Search

The aim of this clinical trial was to investigate the feasibility of intra-arterial infusion of in vitro-expanded Valpha24 natural killer T (NKT) cells combined with submucosal injection of alpha-galactosylceramide (KRN7000; alphaGalCer)-pulsed antigen-presenting cells (APC). A phase I clinical study was carried out in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Patients with locally recurrent HNSCC refractory to standard therapy were eligible. Eight patients received super-selective transcatheter intra-arterial infusion of activated Valpha24 NKT cells into tumor-feeding arteries and nasal submucosal injections of alphaGalCer-pulsed APC twice with a 1-week interval. Valpha24 NKT cell-specific immune responses, safety, and antitumor effects were evaluated. The number of Valpha24 NKT cells and interferon-gamma-producing cells in peripheral blood mononuclear cells increased in seven out of eight patients enrolled. Grade 3 toxicity with a pharyngocutaneous fistula related to local tumor reduction was observed in one patient and mild adverse events with grade 1-2 symptoms occurred in seven patients. Regarding the clinical responses, three cases exhibited a partial but significant response, four were classified as stable disease, and one patient continued to develop progressive disease. The use of the intra-arterial infusion of activated Valpha24 NKT cells and the submucosal injection of alphaGalCer-pulsed APC has been shown to induce significant antitumor immunity and had beneficial clinical effects in the management of advanced HNSCC. The use of such therapeutic modalities may be helpful in the management of tumors and therefore needs to be explored in further detail. The clinical trial registration number was UMIN000000722.

To evaluate the safety, immune responses, and antitumor responses after the administration of alpha-galactosylceramide (alphaGalCer) KRN7000-pulsed PBMC cultured with IL-2 and GM-CSF (IL-2/GM-CSF-cultured PBMCs), a phase I-II study in patients with non-small cell lung cancer was conducted. Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer or recurrent lung cancer refractory to the standard therapy were eligible. alphaGalCer-pulsed IL-2/GM-CSF-cultured PBMCs (1 x 10(9)/m(2)) were i.v. administered four times. Immune responses were monitored weekly. Twenty-three patients were enrolled in this study and 17 cases (73.9%) completed. No severe adverse event related to the treatment was observed. After the injection of alphaGalCer-pulsed IL-2/GM-CSF-cultured PBMCs, an increased number of IFN-gamma-producing cells in the peripheral blood were detected in 10 patients (58.8%). Five cases remained as stable disease, and the remaining 12 cases were evaluated as progressive disease. The estimated median survival time (MST) of the 17 cases was 18.6 mo (range, 3.8 to 36.3 mo). Ten patients who displayed increased IFN-gamma-producing cells (> or =2-fold) showed prolonged MST (31.9 mo; range, 14.5 to 36.3 mo) as compared with poor-responder patients (n = 7) MST (9.7 mo; range, 3.8 to 25.0 mo) (log-rank test, p = 0.0015). The administration of alphaGalCer-pulsed IL-2/GM-CSF-cultured PBMCs was well tolerated and was accompanied by the successful induction of NKT cell-dependent immune responses. The increased IFN-gamma-producing cells that result from alphaGalCer stimulation in PBMCs were significantly associated with prolonged MST. These results are encouraging and warrant further evaluation for survival benefit of this immunotherapy.

Background: Japanese cedar and cypress pollen share a common antigen. The cedar pollen season is followed by the cypress pollen season. However, both the clinical significance and involvement of cypress pollinosis in the treatment of the cedar pollinosis have not yet been clarified., Methods: The clinical efficacy of sublingual immunotherapy with cedar pollen extract for cedar pollinosis was evaluated during the cypress pollen dispersal season in Japan. In addition, the change in cypress pollen specific IgE antibodies of the patients with cedar pollinosis was examined before and after the pollen season., Results: Sublingual immunotherapy with cedar pollen extract did not improve the clinical symptoms of the cedar pollinosis patients combined with cypress pollinosis in the cypress pollen season. The cypress pollen specific IgE antibodies were found to demonstrate significant seasonal changes., Conclusion: The presence of cypress pollinosis should therefore be taken into consideration when planning the optimal treatment for cedar pollinosis. Sublingual immunotherapy with cedar pollen extract may not be effective for cypress pollinosis.