Search

Aims: Pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PAWP) ≥25 mmHg during bicycle ergometry is recommended to uncover occult heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. We hypothesized that PAWP increase would differ in available diastolic stress tests and that the margin of PAWP ≥25 mmHg would only be reliably achieved through ergometry. Methods and results: We conducted a prospective, single‐arm study in patients with an intermediate risk for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction according to the ESC HFA‐PEFF score. A total of 19 patients underwent four stress test modalities in randomized order: leg raise, fluid challenge, handgrip, and bicycle ergometry. The primary outcome was the difference (Δ) between resting and exercise PAWP in each modality. Secondary outcomes were differences (Δ) in mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP), cardiac output (CO), as well as the ratios between mPAP and PAWP to CO. Compared to resting values, passive leg raise (Δ7.7 ± 8.0 mmHg, p = 0.030), fluid challenge (Δ9.2 ± 6.4 mmHg, p = 0.003), dynamic handgrip (Δ9.6 ± 7.5 mmHg, p = 0.002), and bicycle ergometry (Δ22.3 ± 5.0 mmHg, p < 0.001) uncovered increased PAWP during exercise. Amongst these, bicycle ergometry also demonstrated the highest ΔmPAP (27.2 ± 7.1 mmHg, p < 0.001), ΔCO (3.3 ± 2.6 L/min, p < 0.001), ΔmPAP/CO ratio (2.3 ± 2.0 mmHg/L/min, p < 0.001), and ΔPAWP/CO ratio (2.2 ± 1.4 mmHg/L/min, p < 0.001) compared to other modalities. PAWP ≥25 mmHg was only reliably achieved in bicycle ergometry (31.1 ± 3.9 mmHg). In all other modalities only 10.5% of patients achieved PAWP ≥25 mmHg (handgrip 18.4 ± 6.6 mmHg, fluid 18.1 ± 5.6 mmHg, leg raise 16.5 ± 7.0 mmHg). Conclusions: We demonstrate that bicycle ergometry exhibits a distinct haemodynamic response with higher increase of PAWP compared to other modalities. This finding needs to be considered for valid detection of exercise PAWP ≥25 mmHg when non‐bicycle tests remain inconclusive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) has been suggested by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) for assessing the exercise limitations of apparently healthy individuals, but data on elite athletes regarding this test are scarce. (2) Methods: We analyzed CPET in elite (n = 43, 21.9 ± 3.7 years) and recreational (n = 40, 34.7 ± 13.0 years) athletes with persistent subjective exercise intolerance and post-exertional malaise (PEM) after COVID-19 infection. The primary outcome was the point prevalence of the adequate cardiopulmonary response (ACPR), defined by the presence of all of the following ESC criteria for apparently healthy individuals: (1) >100% of predicted peak oxygen consumption (predVO2peak), (2) VE/VCO2 < 30, (3) no exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV), and (4) heart rate recovery of ≥12 beats/minute 1 min after exercise termination (HRR1). Results: ACPR occurred more frequently in elite athletes than in recreational athletes (70.0% vs. 39.5%; p = 0.005), mainly driven by the lower VE/VCO2 (<30: 97.7% vs. 65%, p < 0.001). Elite (11.6%) and recreational athletes (22.5%) showing a plateau of O2 pulse did not display ACPR. Conclusions: ACPR was not observed in all recreational and elite athletes with PEM. In particular, perturbed VE/VCO2 and the plateauing of O2 pulse are suitable for quantifying exercise limitations and may identify a high-risk population with long-COVID-19 syndrome who require their training intensities to be adapted. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

(1) Background: The exercise capacity of patients with a left ventricular assist device (LVAD) remains limited despite mechanical support. Higher dead space ventilation (VD/VT) may be a surrogate for right ventricular to pulmonary artery uncoupling (RV–PA) during cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) to explain persistent exercise limitations. (2) Methods: We investigated 197 patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction with (n = 89) and without (HFrEF, n = 108) LVAD. As a primary outcome NTproBNP, CPET, and echocardiographic variables were analyzed for their potential to discriminate between HFrEF and LVAD. As a secondary outcome CPET variables were evaluated for a composite of hospitalization due to worsening heart failure and overall mortality over 22 months. (3) Results: NTproBNP (OR 0.6315, 0.5037–0.7647) and RV function (OR 0.45, 0.34–0.56) discriminated between LVAD and HFrEF. The rise of endtidal CO2 (OR 4.25, 1.31–15.81) and VD/VT (OR 1.23, 1.10–1.40) were higher in LVAD patients. Group (OR 2.01, 1.07–3.85), VE/VCO2 (OR 1.04, 1.00–1.08), and ventilatory power (OR 0.74, 0.55–0.98) were best associated with rehospitalization and mortality. (4) Conclusions: LVAD patients displayed higher VD/VT compared to HFrEF. Higher VD/VT as a surrogate for RV–PA uncoupling could be another marker of persistent exercise limitations in LVAD patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Heart failure with preserved (HFpEF), mildly reduced (HFmrEF) and reduced (HFrEF) ejection fraction (EF) remains a controversial categorization. Whether these three categories reflect a distinct pattern of exercise limitation in cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) needs to be investigated. We aimed to analyze whether CPET variables differ between all heart failure categories (HF). We analyzed CPET variables of stable HFpEF (n = 123), HFmrEF (n = 31), and HFrEF (n = 153; 74 patients with and 79 patients without left ventricular assist device, LVAD) patients. The association between HF and peak oxygen consumption (VO 2peak) was used as a primary outcome, while the association between HF, oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), and increase of O 2 pulse (ΔO 2 pulse) were analyzed as secondary outcomes. VO 2peak displayed a consistent decline across all HF categories (19.8 ml ± 6.2/kg/min vs. 17.5 ± 7.9 ml/kg/min vs. 13.7 ± 4.0 ml/kg/min, p < 0.001). OUES only showed differences between HFpEF and HFrEF (1.8 ± 0.6 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, p < 0.001) as well as HFmrEF and HFrEF (1.9 ± 0.9 vs. 1.4 ± 0.5, p = 0.004). ΔO 2 pulse differed between HFpEF and HFrEF (7.7 ± 3.5 ml/beat/kg*100 vs. 5.5 ± 3.0 ml/beat/kg*100, p < 0.001) as well as HFpEF and HFmrEF (7.7 ± 3.5 ml/beat/kg*100 vs. 6.3 ± 4.1 ml/beat/kg*100, p = 0.049). Outcome variables did not differ between HFrEF with and without LVAD support (VO 2peak : p = 0.364, OUES: p = 0.129, ΔO 2 pulse: p = 0.564). HF did not display a distinct CPET profile. Thus, EF-based categorization does not entirely reflect exercise limitations. CPET variables could contribute to better characterize HF phenotypes. Differential response of variables of cardiopulmonary exercise testing across ejection fraction in heart failure. HFpEF: Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. HFmrEF: Heart failure with mildly reduced ejection fraction. HFrEF+/-LVAD: Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction with/without left ventricular assist device. VO 2peak : Peak oxygen consumption. OUES: Oxygen uptake efficiency slope. ΔO 2 pulse: Difference between resting and peak O 2 pulse. [Display omitted] • VO2peak declines with HF category. • ΔO2 pulse and OUES show a differential response in HF categories. • Variables of cardiopulmonary exercise testing should be used to delineate exercise limitations of heart failure phenotypes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Beta blockers (BB) reduce chronotropic response and exercise capacity in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). To analyze the influence of BB on exercise performance and O 2 pulse increase as a surrogate for stroke volume in HFpEF. We retrospectively analyzed the influence of BB intake (yes: n = 48/no: n = 51) on peak oxygen uptake (VO 2peak), oxygen uptake efficiency slope (OUES), and increase of O 2 pulse in HFpEF patients undergoing cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET). Associations of outcome variables and risk category of the algorithm of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology (HFA-PEFF score) were calculated. Patients on BB showed lower VO 2peak (p =.003) and OUES (p =.002), with a dominant effect in the high-risk (p =.020; 0.002), but not in the low risk-group (p =.434; p =.499). In the intermediate group BB showed a trend towards lower VO 2peak (p =.078) and lower values for OUES (p =.020). Patients on BB also demonstrated a lower increase of O 2 pulse during exercise (p =.002), without differences between HFA-PEFF risk groups (low: p =.322, intermediate: p =.269, high: p =.313). BB reduce exercise capacity and O 2 pulse increase in HFpEF patients. Direct quantification of O 2 pulse increase may help to improve the discrimination of HFpEF patients. [Display omitted] • BB intake is associated with reduced exercise capacity in HFpEF patients. • BB intake reduces O 2 pulse increase as a surrogate for blunted stroke volume. • BB should be avoided in selected HFpEF patients. • Cardiopulmonary exercise testing contributes to characterize HFpEF phenotype [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Exercise oscillatory ventilation (EOV), indicating pathological fluctuations on pulmonary arterial pressure, is associated with mortality in patients with heart failure (HF). Whether left ventricular assist device (LVAD)‐induced ventricular unloading can reverse EOV and may prevent short‐term rehospitalization has not been investigated. Methods: We performed a retrospective single‐center in‐ and outpatient analysis of patients with (n = 20, LVAD) and without (n = 27, HF) circulatory support and reduced ejection fraction (EF, 22.8 ± 7.9%). The association of cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) variables and 3 months‐rehospitalization (3MR) as a primary outcome was analyzed. Furthermore, CPET variables were compared regarding the presence of EOV (+/−). Results: Lower VO2peak (11.6 ± 4.9 ml/kg/min vs. 14.4 ± 4.3 ml/kg/min, p = 0.039), lower increase of PETCO2 (CI = 0.049–1.127; p = 0.068), and higher VE/VCO2 (43.8 ± 9.5 vs. 38.3 ± 10.6; p = 0.069) were associated with 3MR. Flattening of O2 pulse (CI = 0.139–2.379; p = 0.487) had no impact on 3MR. EOV was present in 59.5% (n = 28/47) of patients, without a significant difference between LVAD and HF patients (p = 0.959). Patients with HF/EOV+ demonstrated significantly lower VO2peak compared with HF/EOV− (p = 0.039). LVAD/EOV+ displayed significantly lower EF (p = 0.004) and fewer aortic valve opening than LVAD/EOV− (p = 0.027). Conclusions: Lower VO2peak, but not EOV, was associated with 3MR. EOV occurred at a similar rate in LVAD and HF patients, which may illustrate insufficient unloading during exercise in chronic LVAD therapy and may contribute to the limited exercise capacity following LVAD implantation. Simultaneous CPET and right heart catheterization studies are needed to elucidate whether EOV may serve as a non‐invasive predictor of insufficient LV unloading necessitating LVAD reprograming. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: We aimed to assess associations between depressive symptoms, lifestyle, and somatic symptoms during the COVID-19 pandemic. Design: A prospective, observational study using a self-designed questionnaire. Setting: Three general practitioners' (GP) offices in rural Germany. Participants: 271 adult patients without manifest cardiovascular or pulmonary disease with (n = 82) and without (n = 189) hypertension reporting to our GP offices. Main outcome measures: The reported increase of depressive symptoms (loneliness, sleeplessness, joylessness, listlessness) prior to the first documented case in Germany on 27.01.2020 (t0) as opposed to patients' health perception during the Corona pandemic (t1) was the primary outcome measure. The secondary outcome measures were changes in physical activity (PA), dyspnea and angina in the two groups. Results: Out of 271 patients (50.8 ± 16.8 years, 55.1% females), 1.5% were tested positive for COVID-19. Overall, listlessness (8.5%, p = 0.001), sleeplessness (5.2%, p = 0.001) and joylessness (4.2%, p = 0.003) were increased. Dyspnea significantly increased (9.2%, p < 0.001) and employment status worsened (6.5%, p < 0.001). There were significant associations between the increase of depressive symptoms, weight increase (p = 0.017), and reduction in physical activity (p = 0.046). However, after adjusting for age, hypertensive patients did not show more depressive symptoms (p = 0.704), dyspnea (p = 0.063) or angina (p = 0.432), nor was there any difference in PA (p = 0.906) compared to healthy individuals. Conclusions: We demonstrate an association between the deterioration of depressive symptoms, weight gain, and reduced physical activity during COVID-19, both in hypertensives and healthy controls. Hypertension is no driver of symptom deterioration during the pandemic. The trial was registered in the German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00022157). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Right heart catheterization (RHC) is associated with a higher procedural risk in older adults, but non-invasive estimation of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a challenge. We aimed to elaborate a non-invasive prediction model to estimate PH. Methods and design: We retrospectively analysed 134 older adults (70.0 years ±12.3; 44.9% males) who reported to our clinic with unclear dyspnea between 01/2015 and 01/2020 and had received RHC as a part of their diagnostic workup. Lung function testing, analysis of blood gas samples, 6 min walk distance and echocardiography were performed within 24 hours of RHC. Main outcome measures: In a stepwise statistical approach by using an in/exclusion algorithm (using the AIC criterion) we analysed non-invasive parameters to test their value in predicting PH (defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure, PAmean, >25mmHg). Discrimination capability of the final model was measured by the AUC (area under curve) from an ROC (receiver operating characteristics) analysis. Results: We yielded a sensitivity of 87.2% and a specificity of 62.5% in a combinatorial logistical model with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) and forced vital capacity (VCmax), the discrimination index was 86.7%. The odds ratios for an increase of 10 mmHg of sPAP were 2.99 (2.08–4.65) and 1.86 (1.11–3.21) for a 1 l decrease in VCmax. On their own, VCmax proved to be specific (83.3%), while sPAP was a sensitive (79.1%) predictor for PH. Conclusions: We provide a combinatorial model to predict PH from sPAP and VCmax in older adults, which may help to avoid invasive procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Right heart catheterization (RHC) is associated with a higher procedural risk in older adults, but non-invasive estimation of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a challenge. We aimed to elaborate a non-invasive prediction model to estimate PH. Methods and design: We retrospectively analysed 134 older adults (70.0 years ±12.3; 44.9% males) who reported to our clinic with unclear dyspnea between 01/2015 and 01/2020 and had received RHC as a part of their diagnostic workup. Lung function testing, analysis of blood gas samples, 6 min walk distance and echocardiography were performed within 24 hours of RHC. Main outcome measures: In a stepwise statistical approach by using an in/exclusion algorithm (using the AIC criterion) we analysed non-invasive parameters to test their value in predicting PH (defined as mean pulmonary artery pressure, PAmean, >25mmHg). Discrimination capability of the final model was measured by the AUC (area under curve) from an ROC (receiver operating characteristics) analysis. Results: We yielded a sensitivity of 87.2% and a specificity of 62.5% in a combinatorial logistical model with systolic pulmonary artery pressure (sPAP) and forced vital capacity (VCmax), the discrimination index was 86.7%. The odds ratios for an increase of 10 mmHg of sPAP were 2.99 (2.08–4.65) and 1.86 (1.11–3.21) for a 1 l decrease in VCmax. On their own, VCmax proved to be specific (83.3%), while sPAP was a sensitive (79.1%) predictor for PH. Conclusions: We provide a combinatorial model to predict PH from sPAP and VCmax in older adults, which may help to avoid invasive procedures. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Exaggerated blood pressure response during exercise is a risk factor for cardiovascular disease, but is inhomogeneously defined in the literature. We used a novel approach by taking into account both workload and blood pressure to define exercise hypertension (systolic values > 200 mmHg at 100W). We examined medically controlled hypertensives (n = 373; mean age 56.7 ± 14.8 years) and their blood pressure response during bicycle ergometry. Exercise hypertension was inversely associated with E/A wave ratio but not E/E' during resting echocardiography (p = 0.045; p = 0.293). Functional air trapping (residual volume/total lung capacity, RV/TLC) was significantly higher in the group of exercise hypertensives (43.6% ± 11.6 vs. 38.1% ± 10.0; p = 0.005). Patients treated with renin-angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) blockers showed lower blood pressure response during exercise than those treated with calcium channel blockers (CCBs) and thiazides (both <0.001) and also displayed higher E/A (p = 0.023) and lower E/E' values (p = 0.042). We provide evidence that the easily accessible parameters E/A inversion and air trapping at rest could be used in clinical routine to screen for exercise-induced hypertension in medically controlled hypertensives. We also show that RAAS blockers have a more favorable effect on blood pressure response during exercise than CCBs and thiazides. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Beta-blocker (BB) therapy is a main pillar in treating patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction and has shown a prognostic benefit. However, evidence for application of BB in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), especially in the absence of coronary artery disease, atrial fibrillation or arterial hypertension, is scarce. HFpEF is characterized by elevations in left atrial pressure and reduced compliance of the left ventricle leading to a hampered increase of cardiac output (CO) during exercise, which results in exertional dyspnea. This may be due to either a limited increase in stroke volume or reduced chronotropy during physical activity. We critically discuss the pathophysiological background of HFpEF, current data on BB in heart failure therapy, as well as the potential benefits and harms of BB therapy in HFpEF. Furthermore, we argue that non-cardio selective BB with peripheral activity to reduce afterload may be more suitable in this population than cardio-selective BB. Although preliminary data on BB in HFpEF are available, multicenter prospective trials to assess a reduction of cardiovascular morbidity are warranted. Future trials need to focus on phenotyping HFpEF patients and assess who may benefit most from tailored BB therapy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Covid-19 is causing a pandemic and forces physicians to restructure their work. We want to share our experience in the outpatient management of potentially-infected patients with special consideration of altered national test strategies during the crisis.Methods: We analysed patients with respiratory symptoms reporting to our three rural general practitioner (GP) offices in North Rhine-Westphalia, Germany, from 27.01-20.04.2020 (n = 489 from a total of 6090 patients). A history of symptoms was taken at the doorstep following a specific questionnaire. Patients with respiratory symptoms were examined in a separated isolation area, while the others were allowed to enter the office. We applied the first recommended algorithm of the German Robert Koch Institute (RKI) to test suspected patients and compared our results with an adapted, more liberal version of the RKI, which is currently applied in Germany.Results: Eighty patients (16.36%, mean age: 47.03 years+ - 18.08) were sent to a nasopharyngeal smear. Five patients (6.25%) proved to be positive, four of whom had established risk factors for COVID-19. Overall, the most common symptoms were cough (83.75%), sore throat (71.25%), as well as myalgia and fatigue (66.25%). The most common diagnoses were rhinopharyngitis (37.22%) and acute bronchitis (30.27%). A sore throat was more common in positively-tested patients (80% vs. 12%). Applying the first RKI test strategy yielded 6.25% of positive tests (n = 80), while the more liberal later RKI recommendation would have achieved 1.36% positive tests from 369 patients. No positive test was missed by applying the conservative strategy. None of our employees called in sick during this period, which emphasises the efficacy and safety of our screening methods.Conclusion: A clinical distinction between ordinary respiratory infections and COVID-19 is not possible in a low-prevalence population. Our model to prevent unprotected physical contact, screen patients in front of the office with protective equipment, and examine respiratory infections in separated areas works in the GP setting without overt health risks for employees. Thus, this approach should be used as a GP standard to uphold patient care without major health risks for the personnel. Large multi-centre studies are necessary to work out the most suitable test strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A well-established characteristic of expertise in many sport skills is the ability to process biological motion to anticipate the actions of an opponent. Presently, it is unclear whether anticipation skill is based on the processing of local, featural information or more global, configural information. In the present study, we attempted to address this question by manipulating the level of visual blur. Expert, skilled, and novice tennis players (N = 56) attempted to judge serve direction in 96 video clips depicting two intermediate-club-level players serving to the deuce court. Each clip was temporally occluded at one of four levels relative to ball-racquet impact (-320 ms, -160 ms, 0 ms, +160 ms) and was shown with one of three levels of blur (no blur, 20% blur, 40% blur). The results revealed a significant effect of blur, such that judgment accuracy decreased as the level of blur increased. There was no interaction with skill level, suggesting that successful judgments were based upon the processing of featural rather than configural information in all three groups. Intriguingly, the novice players performed better than the skilled players who in turn performed better than the experts and this was consistent across all three levels of blur. Analysis of the proportion of correct responses for each trial (item solution probabilities) revealed evidence of greater susceptibility to deception in expert players. Specifically, the expert group had a total of 26 trials (out of 96) on which fewer than 20% of the group members were correct, compared with 15 trials for the skilled group and only 7 trials for the novice group. Finally, the number of deceptive trials was greatest in the 40% blur condition, suggesting that the serve motions depicted in the test trials violated the configural rules to which expert players have become sensitive. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Literature does not provide any reliable comparison between angular stable plate fixation and rigid nail fixation for stabilization of supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures. Thus, the purpose of this study was to compare these two implants in clinical practice relating to fracture healing, functional results and treatment-related complications. Patients and methods: In this retrospective study (level IV), clinical and radiographic records of 86 patients (62 female and 24 male, average age: 75.6) with supracondylar periprosthetic femoral fractures between 1996 and 2010 were analyzed. 48 patients underwent lateral plate fixation by an angular stable plate system (LISS), whereas 38 patients were stabilized by a rigid interlocking nail device. Results: Sixty-four (76 %) patients returned to their pre-injury activity level and were satisfied with their clinical outcome. We had an overall Oxford outcome score of 2.21, with patients following angular stable plate fixation of 2.22, and patients after rigid nail fixation of 2.20. Successful fracture healing within 6 months was achieved in 74 (88 %) patients. Comparing between plate fixation and nail fixation, statistical analysis did not reveal any significant differences. Summary: Overall, we had a relatively high rate of fracture healing and a satisfactory functional outcome with both implants. Both methods of fixation showed similar results relating to the functional outcome and individual satisfaction of the patients. However, with regards to fracture healing and treatment-related complications, intramedullary nail fixation showed slight advantages. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]