Back to Search Start Over

Antiepileptic Drug Teratogenicity and De Novo Genetic Variation Load

Authors :
Perucca, P.
Anderson, A.
Jazayeri, D.
Hitchcock, A.
Graham, J.
Todaro, M.
Tomson, T.
Battino, D.
Perucca, E.
Ferri, M. M.
Rochtus, A.
Lagae, L.
Canevini, M. P.
Zambrelli, E.
Campbell, E.
Koeleman, B. P. C.
Scheffer, I. E.
Berkovic, S. F.
Kwan, P.
Sisodiya, S. M.
Goldstein, D. B.
Petrovski, S.
Craig, J.
Vajda, F. J. E.
O'Brien, T. J.
Leu, C.
Wolking, S.
Peter, S.
Weber, Y. G.
Weckhuysen, S.
Moller, R. S.
Nikanorova, M.
Muhle, H.
Avbersek, A.
Heggeli, K.
Striano, P.
Gambardella, A.
Langley, S. R.
Krenn, M.
Klein, K. M.
Mccormack, M.
Borghei, M.
Willis, J.
Berghuis, B.
Jorgensen, A.
Auce, P.
Francis, B.
Srivastava, P.
Sonsma, A. C. M.
Sander, Jw.
Zimprich, F.
Depondt, C.
Johnson, M. M.
Marson, A. G.
Sills, G. J.
Kunz, W. S.
Cavalleri, G. L.
Delanty, N.
Zara, F.
Krause, R.
Lerche, H.
Andrade, D.
Sen, A.
Bazil, C. W.
Boland, M.
Cavalleri, G.
Choi, H.
Colombo, S.
Costello, D.
Devinsky, O.
Doherty, C. P.
Dugan, P.
Frankel, W.
Heinzen, E.
Johnson, M.
Marson, T.
Mikati, M.
Ottman, R.
Pandolfo, M.
Radtke, R.
Rees, M.
Sadoway, T.
Valley, N.
Walley, N.
Wood, N.
Zuberi, S.
Publication Year :
2020
Publisher :
John Wiley and Sons Inc., 2020.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The mechanisms by which antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) cause birth defects (BDs) are unknown. Data suggest that AED-induced BDs may result from a genome-wide increase of de novo variants in the embryo, a mechanism which we investigated. METHODS: Whole-exome sequencing data from child-parent trios were interrogated for de novo single-nucleotide variants/indels (dnSNVs/indels) and copy number variants (dnCNVs). Generalized linear models were applied to assess de novo variant burdens in: children exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-exposed children) vs children without BDs not exposed prenatally to AEDs (AED-unexposed unaffected children), and AED-exposed children with BDs vs those without BDs, adjusting for confounders. Fisher's exact test was used to compare categorical data. RESULTS: 67 child-parent trios were included: 10 with AED-exposed children with BDs; 46 with AED-exposed unaffected children; 11 with AED-unexposed unaffected children. The dnSNV/indel burden did not differ between AED-exposed children and AED-unexposed unaffected children [median dnSNV/indel number/child (range): 3 (0-7) vs 3 (1-5), p = 0.50]. Among AED-exposed children, there were no significant differences between those with BDs and those unaffected. Likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels were detected in 9/67 (13%) children, none of whom had BDs. The proportion of cases harbouring likely deleterious dnSNVs/indels did not differ significantly between AED-unexposed and AED-exposed children. The dnCNV burden was not associated with AED exposure or birth outcome. INTERPRETATION: Our study indicates that prenatal AED exposure does not increase the burden of de novo variants, and that this mechanism is not a major contributor to AED-induced BDs. These results can be incorporated in routine patient counselling. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Details

Language :
English
Database :
OpenAIRE
Accession number :
edsair.doi.dedup.....54d00056b271fc1c143d3428130add6a