Search

Spinal metastases have unique epidemiological features and treatment methods. Unfortunately, the relative scarcity of spinal metastases has limited the widespread development of descriptive epidemiological studies, especially in Asian countries. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiological characteristics of patients with metastatic spinal tumors in China between 2007 and 2019.From January 2007 and July 2019, data on patients with spinal metastases were collected from five cancer centers in China, and demographic characteristics, primary tumor types, segments and numbers of vertebral lesions, disease-related scores, and treatment methods were reviewed.A total of 2228 patients with spinal metastases were reviewed in this study, including 1279 male patients and 949 female patients, and the male to female ratio was 1.35: 1. More than half of patients developed metastatic diseases between the ages of 50 years and 69 years (64%). Overall, lung cancer (824 cases, 37%) was the most common primary tumor type and the most common level of spinal involvement was multi-level of metastases (860 cases, 39%). 705 patients (32%) had undergone surgical treatments, 1028 patients (46%) had undergone radiotherapy for metastatic vertebrae, and 855 patients (38%) had received systemic treatments. The age, primary tumor type, number of involved vertebrae, Frankel grade, and spinal instability neoplastic score would affect the surgical decision-making.This study provides insight into the epidemiological characteristics of spinal metastasis and health care service utilization in spinal metastasis patients in China.ICD-10: International Classification of Disease, Tenth Revision; VAS: Visual Analogue Scale; KPS: Karnofsky Performance Status; SINS: Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score; SOSG: Spine Oncology Study Group; MRI: Magnetic Resonance Imaging; CT: Computed Tomography; ECT: Emission Computed Tomography.

Background Due to the particularity of patients with bone tumors, the risk of periprosthetic infection following megaprosthetic replacement is much higher than that of traditional total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, few studies specifically reported the risk factors for periprosthetic infection following megaprosthetic replacement. The purposes of the study were to (1) establish a nomogram model, which can provide a reference for clinicians, and patients to reduce the occurrence of periprosthetic infection (2) explore the risk factors for deep infection of megaprosthesis. Hypothesis A prediction model can be established and has favorable predictive accuracy. Patients and Methods One hundred and seventy-seven megaprostheses were identified. There were 61 female patients and 116 male patients with a mean age of 35 years. The following risk factors were analyzed: tumor site, sex, age, material for prosthetic stem, tumor type, smoking, diabetes, length of bone resection, operation time, chemotherapy, BMI, malignant tumor staging and hematoma formation. Finally, based on the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors were used to develop a nomogram model. Results Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the chemotherapy, longer operation time and hematoma formation were risk factors for periprosthetic infection. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the chemotherapy, longer operation time and hematoma formation were significant risk factors for periprosthetic infection. The nomogram model was established using these significant risk factors, with a C-index of 0.766 and an acceptable consistency according to the internal validation, indicating that the prediction model had favorable predictive accuracy. Discussion This study has important implications for the future investigations of prevention of periprosthetic infection. The nomogram model identifies high-risk patients for whom attached prophylaxis measures are required. Future studies regarding reduction of incidence of periprosthetic infection should pay close attention to these high-risk patients. Level of evidence IV, retrospective, cohort study.

Bone metastasis is a common complication of cancer, and bone is the third most common metastatic site following the lung and liver. Among the various bones, spine is the most common site of metastatic tumors. The treatment goals of patients with spinal metastases are mostly palliative, with the aim of reducing pain and improving quality of life. The treatment of spinal metastases has made significant progress over the past few decades. Each new technology has tried to solve the shortcomings of its predecessors. Currently, there are no mature algorithms or specific techniques that have proven to be the best for spinal metastases, and the treatment method often relies on operator and institutional preferences or biases in some cases. Percutaneous vertebral augmentation has unique value in the management of spinal metastases, understanding its indications, surgical techniques, uses, advantages and complications is critical to providing optimal patient care. We believe that the application of percutaneous vertebral augmentation alone or combined with other techniques can achieve optimal pain relief and functional improvement in the patients with spinal metastases.

Objective To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. Methods Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into six groups according to different defatting treatments, which were: high pressure washing for 10 s (10S group), 20 s (20S group), and 30 s (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non-defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of six groups was observed, and the appearance of defatted bone and fresh bone was compared. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. Results The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.40% ± 0.13%, and 1.46% ± 0.11%, respectively) (P = 0.828). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45% ± 0.16%, 1.28% ± 0.07%, and 1.13% ± 0.22%, respectively) (P = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. There was no difference in residual lipid content among the three groups with high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.61 ± 0.18 ug/mL, and 4.66 ± 0.25 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.645). There was no difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23 ug/mL, 4.29 ± 0.24 ug/mL, and 4.27 ± 0.29 ug/mL, respectively) (P = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45 Mpa, and 8.17 ± 0.35 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29 Mpa, and 95.63 ± 4.08 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group, and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67 Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31 Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07 Mpa, and 10.09 ± 0.39 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94 Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54 Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85 Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52 Mpa, respectively) (P = 0.737). Conclusion The defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 s under high pressure washing. In terms of defatting efficiency and its effect on biomechanical properties of bone, high pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting.

Objectives To describe the epidemiological characteristics of patients with spinal metastases between 2007 and 2019. Methods Patients with spinal metastases were identified from several clinical centers in China between January 2007 and July 2019. Demographics, primary tumor types, spinal involvement, and Clinical indicators of each patient were reviewed. Results A total of 1196 patients were included in this study, 717 males (59.95%) and 479 females (40.05%), with a male to female ratio of 1.50:1. Most patients (63.71%) were in the ages range of 50 to 69 years. The mean age was 58.6 ± 11.6 (range 13–89) years and the median age was 59.0 years. The average age of females was younger than that of males, and the difference was statistically significant. The proportion of male patients over 60 years old was higher than that of females, and the difference was statistically significant. The most common primary tumor was lung cancer (n = 437, 36.54%), followed by unknown origin (n = 194, 16.22%), kidney cancer (n = 78, 6.52%), breast cancer (n = 76, 6.35%), and liver/biliary cancer (n = 75, 6.27%). The most common primary tumor was lung cancer in both males and females, followed by unknown origin in males and breast cancer in females. There were 730 patients (61.04%) in the subgroup of the number

Background Aseptic loosening has become the main cause of prosthetic failure in medium- to long-term follow-up. The objective of this study was to establish and validate a nomogram model for aseptic loosening after tumor prosthetic replacement around knee. Methods We collected data on patients who underwent tumor prosthetic replacements. The following risk factors were analyzed: tumor site, stem length, resection length, prosthetic motion mode, sex, age, extra-cortical grafting, custom or modular, stem diameter, stem material, tumor type, activity intensity, and BMI. We used univariate and multivariate Cox regression for analysis. Finally, the significant risk factors were used to establish the nomogram model. Results The stem length, resection length, tumor site, and prosthetic motion mode showed a tendency to be related to aseptic loosening, according to the univariate analysis. Multivariate analysis showed that the tumor site, stem length, and prosthetic motion mode were independent risk factors. The internal validation indicated that the nomogram model had acceptable predictive accuracy. Conclusions A nomogram model was developed for predicting the prosthetic survival rate without aseptic loosening. Patients with distal femoral tumors and those who are applied with fixed hinge and short-stem prostheses are more likely to be exposed to aseptic loosening.

Reconstruction of massive bone defects is challenging for orthopaedic clinicians, especially in cases of severe trauma and resection of tumors in various locales. Autologous iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) is the “gold standard” for bone grafting. However, the limited availability and complications at donor sites resulted in seeking other options like allografts and bone graft substitutes. Demineralized bone matrix (DBM) is a form of allograft using acidic solution to remove mineral components, while leaving much of the proteinaceous components native to bone, with small amounts of calcium‐based solids, inorganic phosphates, and some trace cell debris. It is an osteoconductive and osteoinductive biomaterial and is approved as a medical device for use in bone defects and spinal fusion. To pack consistently into the defect sites and stay firmly in the filling parts, DBM products have various forms combined with biocompatible viscous carriers, including sponges, strips, injectable putty, paste, and paste infused with chips. The present review aims to summarize the properties of various kind of viscous carriers and their clinical use combined with DBM in commercially available products. Given DBM'mercially available products. Given DBM;s long clinical track record and commercial accessibility in standard forms, opportunities to further develop and validate DBM as a versatile bone biomaterial in orthopaedic repair and regenerative medicine contexts are attractive.

Background Accurate survival estimate is necessary when determining the most appropriate treatment modality for metastatic spinal tumor. The main purpose of this study was to identify the prognostic factors of spinal metastasis and establish a decision tree model. Methods A consecutive cohort of 507 patients from 3 institutional clinical centers who were treated for metastatic spinal tumor between 2005 and 2015 were retrospectively reviewed. In total, 70% of the participants were randomly selected as a “training sample.” The prognostic effect of preoperative factors was evaluated using the “training sample,” and a decision tree model was established. Then, the accuracy of the new model, as well as the Tokuhashi and Tomita score, was tested by the “test sample,” which consisted of the remaining 30% of participants. Results A decision tree model was generated based on the significant factors with an order of descending importance on predicting the prognosis. According to the new model, patients were classified into 3 groups, mean survival times of less than 6 months, 6–12 months, and more than 12 months, who were indicated for conservative therapy/palliative operation, palliative operation, and invasive excision, respectively. The newly established model was confirmed to be of high accuracy in predicting overall survival, whereas the Tokuhashi and Tomita scores were of modest accuracy and consistency. Conclusions A new decision tree model for prognosis prediction in spinal metastasis was established with a satisfactory accuracy and consistency. However, the Tokuhashi and Tomita systems were presented to be less correlated between the scores and actual survival.

Objectives To investigate the association between the number of metastases to the spine and survival in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC), as well as the prognosis difference between patients with solitary spinal metastasis (SSM) and multiple spinal metastases (MSM). Methods Three institutional databases were searched to identify all patients who had undergone spinal surgery for metastatic spinal tumors between March 2002 and June 2010. As well as age and gender, preoperative medical conditions were collected from medical records, including primary tumor, preoperative Frankel score, other bone metastases, preoperative Karnofsky performance status (KPS), number of involved vertebrae, pathological fracture metastasis site, serum albumin, sphincter dysfunction and the time of developing motor deficits before surgery. Survival data were obtained from medical records or via telephone follow‐ups. Univariate and multivariate predictors of overall survival for each group were assessed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Results The median postoperative survival time was 6.0 ± 0.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 4.8–7.2) in patients with SSM and 7.0 ± 1.0 months (95% CI 5.1–8.9) in patients with MSM (P = 0.238). The difference in survival was not significant between groups. Furthermore, univariate analysis showed that the number of spinal metastases had no significant association with survival (P = 0.075). Primary tumor (P = 0.004) and preoperative KPS (P

Objective To evaluate the efficacy of Jintiange capsules and Jintiange combined with other therapies in the treatment of osteoporosis. Methods A systematic review of the literature was conducted through databases including China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), the VIP Database for Chinese Technical Periodicals (VIP), Wanfang, and PubMed from inception to April 2018. Network meta-analysis was used to determine the relative efficacy of related treatments on osteoporosis. The primary outcome measures are the bone mineral density (BMD) of the lumbar and femoral neck, and the secondary outcome measures are visual analog pain score (VAS) and adverse events. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted information, and assessed the quality of included trials. Data extracted from eligible studies was pooled and meta-analyzed, and the mean differences (MD) with their 95% confidence intervals were estimated as the effect size between treatments. Results Thirty-one studies were included in this study, containing 28 randomized controlled trials (RCT) and 3 non-randomized controlled trials (non-RCT), with a total of 14 regimens treating osteoporosis. According to the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves, Jintiange capsules combined with atorvastatin (89.9%) and Jintiange combined with bisphosphonates (88.2%) have the best efficacy in terms of the BMD of the lumbar and femoral neck, respectively. Based on the VAS, Jintiange combined with calcium has the best analgesic effect (83.4%). Conclusion Jintiange capsules alone and combined with other therapies is a good choice for treating patients with osteoporosis in terms of improving BMD, relieving pain, and reducing adverse events. More large-scale and well-designed RCT are warranted to confirm the results of this study.

Objective To identify the significant prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with spinal metastases and to establish an online widget for predicting survival with an interactive visual approach. Methods Patients operated for spinal metastases between 2010 and 2018 were retrospectively enrolled and were randomly divided into training and validation samples with a ratio of 7:3. Patients’ characteristics were analyzed with univariate and multivariate Cox analyses to identify independent prognostic factors basing on the training sample. A shiny web tool was developed by transforming the fitted multivariable Cox model into a visual interface. Time-dependent area under the curve plot and calibration curve were generated to assess the discrimination ability and consistency of the novel model, both for the training and validation samples. Results A total of 265 consecutive patients were finally included, with 185 in the training sample and 80 in the validation sample. The primary tumor types, lesion site of metastasis, visceral metastasis, Frankel grade, operation category, number of surgical segments, and the preoperative percentage of lymphocyte were demonstrated to be significantly associated with overall survival. A novel shiny model ( https://yang1209xg.shinyapps.io/predictspinalmetastasis/ ) that could provide predicted survival curve and median survival time was established, with favorable discrimination ability and consistency between predicted and actual survival both in internal and external data, according to time-dependent area under the curve plots and calibration curves. COnclusions A user-friendly shiny app with favorable discrimination ability and consistency was released online for predicting the survival of patients with spinal metastases. A continuous survival curve and the predicted median survival time are available to guide the treatment planning.

Aseptic loosening is a common prosthetic failure mode. The purpose of this study was to identify dose-response relationship between length of femoral stem and aseptic loosening. We collected data of patients who underwent distal femoral prosthetic replacements at our institution from 2001 to 2017. Cox regression and two-piecewise regression model were used to analyze the associations between stem length and aseptic loosening. Significant association of length of femoral stem with aseptic loosening was observed in multivariate model and a non-linear relationship could be found from the smoothed curve. In two-piecewise model, an inflection point was calculated to be 143 mm. On the left of the inflection point, every 1 mm increase in the length of stem indicated that the risk of aseptic loosening could be reduced by 6%. There was a significant non-linear relationship between the length of femoral stem and aseptic loosening, and the inflection point was 143 mm.

Background: Spinal metastases have unique epidemiological features and treatment methods. Unfortunately, the relative scarcity of spinal metastases has limited the widespread development of descriptive epidemiological studies, especially in Asian countries. The purpose of this study was to describe the epidemiological characteristics of patients with metastatic spinal tumors in China between 2007 and 2019.Methods: From January 2007 and July 2019, data on patients with spinal metastases were collected from five cancer centers in China, and demographic characteristics, primary tumor types, segments and numbers of vertebral lesions, disease-related scores, and treatment methods were reviewed.Results: A total of 2228 patients with spinal metastases were reviewed in this study, including 1279 male patients and 949 female patients, and the male to female ratio was 1.35: 1. More than half of patients developed metastatic diseases between the ages of 50 years and 69 years (64%). Overall, lung cancer (824 cases, 37%) was the most common primary tumor type and the most common level of spinal involvement was multi-level of metastases (860 cases, 39%). 705 patients (32%) had undergone surgical treatments, 1028 patients (46%) had undergone radiotherapy for metastatic vertebrae, and 855 patients (38%) had received systemic treatments. The age, primary tumor type, number of involved vertebrae, Frankel grade, and spinal instability neoplastic score would affect the surgical decision-making.Conclusions: This study provides insight into the epidemiological characteristics of spinal metastasis and health care service utilization in spinal metastasis patients in China.

More revisionary reconstruction procedures are required following failing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions, which are often regarded as a technique challenge with very limited goals. This study will be performed to compare the outcomes between groups of primary and revision knee reconstruction. Two observers conducted the literature retrieval from the platforms of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL. Studies which compared knee function and stability between primary and revisionary reconstructions were included. The data was synthesized by meta-analysis with fixed- or random-effects models as appropriate. A total of 10 eligible studies were included with 954 subjects in the primary group and 378 in the revision group. The International Knee Documentation Committee International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subscores, side-to-side difference, and Lysholm score were demonstrated to be significantly improved at final follow-up in both groups, while Tegner score was not. The overall IKDC, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), and Lysholm scores were significantly inferior in the revision group compared to the primary group. However, knee laxity according to side-to-side difference was demonstrated to be similar between the two groups. Revision ACL reconstruction (RACLR) could provide patients with excellent restoration of knee outcomes compared to the status before revision. Also, while knee function in the revision group was inferior to the primary group, knee stability was equivalent between the two groups at the final follow-up.

Background To assess the defatting efficacy of high pressure washing and gradient alcohol and biomechanical properties of defatted bone. Methods Fresh cancellous bone was obtained from the femoral condyle and divided into 6 groups according to different defatting treatments, which were high pressure washing for 10 seconds (10S group), 20 seconds (20S group), 30 seconds (30S group), gradient alcohol immersion (Alcohol group), acetone immersion (Acetone group), and non-defatted (Fresh group). The appearance of 6 groups was observed, comparing the appearance difference between defatted bone and fresh bone. The residual lipid content and infrared spectrum were used to compare the efficacy of defatting, the DNA content was used to compare the cell content after defatting, and the maximum stress and elastic modulus were used to compare the effects of defatting treatment on biomechanical properties. Results The fresh bone was yellow and the pores contained a lot of fat. The defatted bone was white and the porous network was clear. No difference in residual lipid content among the three groups under high pressure washing (1.45 ± 0.16%, 1.40 ± 0.13%, 1.46 ± 0.11%, respectively) ( p = 0.828). No difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (1.45 ± 0.16%, 1.28 ± 0.07%, 1.13 ± 0.22%, respectively) ( p = 0.125). Infrared spectra showed that the fat content of the five defatting groups was significantly lower than that of the fresh group. No difference in residual lipid content among the three groups under high pressure washing (4.53 ± 0.23ug/ml, 4.61±0.18ug/ml, 4.66 ± 0.25ug/ml, respectively) ( p = 0.645). No difference in residual lipid content among the 10S, alcohol, and acetone groups (4.53 ± 0.23ug/ml, 4.29 ± 0.24ug/ml, 4.27±0.29ug/ml, respectively) ( p = 0.247). The maximum stress of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (9.95 ± 0.31Mpa, 9.07 ± 0.45Mpa, 8.17 ± 0.35Mpa, respectively) ( p = 0.003). The elastic modulus of the bone decreased significantly with the increase of the washing time (116.40 ± 3.54Mpa, 106.10 ± 5.29Mpa, 95.63 ± 4.08Mpa, respectively) ( p = 0.003). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (10.09 ± 0.67Mpa, 9.95 ± 0.31Mpa, 10.11 ± 0.07Mpa, 10.09 ± 0.39Mpa) ( p = 0.963). There was no statistical difference in the maximum stress between the fresh group, the 10S group, the alcohol group and the acetone group (119.93 ± 4.94Mpa, 116.40 ± 3.54Mpa, 118.27 ± 0.85Mpa, 118.10 ± 4.52Mpa) ( p = 0.737). Conclusion The results of this experiment indicate that the defatting efficiency was satisfactory at a time of 10 seconds under high pressure washing. High pressure washing and gradient alcohol were similar to conventional acetone solvent extraction defatting.

We aimed to investigate the status quo of orthopaedic publications from China and characterize the most-cited articles to provide valuable insights for orthopaedists. PubMed and Embase databases were used to search for Chinese orthopaedic publications from 1997 to 2017 to determine the growing pattern of Chinese research globally. Then Web of Science database was searched for articles with most citations in all journals included in the Journal Citation Report 2016 under the category of “orthopaedics” for the last five years, and the total numbers of articles in the last three respective years were also analyzed. The number of publications published in PubMed and Embase during the last 20 years ranged from 218 to 6836, and year 2002 had the biggest growth rate of 59.15% and 2014 had the biggest growth value of 1203, comparing with previous years. Fifty-three articles were selected as the most-cited ones for the last five years. European Spine Journal and West China Hospital are the journal and institution that published the most high-impact articles. Majority of the articles (47%) were meta-analysis, and 6 RCTs were identified in a total of 11 clinical articles. Most high-cited clinical articles or meta-analyses were classified as level of evidence of I (41.67%).A total of 1238 articles, 1264 articles, and 1225 articles in the field of orthopedics from China were included in SCI for the last three years. The Chinese orthopaedic research grew rapidly in terms of number of publications in the last decades, and the quality of publications also improved in recent years.

Reconstruction of bone defects following femoral diaphyseal tumor resection is challenging. Segmental allograft (SA) and intercalary prosthesis (IP) are the most common reconstruction methods for femoral diaphyseal metastatic tumors with pathological fracture. However, whether the complications and functional outcomes differ between SA and IP remains unclear. To compare the clinical outcomes and complications for patients treated with SA reconstruction or IP replacement for femoral shaft tumors, 34 patients who had undergone intercalary resection for metastatic tumor with pathological fracture in the femoral diaphysis were evaluated. Of these, 18 had received SA and 16 IP. There were 11 males, and 24 females, with a mean age of 64.5±11.3 years. The most common sites of primary metastases were lung (26.5%), breast (17.6%) and liver (14.7%). The visual analog scale (VAS), implant-related complications and the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) scores for each patient were collected. The follow-up period for patients ranged from 2 to 27 months. At the most recent follow-up, 28 patients had succumbed to mortality, with a mean survival time of 6.9±3.7 months for the IP group and 7.4±3.0 months for the SA group. Patients with IP had a significantly shorter time to full weight bearing and hospitalization time than those who received SA (P=0.003 and P=0.002, respectively). The rates of overall complications and implant-related complications were significantly lower for IP as compared with SA (18.8 vs. 66.7%, P=0.007; 12.5 vs. 55.6%, P=0.013). The reoperation rate of the SA group was higher than that of the IP group (38.9 vs. 12.5%), however the difference between the two groups was statistically insignificant (P=0.125). MSTS scores were significantly higher for the IP group as compared with the SA group at one month after surgery (IP, 26.7±1.6 vs. SA, 20.3±1.5; P

Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes and complications of segmental prosthetic reconstruction for pathological diaphyseal femoral fractures secondary to metastatic tumors. Methods Between 2011 and 2015, we retrospectively evaluated 16 patients (6 men and 10 women; 64.5 ± 11.4 years old at diagnosis) who underwent prosthetic reconstruction after segmental resection of diaphyseal femoral fractures due to metastatic lesions. Visual analog scale (VAS), functional outcomes, implant-related complications, and Mean postoperative Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score for each patient were collected. Results The mean length of bone defect was 10.2 ± 2.6 cm (range, 8–16 cm); follow-up was 9 ± 6.8 months (range, 2–25 months) for all patients, and 24 months (23 and 25 months) for the 2 patients still alive. At final follow-up, 14 patients were dead, indicating a mean survival of 6.9 ± 3.6 months (range, 2–14 months). Mean preoperative VAS score was 8.5 ± 1.0, which decreased to 2.5 ± 1.3 at day 2 postoperatively, indicating significant pain relief (P < 0.05). The MSTS score for lower extremities was 84.6% (range, 73%–90%). The range of motion and function of adjacent joints was within the normal limits in all cases. Three patients (33%) developed complications, including aseptic loosening because of disease progression (1), infection (1), and peri-prosthesis fracture (1). Conclusion These findings demonstrated that this approach greatly relieves pain, and yields satisfactory functional outcomes with fewer complications in patients with pathological femoral fractures secondary to metastatic tumors; however, survival was not significantly improved.

A variety of alternative grafts to autologous iliac crest bone (ICBG) have been developed for lumbar spondylodesis, due to frequent complications following ICBG harvest. The optimal alternative graft to ICBG, however, remains elusive till now. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of fusion materials in lumbar degeneration diseases and to provide a ranking spectrum of the grafts. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different bone grafts in lumbar arthrodesis were eligible for inclusion. A network meta-analysis was performed for endpoints including fusion rate and incidence of adverse events. Twenty-seven RCTs involving 2488 patients and 13 available interventions were included. rhBMP-2 provided the highest fusion rate, being significantly superior to that of ICBG (OR = 0.21, p

Objectives To summarize the epidemiological characteristics of patients following surgery for spinal metastases retrospectively and make a univariate analysis to identify independent variables that could affect the operation decision making. Methods This was a multicenter retrospective review of patients with spinal metastasis who were treated with surgery from 1 January 2007 to 31 July 2019. Basic clinical data were analyzed retrospectively by univariate analysis to identify independent variables that could affect the decision of operation modalities, including gender, age, spinal metastatic site, Frankel score, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS), visual analogue scale (VAS), Tokuhashi score, urinary and fecal incontinence, spinal pathological fracture, primary tumor, extraspinal metastasis, visceral metastasis, and bone lesion (osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed). Results A total of 580 patients including 332 males and 248 females were enrolled in the study with an average age of 58.26 years old (range, 13-86 years old). The most common spinal metastatic level was the thoracic vertebra (190 [32.76%]), followed by the lumbar vertebra (146 [25.17%]), cervical vertebra (47 [8.10%]), and sacral vertebra (35 [6.03%]). Metastases involving more than two sites of the cervical, thoracic, lumbar, and sacral vertebrae arose in 162 (27.93%) patients. For primary tumor, there were 198 (34.14%) cases of lung cancer, 41 (7.07%) cases of kidney cancer, 39 (6.72%) cases of breast cancer, 38 (6.55%) cases of gastrointestinal cancer, 35 (6.03%) cases of lymphoma and myeloma, 25 (4.31%) cases of prostate cancer, 24 (4.14%) cases of liver cancer, 23 (3.97%) cases of mesenchymal tissue sarcoma, 20 (3.45%) cases of thyroid cancer, and 84 (14.48%) cases were tumor with unknown origin. Sixty-three (10.86%) patients received minimally invasive surgery, 460 (79.31%) patients received palliative surgery, and the remaining 57 (9.83%) received tumor resection. According to the univariate analysis, the KPS score, SINS score, VAS score, Tokuhashi score, urinary and fecal incontinence, spinal pathological fracture, and bone lesion (osteolytic, osteoblastic or mixed) were independent and favorable factors affecting the surgery modalities. Conclusions Surgical treatment for spinal metastases was mainly to relieve pain, rebuild spinal stability, improve nerve function, control local tumors, and improve the quality of life of patients. For middle-aged and elderly patients with good general conditions, severe pain, spinal pathological fracture, spine instability and without urinary and fecal incontinence, early surgical treatment should be actively carried out.

The most frequently used auto-grafts for ACL reconstruction (ACLR) are bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) and four-strand hamstring tendon (4S-HT), but significant controversy exists about which graft is better. This study aimed to compare the knee outcomes following ACLR with BPTB and 4S-HT autografts.Subgroup meta-analyses were performed basing on available randomised controlled trials (RCTs) according to different follow-up intervals. 23 RCTs were eligible for inclusion, involving 933 participants in each treatment group.Only short-term (≤2 years) knee anteroposterior and rotational stability were significantly poorer with 4S-HT when compared to BPTB autograft, as judged by side-to-side difference on knee laxity (WMD=-0.50, 95%CI -0.81~-0.18, p=0.002) and pivot-shift test (OR=0.58, 95%CI 0.39~0.88, p=0.010), respectively. The IKDC objective grade was evident to be in favour of 4S-HT group in mid-term (3-5 years) follow-up (OR=0.63, 95%CI 0.43~0.92, p=0.017). Several donor-site related complications, including anterior knee pain, pain with kneeling and extension deficit, were more frequent in BPTB autograft group, while lower short-term iskinetic peak flexion torques both at 60°/S (WMD=8.93, 95%CI 7.88~9.99, p0.001) and 240°/S (WMD=11.63, 95%CI 9.92~13.34, p0.001) were caused by HT harvesting.BPTB was associated with inferior mid- to long-term (5 years) knee functional outcomes, and increased frequency of donor-site complications. In contrast, only short-term knee laxity was increased for 4S-HT autograft, which is expected to be improved by providing more conservative rehabilitation protocol and aperture fixation methods.

Various grafts were selected for restoring knee stability and regaining pre-injury activity levels after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. This review aimed to compare the short-term knee outcomes of different tendon grafts for primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR). Databases of PubMed, Embase, and CENTRAL were retrieved for identifying the published RCT comparing the short-term (≤ 2 years) knee outcomes of different tendon grafts for ACLR. The main outcomes include the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective and objective scores, side-to-side difference on knee laxity, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, Lysholm score, Tegner score, all recorded complications and graft re-ruptures. A total of 32 trials involving 2962 patients and 17 grafts were included. Superior IKDC subjective score was found for quadriceps tendon autograft (QTB) when compared with autografts including bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB), four-strand hamstring tendon (4S-HT), and double-bundle HT. The 4S-HT autograft was associated with poorer anteroposterior and rotational knee stability than the BPTB autograft. Artificial ligament also was found to provide lower knee stability compared with the autografts including the BPTB, patellar tendon, 4S-HT, 4S-HT with preserved tibial insertion, 6S-HT, and four-strand semitendinosus tendon. Additionally, the BPTB allograft showed a statistically higher knee laxity than 6S-HT allograft, while no difference was found between the genuine autografts and non-irradiated allografts. QTB was recommended to be used even over the BPTB and 4S-HT autografts. BPTB autograft was more effective on restoring the knee stability than 4S-HT autograft. Non-irradiated allografts could be safely used as alternatives to autografts. However, artificial ligaments were not recommended for primary ACLR for significantly increased risk of knee laxity.

Background Core decompression (CD) is an important method for the treatment of osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). Few articles investigate the influence of core decompression on outcomes of ONFH. This study was carried out to observe the safety and effectiveness of core decompression in the treatment of ONFH. Methods A comprehensive literature search of databases including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was performed to collect the related studies. The medical subject headings used were “femur head necrosis” and “Core decompression.” The relevant words in title or abstract included but not limited to “Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head,” “femoral head necrosis,” “avascular necrosis of femoral head,” and “ischemic necrosis of femoral head.” The methodological index for nonrandomized studies was adopted for assessing the studies included in this review. Results Thirty-two studies included 1865 patients (2441 hips). Twenty-one studies (1301 hips) using Ficat staging standard, 7 studies (338hips) using Association Research Circulation Osseous (ARCO) staging standard, and University of Pennsylvania system for staging avascular necrosis (UPSS) staging criteria for 4 studies (802 hips). All the studies recorded the treatment, 22 studies (1379 hips) were treated with core decompression (CD) alone, and 7 studies (565 hips) were treated with core decompression combined with autologous bone (CD Autologous bone). Nine subjects (497 hips) were treated with core decompression combined with autologous bone marrow (CD Marrow). Twenty-seven studies (2120 hips) documented the number of conversion to total hip replacement (THA), and 26 studies (1752hips) documented the number of radiographic progression (RP). Twenty-one studies recorded the types of complications and the number of cases, a total of 69 cases. The random-effect model was used for meta-analysis, and the results showed that the overall success rate was 65%. The rate of success showed significant difference on the outcomes of different stages. The rate of success, conversion to THA, and radiographic progression showed significant difference on the outcomes of ONFH using different treatments. Conclusions Core decompression is an effective and safe method of treating ONFH. The combined use of autologous bone or bone marrow can increase the success rate. For advanced femoral head necrosis, the use of CD should be cautious. High-quality randomized controlled trials and prospective studies will be necessary to clarify the effects of different etiology factors, treatments, and postoperative rehabilitation. Until then, the surgeon can choose core decompression to treat ONFH depending on the patient’s condition. Level of evidence I Meta-analysis

The primary goal of treatment in spinal metastasis is typically to extend patients’ lifespan as much as possible, and optimally to relieve the symptoms and so improve quality of life. It is crucial to avoid over- or under-treatment, according to each patient’s individual situation. Thus, this study aimed to identify significant prognostic factors for patients living with metastatic spine disease, and create a new nomogram for the prediction of survival rates. Data from patients who had undergone operations for spinal metastasis between 2005 and 2016 were retrieved retrospectively, and randomized into training (70%) and validation groups (30%). A selection of pre-operative factors was analyzed using univariable and multivariable COX model for the training group. A nomogram was then developed using significant predictors in multivariable analysis. Accuracy was validated using a concordance index (C-index) and calibration curve for the training and validation groups, respectively. A total of 244 participants were enrolled, including 171 in the training group and 73 in the validation group. Primary tumor, Frankel Grade, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS) and adjuvant therapy were found to be significant for predicting survival rates. A nomogram was developed by utilizing these predictors. The C-indexes for the two groups were 0.711 and 0.703 respectively. Moreover, a favorable consistency between the predicted and actual survival probabilities was demonstrated using calibration curves. A user-friendly nomogram model for facilitating medical procedures during clinical encounters was established to aid clinical decision making for individual patients.

Background Knee brace has been commonly used as a device to protect the graft after reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL). Studies have focused on the effects of braces after ACL reconstruction, and controversial results were reported. The current meta-analysis was conducted to identify whether knee braces could provide superior clinical outcomes on knee functional scores and stability evaluations. Hypothesis: Knee braces could not provide superior clinical outcomes on knee functional scores and stability evaluations. Materials and Methods Two reviewers independently retrieved the literature on PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). Data related to the knee functional scores and stability evaluations, including International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) evaluation, Lachman test, manual anterior drawer test, single leg hop test, pivot shift test, side-to-side difference, Lysholm score and Tegner score, were extracted and pooled using meta-analysis with fixed or random- effect models when applicable. Results A total of 7 studies with 440 participants were finally included. The IKDC objective score was pooled using the odds ratio (OR) as effect size, which was demonstrated to be non-significantly different between the brace and no brace groups. All of the other clinical outcomes, including Lysholm score, Tegner score, side-to-side difference, single-leg hop test and VAS pain score, were pooled using the standard mean difference (SMD) as effect size. At final follow up, the aforementioned clinical outcomes were demonstrated to be similar between the brace and non-brace groups. Discussion Knee bracing does not appear to improve the clinical outcomes on the function and stability for ACL-reconstructed knees. Thus, bracing for patients treated with ACL reconstruction should not be recommended routinely. Level of Evidence I, Meta-analysis.

Additional file 1: The searching strategies used in platforms of PubMed and EMBASE. (12.9 KB)

Tendon injury is a very common type of sports trauma, and its incidence has increased over the past decades. Surgical reconstruction with tendon allograft has been increasingly used to restore the motor function and stability of the injured site. However, the risk of disease transmission caused by allogeneic tendon transplantation has been a major problem for tissue bank researchers and clinicians. In order to eliminate the risk of disease transmission, a process of terminal sterilization is necessary. Ionizing irradiation, including gamma irradiation and electron beam irradiation is the most commonly used method for the terminal sterilization, which has been widely proved to be able to effectively inactivate the contained pathogens. Nevertheless, some accompanying damage to the mechanical and histological properties of collagen fibers in tendons will be caused. Therefore, more and more studies have begun to pay attention to the protective effect of radiation protection agents, including the radical scavengers and cross-linking agents, in the irradiation sterilization of allogeneic tendons.

Background Due to the particularity of patients with bone tumors, the risk of periprosthetic infection following megaprosthetic replacement is much higher than that of traditional total knee arthroplasty. Unfortunately, few studies specifically reported the risk factors for periprosthetic infection following megaprosthetic replacement. The purposes of the study were to (1) establish a nomogram model which can provide a reference for clinicians and patients to reduce the occurrence of periprosthetic infection; (2) explore the risk factors for deep infection of megaprosthesis. Hypothesis A prediction model can be established and has favorable predictive accuracy. Patients and methods One hundred and seventy-seven megaprostheses were identified. There were 61 female patients and 116 male patients with a mean age of 35 years. The following risk factors were analyzed: tumor site, sex, age, material for prosthetic stem, tumor type, smoking, diabetes, length of bone resection, operation time, chemotherapy, BMI, malignant tumor staging and hematoma formation. Finally, based on the multivariate analysis, the independent risk factors were used to develop a nomogram model. Results Univariate Cox regression analysis showed that the chemotherapy, longer operation time and hematoma formation were risk factors for periprosthetic infection. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that the chemotherapy, longer operation time and hematoma formation were significant risk factors for periprosthetic infection. The nomogram model was established using these significant risk factors, with a C-index of 0.766 and an acceptable consistency according to the internal validation, indicating that the prediction model had favorable predictive accuracy. Discussion This study has important implications for the future investigations of prevention of periprosthetic infection. The nomogram model identifies high-risk patients for whom attached prophylaxis measures are required. Future studies regarding reduction of incidence of periprosthetic infection should pay close attention to these high-risk patients. Level of evidence IV, retrospective, cohort study.

This study was conducted to identify the influence of ambulatory status prior to treatment on survival of patients with spinal metastases. Two investigators independently retrieved relevant electronic literature in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases, to identify eligible studies. Effect estimates for hazard risk (HR) were extracted and synthesized through fixed-effects or random-effects models as appropriate. A total of 17 eligible studies were identified, with an accumulated number of 3962 participants. HR from 14 studies regarding comparison between ambulatory versus non-ambulatory groups were pooled using a random-effects model, and statistical significance was presented for the pooled HR (HR = 1.96; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.65-2.34). In subgroups of mixed primary tumor and lung cancer, ambulatory status was considered to be a significant prognostic factor (P < 0.05), while in the subgroup of prostate cancer it was not (HR = 1.72; 95% CI, 0.79-3.74). HR from 4 studies related to comparison between Frankel E versus Frankel C-D were pooled using a fixed-effects model, which revealed statistical significance (HR = 1.73; 95% CI, 1.27-2.36). Ambulatory status is a significant prognostic factor in patients with spinal metastases. However, in patients with primary prostate cancer, the prognostic effect of ambulatory status has not yet been confirmed to be significant.

Background Contradictory results have been reported regarding the prognostic effect of ambulatory status in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). The aim of this study was to investigate whether ambulatory status is a significant predictor of overall survival in patients with MSCC and to distinguish the differences of predictors between patients who were ambulatory and those who were not ambulatory before operation. Methods Three clinical centers were retrospectively reviewed to identify patients operated on for MSCC between 2005 and 2015. Fourteen prognostic factors were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival curves, univariate log-rank test, and multivariate Cox hazard regression model for the whole cohort and the subgroups of ambulatory and nonambulatory patients. Results In all, 169 patients were consecutively enrolled. Their mean age was 59.6 ± 10.5 years (range, 18–84 years). The median survival time in the whole cohort was 7.0 ± 0.5 months, whereas it was 7.0 ± 0.8 months and 5.0 ± 1.3 months in ambulatory and nonambulatory patients, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that ambulatory status was not a significant predictor of overall survival (P = 0.266), but primary tumor type and Karnofsky performance status were independent predictors of overall survival for the whole cohort. Primary tumor and metastatic site were significantly associated with survival in ambulatory patients. Gender and Karnofsky performance status were associated with survival in nonambulatory patients. Conclusions Ambulatory status was not shown to predict the prognosis of patients with MSCC. prognostic factors should be distinguished between ambulatory and nonambulatory patients when choosing a therapeutic modality.