Search

Autor u radu obrađuje ulogu apostolskog delegata Pierrea Bastiena oko uvođenja, odnosno neuvođenja kongrue za katolički kler u Bosni i Hercegovini. Congrua (prikladno uzdržavanje svećenika) bio je jedan od »kamena spoticanja« u odnosima između nadbiskupa Stadlera i dijecezanskog klera s jedne strane i franjevaca i biskupa iz njihova reda s druge strane. Kako se pitanje nije moglo riješiti međusobnim dogovorom, Sveta Stolica je rješenje tog pitanja pridržala sebi. Ulogu istražitelja povjerila je apostolskom delegatu Pierreu Bastienu, koji se pitanjem kongrue bavio od 1911. do 1914. godine. U radu su obrađena Bastienova izvješća i prijedlozi, prijedlog austrougarskih vlasti i Bastienove objekcije, odluka Svete Stolice o tom pitanju i reakcije klera na tu odluku., The author investigates the role of apostolic delegate Pierre Bastien in introducing or not introducing congruent for the Catholic clergy in Bosnia and Herzegovina. Congruity (orderly maintenance of priests) was one of the “stumbling blocks” in the relations between Archbishop Stadler and the diocesan clergy, but at the same time this issue also provoked conflicts between the Franciscans and the bishops of their order. Since this matter could not be resolved amicably, the Holy See reserved the resolution to this issue for itself. Thus, Pope entrusted the role of investigator in this matter to the apostolic delegate Pierre Bastien, who dealt with the issue of congruence in the period from 1911 to 1914. The article deals not only with Bastien’s reports and his proposals / solutions, but also discusses the proposal of the Austro-Hungarian authorities and Bastien’s objections to this matter, and finally the decision of the Holy See on this issue, as well ass the reactions of the clergy to the decision of the Holy See.

Tema ovog završnog rada jest djelovanje hercegovačkih franjevaca od njihovog odvajanja od bosanskih franjevaca 1843. Godine pa sve do završetka Prvog svjetskog rata. Prikazan je njihov status, položaj i prilike u kojima su radili za vrijeme turske vlasti te nakon toga i austrougarske vlasti. Također je objašnjen i postupak nastanka Kustodije, a nakon toga i Provincije. U vezi sa razvojem i djelovanjem hercegovačkih franjevaca ističu se i poznate ličnosti koje su svojim zalaganje, hrabrošću i predanim radom pomagale u ostvarenju sna hercegovačkih franjevaca. Neki od njih su fra Rafael Barišić, fra Paskal Buconjić, fra (don) Franjo Milićević te fra Didak Buntić. Posebno se ističe nakladnički i tiskarski rad fra (don) Franje Milićevića te humanitarni rad fra Didaka Buntića. Može se reći da je proces osamostaljenja hercegovačkih franjevaca bio dug, ali se naposljetku isplatio, kako za njih, tako i za hercegovački puk. The main focus of this paper is put on activities of the Franciscans following their separation from the Bosnian Franciscians in 1843. The paper provides an overview of their status, position and circumstances in which they worked during the Turkish and Austro-Hungarian rule. Also, there is an explanation of the birth of the Custody and later the Province. It is important to mention the role of some notablee that helped the Herzegovinian Franciscans with the realization of their dreams. Some of them are Rafael Barišić, Paškal Buconjić, Franjo Milićević and Didak Buntić. In addition, it is important to emphasize the role of Franjo Milićević when it comes to printing and publishing, as well as charity ativities od Didak Buntić. Unduobtedly, the independence of the Herzegovinian Franciscans was rather difficult to archive, but eventually it was of great importance for both them and Herzegovinian people.