Search

Knockout tournaments, also known as single-elimination or cup tournaments, are a popular form of sports competitions. In the standard probabilistic setting, for each pairing of players, one of the players wins the game with a certain (a priori known) probability. Due to their competitive nature, tournaments are prone to manipulation. We investigate the computational problem of determining whether, for a given tournament, a coalition has a manipulation strategy that increases the winning probability of a designated player above a given threshold. More precisely, in every round of the tournament, coalition players can strategically decide which games to throw based on the advancement of other players to the current round. We call this setting adaptive constructive coalition manipulation. To the best of our knowledge, while coalition manipulation has been studied in the literature, this is the first work to introduce adaptiveness to this context. We show that the above problem is hard for every complexity class in the polynomial hierarchy. On the algorithmic side, we show that the problem is solvable in polynomial time when the coalition size is a constant. Furthermore, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the coalition size and the size of a minimum player set that must include at least one player from each non-deterministic game. Lastly, we investigate a generalized setting where the tournament tree can be imbalanced.

The parameterized analysis of graph modification problems represents the most extensively studied area within Parameterized Complexity. Given a graph $G$ and an integer $k\in\mathbb{N}$ as input, the goal is to determine whether we can perform at most $k$ operations on $G$ to transform it into a graph belonging to a specified graph class $\mathcal{F}$. Typical operations are combinatorial and include vertex deletions and edge deletions, insertions, and contractions. However, in many real-world scenarios, when the input graph is constrained to be a geometric intersection graph, the modification of the graph is influenced by changes in the geometric properties of the underlying objects themselves, rather than by combinatorial modifications. It raises the question of whether vertex deletions or adjacency modifications are necessarily the most appropriate modification operations for studying modifications of geometric graphs. We propose the study of the disk intersection graph modification through the scaling of disks. This operation is typical in the realm of topology control but has not yet been explored in the context of Parameterized Complexity. We design parameterized algorithms and kernels for modifying to the most basic graph classes: edgeless, connected, and acyclic. Our technical contributions encompass a novel combination of linear programming, branching, and kernelization techniques, along with a fresh application of bidimensionality theory to analyze the area covered by disks, which may have broader applicability., Comment: To appear in ITCS 2025

In this article we show that Maximum Partial List H-Coloring is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs for every fixed graph H. In particular, this implies that Maximum k-Colorable Subgraph is polynomial-time solvable on P_5-free graphs. This answers an open question from Agrawal, Lima, Lokshtanov, Saurabh & Sharma [SODA 2024]. This also improves the $n^{\omega(G)}$-time algorithm for Maximum Partial H-Coloring by Chudnovsky, King, Pilipczuk, Rz\k{a}\.{z}ewski & Spirkl [SIDMA 2021] to polynomial-time algorithm.

We study Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators, which is the problem of augmenting an $n$-vertex planar graph whose vertices are partitioned into independent sets (called clusters) with paths - one for each cluster - that connect all the vertices in each cluster while maintaining planarity. We show that the problem can be solved in time $2^{O(n)}$ for both the variable and fixed embedding case. Moreover, we show that it can be solved in subexponential time $2^{O(\sqrt{n}\log n)}$ in the fixed embedding case if additionally the input graph is connected. The latter time complexity is tight under the Exponential-Time Hypothesis. We also show that $n$ can be replaced with the vertex cover number of the input graph by providing a linear (resp. polynomial) kernel for the variable-embedding (resp. fixed-embedding) case; these results contrast the NP-hardness of the problem on graphs of bounded treewidth (and even on trees). Finally, we complement known lower bounds for the problem by showing that Clustered Planarity with Linear Saturators is NP-hard even when the number of clusters is at most $3$, thus excluding the algorithmic use of the number of clusters as a parameter., Comment: Appears in the Proceedings of the 35th International Symposium on Algorithms and Computation (ISAAC 2024)

The class of graph deletion problems has been extensively studied in theoretical computer science, particularly in the field of parameterized complexity. Recently, a new notion of graph deletion problems was introduced, called deletion to scattered graph classes, where after deletion, each connected component of the graph should belong to at least one of the given graph classes. While fixed-parameter algorithms were given for a wide variety of problems, little progress has been made on the kernelization complexity of any of them. In this paper, we present the first non-trivial polynomial kernel for one such deletion problem, where, after deletion, each connected component should be a clique or a tree - that is, as densest as possible or as sparsest as possible (while being connected). We develop a kernel consisting of O(k^5) vertices for this problem., Comment: 20 pages, 4 figures, An extended abstract accepted to ISAAC-2024

For a finite set $\mathcal{F}$ of graphs, the $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting problem aims to compute, for a given graph $G$ (taken from some graph class $\mathcal{G}$) of $n$ vertices (and $m$ edges) and a parameter $k\in\mathbb{N}$, a set $S$ of vertices in $G$ such that $|S|\leq k$ and $G-S$ does not contain any subgraph isomorphic to a graph in $\mathcal{F}$. As a generic problem, $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting subsumes many fundamental vertex-deletion problems that are well-studied in the literature. The $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting problem admits a simple branching algorithm with running time $2^{O(k)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$, while it cannot be solved in $2^{o(k)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$ time on general graphs assuming the ETH. In this paper, we establish a general framework to design subexponential parameterized algorithms for the $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting problem on a broad family of graph classes. Specifically, our framework yields algorithms that solve $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting with running time $2^{O(k^c)}\cdot n+O(m)$ for a constant $c<1$ on any graph class $\mathcal{G}$ that admits balanced separators whose size is (strongly) sublinear in the number of vertices and polynomial in the size of a maximum clique. Examples include all graph classes of polynomial expansion and many important classes of geometric intersection graphs. Our algorithms also apply to the \textit{weighted} version of $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting, where each vertex of $G$ has a weight and the goal is to compute the set $S$ with a minimum weight that satisfies the desired conditions. The core of our framework is an intricate subexponential branching algorithm that reduces an instance of $\mathcal{F}$-Hitting (on the aforementioned graph classes) to $2^{O(k^c)}$ general hitting-set instances, where the Gaifman graph of each instance has treewidth $O(k^c)$, for some constant $c<1$ depending on $\mathcal{F}$ and the graph class.

In a disk graph, every vertex corresponds to a disk in $\mathbb{R}^2$ and two vertices are connected by an edge whenever the two corresponding disks intersect. Disk graphs form an important class of geometric intersection graphs, which generalizes both planar graphs and unit-disk graphs. We study a fundamental optimization problem in algorithmic graph theory, Bipartization (also known as Odd Cycle Transversal), on the class of disk graphs. The goal of Bipartization is to delete a minimum number of vertices from the input graph such that the resulting graph is bipartite. A folklore (polynomial-time) $3$-approximation algorithm for Bipartization on disk graphs follows from the classical framework of Goemans and Williamson [Combinatorica'98] for cycle-hitting problems. For over two decades, this result has remained the best known approximation for the problem (in fact, even for Bipartization on unit-disk graphs). In this paper, we achieve the first improvement upon this result, by giving a $(3-\alpha)$-approximation algorithm for Bipartization on disk graphs, for some constant $\alpha>0$. Our algorithm directly generalizes to the broader class of pseudo-disk graphs. Furthermore, our algorithm is robust in the sense that it does not require a geometric realization of the input graph to be given., Comment: In APPROX'24

We propose a novel clustering model encompassing two well-known clustering models: k-center clustering and k-median clustering. In the Hybrid k-Clusetring problem, given a set P of points in R^d, an integer k, and a non-negative real r, our objective is to position k closed balls of radius r to minimize the sum of distances from points not covered by the balls to their closest balls. Equivalently, we seek an optimal L_1-fitting of a union of k balls of radius r to a set of points in the Euclidean space. When r=0, this corresponds to k-median; when the minimum sum is zero, indicating complete coverage of all points, it is k-center. Our primary result is a bicriteria approximation algorithm that, for a given \epsilon>0, produces a hybrid k-clustering with balls of radius (1+\epsilon)r. This algorithm achieves a cost at most 1+\epsilon of the optimum, and it operates in time 2^{(kd/\epsilon)^{O(1)}} n^{O(1)}. Notably, considering the established lower bounds on k-center and k-median, our bicriteria approximation stands as the best possible result for Hybrid k-Clusetring., Comment: Accepted at APPROX 2024

Challenge the champ tournaments are one of the simplest forms of competition, where a (initially selected) champ is repeatedly challenged by other players. If a player beats the champ, then that player is considered the new (current) champ. Each player in the competition challenges the current champ once in a fixed order. The champ of the last round is considered the winner of the tournament. We investigate a setting where players can be bribed to lower their winning probability against the initial champ. The goal is to maximize the probability of the initial champ winning the tournament by bribing the other players, while not exceeding a given budget for the bribes. Mattei et al. [Journal of Applied Logic, 2015] showed that the problem can be solved in pseudo-polynomial time, and that it is in XP when parameterized by the number of players. We show that the problem is weakly NP-hard and W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number of players. On the algorithmic side, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized either by the number of different bribe values or the number of different probability values. To this end, we establish several results that are of independent interest. In particular, we show that the product knapsack problem is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number of items in the knapsack, and that constructive bribery for cup tournaments is W[1]-hard when parameterized by the number of players. Furthermore, we present a novel way of designing mixed integer linear programs, ensuring optimal solutions where all variables are integers.

We initiate the study of the parameterized complexity of the {\sc Collective Graph Exploration} ({\sc CGE}) problem. In {\sc CGE}, the input consists of an undirected connected graph $G$ and a collection of $k$ robots, initially placed at the same vertex $r$ of $G$, and each one of them has an energy budget of $B$. The objective is to decide whether $G$ can be \emph{explored} by the $k$ robots in $B$ time steps, i.e., there exist $k$ closed walks in $G$, one corresponding to each robot, such that every edge is covered by at least one walk, every walk starts and ends at the vertex $r$, and the maximum length of any walk is at most $B$. Unfortunately, this problem is \textsf{NP}-hard even on trees [Fraigniaud {\em et~al.}, 2006]. Further, we prove that the problem remains \textsf{W[1]}-hard parameterized by $k$ even for trees of treedepth $3$. Due to the \textsf{para-NP}-hardness of the problem parameterized by treedepth, and motivated by real-world scenarios, we study the parameterized complexity of the problem parameterized by the vertex cover number ($\mathsf{vc}$) of the graph, and prove that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (\textsf{FPT}) parameterized by $\mathsf{vc}$. Additionally, we study the optimization version of {\sc CGE}, where we want to optimize $B$, and design an approximation algorithm with an additive approximation factor of $O(\mathsf{vc})$., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper will appear in the Proceedings of IPEC 2023

Over the past decade, we witness an increasing amount of interest in the design of exact exponential-time and parameterized algorithms for problems in Graph Drawing. Unfortunately, we still lack knowledge of general methods to develop such algorithms. An even more serious issue is that, here, "standard" parameters very often yield intractability. In particular, for the most common structural parameter, namely, treewidth, we frequently observe NP-hardness already when the input graphs are restricted to have constant (often, being just $1$ or $2$) treewidth. Our work deals with both drawbacks simultaneously. We introduce a novel form of tree decomposition that, roughly speaking, does not decompose (only) a graph, but an entire drawing. As such, its bags and separators are of geometric (rather than only combinatorial) nature. While the corresponding parameter -- like treewidth -- can be arbitrarily smaller than the height (and width) of the drawing, we show that -- unlike treewidth -- it gives rise to efficient algorithms. Specifically, we get slice-wise polynomial (XP) time algorithms parameterized by our parameter. We present a general scheme for the design of such algorithms, and apply it to several central problems in Graph Drawing, including the recognition of grid graphs, minimization of crossings and bends, and compaction. Other than for the class of problems we discussed in the paper, we believe that our decomposition and scheme are of independent interest and can be further extended or generalized to suit even a wider class of problems. Additionally, we discuss classes of drawings where our parameter is bounded by $O(\sqrt{n})$ (where $n$ is the number of vertices of the graph), yielding subexponential-time algorithms. Lastly, we prove which relations exist between drawn treewidth and other width measures, including treewidth, pathwidth, (dual) carving-width and embedded-width., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper will appear in the Proceedings of IPEC 2023

\textit{Fair division} of resources among competing agents is a fundamental problem in computational social choice and economic game theory. It has been intensively studied on various kinds of items (\textit{divisible} and \textit{indivisible}) and under various notions of \textit{fairness}. We focus on Connected Fair Division (\CFDO), the variant of fair division on graphs, where the \textit{resources} are modeled as an \textit{item graph}. Here, each agent has to be assigned a connected subgraph of the item graph, and each item has to be assigned to some agent. We introduce a generalization of \CFDO, termed Incomplete Connected Fair Division (\CFD), where exactly $p$ vertices of the item graph should be assigned to the agents. This might be useful, in particular when the allocations are intended to be ``economical'' as well as fair. We consider four well-known notions of fairness: \PROP, \EF, \EFO, \EFX. First, we prove that \EF-\CFD, \EFO-\CFD, and \EFX-\CFD are W[1]-hard parameterized by $p$ plus the number of agents, even for graphs having constant \textit{vertex cover number} ($\mathsf{vcn}$). In contrast, we present a randomized \FPT algorithm for \PROP-\CFD parameterized only by $p$. Additionally, we prove both positive and negative results concerning the kernelization complexity of \CFD under all four fairness notions, parameterized by $p$, $\mathsf{vcn}$, and the total number of different valuations in the item graph ($\mathsf{val}$)., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper will appear in the Proceedings of FSTTCS 23

Given an undirected graph $G$ and a multiset of $k$ terminal pairs $\mathcal{X}$, the Vertex-Disjoint Paths (\VDP) and Edge-Disjoint Paths (\EDP) problems ask whether $G$ has $k$ pairwise internally vertex-disjoint paths and $k$ pairwise edge-disjoint paths, respectively, connecting every terminal pair in~$\mathcal{X}$. In this paper, we study the kernelization complexity of \VDP~and~\EDP~on subclasses of chordal graphs. For \VDP, we design a $4k$ vertex kernel on split graphs and an $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$ vertex kernel on well-partitioned chordal graphs. We also show that the problem becomes polynomial-time solvable on threshold graphs. For \textsc{EDP}, we first prove that the problem is $\mathsf{NP}$-complete on complete graphs. Then, we design an $\mathcal{O}(k^{2.75})$ vertex kernel for \EDP~on split graphs, and improve it to a $7k+1$ vertex kernel on threshold graphs. Lastly, we provide an $\mathcal{O}(k^2)$ vertex kernel for \EDP~on block graphs and a $2k+1$ vertex kernel for clique paths. Our contributions improve upon several results in the literature, as well as resolve an open question by Heggernes et al.~[Theory Comput. Syst., 2015]., Comment: A preliminary version of this paper will appear in the Proceedings of IPEC 2023

We study the classic {\sc Dominating Set} problem with respect to several prominent parameters. Specifically, we present algorithmic results that sidestep time complexity barriers by the incorporation of either approximation or larger parameterization. Our results span several parameterization regimes, including: (i,ii,iii) time/ratio-tradeoff for the parameters {\em treewidth}, {\em vertex modulator to constant treewidth} and {\em solution size}; (iv,v) FPT-algorithms for the parameters {\em vertex cover number} and {\em feedback edge set number}; and (vi) compression for the parameter {\em feedback edge set number}., Comment: Accepted to IPEC'23

Given a mapping from a set of players to the leaves of a complete binary tree (called a seeding), a knockout tournament is conducted as follows: every round, every two players with a common parent compete against each other, and the winner is promoted to the common parent; then, the leaves are deleted. When only one player remains, it is declared the winner. This is a popular competition format in sports, elections, and decision-making. Over the past decade, it has been studied intensively from both theoretical and practical points of view. Most frequently, the objective is to seed the tournament in a way that "assists" (or even guarantees) some particular player to win the competition. We introduce a new objective, which is very sensible from the perspective of the directors of the competition: maximize the profit or popularity of the tournament. Specifically, we associate a "score" with every possible match, and aim to seed the tournament to maximize the sum of the scores of the matches that take place. We focus on the case where we assume a total order on the players' strengths, and provide a wide spectrum of results on the computational complexity of the problem.

We consider the following problem about dispersing points. Given a set of points in the plane, the task is to identify whether by moving a small number of points by small distance, we can obtain an arrangement of points such that no pair of points is ``close" to each other. More precisely, for a family of $n$ points, an integer $k$, and a real number $d > 0$, we ask whether at most $k$ points could be relocated, each point at distance at most $d$ from its original location, such that the distance between each pair of points is at least a fixed constant, say $1$. A number of approximation algorithms for variants of this problem, under different names like distant representatives, disk dispersing, or point spreading, are known in the literature. However, to the best of our knowledge, the parameterized complexity of this problem remains widely unexplored. We make the first step in this direction by providing a kernelization algorithm that, in polynomial time, produces an equivalent instance with $O(d^2k^3)$ points. As a byproduct of this result, we also design a non-trivial fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithm for the problem, parameterized by $k$ and $d$. Finally, we complement the result about polynomial kernelization by showing a lower bound that rules out the existence of a kernel whose size is polynomial in $k$ alone, unless $\mathsf{NP} \subseteq \mathsf{coNP}/\text{poly}$.

We study the parameterized complexity of two classic problems on directed graphs: Hamiltonian Cycle and its generalization {\sc Longest Cycle}. Since 2008, it is known that Hamiltonian Cycle is W[1]-hard when parameterized by directed treewidth [Lampis et al., ISSAC'08]. By now, the question of whether it is FPT parameterized by the directed feedback vertex set (DFVS) number has become a longstanding open problem. In particular, the DFVS number is the largest natural directed width measure studied in the literature. In this paper, we provide a negative answer to the question, showing that even for the DFVS number, the problem remains W[1]-hard. As a consequence, we also obtain that Longest Cycle is W[1]-hard on directed graphs when parameterized multiplicatively above girth, in contrast to the undirected case. This resolves an open question posed by Fomin et al. [ACM ToCT'21] and Gutin and Mnich [arXiv:2207.12278]. Our hardness results apply to the path versions of the problems as well. On the positive side, we show that Longest Path parameterized multiplicatively above girth} belongs to the class XP., Comment: Accepted to ESA 2023

We re-visit the complexity of kernelization for the $d$-Hitting Set problem. This is a classic problem in Parameterized Complexity, which encompasses several other of the most well-studied problems in this field, such as Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set in Tournaments (FVST) and Cluster Vertex Deletion (CVD). In fact, $d$-Hitting Set encompasses any deletion problem to a hereditary property that can be characterized by a finite set of forbidden induced subgraphs. With respect to bit size, the kernelization complexity of $d$-Hitting Set is essentially settled: there exists a kernel with $O(k^d)$ bits ($O(k^d)$ sets and $O(k^{d-1})$ elements) and this it tight by the result of Dell and van Melkebeek [STOC 2010, JACM 2014]. Still, the question of whether there exists a kernel for $d$-Hitting Set with fewer elements has remained one of the most major open problems~in~Kernelization. In this paper, we first show that if we allow the kernelization to be lossy with a qualitatively better loss than the best possible approximation ratio of polynomial time approximation algorithms, then one can obtain kernels where the number of elements is linear for every fixed $d$. Further, based on this, we present our main result: we show that there exist approximate Turing kernelizations for $d$-Hitting Set that even beat the established bit-size lower bounds for exact kernelizations -- in fact, we use a constant number of oracle calls, each with ``near linear'' ($O(k^{1+\epsilon})$) bit size, that is, almost the best one could hope for. Lastly, for two special cases of implicit 3-Hitting set, namely, FVST and CVD, we obtain the ``best of both worlds'' type of results -- $(1+\epsilon)$-approximate kernelizations with a linear number of vertices. In terms of size, this substantially improves the exact kernels of Fomin et al. [SODA 2018, TALG 2019], with simpler arguments., Comment: Accepted to ESA'23

We introduce a new framework for the analysis of preprocessing routines for parameterized counting problems. Existing frameworks that encapsulate parameterized counting problems permit the usage of exponential (rather than polynomial) time either explicitly or by implicitly reducing the counting problems to enumeration problems. Thus, our framework is the only one in the spirit of classic kernelization (as well as lossy kernelization). Specifically, we define a compression of a counting problem $P$ into a counting problem $Q$ as a pair of polynomial-time procedures: $\mathsf{reduce}$ and $\mathsf{lift}$. Given an instance of $P$, $\mathsf{reduce}$ outputs an instance of $Q$ whose size is bounded by a function $f$ of the parameter, and given the number of solutions to the instance of $Q$, $\mathsf{lift}$ outputs the number of solutions to the instance of $P$. When $P=Q$, compression is termed kernelization, and when $f$ is polynomial, compression is termed polynomial compression. Our technical (and other conceptual) contributions concern both upper bounds and lower bounds.

The streaming model was introduced to parameterized complexity independently by Fafianie and Kratsch [MFCS14] and by Chitnis, Cormode, Hajiaghayi and Monemizadeh [SODA15]. Subsequently, it was broadened by Chitnis, Cormode, Esfandiari, Hajiaghayi and Monemizadeh [SPAA15] and by Chitnis, Cormode, Esfandiari, Hajiaghayi, McGregor, Monemizadeh and Vorotnikova [SODA16]. Despite its strong motivation, the applicability of the streaming model to central problems in parameterized complexity has remained, for almost a decade, quite limited. Indeed, due to simple $\Omega(n)$-space lower bounds for many of these problems, the $k^{O(1)}\cdot {\rm polylog}(n)$-space requirement in the model is too strict. Thus, we explore {\em semi-streaming} algorithms for parameterized graph problems, and present the first systematic study of this topic. Crucially, we aim to construct succinct representations of the input on which optimal post-processing time complexity can be achieved. - We devise meta-theorems specifically designed for parameterized streaming and demonstrate their applicability by obtaining the first $k^{O(1)}\cdot n\cdot {\rm polylog}(n)$-space streaming algorithms for well-studied problems such as Feedback Vertex Set on Tournaments, Cluster Vertex Deletion, Proper Interval Vertex Deletion and Block Vertex Deletion. In the process, we demonstrate a fundamental connection between semi-streaming algorithms for recognizing graphs in a graph class H and semi-streaming algorithms for the problem of vertex deletion into H. - We present an algorithmic machinery for obtaining streaming algorithms for cut problems and exemplify this by giving the first $k^{O(1)}\cdot n\cdot {\rm polylog}(n)$-space streaming algorithms for Graph Bipartitization, Multiway Cut and Subset Feedback Vertex Set.

A \emph{matching} is a subset of edges in a graph $G$ that do not share an endpoint. A matching $M$ is a \emph{$\mathcal{P}$-matching} if the subgraph of $G$ induced by the endpoints of the edges of $M$ satisfies property $\mathcal{P}$. For example, if the property $\mathcal{P}$ is that of being a matching, being acyclic, or being disconnected, then we obtain an \emph{induced matching}, an \emph{acyclic matching}, and a \emph{disconnected matching}, respectively. In this paper, we analyze the problems of the computation of these matchings from the viewpoint of Parameterized Complexity with respect to the parameter \emph{treewidth}., Comment: To Appear in the proceedings of WG 2023

In the Planar Disjoint Paths problem, one is given an undirected planar graph with a set of $k$ vertex pairs $(s_i,t_i)$ and the task is to find $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths such that the $i$-th path connects $s_i$ to $t_i$. We study the problem through the lens of kernelization, aiming at efficiently reducing the input size in terms of a parameter. We show that Planar Disjoint Paths does not admit a polynomial kernel when parameterized by $k$ unless coNP $\subseteq$ NP/poly, resolving an open problem by [Bodlaender, Thomass{\'e}, Yeo, ESA'09]. Moreover, we rule out the existence of a polynomial Turing kernel unless the WK-hierarchy collapses. Our reduction carries over to the setting of edge-disjoint paths, where the kernelization status remained open even in general graphs. On the positive side, we present a polynomial kernel for Planar Disjoint Paths parameterized by $k + tw$, where $tw$ denotes the treewidth of the input graph. As a consequence of both our results, we rule out the possibility of a polynomial-time (Turing) treewidth reduction to $tw= k^{O(1)}$ under the same assumptions. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first hardness result of this kind. Finally, combining our kernel with the known techniques [Adler, Kolliopoulos, Krause, Lokshtanov, Saurabh, Thilikos, JCTB'17; Schrijver, SICOMP'94] yields an alternative (and arguably simpler) proof that Planar Disjoint Paths can be solved in time $2^{O(k^2)}\cdot n^{O(1)}$, matching the result of [Lokshtanov, Misra, Pilipczuk, Saurabh, Zehavi, STOC'20]., Comment: To appear at FOCS'23, 82 pages, 30 figures

A matching $M$ in a graph $G$ is an \emph{acyclic matching} if the subgraph of $G$ induced by the endpoints of the edges of $M$ is a forest. Given a graph $G$ and a positive integer $\ell$, Acyclic Matching asks whether $G$ has an acyclic matching of size (i.e., the number of edges) at least $\ell$. In this paper, we first prove that assuming $\mathsf{W[1]\nsubseteq FPT}$, there does not exist any $\mathsf{FPT}$-approximation algorithm for Acyclic Matching that approximates it within a constant factor when the parameter is the size of the matching. Our reduction is general in the sense that it also asserts $\mathsf{FPT}$-inapproximability for Induced Matching and Uniquely Restricted Matching as well. We also consider three below-guarantee parameters for Acyclic Matching, viz. $\frac{n}{2}-\ell$, $\mathsf{MM(G)}-\ell$, and $\mathsf{IS(G)}-\ell$, where $n$ is the number of vertices in $G$, $\mathsf{MM(G)}$ is the matching number of $G$, and $\mathsf{IS(G)}$ is the independence number of $G$. Furthermore, we show that Acyclic Matching does not exhibit a polynomial kernel with respect to vertex cover number (or vertex deletion distance to clique) plus the size of the matching unless $\mathsf{NP}\subseteq\mathsf{coNP}\slash\mathsf{poly}$.

\textit{Pursuit-evasion games} have been intensively studied for several decades due to their numerous applications in artificial intelligence, robot motion planning, database theory, distributed computing, and algorithmic theory. \textsc{Cops and Robber} (\CR) is one of the most well-known pursuit-evasion games played on graphs, where multiple \textit{cops} pursue a single \textit{robber}. The aim is to compute the \textit{cop number} of a graph, $k$, which is the minimum number of cops that ensures the \textit{capture} of the robber. From the viewpoint of parameterized complexity, \CR is W[2]-hard parameterized by $k$~[Fomin et al., TCS, 2010]. Thus, we study structural parameters of the input graph. We begin with the \textit{vertex cover number} ($\mathsf{vcn}$). First, we establish that $k \leq \frac{\mathsf{vcn}}{3}+1$. Second, we prove that \CR parameterized by $\mathsf{vcn}$ is \FPT by designing an exponential kernel. We complement this result by showing that it is unlikely for \CR parameterized by $\mathsf{vcn}$ to admit a polynomial compression. We extend our exponential kernels to the parameters \textit{cluster vertex deletion number} and \textit{deletion to stars number}, and design a linear vertex kernel for \textit{neighborhood diversity}. Additionally, we extend all of our results to several well-studied variations of \CR., Comment: To Appear in MFCS 2023

We investigate a fundamental vertex-deletion problem called (Induced) Subgraph Hitting: given a graph $G$ and a set $\mathcal{F}$ of forbidden graphs, the goal is to compute a minimum-sized set $S$ of vertices of $G$ such that $G-S$ does not contain any graph in $\mathcal{F}$ as an (induced) subgraph. This is a generic problem that encompasses many well-known problems that were extensively studied on their own, particularly (but not only) from the perspectives of both approximation and parameterization. In this paper, we study the approximability of the problem on a large variety of graph classes. Our first result is a linear-time $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation reduction from (Induced) Subgraph Hitting on any graph class $\mathcal{G}$ of bounded expansion to the same problem on bounded degree graphs within $\mathcal{G}$. This directly yields linear-size $(1+\varepsilon)$-approximation lossy kernels for the problems on any bounded-expansion graph classes. Our second result is a linear-time approximation scheme for (Induced) Subgraph Hitting on any graph class $\mathcal{G}$ of polynomial expansion, based on the local-search framework of Har-Peled and Quanrud [SICOMP 2017]. This approximation scheme can be applied to a more general family of problems that aim to hit all subgraphs satisfying a certain property $\pi$ that is efficiently testable and has bounded diameter. Both of our results have applications to Subgraph Hitting (not induced) on wide classes of geometric intersection graphs, resulting in linear-size lossy kernels and (near-)linear time approximation schemes for the problem., Comment: 52 pages, subsuming the article arXiv:2304.12789

A temporal graph has an edge set that may change over discrete time steps, and a temporal path (or walk) must traverse edges that appear at increasing time steps. Accordingly, two temporal paths (or walks) are temporally disjoint if they do not visit any vertex at the same time. The study of the computational complexity of finding temporally disjoint paths or walks in temporal graphs has recently been initiated by Klobas et al. [IJCAI '21]. This problem is motivated by applications in multi-agent path finding (MAPF), which include robotics, warehouse management, aircraft management, and traffic routing. We extend Klobas et al.'s research by providing parameterized hardness results for very restricted cases, with a focus on structural parameters of the so-called underlying graph. On the positive side, we identify sufficiently simple cases where we can solve the problem efficiently. Our results reveal some surprising differences between the "path version" and the "walk version" (where vertices may be visited multiple times) of the problem, and answer several open questions posed by Klobas et al.

We study an "above guarantee" version of the {\sc Longest Path} problem in directed graphs: We are given a graph $G$, two vertices $s$ and $t$ of $G$, and a non-negative integer $k$, and the objective is to determine whether $G$ contains a path of length at least $dist_G(s,t) +k$ where $dist_G(s,t)$ is the length of a shortest path from $s$ to $t$ in $G$ (assuming that one exists). We show that the problem is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by $k$ in the class of graphs where {\sc $2$-Disjoint Paths} problem is polynomial time solvable., Comment: 16 pages, 5 figures

The problem of packing of equal disks (or circles) into a rectangle is a fundamental geometric problem. (By a packing here we mean an arrangement of disks in a rectangle without overlapping.) We consider the following algorithmic generalization of the equal disk packing problem. In this problem, for a given packing of equal disks into a rectangle, the question is whether by changing positions of a small number of disks, we can allocate space for packing more disks. More formally, in the repacking problem, for a given set of $n$ equal disks packed into a rectangle and integers $k$ and $h$, we ask whether it is possible by changing positions of at most $h$ disks to pack $n+k$ disks. Thus the problem of packing equal disks is the special case of our problem with $n=h=0$. While the computational complexity of packing equal disks into a rectangle remains open, we prove that the repacking problem is NP-hard already for $h=0$. Our main algorithmic contribution is an algorithm that solves the repacking problem in time $(h+k)^{O(h+k)}\cdot |I|^{O(1)}$, where $I$ is the input size. That is, the problem is fixed-parameter tractable parameterized by $k$ and $h$., Comment: Full version of ICALP 2022 paper

We initiate a systematic study of approximation schemes for fundamental optimization problems on disk graphs, a common generalization of both planar graphs and unit-disk graphs. Our main contribution is a general framework for designing efficient polynomial-time approximation schemes (EPTASes) for vertex-deletion problems on disk graphs, which results in EPTASes for many problems including Vertex Cover, Feedback Vertex Set, Small Cycle Hitting (in particular, Triangle Hitting), $P_k$-Hitting for $k\in\{3,4,5\}$, Path Deletion, Pathwidth $1$-Deletion, Component Order Connectivity, Bounded Degree Deletion, Pseudoforest Deletion, Finite-Type Component Deletion, etc. All EPTASes obtained using our framework are robust in the sense that they do not require a realization of the input graph. To the best of our knowledge, prior to this work, the only problems known to admit (E)PTASes on disk graphs are Maximum Clique, Independent Set, Dominating set, and Vertex Cover, among which the existing PTAS [Erlebach et al., SICOMP'05] and EPTAS [Leeuwen, SWAT'06] for Vertex Cover require a realization of the input disk graph (while ours does not). The core of our framework is a reduction for a broad class of (approximation) vertex-deletion problems from (general) disk graphs to disk graphs of bounded local radius, which is a new invariant of disk graphs introduced in this work. Disk graphs of bounded local radius can be viewed as a mild generalization of planar graphs, which preserves certain nice properties of planar graphs. Specifically, we prove that disk graphs of bounded local radius admit the Excluded Grid Minor property and have locally bounded treewidth. This allows existing techniques for designing approximation schemes on planar graphs (e.g., bidimensionality and Baker's technique) to be directly applied to disk graphs of bounded local radius.

Orthogonal graph drawings are used in applications such as UML diagrams, VLSI layout, cable plans, and metro maps. We focus on drawing planar graphs and assume that we are given an \emph{orthogonal representation} that describes the desired shape, but not the exact coordinates of a drawing. Our aim is to compute an orthogonal drawing on the grid that has minimum area among all grid drawings that adhere to the given orthogonal representation. This problem is called orthogonal compaction (OC) and is known to be NP-hard, even for orthogonal representations of cycles [Evans et al., 2022]. We investigate the complexity of OC with respect to several parameters. Among others, we show that OC is fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the most natural of these parameters, namely, the number of \emph{kitty corners} of the orthogonal representation: the presence of pairs of kitty corners in an orthogonal representation makes the OC problem hard. Informally speaking, a pair of kitty corners is a pair of reflex corners of a face that point at each other. Accordingly, the number of kitty corners is the number of corners that are involved in some pair of kitty corners., Comment: 40 pages, 26 figures, to appear in Proc. SOFSEM 2023

The \emph{Delaunay graph} of a point set $P \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ is the plane graph with the vertex-set $P$ and the edge-set that contains $\{p,p'\}$ if there exists a disc whose intersection with $P$ is exactly $\{p,p'\}$. Accordingly, a triangulated graph $G$ is \emph{Delaunay realizable} if there exists a triangulation of the Delaunay graph of some $P \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$, called a \emph{Delaunay triangulation} of $P$, that is isomorphic to $G$. The objective of \textsc{Delaunay Realization} is to compute a point set $P \subseteq \mathbb{R}^2$ that realizes a given graph $G$ (if such a $P$ exists). Known algorithms do not solve \textsc{Delaunay Realization} as they are non-constructive. Obtaining a constructive algorithm for \textsc{Delaunay Realization} was mentioned as an open problem by Hiroshima et al.~\cite{hiroshima2000}. We design an $n^{\mathcal{O}(n)}$-time constructive algorithm for \textsc{Delaunay Realization}. In fact, our algorithm outputs sets of points with {\em integer} coordinates.

Cut problems form one of the most fundamental classes of problems in algorithmic graph theory. For instance, the minimum cut, the minimum $s$-$t$ cut, the minimum multiway cut, and the minimum $k$-way cut are some of the commonly encountered cut problems. Many of these problems have been extensively studied over several decades. In this paper, we initiate the algorithmic study of some cut problems in high dimensions. The first problem we study, namely, Topological Hitting Set (THS), is defined as follows: Given a nontrivial $r$-cycle $\zeta$ in a simplicial complex $\mathsf{K}$, find a set $\mathcal{S}$ of $r$-dimensional simplices of minimum cardinality so that $\mathcal{S}$ meets every cycle homologous to $\zeta$. Our main result is that this problem admits a polynomial-time solution on triangulations of closed surfaces. Interestingly, the optimal solution is given in terms of the cocycles of the surface. For general complexes, we show that THS is W[1]-hard with respect to the solution size $k$. On the positive side, we show that THS admits an FPT algorithm with respect to $k+d$, where $d$ is the maximum degree of the Hasse graph of the complex $\mathsf{K}$. We also define a problem called Boundary Nontrivialization (BNT): Given a bounding $r$-cycle $\zeta$ in a simplicial complex $\mathsf{K}$, find a set $\mathcal{S}$ of $(r+1)$-dimensional simplices of minimum cardinality so that the removal of $\mathcal{S}$ from $\mathsf{K}$ makes $\zeta$ non-bounding. We show that BNT is W[1]-hard with respect to the solution size as the parameter, and has an $O(\log n)$-approximation FPT algorithm for $(r+1)$-dimensional complexes with the $(r+1)$-th Betti number $\beta_{r+1}$ as the parameter. Finally, we provide randomized (approximation) FPT algorithms for the global variants of THS and BNT.

Grid graphs, and, more generally, $k\times r$ grid graphs, form one of the most basic classes of geometric graphs. Over the past few decades, a large body of works studied the (in)tractability of various computational problems on grid graphs, which often yield substantially faster algorithms than general graphs. Unfortunately, the recognition of a grid graph is particularly hard -- it was shown to be NP-hard even on trees of pathwidth 3 already in 1987. Yet, in this paper, we provide several positive results in this regard in the framework of parameterized complexity (additionally, we present new and complementary hardness results). Specifically, our contribution is threefold. First, we show that the problem is fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) parameterized by $k+\mathsf {mcc}$ where $\mathsf{mcc}$ is the maximum size of a connected component of $G$. This also implies that the problem is FPT parameterized by $\mathtt{td}+k$ where $\mathtt{td}$ is the treedepth of $G$ (to be compared with the hardness for pathwidth 2 where $k=3$). Further, we derive as a corollary that strip packing is FPT with respect to the height of the strip plus the maximum of the dimensions of the packed rectangles, which was previously only known to be in XP. Second, we present a new parameterization, denoted $a_G$, relating graph distance to geometric distance, which may be of independent interest. We show that the problem is para-NP-hard parameterized by $a_G$, but FPT parameterized by $a_G$ on trees, as well as FPT parameterized by $k+a_G$. Third, we show that the recognition of $k\times r$ grid graphs is NP-hard on graphs of pathwidth 2 where $k=3$. Moreover, when $k$ and $r$ are unrestricted, we show that the problem is NP-hard on trees of pathwidth 2, but trivially solvable in polynomial time on graphs of pathwidth 1.

The class of assignment problems is a fundamental and well-studied class in the intersection of Social Choice, Computational Economics and Discrete Allocation. In a general assignment problem, a group of agents expresses preferences over a set of items, and the task is to allocate items to agents in an "optimal" way. A verification variant of this problem includes an allocation as part of the input, and the question becomes whether this allocation is "optimal". In this paper, we generalize the verification variant to the setting where each agent is equipped with multiple incomplete preference lists: Each list (called a layer) is a ranking of items in a possibly different way according to a different criterion. In particular, we introduce three multi-layer verification problems, each corresponds to an optimality notion that weakens the notion of global optimality (that is, pareto optimality in multiple layers) in a different way. Informally, the first notion requires that, for each group of agents whose size is exactly some input parameter k, the agents in the group will not be able to trade their assigned items among themselves and benefit in at least alpha layers; the second notion is similar, but it concerns all groups of size at most k rather than exactly k; the third notion strengthens these notions by requiring that groups of k agents will not be part of possibly larger groups that benefit in at least alpha layers. We study the three problems from the perspective of parameterized complexity under several natural parameterizations such as the number of layers, the number of agents, the number of items, the number of allocated items, the maximum length of a preference list, and more. We present an almost comprehensive picture of the parameterized complexity of the problems with respect to these parameters., Comment: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2004.00655

For a graph class ${\cal H}$, the graph parameters elimination distance to ${\cal H}$ (denoted by ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$) [Bulian and Dawar, Algorithmica, 2016], and ${\cal H}$-treewidth (denoted by ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$) [Eiben et al. JCSS, 2021] aim to minimize the treedepth and treewidth, respectively, of the "torso" of the graph induced on a modulator to the graph class ${\cal H}$. Here, the torso of a vertex set $S$ in a graph $G$ is the graph with vertex set $S$ and an edge between two vertices $u, v \in S$ if there is a path between $u$ and $v$ in $G$ whose internal vertices all lie outside $S$. In this paper, we show that from the perspective of (non-uniform) fixed-parameter tractability (FPT), the three parameters described above give equally powerful parameterizations for every hereditary graph class ${\cal H}$ that satisfies mild additional conditions. In fact, we show that for every hereditary graph class ${\cal H}$ satisfying mild additional conditions, with the exception of ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$ parameterized by ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$, for every pair of these parameters, computing one parameterized by itself or any of the others is FPT-equivalent to the standard vertex-deletion (to ${\cal H}$) problem. As an example, we prove that an FPT algorithm for the vertex-deletion problem implies a non-uniform FPT algorithm for computing ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$ and ${\bf tw}_{\cal H}$. The conclusions of non-uniform FPT algorithms being somewhat unsatisfactory, we essentially prove that if ${\cal H}$ is hereditary, union-closed, CMSO-definable, and (a) the canonical equivalence relation (or any refinement thereof) for membership in the class can be efficiently computed, or (b) the class admits a "strong irrelevant vertex rule", then there exists a uniform FPT algorithm for ${\bf ed}_{\cal H}$., Comment: 70 pages, To appear in SODA 2022. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2103.09715, arXiv:2105.04660 by other authors

In the Disjoint Paths problem, the input is an undirected graph $G$ on $n$ vertices and a set of $k$ vertex pairs, $\{s_i,t_i\}_{i=1}^k$, and the task is to find $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths connecting $s_i$ to $t_i$. The problem was shown to have an $f(k)n^3$ algorithm by Robertson and Seymour. In modern terminology, this means that Disjoint Paths is fixed parameter tractable (FPT), parameterized by the number of vertex pairs. This algorithm is the cornerstone of the entire graph minor theory, and a vital ingredient in the $g(k)n^3$ algorithm for Minor Testing (given two undirected graphs, $G$ and $H$ on $n$ and $k$ vertices, respectively, the objective is to check whether $G$ contains $H$ as a minor). All we know about $f$ and $g$ is that these are computable functions. Thus, a challenging open problem in graph algorithms is to devise an algorithm for Disjoint Paths where $f$ is single exponential. That is, $f$ is of the form $2^{{\sf poly}(k)}$. The algorithm of Robertson and Seymour relies on topology and essentially reduces the problem to surface-embedded graphs. Thus, the first major obstacle that has to be overcome in order to get an algorithm with a single exponential running time for Disjoint Paths and {\sf Minor Testing} on general graphs is to solve Disjoint Paths in single exponential time on surface-embedded graphs and in particular on planar graphs. Even when the inputs to Disjoint Paths are restricted to planar graphs, a case called the Planar Disjoint Paths problem, the best known algorithm has running time $2^{2^{O(k)}}n^2$. In this paper, we make the first step towards our quest for designing a single exponential time algorithm for Disjoint Paths by giving a $2^{O(k^2)}n^{O(1)}$-time algorithm for Planar Disjoint Paths., Comment: Full version of STOC 2020 paper; 83 pages

A \emph{fair competition}, based on the concept of envy-freeness, is a non-eliminating competition where each contestant (team or individual player) may not play against all other contestants, but the total difficulty for each contestant is the same: the sum of the initial rankings of the opponents for each contestant is the same. Similar to other non-eliminating competitions like the Round-robin competition or the Swiss-system competition, the winner of the fair competition is the contestant who wins the most games. The {\sc Fair Non-Eliminating Tournament} ({\sc Fair-NET}) problem can be used to schedule fair competitions whose infrastructure is known. In the {\sc Fair-NET} problem, we are given an infrastructure of a tournament represented by a graph $G$ and the initial rankings of the contestants represented by a multiset of integers $S$. The objective is to decide whether $G$ is \emph{$S$-fair}, i.e., there exists an assignment of the contestants to the vertices of $G$ such that the sum of the rankings of the neighbors of each contestant in $G$ is the same constant $k\in\mathbb{N}$. We initiate a study of the classical and parameterized complexity of {\sc Fair-NET} with respect to several central structural parameters motivated by real world scenarios, thereby presenting a comprehensive picture of it., Comment: To appear in the Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems

We study a generalization of the standard approval-based model of participatory budgeting (PB), in which voters are providing approval ballots over a set of predefined projects and -- in addition to a global budget limit, there are several groupings of the projects, each group with its own budget limit. We study the computational complexity of identifying project bundles that maximize voter satisfaction while respecting all budget limits. We show that the problem is generally intractable and describe efficient exact algorithms for several special cases, including instances with only few groups and instances where the group structure is close to be hierarchical, as well as efficient approximation algorithms. Our results could allow, e.g., municipalities to hold richer PB processes that are thematically and geographically inclusive., Comment: 23 pages, 3 tables

In the Disjoint Paths problem, the input consists of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a collection of $k$ vertex pairs, $\{(s_i,t_i)\}_{i=1}^k$, and the objective is to determine whether there exists a collection $\{P_i\}_{i=1}^k$ of $k$ pairwise vertex-disjoint paths in $G$ where the end-vertices of $P_i$ are $s_i$ and $t_i$. This problem was shown to admit an $f(k)n^3$-time algorithm by Robertson and Seymour (Graph Minors XIII, The Disjoint Paths Problem, JCTB). In modern terminology, this means that Disjoint Paths is fixed parameter tractable (FPT) with respect to $k$. Remarkably, the above algorithm for Disjoint Paths is a cornerstone of the entire Graph Minors Theory, and conceptually vital to the $g(k)n^3$-time algorithm for Minor Testing (given two undirected graphs, $G$ and $H$ on $n$ and $k$ vertices, respectively, determine whether $G$ contains $H$ as a minor). In this semi-survey, we will first give an exposition of the Graph Minors Theory with emphasis on efficiency from the viewpoint of Parameterized Complexity. Secondly, we will review the state of the art with respect to the Disjoint Paths and Planar Disjoint Paths problems. Lastly, we will discuss the main ideas behind a new algorithm that combines treewidth reduction and an algebraic approach to solve Planar Disjoint Paths in time $2^{k^{O(1)}}n^{O(1)}$ (for undirected graphs)., Comment: Survey. Appeared in "Treewidth, Kernels, and Algorithms - Essays Dedicated to Hans L. Bodlaender on the Occasion of His 60th Birthday", 2020

In the Stable Marriage problem. when the preference lists are complete, all agents of the smaller side can be matched. However, this need not be true when preference lists are incomplete. In most real-life situations, where agents participate in the matching market voluntarily and submit their preferences, it is natural to assume that each agent wants to be matched to someone in his/her preference list as opposed to being unmatched. In light of the Rural Hospital Theorem, we have to relax the "no blocking pair" condition for stable matchings in order to match more agents. In this paper, we study the question of matching more agents with fewest possible blocking edges. In particular, we find a matching whose size exceeds that of stable matching in the graph by at least t and has at most k blocking edges. We study this question in the realm of parameterized complexity with respect to several natural parameters, k,t,d, where d is the maximum length of a preference list. Unfortunately, the problem remains intractable even for the combined parameter k+t+d. Thus, we extend our study to the local search variant of this problem, in which we search for a matching that not only fulfills each of the above conditions but is "closest", in terms of its symmetric difference to the given stable matching, and obtain an FPT algorithm.

We prove that the Hadwiger number of an $n$-vertex graph $G$ (the maximum size of a clique minor in $G$) cannot be computed in time $n^{o(n)}$, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) fails. This resolves a well-known open question in the area of exact exponential algorithms. The technique developed for resolving the Hadwiger number problem has a wider applicability. We use it to rule out the existence of $n^{o(n)}$-time algorithms (up to ETH) for a large class of computational problems concerning edge contractions in graphs., Comment: Accepted to ICALP 2020

We study the Steiner Tree problem on unit disk graphs. Given a $n$ vertex unit disk graph $G$, a subset $R\subseteq V(G)$ of $t$ vertices and a positive integer $k$, the objective is to decide if there exists a tree $T$ in $G$ that spans over all vertices of $R$ and uses at most $k$ vertices from $V\setminus R$. The vertices of $R$ are referred to as terminals and the vertices of $V(G)\setminus R$ as Steiner vertices. First, we show that the problem is NP-Hard. Next, we prove that the Steiner Tree problem on unit disk graphs can be solved in $n^{O(\sqrt{t+k})}$ time. We also show that the Steiner Tree problem on unit disk graphs parameterized by $k$ has an FPT algorithm with running time $2^{O(k)}n^{O(1)}$. In fact, the algorithms are designed for a more general class of graphs, called clique-grid graphs. We mention that the algorithmic results can be made to work for the Steiner Tree on disk graphs with bounded aspect ratio. Finally, we prove that the Steiner Tree on disk graphs parameterized by $k$ is W[1]-hard., Comment: Accepted in Scandinavian Symposium and Workshops on Algorithm Theory (SWAT) 2020

The Assignment problem is a fundamental and well-studied problem in the intersection of Social Choice, Computational Economics and Discrete Allocation. In the Assignment problem, a group of agents expresses preferences over a set of items, and the task is to find a pareto optimal allocation of items to agents. We introduce a generalized version of this problem, where each agent is equipped with multiple incomplete preference lists: each list (called a layer) is a ranking of items in a possibly different way according to a different criterion. We introduce the concept of global optimality, which extends the notion of pareto optimality to the multi-layered setting, and we focus on the problem of deciding whether a globally optimal assignment exists. We study this problem from the perspective of Parameterized Complexity: we consider several natural parameters such as the number of layers, the number of agents, the number of items, and the maximum length of a preference list. We present a comprehensive picture of the parameterized complexity of the problem with respect to these parameters., Comment: 43 pages, 11 figures

Art Gallery is a fundamental visibility problem in Computational Geometry. The input consists of a simple polygon P, (possibly infinite) sets G and C of points within P, and an integer k; the task is to decide if at most k guards can be placed on points in G so that every point in C is visible to at least one guard. In the classic formulation of Art Gallery, G and C consist of all the points within P. Other well-known variants restrict G and C to consist either of all the points on the boundary of P or of all the vertices of P. Recently, three new important discoveries were made: the above mentioned variants of Art Gallery are all W[1]-hard with respect to k [Bonnet and Miltzow, ESA'16], the classic variant has an O(log k)-approximation algorithm [Bonnet and Miltzow, SoCG'17], and it may require irrational guards [Abrahamsen et al., SoCG'17]. Building upon the third result, the classic variant and the case where G consists only of all the points on the boundary of P were both shown to be \exists R-complete~[Abrahamsen et al., STOC'18]. Even when both G and C consist only of all the points on the boundary of P, the problem is not known to be in NP. Given the first discovery, the following question was posed by Giannopoulos [Lorentz Center Workshop, 2016]: Is Art Gallery FPT with respect to r, the number of reflex vertices? We focus on the variant where G and C are all the vertices of P, called Vertex-Vertex Art Gallery. We show that Vertex-Vertex Art Gallery is solvable in time r^{O(r^2)}n^{O(1)}. Our approach also extends to assert that Vertex-Boundary Art Gallery and Boundary-Vertex Art Gallery are both FPT. We utilize structural properties of "almost convex polygons" to present a two-stage reduction from Vertex-Vertex Art Gallery to a new constraint satisfaction problem (whose solution is also provided in this paper) where constraints have arity 2 and involve monotone functions., Comment: To appear in SoCG 2020

We present an algorithm for the extensively studied Long Path and Long Cycle problems on unit disk graphs that runs in time $2^{O(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)$. Under the Exponential Time Hypothesis, Long Path and Long Cycle on unit disk graphs cannot be solved in time $2^{o(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)^{O(1)}$ [de Berg et al., STOC 2018], hence our algorithm is optimal. Besides the $2^{O(\sqrt{k})}(n+m)^{O(1)}$-time algorithm for the (arguably) much simpler Vertex Cover problem by de Berg et al. [STOC 2018] (which easily follows from the existence of a $2k$-vertex kernel for the problem), this is the only known ETH-optimal fixed-parameter tractable algorithm on UDGs. Previously, Long Path and Long Cycle on unit disk graphs were only known to be solvable in time $2^{O(\sqrt{k}\log k)}(n+m)$. This algorithm involved the introduction of a new type of a tree decomposition, entailing the design of a very tedious dynamic programming procedure. Our algorithm is substantially simpler: we completely avoid the use of this new type of tree decomposition. Instead, we use a marking procedure to reduce the problem to (a weighted version of) itself on a standard tree decomposition of width $O(\sqrt{k})$., Comment: Extended version to appear in SoCG'20