Back to Search Start Over

Tumor Dose Response in Yttrium-90 Resin Microsphere Embolization for Neuroendocrine Liver Metastases: A Tumor-Specific Analysis with Dose Estimation Using SPECT-CT

Authors :
Akira Adachi
Y. Matsui
Kenneth J. Kolbeck
Younes Jahangiri
Yindee Geeratikun
Khashayar Farsad
Orapin Chansanti
Jeffrey S. Stevens
John A. Kaufman
Source :
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR. 28(11)
Publication Year :
2017

Abstract

Purpose To evaluate dose-response relationship in yttrium-90 ( 90 Y) resin microsphere radioembolization for neuroendocrine tumor (NET) liver metastases using a tumor-specific dose estimation based on technetium-99m–labeled macroaggregated albumin ( 99m Tc MAA) single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT)-CT. Materials and Methods Fifty-five tumors (mean size 3.9 cm) in 15 patients (10 women; mean age 57 y) were evaluated. Tumor-specific absorbed dose was estimated using a partition model. Initial (median 2.3 months) follow-up data were available for all tumors; last (median 7.6 months) follow-up data were available for 45 tumors. Tumor response was evaluated using Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST) on follow-up CT. Tumors with complete or partial response were considered responders. Mean tumor absorbed dose was 231.4 Gy ± 184.3, and mean nontumor liver absorbed dose was 39.0 Gy ± 18.0. Results Thirty-six (65.5%) and 30 (66.7%) tumors showed response at initial and last follow-up, respectively. Mean absorbed doses in responders and nonresponders at initial and last follow-up were 285.8 Gy ± 191.1 and 128.1 Gy ± 117.1 ( P = .0004) and 314.3 Gy ± 195.8 and 115.7 Gy ± 117.4 ( P = .0001). Cutoff value of ≥ 191.3 Gy for tumor-specific absorbed dose predicted tumor response with 93% specificity, whereas P = .007). Conclusions Tumor-specific absorbed dose, estimated with a partition model, was significantly associated with tumor response in NET liver metastases. An estimated dose ≥ 191.3 Gy predicted treatment response with high sensitivity and specificity.

Details

ISSN :
15357732
Volume :
28
Issue :
11
Database :
OpenAIRE
Journal :
Journal of vascular and interventional radiology : JVIR
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....f73805ce75f72923f84164e7b0a0c74c