1. Comparison of different phaco techniques in coaxial micro-incision cataract surgery
- Author
-
Yan-Li Zhou, Yong Wang, Xian-Yi Bao, Rong Xu, Ting-Ting Peng, and Ming Sun
- Subjects
cataract ,coaxial micro-incision ,phacoemulsification ,phaco-chop ,divide-and-conquer ,stop-and-chop ,Ophthalmology ,RE1-994 - Abstract
AIM: To compare the efficiency of coaxial micro-incision cataract surgery(MICS)performed by 3 phacoemulsification techniques(phaco-chop, divide-and- conquer and stop-and-chop).METHODS: It was a perspective and randomized clinical trial. Totally 135 patients with age-related cataract were selected randomly and underwent MICS. According to the lens nuclear opacity(NO)of LOCSⅢ grading standards, it can be divided into 3 groups as NO2, NO3 and NO4 group. All groups were randomly subdivided into 3 groups(phaco-chop, divide-and-conquer and stop-and-chop group). The observation target included best-corrected visual acuity(BCVA), central corneal thickness(CCT)and endothelial cell count(ECC)before operation and 1mo postoperation, ultrasound time(UST), cumulative dissipated energy(CDE), estimated fluied used(EFU)in operation and complications.RESULTS:In lens nuclear opacity NO4 coaxial micro-incision phacoemulsification, phaco-chop group showed significantly less UST, CDE and EFU than the divide-and-conquer and stop-and-chop groups(P<0.05)and the ratio of endothelial cell loss was significantly lower in the phaco-chop group than in the divide-and-conquer and stop-and-chop groups 1mo after surgery(P<0.05). However, after 1mo surgery, BCVA and CCT among three chop technique groups in different lens nuclear opacity groups had no significant differences(P>0.05).CONCLUSION: All 3 techniques may be effective for coaxialmicroincision cataract surgery in mild and moderate nuclear opacity cataracts. However, in eyes with severe nuclear opacity cataract, the phaco-chop technique can be more effective for phacoemulsification, and less corneal endothelial damage.
- Published
- 2014
- Full Text
- View/download PDF