Search

Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) are rare but serious cutaneous reactions characterized by epidermal and mucocutaneous detachment, most often drug-induced. SJS and TEN are considered the opposite extremes of the same spectrum of disease, where the percentage of skin involvement is 30% in TEN; the in-between range is called a SJS/TEN overlap. We present the case of a 64-year-old patient who was treated with lamotrigine, an anti-epileptic drug, and developed SJS/TEN. After being hospitalized and recovering for three days due to the worsening of the clinical presentation, he was transferred to a burn center. Making an early diagnosis and identifying the indicated drug is extremely important to set the appropriate treatment and reduce mortality. Advanced supportive care is required.

Background: The increasing adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical settings highlights their efficacy in treating diverse conditions, while also emphasizing the potential for common cutaneous adverse reactions to arise. The aim of this study is to investigate a multitude of impacting factors and determinants among patients presenting with ICI-associated cutaneous adverse reactions. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of ICI-associated cutaneous adverse reactions using data from the FAERS. Our study spans from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2023, focusing on ICIs, including anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4 agents. Findings: Among the 334,293 reported irAR, 17,431 were identified as cutaneous adverse reactions (ARs). Predominant cutaneous ARs included rash (21.01 %), pruritus (11.22 %), and pemphigoid (3.90 %). Stevens-Johnson syndrome emerged as the most reported severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) (2.08 %). Anti-CTLA-4 agents exhibited higher cutaneous toxicity compared to anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents. Anti-PD-1 agents demonstrated an elevated mortality rate. The combined use of ICIs with chemotherapy amplified the risk of SCAR and mortality. Targeted therapy was a risk factor for cutaneous ARs but was associated with reduced mortality. The median onset day for cutaneous toxicity was 21 days, while for SCAR, it was 23 days. Weight and age were identified as predictors of SCAR, cutaneous toxicity, and mortality. Skin cancer increased skin toxicity, while lung cancer heightened SCAR formation. The number of administered ICIs positively correlated with SCAR, skin toxicity, and mortality. Interpretation: This study highlights the significance of early identification and effective management of cutaneous toxicities, along with personalized follow-up care, as essential strategies for minimizing risks and preventing treatment disruptions.

Tislelizumab may induce immune-related adverse events, especially adverse skin events. Early detection and timely intervention of cutaneous adverse events are crucial to improve patients' quality of life and reduce the disruption of therapeutic regimens. This study aimed to determine the clinical characteristics of cutaneous adverse reactions to tislelizumab and offer a reference for its rational clinical use. Case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions induced by tislelizumab were collected from the relevant databases (up to 31 March 2023). Patient age, sex, primary disease, medication use, occurrence of adverse skin conditions, treatment, and outcomes were recorded and descriptively analysed. A total of 13 patients were enrolled, including six males and seven females, aged 55–79 years, with a median age of 75 years and a mean age of 70.92 ± 8.84 years. The original disease was lung carcinoma in none patients, cervical carcinoma in two, and urothelial carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma in one each. The time from the initiation of medication use to the occurrence of cutaneous adverse reactions ranged from 7 to 177 days. Among the 13 patients, 10 showed improvement after drug withdrawal or symptomatic treatment. Two patients died (one died of disease progression and multiorgan failure, one died of acute coronary syndrome), and one patient's adverse skin reactions persisted without treatment. Tislelizumab-related cutaneous adverse reactions mostly occur after several days to months of treatment. In clinical practice, evaluation and monitoring should be strengthened. More attention should be paid to erythema and rashes, which may be signs of serious adverse skin reactions. Early detection and intervention can ensure the safe use of drugs and provide greater clinical benefits to patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Tattooing is the procedure of implanting permanent pigment granules and additives into the dermal layer of the skin, serving various purposes such as decoration, medical identification, or accidental markings. There has been a significant rise in the popularity of decorative tattooing as a form of body art among both teenagers and young adults. Thus, the incidence of tattoos is increasing, with expanding applications such as permanent makeup, scar camouflage, nipple–areola, lips, and eyebrows tattooing, and utilization in oncological radiotherapy such as colon marking. However, there have been reported a broad range of adverse reactions linked to tattooing, encompassing allergic reactions, superficial and deep cutaneous infections, autoimmune disorders induced by the Koebner phenomenon, cutaneous tumors, and others. These reactions exhibit different onset times for symptoms, ranging from immediate manifestations after tattoo application to symptoms emerging several years later. Given the limited information on a tattoo's side effects, this review aims to elucidate the clinical spectrum of cutaneous complications of tattoos in different patients. The analysis will investigate both allergic and nonallergic clinical presentations of tattoo-related side effects, microscopic findings from skin biopsies, and therapeutic outcomes. This exploration is essential to improve our understanding of tattoo-related cutaneous complications and associated differential diagnoses and highlight the significance of patient awareness regarding potential risks before getting a tattoo. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous adverse events are commonly reported in adult patients with chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) receiving tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs); however, little is known about the cutaneous reactions in children receiving TKIs for CML. As pediatric patients may require lifelong TKI therapy, it is essential to understand the wide range of potential cutaneous toxicities. We examined all case studies, cohort studies, and clinical trials in PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase that reported cutaneous reactions to first‐, second‐, and third‐generation TKIs in children 18 years or younger with CML. This review article focuses on the TKI drug types and doses, patient demographic characteristics, features of skin reactions, and clinical outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Antiepileptics are among the drugs mainly implicated in cutaneous adverse drug reactions (CADRs). Materials and Methods: The aim of this case series was to study the epidemiological, clinical, evolutionary, and therapeutic profile of antiepileptic-drug-induced toxidermia and the most often incriminated antiepileptic drugs. Results: We collected seventeen cases of a CADR to antiepileptic drugs at the Dermatology Department of CHU Mohamed VI in Marrakech over a period of five years. The mean age was 42 years. The pattern of CADRs was as follows: DRESS syndrome in 52.9%, Stevens-Johnson syndrome in 23.5%, Lyell syndrome in 11.8%, and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis and fixed bullous generalized drug eruption in 5.9% each. Carbamazepine was the most often incriminated antiepileptic drug. Conclusion: CADRs to antiepileptic drugs are dominated by DRESS syndrome. Through this study, we underline the potential of antiepileptic drugs to induce serious toxidermia and that, therefore, their prescription must be reasoned. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous immune-related adverse events (cirAEs) occur in up to 40% of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) recipients. However, the association of cirAEs with survival remains unclear. To investigate the association of cirAEs with survival among ICI recipients. ICI recipients were identified from the Mass General Brigham healthcare system and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute. Patient charts were reviewed for cirAE development within 2 years after ICI initiation. Multivariate time-varying Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, Charlson Comorbidity Index, ICI type, cancer type, and year of ICI initiation were utilized to investigate the impact of cirAE development on overall survival. Of the 3731 ICI recipients, 18.1% developed a cirAE. Six-month landmark analysis and time-varying Cox proportional hazards models demonstrated that patients who developed cirAEs were associated with decreased mortality (hazardratio [HR] = 0.87, P =.027), particularly in patients with melanoma (HR = 0.67, P =.003). Among individual morphologies, lichenoid eruption (HR = 0.51, P <.001), psoriasiform eruption (HR = 0.52, P =.005), vitiligo (HR = 0.29, P =.007), isolated pruritus without visible manifestation of rash (HR = 0.71, P =.007), acneiform eruption (HR = 0.34, P =.025), and non-specific rash (HR = 0.68, P <.001) were significantly associated with better survival after multiple comparisons adjustment. Retrospective design; single geography. CirAE development is associated with improved survival among ICI recipients, especially patients with melanoma. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of vaccines represented a milestone to allow the slowing down and then containing of the exponential increase in ongoing infections and deaths of COVID-19. Since the first months of the vaccination campaign in various continents, there has been a certain number of reports of adverse events, including skin reactions. We conducted a systematic review, searching on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for the words: COVID vaccine, dermatopathology, skin, eruptions, rash, cutaneous, BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), ChAdOX1 (AstraZeneca), and mRNA-1273 (Moderna). A total of 28 records were initially identified in the literature search of which two were duplicates. After screening for eligibility and inclusion criteria, 18 publications were ultimately included. Various clinical cutaneous manifestations and histopathological patterns following vaccination have been described in literature. The most frequent clinical-pathological presentations were erythematous maculo-papular eruptions in different way of distribution with histopathological pictures mostly represented by interface changes and mixed peri-vascular and peri-adnexal cell infiltrate. Other presentations included new onset of pemphigoid bullous disease (n = 15), delayed T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction (injection site reactions) (n = 10), purpuric skin rash (n = 13), mostly localized on the legs bilaterally and symmetrically with histological pictures characterized by extravasation of erythrocytes in the superficial and middle dermis, and other types of reactions. New studies with large case series and further literature reviews are needed to improve the clinical management of patients and optimize the timeline for carrying out histological biopsy for confirmatory, supportive, and differential diagnosis purposes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Although vaccination is widely accepted as an effective method of preventing and controlling the COVID‐19 pandemic, many people are concerned about possible cutaneous side‐effects, which can delay or prevent them from being vaccinated. The objectives of this systematic review were to assess the global prevalence and clinical manifestations of cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID‐19 vaccination. PubMed and Scopus databases were searched for articles published from 1 January 2019 to 31 December 2021, and reference lists for each selected article were screened. Case reports, case series, observational studies and randomized controlled trials that provided information on cutaneous adverse reactions following COVID‐19 vaccines were included. A total of 300 studies were included in a systematic review of which 32 studies with 946 366 participants were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled prevalence of cutaneous manifestations following COVID‐19 vaccination was 3.8% (95% CI, 2.7%–5.3%). COVID‐19 vaccines based on the mRNA platform had a higher prevalence than other platforms at 6.9% (95% CI, 3.8%–12.3%). Various cutaneous manifestations have been reported from injection site reactions, which were the most common (72.16%) to uncommon adverse reactions such as delayed inflammatory reactions to tissue filler (0.07%) and flares of pre‐existing dermatoses (0.07%). Severe cutaneous reactions such as anaphylaxis have also been reported, but in rare cases (0.05%). In conclusion, cutaneous adverse reactions are common, especially in those receiving mRNA vaccines. Most reactions are mild and are not contraindications to subsequent vaccination except for anaphylaxis, which rarely occurs. COVID‐19 vaccination may also be associated with flares of pre‐existing dermatoses and delayed inflammatory reactions to tissue filler. Patients with a history of allergies, pre‐existing skin conditions or scheduled for filler injections should receive additional precounselling and monitoring. A better understanding of potential side‐effects may strengthen public confidence in those wary of new vaccine technologies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Skin disorders are frequent adverse events after coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19) vaccination. However, the pathogenesis of these disorders is not fully understood. Here, we report a case series of cutaneous adverse events following COVID‐19 vaccination, and the results of our investigation reveal the underlying mechanism. Case 1: a 47‐year‐old female developed a wheal, confined to the COVID‐19 vaccination site, 2 days after her first injection. She was treated with topical steroids and oral antihistamines. Case 2: a 51‐year‐old female showed generalized petechial erythema accompanied by fever, genital bleeding, thrombocytopenia, liver dysfunction, and disseminated intravascular coagulation, 2 days after her second injection. She was diagnosed with vaccine‐induced macrophage activation syndrome and treated with anti‐inflammatory therapy. Immunohistological analysis of the skin eruption, in both these cases, showed infiltration of CD123+ BDCA2+ plasmacytoid dendritic cells (p‐DC). Despite the distinctive clinical features in these two cases, this finding suggests that p‐DC might be involved in different cutaneous adverse events after COVID‐19 vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fandresena Arilala Sendrasoa, Irina Mamisoa Ranaivo, Arifetraniaina Julia Raherivelo, Fahafahantsoa Rapelanoro Rabenja, Lala Soavina Ramarozatovo Department of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, MadagascarCorrespondence: Fandresena Arilala SendrasoaDepartment of Dermatology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Antananarivo, Antananarivo, MadagascarEmail nasendrefa@yahoo.frBackground: Long-term oral corticosteroids have an important role in dermatological care in Madagascar. However, significant adverse effects have been associated with continuous exposure to oral corticosteroids.Objective: We aim to assess the adverse effects of long-term corticosteroid therapy in patients seen in the Department of Dermatology at the University Hospital Joseph Raseta Befelatanana Antananarivo (UH/JRB), Madagascar, and to identify the risk factors associated with these adverse effects.Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted during 4 months to assess the adverse effects of long-term corticosteroid therapy in patients seen in the Department of Dermatology. Patients treated with oral corticosteroids for more than 3 months were included in our study.Results: The prevalence of long-term use of oral corticosteroids in the Department of Dermatology of UH/JRB was 34.28%. A total of 51 patients were included and adverse effects occurred in 64.70% of this population. Repetitive infections and cutaneous adverse reactions were the most frequent adverse effects, in 23.52% and 11.76% of cases, respectively. There were no correlations between age, gender, type of disease treated, the molecule used or daily dose and the risk of adverse effects. Patients who received a corticosteroid dose of more than 40 mg daily (longer than 3 months) or a high cumulative dose of corticosteroids had a high risk of adverse effects.Conclusion: Repetitive infections and cutaneous adverse reactions are the most frequent adverse effects of long-term oral corticosteroid use. Prescribing the lowest effective dose may reduce the risk of these adverse effects. Furthermore, prevention of the adverse effects of corticosteroids through diet, calcium and vitamin D supplementation is strongly recommended during long-term oral corticosteroid therapy.Keywords: oral corticosteroids, repetitive infections, cutaneous adverse reactions, high dose

The coronavirus vaccine was developed to help overcome the COVID‐19 crisis. This study aimed to identify the cutaneous side effects secondary to Pfizer‐BioNTech and Oxford‐AstraZeneca COVID‐19 vaccines in the general population of Saudi Arabia and to list the risk factors for the development of cutaneous side effects. This cross‐sectional study was conducted in 2021, self‐administered surveys were distributed electronically through social media, and telephonic interviews were conducted with a sample size of 1000 participants. Data analysis was performed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences. A total of 1021 patients (229 male and 722 female) aged 12 years or older were included. While 833 participants were medically free, 188 had chronic illnesses. While 802 participants were not taking any medications, 219 were taking medications regularly. Oxford‐Astra Zeneca and Pfizer BioNTech vaccines were administered to 319 and 702 participants, respectively. One‐hundred and twenty‐five participants previously had COVID‐19 infection and 407 were exposed to a PCR positive case of COVID. Six hundred and fifty‐nine patients (64.5%) reported experiencing injection site reactions: 606 (59.4%) had injection site pain, 168 (16.5%) had injection site swelling, and 107 (10.5%) had injection site redness. Only 51 patients (5%) experienced cutaneous side effects after injection. A significant association was found between chronic illnesses and cutaneous side effects post‐vaccine (9% vs. 4.1%; p value = 0.005). Patients on medications showed a higher rate of symptoms (8.2% vs. 4.1%; p value = 0.005). Age, gender, vaccine types, and history of COVID‐19 infection were not significantly associated with cutaneous side effects post‐vaccine. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The advent of vaccines represented a milestone to allow the slowing down and then containing of the exponential increase in ongoing infections and deaths of COVID-19. Since the first months of the vaccination campaign in various continents, there has been a certain number of reports of adverse events, including skin reactions. We conducted a systematic review, searching on PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Cochrane Library for the words: COVID vaccine, dermatopathology, skin, eruptions, rash, cutaneous, BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech), ChAdOX1 (AstraZeneca), and mRNA-1273 (Moderna). A total of 28 records were initially identified in the literature search of which two were duplicates. After screening for eligibility and inclusion criteria, 18 publications were ultimately included. Various clinical cutaneous manifestations and histopathological patterns following vaccination have been described in literature. The most frequent clinical-pathological presentations were erythematous maculo-papular eruptions in different way of distribution with histopathological pictures mostly represented by interface changes and mixed peri-vascular and peri-adnexal cell infiltrate. Other presentations included new onset of pemphigoid bullous disease (n = 15), delayed T-cell-mediated hypersensitivity reaction (injection site reactions) (n = 10), purpuric skin rash (n = 13), mostly localized on the legs bilaterally and symmetrically with histological pictures characterized by extravasation of erythrocytes in the superficial and middle dermis, and other types of reactions. New studies with large case series and further literature reviews are needed to improve the clinical management of patients and optimize the timeline for carrying out histological biopsy for confirmatory, supportive, and differential diagnosis purposes.

Background: The increasing adoption of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in clinical settings highlights their efficacy in treating diverse conditions, while also emphasizing the potential for common cutaneous adverse reactions to arise. The aim of this study is to investigate a multitude of impacting factors and determinants among patients presenting with ICI-associated cutaneous adverse reactions., Methods: We conducted a comprehensive analysis of ICI-associated cutaneous adverse reactions using data from the FAERS. Our study spans from January 1, 2015, to March 31, 2023, focusing on ICIs, including anti-PD-1, anti-PD-L1, and anti-CTLA-4 agents., Findings: Among the 334,293 reported irAR, 17,431 were identified as cutaneous adverse reactions (ARs). Predominant cutaneous ARs included rash (21.01 %), pruritus (11.22 %), and pemphigoid (3.90 %). Stevens-Johnson syndrome emerged as the most reported severe cutaneous adverse reaction (SCAR) (2.08 %). Anti-CTLA-4 agents exhibited higher cutaneous toxicity compared to anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 agents. Anti-PD-1 agents demonstrated an elevated mortality rate. The combined use of ICIs with chemotherapy amplified the risk of SCAR and mortality. Targeted therapy was a risk factor for cutaneous ARs but was associated with reduced mortality. The median onset day for cutaneous toxicity was 21 days, while for SCAR, it was 23 days. Weight and age were identified as predictors of SCAR, cutaneous toxicity, and mortality. Skin cancer increased skin toxicity, while lung cancer heightened SCAR formation. The number of administered ICIs positively correlated with SCAR, skin toxicity, and mortality., Interpretation: This study highlights the significance of early identification and effective management of cutaneous toxicities, along with personalized follow-up care, as essential strategies for minimizing risks and preventing treatment disruptions., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (© 2024 Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

As the number of vaccinated individuals has increased, there have been increasing reports of cutaneous hypersensitivity reactions. The main COVID-19 vaccines administered include messenger ribonucleic acid vaccines, non-replicating viral vector vaccines, inactivated whole-virus vaccines, and protein-based vaccines. These vaccines contain active components such as polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, aluminum, tromethamine, and disodium edetate dihydrate. Recent advances in understanding the coordination of inflammatory responses by specific subsets of lymphocytes have led to a new classification based on immune response patterns. We categorize these responses into four patterns: T helper (Th)1-, Th2-, Th17/22-, and Treg-polarized cutaneous inflammation after stimulation of COVID-19 vaccines. Although the association between COVID-19 vaccination and these cutaneous adverse reactions remains controversial, the occurrence of rare dermatoses and their short intervals suggest a possible relationship. Despite the potential adverse reactions, the administration of COVID-19 vaccines is crucial in the ongoing battle against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. • Since the COVID-19 pandemic, various vaccines have been developed. • Active components included polyethylene glycol, polysorbate 80, and aluminum. • T helper (Th)1-, Th2-, Th17/22-, and Treg- cutaneous inflammation were observed. • Numerous cutaneous adverse reactions can occur after COVID-19 vaccination. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Following vaccination for COVID-19, various cutaneous adverse reactions (CARs) are reported. Here is an Asian male in late 50's who developed necrotic skin with mucosal involvement 10 days following booster dose of ChAdOx1 nCov-19 vaccination. Based on disease course and morphology, toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN) was suspected. The patient developed respiratory distress and was intubated, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) administered at 2 g/kg body weight following which skin lesions healed in fourth week, the patient was discharged after 50 days of intensive care unit (ICU) stay. Severe CARs are rare following vaccination, of two components in ChAdOx1nCoV-19 adenoviral vector vaccine, virotopes cause T-cell mediated granulysin and granzyme B release leading to epidermal detachment and mucosal involvement of conducting airways causing respiratory failure. CARs can also occur in whom first and second dose was uneventful. Supportive therapy and prevention of sepsis are mainstay of management. Though the use of IVIG has shown conflicting results, our case was successfully managed with IVIG.

Abstract Background Drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS) syndrome is a serious life-treating condition characterized by skin eruption, fever, haematologic abnormalities, and multi-organ involvement that can be fatal if unrecognized, especially in patients with liver failure. Diagnosis may be difficult because it is rarely described in children and can mimic many different conditions. Case presentation We report two cases of DRESS syndrome due to prolonged antibiotic treatment in young children in whom recovery occurred following different therapeutic approaches. A previously healthy 5-year-old boy had been receiving intravenous vancomycin for right wrist and left elbow osteomyelitis and developed DRESS syndrome on day 30. The patient achieved a complete resolution of all symptoms with pulse methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone. A 4-year-old girl with cystic fibrosis, pancreatic insufficiency, chronic pulmonary colonization by Gram-positive bacteria admitted for pulmonary exacerbation was treated with intravenous piperacillin-tazobactam and tobramycin. After 14 days of treatment, she developed DRESS syndrome: antibiotic treatment was therefore stopped, and without any further therapy, a progressive resolution of the patient’s clinical features was observed within 7 days, while the normalization of laboratory abnormalities was achieved at 14 days. Conclusions Our cases highlight that paediatricians should be aware of the clinical presentations of and therapeutic approaches for DRESS syndrome, especially in children receiving long-term antibiotic treatment. The removal of the offending drug is crucial and may be the only life-saving measure. In more aggressive cases, corticosteroid or other immunosuppressive drugs should be considered to achieve the best outcome.

What is known and objective: Imatinib mesylate (IM) is the first‐line therapy for unresectable or metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs). Here, we report a case of successful progressive dose optimization by therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) for a patient with GISTs who developed IM‐associated serious cutaneous reactions. Case description: A 72‐year‐old female patient received IM at a dose of 400 mg/day for GISTs. The patient developed serious eczematoid drug eruptions and desquamation, following which IM was discontinued. One year later, the GISTs recurred with metastasis, and IM was re‐administered at a dose of 100 mg/day, and the dose was gradually increased on the basis of TDM. The final dose of IM was 200 mg/day, and the trough concentration (Ctrough) of IM was 1457.76 ng/mL. The images obtained from follow‐up computed tomography (CT) showed a marked anti‐tumour response. IM was well tolerated and the patient developed tolerable IM‐associated cutaneous reactions. What is new and conclusion: The strategy of TDM‐guided dose optimization makes it possible to achieve optimal clinical efficacy for patients with GISTs who develop IM‐associated serious cutaneous reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The association between cutaneous adverse drug reactions (cADRs) caused by antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) and human leukocyte antigen‑A (HLA-A) and HLA-B genes in Chinese Han population in Shanghai was investigated. Through the case-control study, 30 child patients with AED-induced cADRs (cADRs group), 60 AED-tolerant child patients (AED-tolerant group) and 60 normal children not taking AEDs (normal group) were collected. The HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 genotypes were detected using the polymerase chain reactionsequence- specific oligonucleotide (PCR-SSO) probe method, and the correlation of HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 genes with the incidence of cADRs was analyzed. The positive rate of HLA-B*15:02 gene was 83.33% in the cADRs group, which was significantly increased compared with that in the AED-tolerant and normal groups (P<0.01). The positive rate of HLA-A*31:01 gene was 63.33% in the cADRs group, which was obviously increased compared with that in the AED-tolerant and normal groups (P<0.01). There were no significant differences in HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 genotypes between the AED-tolerant and normal groups (P>0.05). The results showed that HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 are significantly associated with cADRs in a Chinese Han population in Shanghai, suggesting that HLA-B*15:02 and HLA-A*31:01 genotypes should be detected in the application of AEDs. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Taxanos são drogas quimioterápicas cada vez mais utilizadas no tratamento adjuvante de um grande número de cânceres, principalmente câncer de mama e de pulmão. Os efeitos colaterais não cutâneos mais importantes e limitantes do uso destas drogas são neutropenia e mucosite. Os efeitos colaterais cutäneos, além de muito frequente, interfere de forma importante na qualidade de vida dos doentes. Não existem tratamentos totalmente eficazes, mas algumas orientações podem diminuir os sintomas e prevenir recidivas em novas sessões de quimioterapiaChemotherapy with taxanes has recently become part of the treatment for many advanced neoplastic diseases, specially breast and lung cancer. Their main noncutaneous adverse reactions include neutropenia and mucositis, which eventually lead to drug discontinuation. Cutaneous adverse reactions are frequent and significantly interfere with the patient's quality of life. Treatments are poorly effective, but special recommendations may improve symptoms and prevent relapses requiring drug rechallenge

The majority of patients who are treated with these drugs have an acneiform skin rash, paronychia, and xerosis cutis with pruritus as a result of their treatment. Keywords: Poziotinib; cutaneous adverse reactions; non-small cell lung cancer EN Poziotinib cutaneous adverse reactions non-small cell lung cancer 769 770 2 05/27/22 20220601 NES 220601 Dear Editor, Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, and activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is known to be an important target for therapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Poziotinib in non-small-cell lung cancer harboring HER2 exon 20 insertion mutations after prior therapies: ZENITH20-2 trial. [Extracted from the article]

Background: Lenalidomide is commonly used for treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) as well as other hematological disorders. Cutaneous adverse reactions occur frequently and withholding lenalidomide treatment may have implications for prognosis., Objective: To evaluate the role of lenalidomide desensitization in patients with cutaneous adverse reactions., Methods: A retrospective review of patients referred for lenalidomide desensitization between May 2019 and May 2022 at a tertiary hospital. All patients underwent a 6-week outpatient desensitization with premedication., Results: There were 12 patients: 10 males and 2 females with a median age of 65 years. All had MM with autologous stem cell transplantation and lenalidomide 10 mg daily added for maintenance therapy. Most patients (n = 8) had a generalized maculopapular exanthem with or without pruritus. All patients had delayed cutaneous reactions; the median time to onset was 14 days (range 2-28 d). Six patients tolerated desensitization: 5 on the first attempt and 1 after 3 attempts and supplementary oral prednisolone. Four patients underwent multiple (≤3) attempts at desensitization owing to breakthrough symptoms. In patients who failed desensitization, recurrence of symptoms occurred variably, either early (within days), within weeks, or delayed by more than 1 month., Conclusions: Lenalidomide desensitization is worthwhile and allows continuation of treatment. In our MM cohort, lenalidomide desensitization was successful in only 50% of cases, including some cases in whom ongoing symptoms were mitigated by cotreatment with antihistamine., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The new molecular targeted therapy has been developed over the past decades by using the molecular targeted molecular changes discovered in specific types of cancer. Unfortunately, most of these agents (epidermal growth factor receptors, multi-targeted small molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies) have severe cutaneous adverse reactions, that not only interfere with the patient's quality of life, but also are dose-limiting and may require treatment interruptions. These cutaneous complications and their management must be very well known by any oncologist and dermatologist who treat oncologic patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Classical antineoplastic therapy is encumbered by extensively studied adverse reactions, most often of systemic nature. The emergence of new generations of anticancer treatments, including epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors, besides improving the response to treatment and the survival rate, is accompanied by the occurrence of new specific side effects, incompletely studied. These side effects are most often cutaneous (hand foot syndrome, acneiform reactions), and in some cases are extremely severe, requiring dose reduction or drug discontinuation. The prevention of the cutaneous adverse effects and their treatment require a close collaboration between the oncologist and the dermatologist. The occurrence of some of these skin adverse effects may be a favorable prognostic factor for the response to the cancer treatment and the overall survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous adverse reactions are reported for many therapeutic agents and, in general, are observed in between 0% and 8% of treated patients depending on the drug. Antiosteoporotic agents are considered to be safe in terms of cutaneous effects, however there have been a number of case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions which warrant consideration. This was the subject of a working group meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in April 2009, which focused on the impact of cutaneous adverse reactions and drug-induced hypersensitivity in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This position paper was drafted following these discussions and includes a flowchart for their recognition. Cutaneous adverse reactions observed with antiosteoporotic agents were reviewed and included information from case reports, regulatory documents and pharmacovigilance. These reactions ranged from benign effects including exanthematous or maculopapular eruption (drug rash), photosensitivity and urticaria, to the severe and potentially life-threatening reactions of angioedema, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. A review of the available evidence demonstrates that cutaneous adverse reactions occur with all commonly used antiosteoporotic treatments. Notably, there are reports of Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis for bisphosphonates, and of DRESS and toxic epidermal necrolysis for strontium ranelate. These severe reactions remain very rare (<1 in 10,000 cases). In general, with proper management and early recognition, including immediate and permanent withdrawal of the culprit agent, accompanied by hospitalization, rehydration and systemic corticosteroids if necessary, the prognosis is positive. [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Summary: Antiepileptic drugs including lamotrigine (LTG) and carbamazepine (CBZ) are among the most common causes of cutaneous adverse reactions (cADRs). Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-B*1502 has been strongly associated with CBZ-induced Stevens-Johnson syndrome/toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS/TEN). To investigate this relationship, we performed high-resolution HLA genotyping on LTG-tolerant controls, healthy volunteers, and patients affected by LTG-induced cADRs, ranging from maculopapular exanthema (MPE) to SJS/TEN. Patients with LTG-induced cADRs (n =25, including three with SJS/TEN and 22 with MPE), 21 LTG-tolerant controls, and 71 healthy volunteers were enrolled. The differences in the starting dosage of LTG among the SJS/TEN, MPE, and LTG-tolerant control groups were not statistically significant. HLA-B*1502 frequency was 33.3% (1/3; LTG-induced SJS/TEN group), 9.1% (2/22; LTG-induced MPE group), 4.8% (1/21; LTG-tolerant group), and 8.5% (6/71; healthy volunteers). There was no significant difference in the frequency of subjects with the HLA-B*1502 allele between the SJS/TEN group and LTG-tolerant group (p =0.239, OR=10.0, 95% CI 0.44–228.7), and healthy volunteers (p =0.26, OR=5.42, 95% CI 0.43–68.8), MPE and LTG-tolerant groups (p =1.0, OR=1.08, 95% CI 0.20–5.8), and healthy volunteers (p =1.0, OR=2.0, 95% CI 0.17–23.9). None of the HLA alleles detected were associated with LTG-induced cADRs. In conclusion, HLA-B*1502 and other HLA alleles are not directly associated with LTG-induced MPE. The possibility that HLA-B*1502 is associated with an increased risk of LTG-induced SJS/TEN could not be excluded. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous adverse reactions are reported for many treatments including antiosteoporotic agents. This position paper includes an algorithm for their recognition. With early recognition and proper management, including immediate and permanent withdrawal of the culprit agent, accompanied by hospitalization, rehydration, and systemic corticosteroids, if necessary, the prognosis is good. Cutaneous adverse reactions are reported for many therapeutic agents and observed in between 0% and 8% of treated patients depending on the drug. The antiosteoporotic agents are reputed to be safe in terms of cutaneous effects; however, there have been a number of case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions, which merit consideration. This was the subject of a Working Group meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in April 2009, to focus on the impact of cutaneous adverse reactions and drug-induced hypersensitivity in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. We prepared this position paper following these discussions, and include an algorithm for their recognition. We reviewed cutaneous adverse reactions observed with antiosteoporotic agents, including information from case reports, regulatory documents, and pharmacovigilance. The cutaneous adverse reactions range from benign reactions including exanthematous or maculopapular eruption (drug rash), photosensitivity, and urticaria to the severe and potentially life-threatening reactions, angioedema, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Review of available evidence shows that cutaneous adverse reactions occur with all commonly used antiosteoporotic agents. Notably, there are reports of SJS and TEN for bisphosphonates, and of DRESS and TEN for strontium ranelate. These severe reactions remain very rare (<1 in 10,000 cases). With early recognition and proper management, including immediate and permanent withdrawal of the culprit agent, accompanied by hospitalization and rehydration and systemic corticosteroids if necessary, the prognosis is good. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The value of skin tests in the diagnosis of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) has been limited. Lack of knowledge as to the nature of drug allergens has contributed to these limitations. Several reports have addressed the roles of metabolites in cutaneous ADRs and skin testing. We evaluated the role of a carbamazepine (CBZ) metabolite on the results obtained from patch tests, using CBZ and its main metabolite 10, 11-epoxide of CBZ (CBZ-epoxide), on 13 patients with CBZ-induced drug eruptions and 39 controls with no CBZ-induced cutaneous ADRs. 10 of the 13 patients showed a positive reaction, and 2 of the 10 patients had a reaction to the CBZ-epoxide only and 1 to both CBZ and CBZ-epoxide. None of the 39 controls displayed any reactions to either CBZ or CBZ-epoxide. Patch testing of suspected drugs, as well as their available metabolites, would be helpful in improving the results. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The introduction of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in the recent years has resulted in high response rates and extended survival in patients with metastatic/advanced malignancies. Their mechanism of action is the indirect activation of cytotoxic T-cells through the blockade of inhibitory receptors of immunomodulatory pathways, such as cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1). Despite their impressive therapeutic results, they can also induce immune-related toxicity, affecting various organs, including the skin., Objective: To provide an updated summarized overview of the most common immune-mediated cutaneous side effects and their management., Method: English articles derived from the databases PubMed and SCOPUS and published between 2009 and 2018, were analyzed for this narrative review., Results: The most common adverse cutaneous reactions include maculopapular rash, lichenoid reactions, vitiligo and pruritus, with severity Grade 1 or 2. Less frequent but eventually life-threatening skin side effects, including Stevens-Johnson syndrome, Drug Reaction with Eosinophilia and Systemic Symptoms and Toxic Epidermal necrolysis, have also been reported., Conclusion: Basic knowledge of the Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitors-induced skin toxicity is necessary in order to recognize these treatment-related complications. The most frequent skin side effects, such as maculopapular rash, vitiligo and pruritus, tend to subside under symptomatic treatment so that permanent discontinuation of therapy is not commonly necessary. In the case of life-threatening side effects, apart from the necessary symptomatic treatment, the immunotherapy should be permanently stopped. Information concerning the management of ICIs-mediated skin toxicity can be obtained from the literature as well as from the Summary of Product Characteristics of each agent., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Background: Methotrexate-induced epidermal necrosis (MEN) is a rare but life-threatening cutaneous reaction that mimics Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS) and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).Objectives: To investigate the clinicopathology, risk factors, and prognostic factors of MEN.Methods: We enrolled 24 patients with MEN and 150 controls and analyzed the demographics, pathology, and plasma concentrations of methotrexate (MTX).Results: Patients with MEN showed extensive skin necrosis (mean, 33.2% total body surface area) but no target lesions. The histopathology displayed keratinocyte dystrophy. Early signs of MEN included painful skin erosions, oral ulcers, and leukopenia/thrombocytopenia. Although 79.2% patients received leucovorin treatment, there was 16.7% mortality. Risk factors for MEN included older age (>60 years), chronic kidney disease, and high initial dosage of MTX without folic acid supplementation. Renal insufficiency delayed MTX clearance. Severe renal disease and leukopenia predicted poor prognosis in MEN, but none of the SCORe of Toxic Epidermal Necrosis criteria were associated with mortality of MEN.Limitations: The study was limited by the small sample size.Conclusion: MEN exhibited distinct clinicopathologic features from SJS/TEN. Recognition of the early signs and prognostic factors is important, because the rapid institution of leucovorin may be helpful. To reduce the risk of MEN, physicians should avoid prescribing MTX to high-risk patients and titrate the dosage slowly upward with folic acid supplementation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

There are many different types of cutaneous adverse reactions. The most classical reactions are driven by T lymphocytes that specifically react towards a drug, with an individual genetic susceptibility linked to certain type I major histocompatibility complex alleles. These reactions are characterized by a wide variety of clinical and histopathological presentations, and a wide range of severity. The most frequent entity is the maculopapular rash, while the most aggressive forms are the Steven-Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis (SJS-TEN). The histopathological alterations associated to each of these syndromes have been better described in the literature during the past 10 years, encompassing non-specific lesions, as in most drug induced maculopapular rashes, to more specific inflammatory patterns. The finding of confluent apoptotic keratinocytes with epidermal detachment is the prototypical aspect of SJS-TEN. There are however numerous pitfalls, and a similar aspect to those observed in each cutaneous drug reactions entities can be found in other diseases. DRESS syndrome can indeed present with dense and epidermotropic T-cell infiltrate, sometimes with nuclear atypias, and thus can be difficult to distinguish from a primary or secondary cutaneous T-cell lymphoma. The diagnosis of cutaneous adverse reactions relies on a clinical-pathological confrontation and requires an accurate evaluation of drug imputability., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.)

Presents a case study for a certain analgesic as a cause of postoperative erythroderma. Presentation of an aged woman with a previous history of contact dermatitis who developed erythmatous widespread skin reaction after surgery with the treatment of several drugs including metamizol; Results after conducting patch tests among the investigated patients; Diagnosis based on the results of the patch tests.

Care of the oncologic patient requires an integral understanding of the adverse reactions of chemotherapy. With the advent of targeted agents and immunomodulating therapies, reactions to these newer treatments are of clinical interest. Cutaneous side effects of chemotherapeutic agents, including toxic erythema and mucositis, are common and may require cessation of treatment if associated with discomfort, superinfection, or negative impact on quality of life. This article reviews the cutaneous adverse reactions and treatment options of both conventional cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents and newer targeted, multikinase inhibitors and immunomodulating therapies. An understanding of possible cutaneous reactions by all providers involved in the care of the oncologic patient is critical for prompt recognition, allowing for appropriate treatment and referral to dermatologists when necessary., (Copyright © 2016. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Cutaneous adverse reactions are reported for many therapeutic agents and, in general, are observed in between 0% and 8% of treated patients depending on the drug. Antiosteoporotic agents are considered to be safe in terms of cutaneous effects, however there have been a number of case reports of cutaneous adverse reactions which warrant consideration. This was the subject of a working group meeting of the European Society for Clinical and Economic Aspects of Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis in April 2009, which focused on the impact of cutaneous adverse reactions and drug-induced hypersensitivity in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis. This position paper was drafted following these discussions and includes a flowchart for their recognition. Cutaneous adverse reactions observed with antiosteoporotic agents were reviewed and included information from case reports, regulatory documents and pharmacovigilance. These reactions ranged from benign effects including exanthematous or maculopapular eruption (drug rash), photosensitivity and urticaria, to the severe and potentially life-threatening reactions of angioedema, drug rash with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms (DRESS), Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis. A review of the available evidence demonstrates that cutaneous adverse reactions occur with all commonly used antiosteoporotic treatments. Notably, there are reports of Stevens Johnson syndrome and toxic epidermal necrolysis for bisphosphonates, and of DRESS and toxic epidermal necrolysis for strontium ranelate. These severe reactions remain very rare (<1 in 10,000 cases). In general, with proper management and early recognition, including immediate and permanent withdrawal of the culprit agent, accompanied by hospitalization, rehydration and systemic corticosteroids if necessary, the prognosis is positive.