Search

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The European Stop Kinase Inhibitors (EURO-SKI) study is the largest clinical trial for investigating the cessation of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with chronic myeloid leukemia in stable deep molecular remission (DMR). Among 728 patients, 434 patients (61%; 95% CI, 57 to 64) remained in major molecular response (MMR) at 6 months and 309 patients of 678 (46%; 95% CI, 42 to 49) at 36 months. Duration of TKI treatment and DMR before TKI stop were confirmed as significant factors for the prediction of MMR loss at 6 months. In addition, the type of BCR::ABL1 transcript was identified as a prognostic factor. For late MMR losses after 6 months, TKI treatment duration, percentage of blasts in peripheral blood, and platelet count at diagnosis were significant factors in multivariate analysis. For the entire study period of 36 months, multiple logistic regression models confirmed duration of treatment, blasts, and transcript type as independent factors for MMR maintenance. In addition to the duration of treatment, transcript type as well as blasts in peripheral blood at diagnosis should be considered as important factors to predict treatment-free remission.

Eosinophilic granulocytes are normally present in low numbers in the bloodstream. Patients with an increased number of eosinophilic granulocytes in the differential count (eosinophilia) are common and can pose a clinical challenge because conditions with eosinophilia occur in all medical specialties. The diagnostic approach must be guided by a thorough medical history, supported by specific tests to guide individualized treatment. Neoplastic (primary) eosinophilia is identified by one of several unique acquired genetic causes. In contrast, reactive (secondary) eosinophilia is associated with a cytokine stimulus in a specific disease, while idiopathic eosinophilia is a diagnosis by exclusion. Rational treatment is disease-directed in secondary cases and has paved the way for targeted treatment against the driver in primary eosinophilia, whereas idiopathic cases are treated as needed by principles in eosinophilia originating from clonal drivers. The vast majority of patients are diagnosed with secondary eosinophilia and are managed by the relevant specialty—e.g., rheumatology, allergy, dermatology, gastroenterology, pulmonary medicine, hematology, or infectious disease. The overlap in symptoms and the risk of irreversible organ involvement in eosinophilia, irrespective of the cause, warrants that patients without a diagnostic clarification or who do not respond to adequate treatment should be referred to a multidisciplinary function anchored in a hematology department for evaluation. This review presents the pathophysiology, manifestations, differential diagnosis, diagnostic workup, and management of (adult) patients with eosinophilia. The purpose is to place eosinophilia in a clinical context, and therefore justify and inspire the establishment of a multidisciplinary team of experts from diagnostic and clinical specialties at the regional level to support the second opinion. The target patient population requires highly specialized laboratory analysis and therapy

Background Risk factors for, and long-term outcomes following, detection of varicella zoster virus (VZV) DNA in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) are unknown. Methods We performed a nationwide population-based cohort study of all Danish residents who had VZV DNA detected in the CSF by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) between 1 January 1997 and 1 March 2016 (VZV cohort; n = 517) and an age- and sex- matched comparison cohort from the general Danish population (n = 9823). We examined potential risk factors and mortality, neurologic morbidity, psychiatric morbidity, redemptiom of prescriptions for nervous system medicine prescribed for the nervous system, and social outcomes. Results Prior hospital admission, redemption of immunosuppressive medicine, comorbidity, and immunosuppressive conditions were associated with detection of VZV DNA in the CSF. Mortality was increased in the VZV cohort, especially during the first year of observation and among patients with encephalitis. Patients in the VZV cohort had an increased risk of dementia and epilepsy. The redemption of antiepileptics and antidepressants was increased in the VZV cohort. Conclusions Immunosuppression and comorbidity are associated with increased risk of detection of VZV DNA in the CSF and the condition is associated with increased mortality and neurological morbidity.

Ann-Brit E Hansen,1– 3 Hanne T Vestergaard,4 Ram B Dessau,5 Jacob Bodilsen,6 Nanna S Andersen,7 Lars H Omland,1 Claus B Christiansen,8 Svend Ellermann-Eriksen,9 Lene Nielsen,10 Thomas Benfield,2,3 Henrik T Sørensen,11 Christian Ø Andersen,12 Anne-Mette Lebech,1,3 Niels Obel1,3 1Department of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 2Department of Infectious Diseases, Amager Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, Denmark; 3Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; 4Department of Virus & Microbiological Special Diagnostics, Statens Serum Institute, Copenhagen, Denmark; 5Department of Clinical Microbiology, Slagelse Hospital, Slagelse, Denmark; 6Departments of Infectious Diseases and Clinical Microbiology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark; 7Department of Clinical Microbiology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; 8Department of Clinical Microbiology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; 9Department of Clinical Microbiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 10Department of Clinical Microbiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev, Denmark; 11Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark; 12Department of Clinical Microbiology, Amager Hvidovre University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Hvidovre, DenmarkCorrespondence: Ann-Brit E HansenDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Blegdamsvej 9, Copenhagen Ø DK-2100, DenmarkTel +45 30299306Email ann-brit.eg.hansen.02@regionh.dkBackground: The long-term prognosis following herpes simplex virus (HSV) central nervous system (CNS) infection is still debated.Patients and Methods: We examined outcomes in all Danish residents who, during 2000– 2016, tested PCR positive for HSV-1 (n=208) or HSV-2 (n=283)

Background: The long-term prognosis following herpes simplex virus (HSV) central nervous system (CNS) infection is still debated.Patients and Methods: We examined outcomes in all Danish residents who, during 2000-2016, tested PCR positive for HSV-1 (n=208) or HSV-2 (n=283) in the cerebrospinal fluid, compared to comparison cohorts from the general population (n=2080 and n=2830).Results: One-year mortality was increased among HSV-1 patients (difference 19.3%; 95% CI: 13.6% to 25.0%) and HSV-2 patients (difference 5.3%; 95% CI: 2.5% to 8.1%), but thereafter mortality was not increased. After exclusion of persons diagnosed with cancer prior to study inclusion, one-year mortality difference for HSV-2 patients was 1.7% (-0.1% to 3.5%). After five years, HSV-1 patients had lower employment (difference -19.8%; 95% CI: -34.7% to -4.8%) and higher disability pension rates (difference 22.2%; 95% CI: 8.4% to 36.0%) than the comparison cohort, but similar number of inpatient days, outpatient visits, and sick leave. HSV-2 patients had employment and disability pension rates comparable to the comparison cohort, but more inpatient days (difference 1.5/year; 95% CI: -0.2 to 3.2), outpatient visits (difference 1.3/year; 95% CI: 0.3 to 3.2), and sick leave days (difference 9.1/year; 95% CI: 7.9 to 10.4).Conclusion: HSV-1 and HSV-2 CNS infections differ substantially with respect to prognosis. HSV-1 CNS infection is followed by increased short-term mortality and long-term risk of disability. HSV-2 CNS infection has no substantial impact on mortality or working capability but is associated with increased morbidity.

Background: In Denmark, the acceptance of the HPV vaccination program has been threatened by reports of suspected adverse events. Epstein Barr Virus (EBV) infection is associated with symptoms of long-lasting tiredness and may be misinterpreted as HPV vaccine adverse events. The main aim of this study was to examine if EBV infection around time of HPV vaccination was a risk factor for later suspected vaccine adverse events. Methods: The study was a nationwide register-based matched case-control study. Cases were females vaccinated against HPV in the period 2011 throughout 2017 with suspected adverse events. For each case, five HPV vaccinated females without suspected adverse events were selected. Information about EBV infection was obtained from the Danish Microbiology Database and assessed for three time periods: (1) before first HPV vaccination, (2) around time of HPV vaccination, and (3) any time during the study period 2010–2017. Multiple logistic regression was used to estimate the association between EBV and suspected adverse events. Results: We identified 1217 cases, matched to 6085 controls. A higher proportion of cases (38; 3.1%) than controls (31; 0.5%) were tested for EBV around time of HPV vaccination and cases had elevated odds for testing both EBV positive (OR 4.52, 95% CI 2.68–7.63) and EBV negative (OR 20.99, 95% CI 5.81–75.79). Only five females were classified with acute/recent EVB infection in this period. Conclusion: Misinterpretation of EBV infection late symptoms is not a leading explanation for Danish females experiencing suspected adverse events after HPV vaccination. Although EBV cannot be excluded as an explanatory factor for a very small proportion of suspected adverse events, the findings are more likely explained by protopathic bias, i.e. the fact that a larger proportion of females suspecting adverse events are tested for EBV.