Search

Brevetoxins (BTXs) constitute a family of lipid-soluble toxic cyclic polyethers mainly produced by Karenia brevis, which is the main vector for a foodborne syndrome known as neurotoxic shellfish poisoning (NSP) in humans. To prevent health risks associated with the consumption of contaminated shellfish in France, the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety (ANSES) recommended assessing the effects of BTXs via an acute oral toxicity study in rodents. Here, we investigated the effect of a single oral administration in both male and female mice with several doses of BTX-3 (100 to 1,500 µg kg−1 bw) during a 48 h observation period in order to provide toxicity data to be used as a starting point for establishing an acute oral reference dose (ARfD). We monitored biological parameters and observed symptomatology, revealing different effects of this toxin depending on the sex. Females were more sensitive than males to the impact of BTX-3 at the lowest doses on weight loss. For both males and females, BTX-3 induced a rapid, transient and dose-dependent decrease in body temperature, and a transient dose-dependent reduced muscle activity. Males were more sensitive to BTX-3 than females with more frequent observations of failures in the grip test, convulsive jaw movements, and tremors. BTX-3's impacts on symptomatology were rapid, appearing during the 2 h after administration, and were transient, disappearing 24 h after administration. The highest dose of BTX-3 administered in this study, 1,500 µg kg−1 bw, was more toxic to males, leading to the euthanasia of three out of five males only 4 h after administration. BTX-3 had no effect on water intake, and affected neither the plasma chemistry parameters nor the organs' weight. We identified potential points of departure that could be used to establish an ARfD (decrease in body weight, body temperature, and muscle activity). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was requested to assess the differences in the outcome of the risk assessment of tropane alkaloids (TAs) in food between the CONTAM Panel and the Joint FAO/WHO meeting (FAO/WHO) and to conclude if an update of the EFSA opinion on tropane alkaloids in food and feed would be appropriate. TAs are secondary metabolites occurring in several plants. The main TAs considered in the assessments of EFSA and FAO/WHO were (‐)‐hyoscyamine and (‐)‐scopolamine, which exert their pharmacological and toxicological effects by acting as competitive antagonists of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Both EFSA and FAO/WHO considered a study in human volunteers as the key study to assess the effects of TAs. The CONTAM Panel established a group acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.016 μg/kg body weight (bw) for the sum of (‐)‐hyoscyamine and (‐)‐scopolamine, based on decreased heart rate. FAO/WHO concluded that it was not possible to establish an ARfD and instead selected a point of departure of 1.54 μg/kg bw for the sum of the two substances, based on decreased salivary secretion, and applied it in a margin of exposure approach. A detailed assessment of the differences in the two approaches is provided in the report. Overall, it is not straightforward to compare quantitatively the differences emerging from the assessments of the CONTAM Panel and the FAO/WHO, in view of the different approaches applied and the different scopes of the assessments. Given the existing uncertainties, the ARfD established by the CONTAM Panel should be retained without modifications as protective towards the general population including susceptible subgroups. In conclusion, based on the comparison with the FAO/WHO assessment, an update of the CONTAM Panel assessment on the risks to human health related to the presence of tropane alkaloids in food is not considered necessary. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A QuEChERS method, followed by GC-MS/MS and LC-MS/MS was used for determining more than 400 pesticide residues in grape leaves collected from the Egyptian markets during the 2021 summer season. Seventy-eight samples contained 36 pesticide residues of different chemical groups above the EU-MRLs. Fungicides were the most frequently detected pesticides (59%), followed by insecticides (35%) and herbicides (5%).Hazard Quotients and Hazard Indexes were calculated where the results showed that both do not pose any health risk to consumers. Furthermore, cumulative risk assessment parameters (cHI) according to pesticide chemical group were calculated, resulting in 0.06, 0.09, 0.20, 0.28, 0.7 and 1.1% for strobin, organophosphorus, neonicotinoid, pyrethroid, benzimidazole and azole compounds, respectively. Fungicides were the major contributors to cHI, above insecticides by a factor of 2.7. Hence, there is a need for continuous survey and monitoring to protects consumers from exposure to unauthorized substances such as carbendazim, benomyl and profenofos. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was requested to assess the differences in the outcome of the risk assessment of tropane alkaloids (TAs) in food between the CONTAM Panel and the Joint FAO/WHO meeting (FAO/WHO) and to conclude if an update of the EFSA opinion on tropane alkaloids in food and feed would be appropriate. TAs are secondary metabolites occurring in several plants. The main TAs considered in the assessments of EFSA and FAO/WHO were (‐)‐hyoscyamine and (‐)‐scopolamine, which exert their pharmacological and toxicological effects by acting as competitive antagonists of the muscarinic acetylcholine receptors. Both EFSA and FAO/WHO considered a study in human volunteers as the key study to assess the effects of TAs. The CONTAM Panel established a group acute reference dose (ARfD) of 0.016 μg/kg body weight (bw) for the sum of (‐)‐hyoscyamine and (‐)‐scopolamine, based on decreased heart rate. FAO/WHO concluded that it was not possible to establish an ARfD and instead selected a point of departure of 1.54 μg/kg bw for the sum of the two substances, based on decreased salivary secretion, and applied it in a margin of exposure approach. A detailed assessment of the differences in the two approaches is provided in the report. Overall, it is not straightforward to compare quantitatively the differences emerging from the assessments of the CONTAM Panel and the FAO/WHO, in view of the different approaches applied and the different scopes of the assessments. Given the existing uncertainties, the ARfD established by the CONTAM Panel should be retained without modifications as protective towards the general population including susceptible subgroups. In conclusion, based on the comparison with the FAO/WHO assessment, an update of the CONTAM Panel assessment on the risks to human health related to the presence of tropane alkaloids in food is not considered necessary.

An evaluation of acute dietary exposure to pesticide residues, applying deterministic and stochastic methods, was performed for a selected group of pesticides in two representative age groups from Argentina. Thus, 28 active ingredients (a.i.) and 75 food items were evaluated for the group of 2-5-year-old children, while 9 a.i. and 59 food items were considered for the 10-49-year-old women group. A deterministic assessment was conducting following the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) and World Health Organization (WHO) procedure but using the national maximum residue limits (MRLs) as pesticide residue concentration data, while in the stochastic approach, a theoretical distribution modeled with the available information was used. Food consumption data were obtained from the 2004-2005 comprehensive national nutrition and health survey. The risk was estimated by comparing the short-term dietary exposure with the acute reference dose (ARfD) values for each pesticide-food combination evaluated. In the deterministic assessment, 173 (39.1%) and 40 (31.3%) combinations exceeded the ARfD thresholds for the 2-5-year-old children and 10-49-year-old women groups, respectively. This conservative study generated relevant information as a first stage of acute dietary risk assessment in Argentina. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To derive an acute TTC threshold, the correlation between Allowable Daily Intakes (ADIs, chronic values) and Acute Reference Doses (ARfDs) of pesticides evaluated in the EU was investigated and their distributions were compared. The correlation between ARfDs and ADIs was significant (p = 0.01), but weak (r 2 = 0.051). Consequently, using this approach to derive acute TTC values does not seem valid. Therefore, the distributions of ARfDs and ADIs were compared directly, in order to extrapolate from chronic to acute TTC values. This comparison made for the combined Cramer structural class II and III pesticides showed a ratio ARfD/ADI of approximately 3 at the fifth percentile of the distributions. Based on these results, it is justified to propose a TTC for acute effects for Cramer III substances by multiplying the Cramer class III TTC threshold of 90 μg/person/day with a factor 3. This leads to an acute TTC threshold based on the Munro dataset for Cramer class III substances of 270 μg/person/day. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Based on 289 public pesticide evaluations, geometric means of subchronic/chronic No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) ratios of 2.6, 2.5 and 1.6 in mice, rats and dogs were calculated. The 75th percentiles are 5.5, 5.1 and 3.2. Higher ratios correlate with increased dose spacing in chronic studies and may be mainly explained therewith. In rats fed at constant pesticide concentrations in feed, the mean chronic dose decreases by 1.7- and 2.7-fold compared to the subchronic and subacute phase. These dose decreases match the subchronic/chronic NOAEL ratios. The ratio of predicted rat chronic NOAEL (dose decrement adjusted subchronic NOAEL) to experimental chronic NOAEL is 1.5 and the 75th percentile is 3.0. In dietary risk assessment, the Acute Reference Dose and the Acceptable Daily Intake (derived from acute and chronic NOAEL) are compared to acute (IESTI) or mean (TMDI) exposure estimates. Because IESTI and TMDI base on acute or mean food consumption they differ by orders of magnitude for certain commodities. As subchronic and chronic NOAEL are similar, it remains to be shown whether pesticide intake estimates based on mean food consumption are adequate measures to compare against the ADI if repeated daily exposures considerably higher than mean exposures may occur. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To protect human health, acute reference values have been established for pesticides which have the potential to cause a toxic effect after acute human exposure. These values are used to identify exposure levels below which there is no appreciable risk. Comprehensive reference documents, including OECD criteria, are available to aid identification of relevant toxicological endpoints. Within Europe, there is a concern that the identification process is inconsistent and unnecessarily conservative such that safe products with no established human health risk are being restricted. For this reason, the basis for the setting of an acute reference dose (ARfD) has been investigated for 130 pesticides to better understand how the toxicological endpoints are selected. The investigation has shown that most ARfDs are derived from repeat dose studies and that there is an over-representation of prenatal developmental toxicity studies. There is clear evidence that ARfDs derived from rabbit developmental toxicity studies are set over conservatively with regard to acute maternal effects and often inappropriately. To facilitate an improved system, refinements to the existing process are recommended, the use of maternal data in the rabbit as the basis for deriving an ARfD is critically evaluated and a new, more pragmatic approach to ARfD derivation is proposed. • Acute reference doses (ARfDs) are set for acutely toxic chemicals. • Regulators evaluate the toxicity of a chemical and decide on the need for an ARfD. • Decisions are not based on thorough data analysis, only LOAELs and NOAELs. • ARfDs may be set inappropriately and the basis for the decision unclear. • A request for change to the current process is made. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to determine the residues of pesticides in raw and processed berries from Poland and to propose the estimation of risk assessment for two populations: of adults and children as the most critical group. The 170 samples of berry fruits and their products were collected in 2011: gooseberry (11), blackcurrant (25) and redcurrant (35), raspberry (27), strawberry (62), and the concentrated juice of blackcurrant (3), redcurrant (1), raspberry (2), and strawberry (4). The study included 160 pesticides, among which 29 were detected. Pesticide residues were noted in 44.7% samples, 14.7% samples above the maximum residue level were found. During the study, the prohibited substances for protection of crops were found such as procymidone, flusilazole, tetraconazole, and trifloxystrobin. Procymidone was found in 10 samples of raspberry and blackcurrant, while flusilazole, tetraconazole, and trifloxystrobin were detected in gooseberry. About 34.1% of the samples contained more than one residue (from 2 to 9). Based on the results of the occurrence of pesticide residues in berry fruits, long- and short-term health risk was estimated. The acute and chronic exposures were minimal and did not exceed a safe value of 100% safety value acute reference dose and acceptable daily intake. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hazard characterisation is largely based on an approach of (statistically) comparing dose groups with the controls in order to derive points of departure such as no-observed-adverse-effect levels (NOAELs) or lowest-observed-adverse-effect levels (LOAELs). This approach suggests the absence of any relevant effect at the NOAEL. The NOAEL approach has been debated for decades. A recent Scientific Opinion by the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) concluded that the Benchmark Dose (BMD) approach should be preferred over the NOAEL approach for deriving human (health-based) limit or guidance values. Nonetheless, the BMD approach is used infrequently within European regulatory frameworks. The reason for this may lie in legislation or guidelines requiring the use of the NOAEL approach. In this context, various EU regulatory frameworks were examined on such demands. Interestingly, no single legislation was identified containing statutory requirements in conflict with the use of the BMD approach., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Upon analysis of chemically complex food matrices a forest of peaks is likely to be found. Identification of these peaks and concurrent determination of the toxicological relevance upon exposure is very time consuming, expensive and often requires animal studies. Recently, a safety assessment framework based on the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) was published to assess the safety of chemically complex matrices more efficiently. In this safety assessment framework, the toxicological relevance of exposure to unidentified substances in chemically complex food matrices can be related to the Cramer class III TTC threshold, currently set at 90 μg/day. However, possible additive or synergistic effects of combined exposure is not covered. The current evaluation describes the relevance of combined low dose exposure to unidentified substances in chemically complex food matrices. It is concluded that to some extent cumulative effects at exposure levels for each substance at or below the Cramer class III TTC threshold, being present in a complex mixture including food, might occur. However the health relevance of possible cumulative effects at this dose level is considered to be that low that a need for a correction factor to cover possible cumulative effects is very low to absent., (Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)