Search

Abstract Background Among the oral antivirals used for treating patients with mild-to-moderate novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), nirmatrelvir/ritonavir (NMV/RTV) and ensitrelvir (ESV) are inhibitors of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A, and therefore, can cause drug–drug interactions with concomitant medications. Tacrolimus (TAC), a substrate of CYP3A4/5, is administered for a long period to prevent rejection after kidney transplantation. TAC should be discontinued while using NMV/RTV because blood TAC levels significantly increase when these drugs are concomitantly administered. However, the influence of ESV on blood TAC levels has not yet been reported, and the management of TAC doses during the use of ESV remains unclear. Case presentation We experienced three kidney transplant recipients with COVID-19, whose blood trough levels of TAC increased by the concomitant use of NMV/RTV or ESV. In two patients administering NMV/RTV, blood trough levels of TAC increased more than tenfold after combination therapy, whereas in one patient administering ESV, TAC level increased approximately threefold. Conclusions These cases suggest that TAC administration should be discontinued during NMV/RTV treatment to maintain blood TAC levels within the therapeutic range, and a reduced TAC dose is sufficient during ESV treatment.

Abstract Background Ganciclovir and its prodrug, valganciclovir, are first-line agents for cytomegalovirus infection prophylaxis after lung transplantation. Although valganciclovir prophylaxis is known to result in severe leukopenia as an adverse effect, dosage adjustment based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of ganciclovir concentration is not generally implemented in clinical practice. Case presentation In this report, we describe the case of a female in her fifties after lung transplantation who successfully maintained valganciclovir prophylaxis under TDM with a minimal occurrence of severe leukopenia. Valganciclovir administration was initiated at a conventional dose of 450 mg/day on postoperative day 43 but was reduced to 450 mg/2 days on postoperative day 69 because of a decrease in white blood cell count and an increase in trough ganciclovir concentration. Subsequently, the valganciclovir dose adjustment was switched from label-indicated renal function-guided dosing to TDM-based dosing, targeting a trough level of 300–800 ng/mL. This target range was determined through deliberations with infectious disease specialists and pharmacists based on previously reported data. The TDM-based dose adjustment successfully prevented cytomegalovirus reactivation without causing significant adverse effects. Valganciclovir prophylaxis was completed on postoperative day 256, and the patient was transferred to another hospital for rehabilitation. Conclusions The findings of the present case suggest that TDM-based dosing could be helpful for clinicians in optimizing the prophylactic administration of valganciclovir in patients undergoing lung transplantation.

Abstract Background Drug-drug interaction management is complex. Nirmatrelvir/ritonavir is a potent cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A inhibitor and influences pharmacokinetics of co-administered drugs. Although there are several reports about drug-drug interactions of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir, an influence of a concomitant use of nirmatrelvir/ritonavir and another potent CYP3A inhibitor on tacrolimus remains unclear. Here, we experienced a lung transplant patient with the novel coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this patient, nirmatrelvir/ritonavir was administered, and the inhibitory effect of itraconazole on CYP3A was prolonged. Case presentation We present a case in forties who had undergone lung transplantation. He was administered itraconazole and tacrolimus 1.0 mg/d, with a trough value of 8–12 ng/mL. The patient contracted the COVID-19, and a nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment was initiated. During the antiviral treatment, tacrolimus administration was discontinued for 5 d. Tacrolimus was resumed at 1.0 mg/d after completion of the nirmatrelvir/ritonavir treatment, but the trough value after 7 d was high at 31.6 ng/mL. Subsequently, the patient was placed on another 36-h tacrolimus discontinuation, but the trough value decreased to only 16.0 ng/mL. Conclusions Co-administration of ritonavir caused a prolonged decrease in tacrolimus clearance through its inhibitory effects on CYP3A in a patient taking itraconazole. Management of drug-drug interaction by pharmacists can be important for patients with multiple medications.

Abstract Background Tacrolimus is a key drug in immunosuppressive therapy following lung transplantation. The blood tacrolimus levels are likely to fluctuate in the early postoperative period, and failure to maintain the tacrolimus trough level in target ranges is a risk factor for rejection. However, there is little information about the relationship between the time in therapeutic range (TTR) of the tacrolimus trough level (tacrolimus TTR) and clinical outcomes. This study aimed to evaluate the association between tacrolimus TTR and acute rejection (AR) within the first three months after lung transplantation. Methods This was a retrospective study of patients who underwent lung transplantation at a single center. The target tacrolimus trough levels were 10–15 ng/mL, and tacrolimus TTR was calculated using the Rosendaal method. The cut-off value of the tacrolimus TTR was estimated by receiver operating characteristic analysis based on AR. Results The study included 90 patients. AR was observed in 26 patients. In this study, ‘‘early-AR’’ was defined as any AR within 2 weeks post-transplant (n = 22) and ‘‘late-AR’’ was defined as any AR after 1-month post-transplant (n = 4). For early AR, the relationship between tacrolimus TTR and the onset of AR was examined. There were no differences in the tacrolimus TTR between the early-AR group and non-AR group (35.7 ± 22.4 vs 31.5 ± 19.9%, P = 0.416). For late-AR, the relationship with tacrolimus TTR was examined every 10 d. The tacrolimus TTR during postoperative days (POD) 21–30 and POD 31–onset was significantly lower in the late-AR group than the no-AR group (50.0 ± 7.1 vs. 71.8 ± 18.0% and 37.0 ± 26.6 vs. 68.9 ± 31.5%, P

Abstract Remdesivir, a prodrug of the nucleoside analog GS‐441524, plays a key role in the treatment of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19). However, owing to limited information on clinical trials and inexperienced clinical use, there is a lack of pharmacokinetic (PK) data in patients with COVID‐19 with special characteristics. In this study, we aimed to measure serum GS‐441524 concentrations and develop a population PK (PopPK) model. Remdesivir was administered at a 200 mg loading dose on the first day followed by 100 mg from day 2, based on the package insert, in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) greater than or equal to 30 ml/min. In total, 190 concentrations from 37 Japanese patients were used in the analysis. The GS‐441524 trough concentrations were significantly higher in the eGFR less than 60 ml/min group than in the eGFR greater than or equal to 60 ml/min group. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in four patients hardly affected the total body clearance (CL) and volume of distribution (Vd) of GS‐441524. A one‐compartment model described serum GS‐441524 concentration data. The CL and Vd of GS‐441524 were significantly affected by eGFR readjusted by individual body surface area and age, respectively. Simulations proposed a dose regimen of 200 mg on day 1 followed by 100 mg once every 2 days from day 2 in patients with an eGFR of 30 ml/min or less. In conclusion, we successfully established a PopPK model of GS‐441524 using retrospectively obtained serum GS‐441524 concentrations in Japanese patients with COVID‐19, which would be helpful for optimal individualized therapy of remdesivir.

Abstract Background The standard anticoagulation therapy for patients implanted with left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) includes warfarin therapy. We developed a cloud-based home medical management information-sharing system named as LVAD@home. The LVAD@home system is an application designed to be used on iPad tablet computers. This system enables the sharing of daily information between a patient and care providers in real time. In this study, we reported cases of outpatients with LVADs using this system to manage anticoagulation therapy. Case presentation The patient, a man in his 40s with end-stage heart failure owing to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, underwent LVAD implantation and warfarin was started on postoperative day 1. He started to use LVAD@home to manage warfarin therapy after discharge (postoperative day 47). He sent his data to care providers daily. By using this system, the pharmacist observed his signs of reduced dietary intake 179 days after discharge, and after consulting the physician, told the patient to change the timing of the next measurement earlier than usual. On the next day, the prothrombin time-international normalized ratio increased from 2.0 to 3.0, and thus the dose was decreased by 0.5 mg. Four patients used this system to monitor warfarin therapy from October 2015 to March 2018. In these patients, the time in therapeutic range was 90.1 ± 1.3, which was higher than that observed in previous studies. Additionally, there were no thromboembolic events or bleeding events. Conclusions The cloud-based home management system can be applied to share real-time patient information of factors, including dietary intake that interact with warfarin. It can help to improve long-term anticoagulation outcomes in patients implanted with LVAD.

We have prepared and isolated neutral polycyclic hydrocarbon radicals. A butyl-substituted radical gave single crystals, in which a π-dimeric structure, not a σ-bonded dimer, was observed, even though steric protection was absent. Thermodynamic stabilization due to the highly spin-delocalized structure contributes effectively to the suppression of σ-bond formation. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]