Search

Carbon-ions are charged particles with a high linear energy transfer, and therefore, they make a better dose distribution with greater biological effects on the tumors compared with photons and protons. Since prostate cancer, renal cell carcinoma, and retroperitoneal sarcomas such as liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma are known to be radioresistant tumors, carbon-ion radiotherapy, which provides the advantageous radiobiological properties such as an increasing relative biological effectiveness toward the Bragg peak, a reduced oxygen enhancement ratio, and a reduced dependence on fractionation and cell-cycle stage, has been tested for these urological tumors at the National Institute for Radiological Sciences since 1994. To promote carbon-ion radiotherapy as a standard cancer therapy, the Japan Carbon-ion Radiation Oncology Study Group was established in 2015 to create a registry of all treated patients and conduct multi-institutional prospective studies in cooperation with all the Japanese institutes. Based on accumulating evidence of the efficacy and feasibility of carbon-ion therapy for prostate cancer and retroperitoneal sarcoma, it is now covered by the Japanese health insurance system. On the other hand, carbon-ion radiotherapy for renal cell cancer is not still covered by the insurance system, although the two previous studies showed the efficacy. In this review, we introduce the characteristics, clinical outcomes, and perspectives of carbon-ion radiotherapy and our efforts to disseminate the use of this new technology worldwide.

Suppression of respiratory movement is crucial for safe and effective stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). SyncTraX FX4 is a novel device for synchronous respiratory irradiation. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of SBRT using SyncTraX FX4 for patients with lung cancer.Patients treated with SBRT using SyncTraX FX4 between November 2017 and August 2020 were included. In all cases, fiducial markers were inserted into the lung, and the total dose administered was 55 or 60 Gy, depending on the distance from the central region of the lung. Acute and late toxicities were reported, and local control, progression-free survival, cancer-specific survival, and overall survival were analyzed.We evaluated 16 patients and 17 sites. The median follow-up period was 14.4 months. In both the acute and late phases, one patient experienced grade 3 radiation pneumonitis; however, grade 4 or higher toxicities were not observed. There was no local recurrence during the observation period, and the overall survival, cancer-specific survival, and progression-free survival at 2 years were 54.6%, 85.1%, and 33.7%, respectively.SBRT with SyncTraX FX4 can provide safe and effective treatment for lung cancer patients in poor condition.

The aim of this study was to reclassify high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy using the Candiolo nomogram and evaluate usefulness to predict the following 10-year biochemical recurrence. Six hundred seventy-two high-risk prostate cancer patients were reclassified according to the Candiolo nomogram. The cumulative incidence curves for biochemical recurrence were compared by Gray’s test. Furthermore, five predictors of the Candiolo nomogram in our patients were evaluated by Fine and Gray regression hazards model. The higher the Candiolo risk, the worse the biochemical recurrence, especially in high- and very high-risk patients. Out of five predictors, age ≥70 years, cT3 stage, biopsy Gleason score ≥9 or the percentage of positive biopsy cores ≥50% had significant impacts on 10-year biochemical recurrence in our patients. The Candiolo nomogram can reclassify our high-risk prostate cancer patients treated with carbon-ion radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy and evaluate the biochemical recurrence preciously.

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of particle beam therapy (PBT) with proton or carbon ion beam for pelvic recurrence of colorectal cancer (PRCC) by comparing the clinical outcomes of a dataset of prospectively enrolled patients for PBT with those from the literature, which were collected by a systematic review of external X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) and PBT. Patients with PRCC treated at 14 domestic facilities between May 2016 and June 2019 and entered the database for prospective observational follow-up were analyzed. The registry data analyzed included 159 PRCC patients treated with PBT of whom 126 (79%) were treated with carbon ion radiation therapy (CIRT). The 3-year overall survival and local control rate were 81.8 and 76.4%, respectively. Among these PRCC patients, 5.7% had Grade 3 or higher toxicity. Systematic search of PubMed and Cochrane databases published from January 2000 to September 2020 resulted in 409 abstracts for the primary selection. Twelve studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria. With one additional publication, 13 studies were selected for qualitative analysis, including 9 on XRT and 4 on PBT. There were nine XRT studies, which included six on 3D conformal radiotherapy and three on stereotactic body radiation therapy, and four PBT studies included three on CIRT and one on proton therapy. A pilot meta-analysis using literatures with median survival time extractable over a 20-month observation period suggested that PBT, especially CIRT, may be a promising treatment option for PRCC not amenable to curative resection.

This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of particle therapy (proton beam therapy and carbon-ion radiotherapy) for esophageal cancer by analyzing prospective nationwide registry data from particle therapy facilities throughout Japan. Patients diagnosed with esophageal cancer who received particle therapy between May 2016 and June 2018 were recruited from the registries of 12 particle therapy centers in Japan. Eventually, we enrolled 174 patients who met the inclusion criteria. Of the 174 patients, 137 (78.7%) were male, with a median age of 69 years (range: 41–88 years). Clinical stages included I (n = 55; 31.6%), II (n = 31; 17.8%), III (n = 82; 47.1%), IV (n = 3; 1.7%) and unknown (n = 3; 1.7%) (Union for International Cancer Control, seventh edition), and the median follow-up period was 908 days (range: 76–1669 days) for all patients. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate, the 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) rate and the 3-year local control (LC) rates were 60.5, 53.2 and 72.7%, respectively. For each clinical stage, the 3-year OS rates were I, 84.8%; II, 60.3% and III, 42.9%; the 3-year PFS rates were I, 71.9%; II, 58.3% and III, 37.0% and the 3-year LC were I, 78.4%; II, 79.8% and III, 65.2%, respectively. Notably, four patients (2.3%) with ≥Grade 3 cardiopulmonary toxicities were observed (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 5.0). Our study showed that particle therapy for esophageal cancer has lower rates of adverse cardiopulmonary events than X-ray radiotherapy.

Curing local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) is difficult with conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) on the other hand, has unique physical characteristics that permit higher doses to LRRC while minimizing side effects on surrounding organs. However, the efficacy of PBT on controlling rectal cancer recurrence has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LRRC.

Background This is the first study to compare the long-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Methods We reviewed patients with clinical stage IB–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (UICC 7th edition) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (2009–2017). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence or regrowth rates were compared between the two treatment groups. Subgroup analyses of overall survival according to baseline characteristics were also performed. Results Forty-three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery (median follow-up 47.4 months) and 60 received definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (median follow-up 51.5 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for sex, tumor location, and cT classification. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy groups had similar 3-year overall survival rates (73.1% and 61.7%, respectively, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.58, p = 0.66), 3-year progression-free survival rates (46.5% and 45%, respectively, hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.62–1.70, p = 0.92), and recurrence or regrowth rates (53.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.84). In the subgroup analysis, favorable survival was observed after definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for cT1–2 disease (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.84–7.99) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery for cT3 or higher disease (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.67, p-for-interaction = 0.002). Conclusions Long-term outcomes were comparable between the treatments. The choice of the treatment according to cT classification might affect survival.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) located in the caudate lobe (caudate HCC) is rare; however, patients with this type of tumour have poorer prognoses than those with HCC in other segments. Despite many published reports on the clinical usefulness of proton beam therapy (PBT) for HCC, data on the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing PBT for caudate HCC remain scarce. Therefore, the present study aimed to investigate the outcomes of this group of patients. Thirty patients with caudate HCC who underwent definitive PBT between February 2002 and February 2014 were retrospectively analysed. The total irradiation doses ranged from 55 to 77 (median 72.6) Gy relative biological dose. The median follow-up period was 37.5 (range, 3.0–152.0) months. The overall survival (OS) rates at one, three and five years were 86.6%, 62.8% and 46.1%, respectively. According to univariate and multivariate analyses, Child-Pugh A (P

Highlights • Proton beam therapy is likely to be safe for liver hemangiomas because, in our experience. • Proton beam therapy achieves good local control for liver hemangiomas without causing severe hepatic damage. • Proton beam therapy expected to minimize the risk of late adverse events., Background Hepatic hemangiomas are benign tumors with a favorable prognosis, but giant hepatic hemangiomas can cause abdominal symptoms and are indicated for treatment. Most cases are treated with surgery, but radiotherapy has also been used. However, to date, there have been no reports of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. Case presentation A 46-year-old woman had a tumor of 80 × 80 mm in the left medial lobe of the liver, which was diagnosed as a giant hemangioma based on the contrast pattern. Therapy was required for a giant hepatic hemangioma with symptoms, but the patient refused blood transfusion due to religious reasons, which made surgical resection difficult. Therefore, she was referred to our hospital for proton beam therapy. At her first visit, liver function was Child-Pugh A (5 points) and there was no elevation of tumor markers. Proton beam therapy of 28.6 Gy (RBE) given in 13 fractions was performed without interruption. The only observed acute radiation toxicity was Grade 1 dermatitis. One year after proton beam therapy, the hemangioma had significantly decreased, and a complete response has been maintained for 15 years based on ultrasound and MRI. Conclusion This case is the first reported use of proton beam therapy for a hepatic hemangioma. The outcome suggests that this treatment may be effective for a giant liver hemangioma.

Highlights • A cervical desmoid tumor could be successfully controlled with proton therapy. • Desmoid tumors commonly occur in the limbs and trunk, rarely in the neck. • Proton beam therapy was selected to reduce radiation related adverse events., Desmoid tumors are benign, but may have a locally invasive tendency that commonly results in local recurrence. Most occur on the body trunk or extremities, whereas a head and neck desmoid tumor is relatively rare. The efficacy of radiotherapy has been suggested and 50–60 Gy is used for unresectable or recurrent desmoid tumors, but there are few reports of use of particle beam therapy. However, since this tumor occurs more often in younger patients compared to malignant tumors and the prognosis is favorable, there may be an advantage of this therapy. We treated a male patient with a head and neck recurrent desmoid tumor with proton beam therapy (PBT) at a dose of 60 Gy (RBE). This patient underwent surgical resection as initial treatment, but the tumor recurred only six months after surgery, and resection was performed again. After PBT, the tumor gradually shrank and complete remission has been achieved for 10 years without any severe late toxicity. Here, we report the details of this case, with a review of the literature. We suggest that PBT may reduce the incidence of second malignant tumors by reducing the dose exposure around the planning target volume.

To investigate the outcomes of elderly patients with cT1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) undergoing proton beam therapy (PBT).Between 2009 and 2019, 110 patients receiving hypofractionated PBT for cT1-3N0M0 NSCLC were retrospectively reviewed.The median follow-up was 36.5 months (range=4.9-131.0 months). In the elderly group (80 years or older), the 3-year overall survival and progression-free survival rates were 79.8% and 73.9%, respectively, and the corresponding rates in the younger group were 80.5% and 61.2%, respectively. Grade 3 radiation pneumonitis (RP) was observed in 4.4% patients in the young group, whereas no grade 3 RP was observed in the elderly group. Age was not a risk factor for symptomatic RP. There were no significant differences in the survival and adverse events between the elderly and younger groups.PBT may be a reasonable approach for treating lung cancer in elderly patients with T1-3N0M0 NSCLC.

Background: Langerhans cell histiocytosis (LCH) is a rare disease, especially in adults. It is often associated with non-fatal bone and skin lesions and has relatively good radiosensitivity. In contrast, brain and lymph node metastases from LCH lesions are considered to be less sensitive to radiotherapy. Case Report: At our institution, 30 Gy radiotherapy was used to treat bone lesions with dural invasion in a patient with adult-onset LCH. The patient was treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy for 21 years since the initial diagnosis. After radiotherapy, the tumor shrank rapidly, and a complete response was achieved 1 year after treatment. The patient survived without local recurrence. Conclusion: Here, we report the details of this case, along with a review of the literature. We suggest that even with invasion of the tissues around the bone lesions in LCH, local recurrence can be prevented by middle radiation doses.

We assessed the development of lymphopenia during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) using X-ray versus proton beams and the impact on survival in patients with esophageal cancer. Among patients with esophageal cancer who were administered concurrent CRT with a curative intent at our institute from 2014 to 2018, 69 (15 receiving X-ray radiotherapy (XRT) and 54 receiving proton beam therapy [PBT]) who underwent weekly blood testing during treatment were enrolled. The absolute lymphocyte counts (ALC) at 1, 5 and 6 weeks were significantly higher in the patients who received PBT than in those who received XRT (p = 0.002, p = 0.006 and p = 0.009, respectively), and a similar trend in the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) was observed (p = 0.003 at 5 weeks). The 2-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates tended to be higher in the patients who maintained an ALC ≥200 compared with those who did not (p = 0.083 and p = 0.053, respectively), and similar trends were observed in the NLR (p = 0.061 and p = 0.038, respectively). Dose–volume analysis revealed significant correlations between volumes of the thoracic bones irradiated by 5–50 Gy and minimum ALCs and maximum NLR. These findings suggested that PBT prevented the development of lymphopenia during CRT by reducing the irradiated volume of the thoracic bone, and the maintained lymphocyte count is possibly one of the early predictors for survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Background and purpose We investigated clinical outcomes of proton beam concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for unresectable, locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC) patients. Materials and methods Records from 42 unresectable LAPC patients (21 male and 21 female, 39–83 years old) with IIB/III clinical staging of 1/41 treated by proton beam CCRT were retrospectively reviewed. Twelve patients received a conventional 50 Gray equivalents (GyE) in 25 fractions protocol and 30 others received a higher dose protocol of 54.0–67.5 GyE in 25–33 fractions. Gemcitabine or S-1 (Tegafur, Gimeracil and Oteracil) was used concurrently. Toxicity, overall survival (OS) and local control (LC) were examined. Results Acute adverse events of grades 1, 2, 3 and 4 were found in 4, 15, 17 and 2 patients, respectively. All grade 3 and 4 events were hematologic. Late adverse events of grades 1 and 2 were found in 3 and 2 patients, respectively. No late adverse effects of grade 3 or higher were observed. The 1-year/2-year OS rates from the start of CCRT were 77.8/50.8% with median survival time (MST) of 25.6 months. The 1-year/2-year LC rate from CCRT start was 83.3/78.9% with a median time to local recurrence of more than 36 months. Total irradiation dose was the only significant factor in univariate analyses of OS and LC (p = 0.015 and 0.023, respectively). Conclusion Proton beam CCRT lengthened survival periods compared to previous photon CCRT data and higher dose irradiation prolonged LC and OS for unresectable LAPC patients. Proton beam therapy is therefore safe and effective in these cases.

This is the first study to compare the long-term outcomes between neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We reviewed patients with clinical stage IB–III esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (UICC 7th edition) who underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery or definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (2009–2017). Overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence or regrowth rates were compared between the two treatment groups. Subgroup analyses of overall survival according to baseline characteristics were also performed. Forty-three patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery (median follow-up 47.4 months) and 60 received definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy (median follow-up 51.5 months). Baseline characteristics were similar between the groups except for sex, tumor location, and cT classification. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery and definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy groups had similar 3-year overall survival rates (73.1% and 61.7%, respectively, hazard ratio: 0.88, 95% confidence interval 0.49–1.58, p = 0.66), 3-year progression-free survival rates (46.5% and 45%, respectively, hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.62–1.70, p = 0.92), and recurrence or regrowth rates (53.5% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.84). In the subgroup analysis, favorable survival was observed after definitive chemoradiotherapy with proton beam therapy for cT1–2 disease (hazard ratio 2.58, 95% confidence interval 0.84–7.99) and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy + surgery for cT3 or higher disease (hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.15–0.67, p-for-interaction = 0.002). Long-term outcomes were comparable between the treatments. The choice of the treatment according to cT classification might affect survival.

Background/aim Curing local recurrence of rectal cancer (LRRC) is difficult with conventional photon radiotherapy. Proton beam therapy (PBT) on the other hand, has unique physical characteristics that permit higher doses to LRRC while minimizing side effects on surrounding organs. However, the efficacy of PBT on controlling rectal cancer recurrence has not yet been reported. This study aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and toxicities of PBT for LRRC. Patients and methods Clinical outcomes were retrospectively evaluated for 12 patients with 13 total lesions that had received PBT for LRRC at our institute. Results The median follow-up period from the initiation of PBT was 35.6 months. The 3-year local control, progression-free survival and overall survival rates were 80.2%, 10.4% and 73.8%, respectively. Median survival time was 67.1 months. There were no severe acute or late adverse events. Conclusion PBT could be a safe and effective treatment method for LRRC.

Background Present treatment strategy for unresectable locally advanced (UR-LA) pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients is controversial. Hence, a triple-modal therapy, which is a multidisciplinary strategy, was designed for patients with UR-LA PDAC by adding hyperthermia to conventional chemoradiotherapy at our institution. In this study we aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of this strategy. Methods Data of 21 UR-LA PDAC patients who underwent the triple-modal treatment were retrospectively analyzed for evaluating the safety and oncological effect of the treatment. The treatment schedule included, five concurrent infusions of gemcitabine (800 mg/m2) followed by hyperthermia (1 h) and X-ray (2 Gy) or proton beam radiation (2.7 Gy) on days 1, 8, 15, 29, and 36. Additional radiotherapies applied a total dose of 50 Gy/25 fr for X-ray radiation or 67.5 Gy/25 fr for proton beam radiation. Results Median overall survival (OS) was 23.6 months. Conversion surgery was performed in 5 patients (23.8%), and a R0 margin could be achieved in 4 of them; however, their median OS (16.3 months) tended to be shorter than that of the patients who did not undergo resection (23.6 months, p = 0.562). Further, the median OS of patients who underwent proton beam radiation (28.0 months) was significantly longer than that of patients who underwent X-ray radiation (13.9 months, p = 0.045). Most adverse events were manageable, except for one grade 3 gastric ulcer. The median tumor size and marker reduction rates were −17% and −91%, respectively. The tumor responses were partial response, stable disease, and progressive disease in 3, 15, and 3 patients, respectively. Conclusion Triple-modal strategy, especially when combined with proton beam radiation, is feasible and results in favorable survival outcomes in patients with UR-LA PDAC.

Simple Summary Radiotherapy has a key role in treatment of pediatric cancer and has greatly improved survival in recent years. However, vertebrae are often included in the irradiated area, and this may affect growth after treatment. In this study, we examined the relationship of the dose of proton beam therapy with subsequent growth of 353 vertebral bodies in 23 children (10 boys, 13 girls) with a median age at treatment of 4 years old and a median observation period of 13.9 months. Most importantly, we found that the growth rate of vertebral bodies decreased even at a low proton beam therapy dose, which indicates the need for careful planning of the irradiation area in this patient population. Growth inhibition was clearly dose-dependent, and proton beam therapy had the same growth inhibitory effect as photon radiotherapy, at least within the irradiated field. Abstract Impairment of bone growth after radiotherapy for pediatric bone cancer is a well-known adverse event. However, there is limited understanding of the relationship between bone growth and irradiation dose. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed bone growth impairment after proton beam therapy for pediatric cancer. A total of 353 vertebral bodies in 23 patients under 12 years old who received proton beam therapy were evaluated. Compared to the non-irradiated vertebral body growth rate, the irradiated vertebral body rate (%/year) was significantly lower: 77.2%, 57.6%, 40.8%, 26.4%, and 14.1% at 10, 20, 30, 40, and 50 Gy (RBE) irradiation, respectively. In multivariate analysis, radiation dose was the only factor correlated with vertebral body growth. Age, gender, and vertebral body site were not significant factors. These results suggest that the growth rate of the vertebral body is dose-dependent and decreases even at a low irradiated dose. This is the first report to show that proton beam therapy has the same growth inhibitory effect as photon radiotherapy within the irradiated field.

Proton beam therapy (PBT) is a curative treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), because it can preserve liver function due to dose targeting via the Bragg peak. However, the degree of direct liver damage by PBT is unclear. In this study, we retrospectively analyzed liver/biliary enzymes and total bilirubin (T-Bil) as markers of direct liver damage during and early after PBT in 300 patients. The levels of these enzymes and bilirubin were almost stable throughout the treatment period. In patients with normal pretreatment levels, aminotransferase (AST), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase (GGT), and T-Bil were abnormally elevated in only 2 (1.2%), 1 (0.4%), 0, 2 (1.2%), and 8 (3.5%) patients, respectively, and in 8 of these 13 patients (61.5%) the elevations were temporary. In patients with abnormal pretreatment levels, the levels tended to decrease during PBT. GGT and T-Bil were elevated by 1.62 and 1.57 times in patients who received 66 Gy (RBE) in 10 fractions and 74 Gy (RBE) in 37 fractions, respectively, but again these changes were temporary. These results suggest that direct damage to normal liver caused by PBT is minimal, even if a patient has abnormal pretreatment enzyme levels.

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dose distribution of proton beam therapy (PBT) using a concomitant boost technique for unresectable pancreatic cancers. This simulation study involved 36 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer. The irradiation dose was set as 67.5 gray equivalent (GyE) with 25 fractions using concomitant boost technique. The irradiation dose was set as 50 GyE to cover the whole target and another posterior beam of 17.5 GyE was added to ensure that 10% isodose line was not delivered to the gastrointestinal (GI) tract. Dose distribution of the gross tumor volume and GI tract was examined. V55GyE, 60GyE, 65GyE were 80.8, 66.5, and 42.4%, respectively, and mean dose was 64.1 GyE in all patients. The distance from the GI tract showed significant difference in dose distribution (P = 0.002 in V55GyE, 0.0009 in V60GyE, 0.003 in V65GyE, and 0.02 in mean dose, respectively). Location, tumor diameter, or lymph nodes metastasis did not show any difference. We found that irradiated dose is closely related to the distance from the GI tract. Clinically, this protocol is expected to have outstanding effects on local control of tumors compared to conventional PBT.