Search

The human lutropin receptor (hLHR) plays a pivotal role in reproductive endocrinology. A number of naturally occurring mutations of the hLHR have been identified that cause the receptor to become constitutively active. To gain further insights into the structural basis for the activation of the hLHR by activating mutations, we chose to examine a particularly strong constitutively activating mutation of this receptor, L457R, in which a leucine that is highly conserved among rhodopsin-like G protein-coupled receptors in helix 3 has been substituted with arginine. Using both disruptive as well as reciprocal mutagenesis strategies, our studies demonstrate that the ability of L457R to stabilize an active form of the hLHR is because of the formation of a salt bridge between the replacing amino acid and Asp-578 in helix 6. Such a lock between the transmembrane portions of helices 3 and 6 is concurrent with weakening the connections between the cytosolic ends of the same helices, including the interaction found in the wild-type receptor between Arg-464, of the (E/D)R(Y/W) motif, and Asp-564. This structural effect is properly marked by the increase in the solvent accessibility of selected amino acids at the cytosolic interfaces between helices 3 and 6. The integrity of the conserved amino acids Asn-615 and Asn-619 in helix 7 is required for the transfer of the structural change from the activating mutation site to the cytosolic interface between helices 3 and 6. The results of in vitro and computational experiments further suggest that the structural trigger of the constitutive activity of the L457R mutant may also be responsible for its lack of hormone responsiveness.

The aim of this review is to summarize some of the main findings from our laboratory as well as from others concerning the biochemical, molecular, and functional properties of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor. Experimental and computational mutagenesis of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor have been instrumental in elucidating some of the molecular mechanisms underlying receptor activation and receptor coupling to Gq. The knockout mouse model lacking the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor has highlighted the potential implication of this receptor subtype in variety of functions including the regulation of blood pressure, glucose homeostasis, and the rewarding response to drugs of abuse.

The lutropin receptor is a member of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors and, in humans, binds two closely related ligands, members of the heterodimer glycoprotein hormone family. As reviewed herein, comparative analyses of natural, engineered, and computer-simulated mutations of the lutropin receptor have provided considerable insight into the molecular basis of receptor function.

This work describes the ab initio procedure employed to build an activation model for the alpha 1b-adrenergic receptor (alpha 1b-AR). The first version of the model was progressively modified and complicated by means of a many-step iterative procedure characterized by the employment of experimental validations of the model in each upgrading step. A combined simulated (molecular dynamics) and experimental mutagenesis approach was used to determine the structural and dynamic features characterizing the inactive and active states of alpha 1b-AR. The latest version of the model has been successfully challenged with respect to its ability to interpret and predict the functional properties of a large number of mutants. The iterative approach employed to describe alpha 1b-AR activation in terms of molecular structure and dynamics allows further complications of the model to allow prediction and interpretation of an ever-increasing number of experimental data.

In this study, a quantitative approach was used to investigate the role of D142, which belongs to the highly conserved E/DRY sequence, in the activation process of the α 1B -adrenergic receptor (α 1B -AR). Experimental and computer-simulated mutagenesis were performed by substituting all possible natural amino acids at the D142 site. The resulting congeneric set of proteins together with the finding that all the receptor mutants show various levels of constitutive (agonist-independent) activity enabled us to quantitatively analyze the relationships between structural/dynamic features and the extent of constitutive activity. Our results suggest that the hydrophobic/hydrophilic character of D142, which could be regulated by protonation/deprotonation of this residue, is an important modulator of the transition between the inactive (R) and active (R*) state of the α 1B -AR. Our study represents an example of quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis of the activation process of a G protein-coupled receptor.

Site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics simulations of the alpha 1B-adrenergic receptor (AR) were combined to explore the potential molecular changes correlated with the transition from R (inactive state) to R (active state). Using molecular dynamics analysis we compared the structural/dynamic features of constitutively active mutants with those of the wild type and of an inactive alpha 1B-AR to build a theoretical model which defines the essential features of R and R. The results of site-directed mutagenesis were in striking agreement with the predictions of the model supporting the following hypothesis. (i) The equilibrium between R and R depends on the equilibrium between the deprotonated and protonated forms, respectively, of D142 of the DRY motif. In fact, replacement of D142 with alanine confers high constitutive activity to the alpha 1B-AR. (ii) The shift of R143 of the DRY sequence out of a conserved 'polar pocket' formed by N63, D91, N344 and Y348 is a feature common to all the active structures, suggesting that the role of R143 is fundamental for mediating receptor activation. Disruption of these intramolecular interactions by replacing N63 with alanine constitutively activates the alpha 1B-AR. Our findings might provide interesting generalities about the activation process of G protein-coupled receptors.

This article describes a computational strategy aimed at studying the structural communication in G-Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) and G proteins. The strategy relies on comparative Molecular Dynamics (MD) simulations and analyses of wild-type (i.e., reference state) vs. mutated (i.e., perturbed state), or free (i.e., reference state) vs. bound (i.e., perturbed state) forms of a GPCR or a G protein. Bound forms of a GPCR include complexes with small ligands and/or receptor dimers/oligomers, whereas bound forms of heterotrimeric GDP-bound G proteins concern the complex with a GPCR. The computational strategy includes structure prediction of a receptor monomer (in the absence of high-resolution structure), a receptor dimer/oligomer, and a receptor-G protein complex, which constitute the inputs of MD simulations. Finally, the analyses of the MD trajectories are instrumental in inferring the structural/dynamics differences between reference and perturbed states of a GPCR or a G protein. In this respect, focus will be put on the analysis of protein structure networks and communication paths.

In class A GPCRs the E/DRY motif is critical for receptor activation and function. According to experimental and computational data, R3.50 forms a double salt bridge with the adjacent E/D3.49 and E/D6.30 in helix 6, constraining the receptor in an inactive state. The disruption of this network of interactions facilitates conformational transitions that generate a signal or constitutive activity. Here we demonstrate that non-conservative substitution of either E129(3.49) or E240(6.30) of thromboxane prostanoid receptor (TP) resulted in mutants characterized by agonist-induced more efficient signaling properties, regardless of the G protein coupling. Results of computational modeling suggested a more effective interaction between G q and the agonist-bound forms of the TP mutants, compared to the wild type. Yet, none of the mutants examined revealed any increase in basal activity, precluding their classification as constitutively active mutants. Here, we propose that these alternative active conformations might be identified as superactive mutants or SAM. © 2010 Springer Basel AG.

Herein we make an overview of the results of our computational experiments aimed at gaining insight into the molecular mechanisms of GPCR functioning either in their normal conditions or when hit by gain-of-function or loss-of-function mutations. Molecular simulations of a number of GPCRs in their wild type and mutated as well as free and ligand-bound forms were instrumental in inferring the structural features, which differentiate the mutation- and ligand-induced active from the inactive states. These features essentially reside in the interaction pattern of the E/DRY arginine and in the degree of solvent exposure of selected cytosolic domains. Indeed, the active states differ from the inactive ones in the weakening of the interactions made by the highly conserved arginine and in the increase in solvent accessibility of the cytosolic interface between helices 3 and 6. Where possible, the structural hallmarks of the active and inactive receptor states are translated into molecular descriptors useful for in silico functional screening of novel receptor mutants or ligands. Computational modeling of the supramolecular organization of GPCRs and their intracellular partners is the current challenge toward a deep understanding of their functioning mechanisms.

In this study, molecular simulations have been combined with site-directed mutagenesis experiments to explore M398(2.43), a LH (lutropin) receptor (LHR) site in helix 2 susceptible to spontaneous activating mutations, and to develop a computational tool for predicting the functionality (i.e. active or nonactive) of LHR mutants.Site-directed mutagenesis experiments engineered 15 different substitutions for M389(2.43), which resulted in variable levels of constitutive activity, inversely correlated with the size of the replacing amino acid. This inverse correlation is suggested to be mediated by I460(3.46), M571(6.37), and Y623(7.53), the tyrosine of the NPxxY motif. In fact, size reduction at position 398(2.43), which is concurrent with constitutive receptor activity, releases the van der Waals interactions found in the wild-type LHR between M398(2.43) and these three amino acids, resulting in structural modifications in the proximity to the E/DRY/W motif. An increment, above a threshold value, in the solvent accessibility of the cytosolic ends of helices 3 and 6 is the main structural feature shared by the active mutants of the LHR. This feature has been successfully used for predicting the functionality of the engineered mutants at M398(2.43), proving that molecular simulations can be useful for in silico screening of LHR mutants.

The luteinizing hormone receptor (LHR) is a member of the superfamily of G protein-coupled receptors and, in humans, binds two closely related ligands, members of the heterodimeric glycoprotein hormone family. This receptor is an essential component of the reproductive axis in males and females, and a number of naturally occurring pathophysiologic activating and inactivating mutations have been described. This review deals with the current state of knowledge of the structure of LHR based on molecular modeling and the supporting experimental data from engineered and naturally occurring mutations.

Reproduction cannot take place without the proper functioning of the lutropin/choriogonadotropin receptor (LHR). When the LHR does not work properly, ovulation does not occur in females and Leydig cells do not develop normally in the male. Also, because the LHR is essential for sustaining the elevated levels of progesterone needed to maintain pregnancy during the first trimester, disruptions in the functions of the LHR during pregnancy have catastrophic consequences. As such, a full understanding of the biology of the LHR is essential to the survival of our species. In this review we summarize our current knowledge of the structure, functions, and regulation of this important receptor.

Computer simulations on a new model of the alpha1b-adrenergic receptor based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin have been combined with experimental mutagenesis to investigate the role of residues in the cytosolic half of helix 6 in receptor activation. Our results support the hypothesis that a salt bridge between the highly conserved arginine (R143(3.50)) of the E/DRY motif of helix 3 and a conserved glutamate (E289(6.30)) on helix 6 constrains the alpha1b-AR in the inactive state. In fact, mutations of E289(6.30) that weakened the R143(3.50)-E289(6.30) interaction constitutively activated the receptor. The functional effect of mutating other amino acids on helix 6 (F286(6.27), A292(6.33), L296(6.37), V299(6.40,) V300(6.41), and F303(6.44)) correlates with the extent of their interaction with helix 3 and in particular with R143(3.50) of the E/DRY sequence.

Many naturally occurring and engineered mutations lead to constitutive activation of the G protein-coupled lutropin receptor (LHR), some of which also result in reduced ligand responsiveness. To elucidate the nature of interhelical interactions in this heptahelical receptor and changes thereof accompanying activation, we have utilized site-directed mutagenesis on transmembrane helices 6 and 7 of rat LHR to prepare and characterize a number of single, double, and triple mutants. The potent constitutively activating mutants, D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q, were combined with weaker activating mutants, N593(7.45)R and N597(7.49)Q, and the loss-of-responsiveness mutant, N593(7.45)A. The engineered mutants have also been simulated using a new receptor model based on the crystal structure of rhodopsin. The results suggest that constitutive LHR activation by mutations at Asp-556(6.44) is triggered by the breakage or weakening of the interaction found in the wild type receptor between Asp-556(6.44) and Asn-593(7.45). Whereas this perturbation is unique to the activating mutations at Asp-556(6.44), common features to all of the most active LHR mutants are the breakage of the charge-reinforced H-bonding interaction between Arg-442(3.50) and Asp-542(6.30) and the increase in solvent accessibility of the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6, which probably participate in the receptor-G protein interface. Asn-593(7.45) and Asn-597(7.49) also seem to be necessary for the high constitutive activities of D556(6.44)H and D556(6.44)Q and for full ligand responsiveness. The new theoretical model provides a foundation for further experimental work on the molecular mechanism(s) of receptor activation.

Naturally occurring activating mutations in the human LH receptor (hLHR) gene are the cause of sporadic or familial male gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty. We have previously reported three different activating mutations of the hLHR gene in four unrelated Brazilian boys with male-limited precocious puberty. In the current study, we examined three other Brazilian boys, two brothers and one unrelated boy, with gonadotropin-independent precocious puberty. Direct sequencing of the entire exon 11 of the hLHR gene in the two brothers revealed a heterozygous substitution of T for C at nucleotide 1103, resulting in the substitution of leucine at position 368 by proline in the first transmembrane helix. Their mother carried the same mutation, establishing the familial nature of this mutation. Human embryonic 293 cells expressing hLHR(L368P) bound hCG with the same high affinity as cells expressing the wild-type hLHR. Cells expressing the novel L368P mutation displayed up to a 12-fold increase in basal cAMP production compared with cells expressing the same number of cell surface wild-type hLHR, indicating constitutive activation of the mutant receptor. In addition, the cAMP levels in cells expressing the hLHR mutant were further augmented by hCG. Molecular dynamics simulations suggest that substitution of L368 of the hLHR by proline results in lack of a salt bridge interaction between D405 and R464 (distance 9. 0 A vs. 4.7 A in wild-type hLHR) as well as by the opening of a crevice between the second and third intracellular loops, which may allow G proteins greater accessibility. These structural features were shared by other activating mutants of the hLHR. Sequencing of exon 11 of the hLHR gene of the unrelated boy revealed that he carried a homozygous nucleotide substitution causing an A568V mutation in the third cytoplasmic loop of the receptor. This mutation was previously found in two unrelated Brazilian boys, but in heterozygous state. Clinical and hormonal data of the patient with the homozygous A568V were not different from those individuals with the Ala568Val mutation in a heterozygous state. Furthermore, the phenotype caused by dominant activating mutations of the hLHR gene are not altered when both alleles carry a mutant sequence. Our studies show that the A568V is the most frequent cause of male-limited precocious puberty in Brazilian boys. Lastly, the identification of a novel activating L368P mutation in the first transmembrane helix of two Brazilian boys with familial male-limited precocious puberty provides further insights into the mechanism of activation of the hLHR.

It has been shown previously that a naturally occurring mutation of the human LH/CG receptor (hLHR), which replaces L457 in helix III with arginine, results in a receptor that constitutively elevates basal cAMP but does not respond to human CG (hCG) with further cAMP production. In the present study, substitutions of L457 with several amino acids were examined. The constitutive activation of cAMP production was observed only when L457 was replaced with a positively charged residue. Although constitutive activation of the inositol phosphate pathway could not be detected when measuring inositol phosphate production, the use of a more sensitive reporter gene assay for protein kinase C activation revealed the constitutive activation of this pathway by the R- and K-substituted mutants. Therefore, L457 of the hLHR plays a key role in stabilizing the receptor in an inactive conformation. Molecular modeling shows that the insertion of R, K, or H at position 457 triggers the receptor transition toward an active state due to the proximity of an anionic amino acid, D578, in helix VI. These substitutions cause perturbations in helix III-helix VI and helix III-helix VII interactions that culminate in the opening of a solvent-accessible site in the cytosolic domains potentially involved in Gs recognition. Interestingly, L457R was completely unresponsive and the K- and H-substituted L457 hLHR mutants were significantly blunted in their cAMP responses to hCG stimulation. Cells expressing L457R were also unresponsive to hCG with regards to increased inositol phosphate production. Other substitutions of L457 were identified, though, that selectively permit the hormonal stimulation of only one of the two signaling pathways. These results suggest a pivotal role for L457 in hormone-stimulated signal transduction by the hLHR.

To investigate their role in receptor coupling to G(q), we mutated all basic amino acids and some conserved hydrophobic residues of the cytosolic surface of the alpha(1b)-adrenergic receptor (AR). The wild type and mutated receptors were expressed in COS-7 cells and characterized for their ligand binding properties and ability to increase inositol phosphate accumulation. The experimental results have been interpreted in the context of both an ab initio model of the alpha(1b)-AR and of a new homology model built on the recently solved crystal structure of rhodopsin. Among the twenty-three basic amino acids mutated only mutations of three, Arg(254) and Lys(258) in the third intracellular loop and Lys(291) at the cytosolic extension of helix 6, markedly impaired the receptor-mediated inositol phosphate production. Additionally, mutations of two conserved hydrophobic residues, Val(147) and Leu(151) in the second intracellular loop had significant effects on receptor function. The functional analysis of the receptor mutants in conjunction with the predictions of molecular modeling supports the hypothesis that Arg(254), Lys(258), as well as Leu(151) are directly involved in receptor-G protein interaction and/or receptor-mediated activation of the G protein. In contrast, the residues belonging to the cytosolic extensions of helices 3 and 6 play a predominant role in the activation process of the alpha(1b)-AR. These findings contribute to the delineation of the molecular determinants of the alpha(1b)-AR/G(q) interface.

Here, three-dimensional model building and molecular dynamics simulations of the luteinizing hormone receptor have been employed to generate hypotheses about the molecular mechanisms underlying the activation of the receptor induced by naturally occurring activating mutations. The comparative analysis of the wild-type receptor and of 16 constitutively active or inactive mutants has been instrumental in inferring the structural/dynamic features which could characterize the inactive and the active forms of the receptor. These features have been also employed for predicting the functional behavior of new receptor mutants. The results of this study might provide a structural framework to interpret the pathological effects induced by mutations of the luteinizing hormone receptor. In addition, the proposed theoretical model could be useful for engineering new mutations or ligands able to modulate receptor function.

We have suggested previously that both the negatively and positively charged residues of the highly conserved Glu/Asp-Arg-Tyr (E/DRY) motif play an important role in the activation process of the alpha(1b)-adreneric receptor (AR). In this study, R143 of the E/DRY sequence in the alpha(1b)-AR was mutated into several amino acids (Lys, His, Glu, Asp, Ala, Asn, and Ile). The charge-conserving mutation of R143 into lysine not only preserved the maximal agonist-induced response of the alpha(1b)-AR, but it also conferred high degree of constitutive activity to the receptor. Both basal and agonist-induced phosphorylation levels were significantly increased for the R143K mutant compared with those of the wild-type receptor. Other substitutions of R143 resulted in receptor mutants with either a small increase in constitutive activity (R143H and R143D), impairment (R143H, R143D), or complete loss of receptor-mediated response (R143E, R143A, R143N, R143I). The R413E mutant displayed a small, but significant increase in basal phosphorylation despite being severely impaired in receptor-mediated response. Interestingly, all the arginine mutants displayed increased affinity for agonist binding compared with the wild-type alpha(1b)-AR. A correlation was found between the extent of the affinity shift and the intrinsic activity of the agonists. The analysis of the receptor mutants using the allosteric ternary complex model in conjunction with the results of molecular dynamics simulations on the receptor models support the hypothesis that mutations of R143 can drive the isomerization of the alpha(1b)-AR into different states, highlighting the crucial role of this residue in the activation process of the receptor.

The alpha1b-adrenergic receptor (AR) is a member of the large superfamily of seven transmembrane domain (TMD) G protein-coupled receptors (GPCR). Combining site-directed mutagenesis of the alpha1b-AR with computational simulations of receptor dynamics, we have explored the conformational changes underlying the process of receptor activation, i.e. the transition between the inactive and active states. Our findings suggest that the structural constraint stabilizing the alpha1b-AR in the inactive form is a network of H-bonding interactions amongst conserved residues forming a polar pocket and R143 of the DRY sequence at the end of TMDIII. We have recently reported that point mutations of D142, of the DRY sequence and of A293 in the distal portion of the third intracellular loop resulted in ligand-independent (constitutive) activation of the alpha1b-AR. These constitutively activating mutations could induce perturbations resulting in the shift of R143 out of the polar pocket. The main role of R143 may be to mediate receptor activation by triggering the exposure of several basic amino acids of the intracellular loops towards the G protein. Our investigation has been extended also to the biochemical events involved in the desensitization process of alpha1b-AR. Our results indicate that immediately following agonist-induced activation, the alpha1b-AR can undergo rapid agonist-induced phosphorylation and desensitization. Different members of the G protein coupled receptor kinase family can play a role in agonist-induced regulation of the alpha1b-AR. In addition, constitutively active alpha1b-AR mutants display different phosphorylation and internalization features. The future goal is to further elucidate the molecular mechanism underlying the complex equilibrium between activation and inactivation of the alpha1b-AR and its regulation by pharmacological substances. These findings can help to elucidate the mechanism of action of various agents displaying properties of agonists or inverse agonists at the adrenergic system.

The aim of this study was to investigate the molecular changes associated with the transition of the human oxytocin receptor from its inactive to its active states. Mutation of the conserved arginine of the glutamate/aspartate-arginine-tyrosine motif located in the second intracellular domain gave rise to the first known constitutively active oxytocin receptor (R137A), whereas mutation of the aspartic acid located in the second transmembrane domain led to an inactive receptor (D85A). The structural features of the constitutively active and inactive receptor mutants were compared with those of the wild type in its free and agonist-bound states. The results suggest that, although differently triggered, the activation process induced by the agonist and the activating mutation are characterized by the opening of a solvent exposed site formed by the 2nd intracellular loop, the cytosolic extension of helix 5, and the 3rd intracellular loop; on the contrary, the D85A mutation prevents oxytocin from triggering the opening of a cytosolic site. On the basis of these findings, we hypothesize that this cytosolic crevice plays an important role in G protein recognition. Finally, comparative analysis of the free- and agonist-bound forms of the wild-type oxytocin receptor and alpha1B adrenergic receptor suggests that the highly conserved polar amino acids and the seven helices play similar mechanistic roles in the different G protein-coupled receptors.

Oxytocin (OT) and vasopressin (AVP) receptors belong to the G-protein-coupled receptor family; in these receptors, the peptide agonists bind to a region delimited by the upper third of the transmembrane part of the molecule (1) and the molecular interactions responsible for agonist selectivity have been extensively investigated (2–5). However, nothing is known on the intramolecular changes that characterize the active conformation(s) of these receptors. In order to get a better understanding of the process of receptor activation, we started a project aimed at the identification of the key residues involved in stabilizing the active conformation(s) of the human oxytocin receptor.

The adrenergic receptors (ARs) belong to the superfamily of membrane-bound G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs). Our investigation has focused on the structure-function relationship of the alpha 1b-AR subtype used as the model system for other GPCRs. Site-directed mutagenesis studies have elucidated the structural domains of the alpha 1b-AR involved in ligand binding, G protein coupling or desensitization. In addition, a combined approach using site-directed mutagenesis and molecular dynamics analysis of the alpha 1b-AR has provided information about the potential mechanisms underlying the activation process of the receptor, i.e. its transition from the 'inactive' to the 'active' conformation.

Although it is now widely accepted that G-protein-coupled receptors exist in at least two allosteric states, inactive and active, and that the spontaneous equilibrium between the two is regulated by various events including the binding of specific agonists and antagonists, the molecular counterparts of these functionally different states are still poorly understood. In this paper, we review our current knowledge concerning the structure-function relationships of the oxytocin and vasopressin receptors, focusing in particular on the process of receptor activation. Using a combined approach of site-directed mutagenesis and molecular modelling, we investigated the molecular events leading to agonist-dependent and -independent receptor activation in the human oxytocin receptor. Our analysis allows us to propose that the active conformations of this receptor are characterised by similar rearrangements of its cytosolic regions that ultimately lead to the opening of a putative docking site for the G-protein. Furthermore, the dynamics of these motions are similar to that observed in the alpha1B-adrenergic receptor, thus suggesting that, although activated by different ligands, the process of receptor isomerization in these two receptors is regulated by the same cluster of highly conserved residues and that common molecular events are responsible for receptor activation in different G-protein-coupled receptors.