Search

Please see the Editorial Comment by Joanna Kee-Sampson discussing this article. BACKGROUND. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has synergistic properties when combined with ablative therapies f...

To evaluate embolization efficacy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVM) using Amplatzer vascular plugs (AVP) and coils. Eighty-eight embolized simple PAVMs in 38 patients were retrospectively analyzed by follow-up CT. Mean age was 50.2 ± 15.6 years and 22 (57.9%) patients were females. Mean follow-up interval was 38.2 ± 28.4 months (median 29.9 months). Embolization devices included AVP I, AVP II, AVP 4, and coils. Technical success was defined as no visualization of an early draining vein at angiography after embolization. Treatment success was defined as complete disappearance or decrease in size of the venous aneurysm ≥ 70% at follow-up CT. Technical success rate was 100% and treatment success rate evaluated by CT for the various embolization strategies was 100% for AVP I (n = 6), 100% for AVP I + coils (n = 5), 83.3% for AVP II (n = 6), 40.0% for AVP II + coils (n = 5), 87.5% for AVP 4 (n = 8), 50.0% for AVP 4 + coils (n = 8), and 78.0% for coils alone (n = 50). No statistically significant difference in embolization efficacy was seen between different devices (P = 0.083). Although not statistically significant, combination use of coils with AVPs demonstrated lower rates of clinical embolization success (P = 0.053). Embolization of PAVMs demonstrated high technical and treatment success rates with available embolic devices. No significant statistical differences were demonstrated between AVPs. However, the need for both coils and AVPs may suggest a more complicated underlying lesion at risk for recurrence.

To evaluate embolization efficacy of pulmonary arteriovenous malformations (PAVM) using Amplatzer vascular plugs (AVP) and coils.Eighty-eight embolized simple PAVMs in 38 patients were retrospectively analyzed by follow-up CT. Mean age was 50.2 ± 15.6 years and 22 (57.9%) patients were females. Mean follow-up interval was 38.2 ± 28.4 months (median 29.9 months). Embolization devices included AVP I, AVP II, AVP 4, and coils. Technical success was defined as no visualization of an early draining vein at angiography after embolization. Treatment success was defined as complete disappearance or decrease in size of the venous aneurysm ≥ 70% at follow-up CT.Technical success rate was 100% and treatment success rate evaluated by CT for the various embolization strategies was 100% for AVP I (n = 6), 100% for AVP I + coils (n = 5), 83.3% for AVP II (n = 6), 40.0% for AVP II + coils (n = 5), 87.5% for AVP 4 (n = 8), 50.0% for AVP 4 + coils (n = 8), and 78.0% for coils alone (n = 50). No statistically significant difference in embolization efficacy was seen between different devices (P = 0.083). Although not statistically significant, combination use of coils with AVPs demonstrated lower rates of clinical embolization success (P = 0.053).Embolization of PAVMs demonstrated high technical and treatment success rates with available embolic devices. No significant statistical differences were demonstrated between AVPs. However, the need for both coils and AVPs may suggest a more complicated underlying lesion at risk for recurrence.

OBJECTIVE. The Viatorr stent-graft (W. L. Gore and Associates), specifically made for transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) creation, has significantly improved TIPS patency compared with bare metal stents. Post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (HE), however, remains relatively common after TIPS creation. We describe a technique to secondarily restrict a Viatorr stent-graft to treat post-TIPS refractory HE and maintain use of the Viatorr device. CONCLUSION. We show a simple technique to modify the Viatorr stent-graft for TIPS reduction.

Purpose To evaluate dose-response relationship in yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) resin microsphere radioembolization for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases using a tumor-specific dose estimation based on technetium-99m–labeled macroaggregated albumin ( 99m Tc MAA) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT. Materials and Methods Fifty-five tumors (mean size 3.9 cm) in 15 patients (10 women; mean age 57 y) were evaluated. Tumor-specific absorbed dose was estimated using a partition model. Initial (median 2.3 months) follow-up data were available for all tumors; last (median 7.6 months) follow-up data were available for 45 tumors. Tumor response was evaluated using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) on follow-up CT. Tumors with complete or partial response were considered responders. Mean tumor absorbed dose was 231.4 Gy ± 184.3, and mean nontumor liver absorbed dose was 39.0 Gy ± 18.0. Results Thirty-six (65.5%) and 30 (66.7%) tumors showed response at initial and last follow-up, respectively. Mean absorbed doses in responders and nonresponders at initial and last follow-up were 285.8 Gy ± 191.1 and 128.1 Gy ± 117.1 ( P = .0004) and 314.3 Gy ± 195.8 and 115.7 Gy ± 117.4 ( P = .0001). Cutoff value of ≥ 191.3 Gy for tumor-specific absorbed dose predicted tumor response with 93% specificity, whereas P = .007). Conclusions Tumor-specific absorbed dose, estimated with a partition model, was significantly associated with tumor response in NET liver metastases. An estimated dose ≥ 191.3 Gy predicted treatment response with high sensitivity and specificity.

443 Background: To assess the relative efficacy and toxicity associated with TACE+Ablation (Ablation) or TACE+SBRT (SBRT) in a large cohort of patients with unresectable HCC. Methods: Patients with HCC undergoing Ablation or SBRT from 2006-2016 with available follow up were included. Treatment groups were different at baseline regarding tumor stage (BCLC A, B and C: 96%, 4%, 0% (Ablation) vs. 73%, 14% and 13% (SBRT), P < 0.001) and severity of liver disease (CTP A, B, and C: 55%, 45% and 0% (Ablation) vs. 50%, 41%, and 9% (SBRT), P = 0.007). Propensity scores were calculated with age, sex, BCLC stage, CTP class, etiology of liver disease, tumor number, and diameter to balance the cohorts. Average treatment effects on survival with multivariable propensity score-weighted competing risk Cox regression models were evaluated, with BCLC stage, number of treated tumors and liver transplant as additionally controlled variables. Primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS), local tumor control and hepatotoxicity. Treatment-related hepatotoxicity was defined as a two point change in CTP within six months after treatment. Results: 192 subjects were included (101 Ablation, 91 SBRT; median age=60 years, 75% men). Liver disease included HCV (78%), alcohol (35%) and NASH (8%). Liver transplant-adjusted 1- and 2-year OS rates were significantly greater for Ablation vs SBRT (88% vs. 75% and 77% vs. 50%, P