1 expression levels and poor OS., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Immunotherapy has redefined the treatment of cancer patients and it is constantly generating new advances and approaches. Among the multiple options of immunotherapy, bispecific antibodies (bsAbs) represent a novel thoughtful approach. These drugs integrate the action of the immune system in a strategy to redirect the activation of innate and adaptive immunity toward specific antigens and specific tumor locations. Here we discussed some basic aspects of the design and function of bsAbs, their main challenges and the state-of-the-art of these molecules in the treatment of hematological and solid malignancies and future perspectives.

Background: Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) changed the therapeutic landscape of patients with lung cancer. However, only a subset of them derived clinical benefit and evidenced the need to identify reliable predictive biomarkers. Liquid biopsy is the non-invasive and repeatable analysis of biological material in body fluids and a promising tool for cancer biomarkers discovery. In particular, there is growing evidence that extracellular vesicles (EVs) play an important role in tumor progression and in tumor-immune interactions. Thus, we evaluated whether extracellular vesicle PD-L1 expression could be used as a biomarker for prediction of durable treatment response and survival in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing treatment with ICIs., Methods: Dynamic changes in EV PD-L1 were analyzed in plasma samples collected before and at 9 ± 1 weeks during treatment in a retrospective and a prospective independent cohorts of 33 and 39 patients, respectively., Results: As a result, an increase in EV PD-L1 was observed in non-responders in comparison to responders and was an independent biomarker for shorter progression-free survival and overall survival. To the contrary, tissue PD-L1 expression, the commonly used biomarker, was not predictive neither for durable response nor survival., Conclusion: These findings indicate that EV PD-L1 dynamics could be used to stratify patients with advanced NSCLC who would experience durable benefit from ICIs., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Background: Platelets are active players in tumorigenesis, although the exact interactive mechanisms and their direct impact on tumor cells remain largely unknown. Methods: Bidirectional transference of lipids, proteins and RNA between platelets and tumor cells and its impact on tumor cell behavior and tumor process are analyzed in this work. Phenotypic, genetic and functional modifications induced by platelets were analyzed both in tumor cell lines and in circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Results: Data from these assays showed that platelets transferred structural components to tumor cells with higher efficiency than tumor cells to platelets (p = 0.001). This biological interplay occurred by direct contact, internalization or via extracellular vesicles. As a result, tumor cells acquired platelet markers (CD61 and CD42), showed decreased EpCAM, expressed epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition markers, and increased proliferation rates. Moreover, we were able to detect CD61 in CTCs from early and advanced prostate cancer. Conclusions: Our results demonstrated, for the first time, that platelets educate tumor cells by highly efficient transference of lipids, proteins and RNA through different mechanisms. These results suggest that tumor cells and CTCs might acquire highly dynamic and aggressive phenotypes due to platelets interaction including EMT, stem-like phenotype and high proliferative rates., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: Christian Rolfo reports roles in speaker bureaus for MSD and AstraZeneca; advisory board roles with ARCHER, Inivata, and Merck Serono; consultant roles with Mylan and Oncompass; a supported research grant from the Lung Cancer Research Foundation/Pfizer; and research support from Guardant Health and Biomark. Massimo Cristofanilli reports consultant role for Lilly and Cytodyn; advisory board role for Menarini and honorary role in Foundation Medicine. The other authors declare no potential conflicts of interest., (© The author(s).)

In light of Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) variants potentially undermining humoral immunity, it is important to understand the fine specificity of the antiviral antibodies. We screened 20 COVID-19 patients for antibodies against 9 different SARS-CoV-2 proteins observing responses against the spike (S) proteins, the receptor-binding domain (RBD), and the nucleocapsid (N) protein which were of the IgG1 and IgG3 subtypes. Importantly, mutations which typically occur in the B.1.351 "South African" variant, significantly reduced the binding of anti-RBD antibodies. Nine of 20 patients were critically ill and were considered high-risk (HR). These patients showed significantly higher levels of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-β) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSC), and lower levels of CD4 + T cells expressing LAG-3 compared to standard-risk (SR) patients. HR patients evidenced significantly higher anti-S1/RBD IgG antibody levels and an increased neutralizing activity. Importantly, a large proportion of S protein-specific antibodies were glycosylation-dependent and we identified a number of immunodominant linear epitopes within the S1 and N proteins. Findings derived from this study will not only help us to identify the most relevant component of the anti-SARS-CoV-2 humoral immune response but will also enable us to design more meaningful immunomonitoring methods for anti-COVID-19 vaccines., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Purpose of Review: Cancer vaccines are one of the most extensively studied immunotherapy type in solid tumors. Despite favorable presuppositions, so far, the use of cancer vaccines has been associated with disappointing results. However, a new generation of vaccines has been developed, promising to revolutionize the immunotherapy field., Recent Findings: In this review, we aim to highlight the advances in cancer vaccines and the remaining hurdles to overcome. Cancer vaccination has experienced tremendous progress in the last decade, with myriad promising developments. Future efforts should focus on optimization of target identification, streamlining of most appropriate vaccination strategies, and adjuvant development, as well as predictive biomarker identification. Cautious optimism is warranted in the face of early successes seen in recent clinical trials for oncolytic vaccines. If an approach were to prove successful, it could revolutionize cancer therapy the way ICIs did in the previous decade., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

Introduction: In the current era of personalized medicine, liquid biopsy has acquired a relevant importance in patient management of advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). As a matter of fact, liquid biopsy may supplant the problem of inadequate tissue for molecular testing. The term 'liquid biopsy' refers to a number of different biological fluids, but is most clearly associated with plasma-related platforms. It must be taken into account that pre-analytical processing and the selection of the appropriate technology according to the clinical context may condition the results obtained. In addition, novel clinical applications beyond the evaluation of the molecular status of predictive biomarkers are currently under investigation., Areas Covered: This review summarizes the available evidence on pre-analytical issues and different clinical applications of liquid biopsies in NSCLC patients., Expert Opinion: Liquid biopsy should be considered not only as a valid alternative but as complementary to tissue-based molecular approaches. Careful attention should be paid to the optimization and standardization of all phases of liquid biopsy samples management in order to determine a significant improvement in either sensitivity or specificity, while significant reducing the number of 'false negative' or 'false positive' molecular results.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) representing its most commonly diagnosed sub-type. Despite the significant improvements in lung cancer biomarkers knowledge, accompanied by substantial technological advances in molecular tumor profiling, a considerable fraction (up to 30 %) of advanced NSCLC patient presents with major testing challenges or tissue unavailability for molecular analysis. In this context, liquid biopsy is on the rise, currently gaining considerable interest within the molecular pathology and oncology community. Molecular profiling of liquid biopsy specimens using next generation molecular biology methodologies is a rapidly evolving field with promising applications not exclusively limited to advanced stages but also more recently expanding to early stages cancer patients. Here, we offer an overview of some of the most consolidated and emerging applications of next generation sequencing technologies for liquid biopsy testing in NSCLC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction : The rise of the personalized era in lung cancer prompted the evaluation of novel diagnostic tools to overcome some of the limits of traditional tumor genotyping. Liquid biopsy refers to a multitude of minimally invasive techniques that can allow a real-time biomolecular characterization of the tumor through the analysis of human body fluids. Areas covered : Herein we provide a comprehensive overview of the role of liquid biopsy in lung cancer, mainly focusing on the most studied members of the liquid biopsy family, cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and circulating tumor cells (CTCs). Expert opinion : Among the different components of the large liquid biopsy family, cfDNA is the most studied and widely adopted source for tumor genotyping in lung cancer, already entered clinical practice for detection of both sensitizing and resistance EGFR mutations. However, the impressive technological advances made in the last few years are expanding its potential applications, allowing a more comprehensive plasma genotyping through next-generation sequencing and moving from advanced/metastatic disease to novel frontiers, such as early detection and minimal residual disease evaluation.

Metastasis is the leading cause of cancer-related deaths and despite measurable progress in the field, underlying mechanisms are still not fully understood. Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) disseminate within the bloodstream, where most of them die due to the attack of the immune system. On the other hand, recent evidence shows active interactions between CTCs and platelets, myeloid cells, macrophages, neutrophils, and other hematopoietic cells that secrete immunosuppressive cytokines, which aid CTCs to evade the immune system and enable metastasis. Platelets, for instance, regulate inflammation, recruit neutrophils, and cause fibrin clots, which may protect CTCs from the attack of Natural Killer cells or macrophages and facilitate extravasation. Recently, a correlation between the commensal microbiota and the inflammatory/immune tone of the organism has been stablished. Thus, the microbiota may affect the development of cancer-promoting conditions. Furthermore, CTCs may suffer phenotypic changes, as those caused by the epithelial-mesenchymal transition, that also contribute to the immune escape and resistance to immunotherapy. In this review, we discuss the findings regarding the collaborative biological events among CTCs, immune cells, and microbiome associated to immune escape and metastatic progression., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

miRNAs are well known for being implicated in a myriad of biological situations, including those related to serious diseases. Amongst miRNAs, miRNA-21 has the spotlight as it is reported to be up-regulated in multiple severe pathological conditions, being its quantification a key point in medicine. To date, most of the techniques for miRNA quantification have shown to be less effective than expected; thus, we herein present a novel, rapid, cost-effective, robust and PCR-free approach, based on dynamic chemistry, for the identification and quantification of miRNA directly from tumour cells using both FACS and a fluorescent microplate. This dynamic chemistry novel application involves bead based reagents and allows quantifying the number of miR-21 molecules presented in MDA-MB-468 and H1975 tumour cells., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Exosomes are cell-derived extracellular vesicles of 30-150 nm in size and are involved in intercellular communication. Because of their bioactive cargo, consisting of proteins, RNA and lipids, and their natural ability to deliver these biomolecules to recipient cells, exosomes are increasingly being studied as novel drug delivery vehicles or as cell-free approaches to regenerative medicine. However, one of the major hurdles for clinical translation of therapeutic strategies based on exosomes is their low yield when produced under standard culture conditions. Exosomes are vesicles of endocytic origin and are released when multivesicular endosomes fuse with the plasma membrane. Here, we demonstrate that interfering with endolysosomal trafficking significantly increases exosome release. Furthermore, these exosomes retain their regenerative bioactivity as demonstrated by pro-survival and angiogenesis assays using both cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells. These results may be employed to increase exosome production for studying biological functions or to improve clinical translation of exosome-based therapeutics., (Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)