1. Antiepileptic Drug Teratogenicity and De Novo Genetic Variation Load
- Author
-
Perucca, P., Anderson, A., Jazayeri, D., Hitchcock, A., Graham, J., Todaro, M., Tomson, T., Battino, D., Perucca, E., Ferri, M. M., Rochtus, A., Lagae, L., Canevini, M. P., Zambrelli, E., Campbell, E., Koeleman, B. P. C., Scheffer, I. E., Berkovic, S. F., Kwan, P., Sisodiya, S. M., Goldstein, D. B., Petrovski, S., Craig, J., Vajda, F. J. E., O'Brien, T. J., Leu, C., Wolking, S., Peter, S., Weber, Y. G., Weckhuysen, S., Moller, R. S., Nikanorova, M., Muhle, H., Avbersek, A., Heggeli, K., Striano, P., Gambardella, A., Langley, S. R., Krenn, M., Klein, K. M., Mccormack, M., Borghei, M., Willis, J., Berghuis, B., Jorgensen, A., Auce, P., Francis, B., Srivastava, P., Sonsma, A. C. M., Sander, Jw., Zimprich, F., Depondt, C., Johnson, M. M., Marson, A. G., Sills, G. J., Kunz, W. S., Cavalleri, G. L., Delanty, N., Zara, F., Krause, R., Lerche, H., Andrade, D., Sen, A., Bazil, C. W., Boland, M., Cavalleri, G., Choi, H., Colombo, S., Costello, D., Devinsky, O., Doherty, C. P., Dugan, P., Frankel, W., Heinzen, E., Johnson, M., Marson, T., Mikati, M., Ottman, R., Pandolfo, M., Radtke, R., Rees, M., Sadoway, T., Valley, N., Walley, N., Wood, N., and Zuberi, S.
- Subjects
Adult ,Male ,0301 basic medicine ,Pediatrics ,medicine.medical_specialty ,DNA Copy Number Variations ,Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide ,Paternal Age ,03 medical and health sciences ,Epilepsy ,0302 clinical medicine ,Pregnancy ,Polymorphism (computer science) ,medicine ,Humans ,Exome ,Copy-number variation ,Indel ,business.industry ,Confounding ,Infant, Newborn ,Abnormalities, Drug-Induced ,Genetic Variation ,DNA ,medicine.disease ,Genetic load ,Exact test ,Teratogens ,030104 developmental biology ,Neurology ,Anticonvulsants ,Female ,Neurology (clinical) ,Genetic Load ,business ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery - Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms by which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) cause birth defects (BDs) are unknown. Data suggest that AED-induced BDs may result from a genome-wide increase of de novo variants in the embryo, a mechanism which we investigated. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing data from child-parent trios were interrogated for de novo single-nucleotide variants/indels (dnSNVs/indels) and copy number variants (dnCNVs). Generalized linear models were applied to assess de novo variant burdens in: children exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-exposed children) vs children without BDs not exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-unexposed unaffected children), and AED-exposed children with BDs vs those without BDs, adjusting for confounders. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: 67 child-parent trios were included: 10 with AED-exposed children with BDs; 46 with AED-exposed unaffected children; 11 with AED-unexposed unaffected children. The dnSNV/indel burden did not differ between AED-exposed children and AED-unexposed unaffected children [median dnSNV/indel number/child (range): 3 (0-7) vs 3 (1-5), p = 0.50]. Among AED-exposed children, there were no significant differences between those with BDs and those unaffected. Likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels were detected in 9/67 (13%) children, none of whom had BDs. The proportion of cases harbouring likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels did not differ significantly between AED-unexposed and AED-exposed children. The dnCNV burden was not associated with AED exposure or birth outcome. INTERPRETATION: Our study indicates that prenatal AED exposure does not increase the burden of de novo variants, and that this mechanism is not a major contributor to AED-induced BDs. These results can be incorporated in routine patient counselling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
- Published
- 2020